Stitcher

https://www.who.int/genomics/public/geneticdiseases/en/ As per WHO. Please don't say that they are also stating blatant false. Again, this was the broad headline, "Genetic variation" under which comes the mutation & polymorphism. Polymorphism is the normal variations and mutation is the abnormal alteration or deviation from normal variant. Will you still want to say that everyone is wrong except your mentioned website?! Maybe your referred website used the word "mutation" as a vague term for "genetic alteration" just to simplify the definition so that everyone can understand without any difficulties, as mass people refers every kind of genetic alteration as "mutation". Earlier I said, mutation may or may not have effects on phenotype. If mutation shows effects then it is termed as genetic disease. And if mutation is silent then its called "incomplete penetrance". But still it comes under the term "genetic defect" as it is deviated from normal variant and it may exert its fatal effects on the affected person anytime. I also found the author of that site as biased by "evolution theory" who tried to explain the disorders by natural selection but failed. It is due to the fact that they have taken the theory as a principle for explaining other proven scientific matters, whereas it is just a theory. Not proven yet and not established as a scientific law. An evidence is here- https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/mutationsanddisorders/evolution Lol, what? They don't even know the answers? Actually they really don't know what they are talking about. And until they don't give up the efforts to explain everything by a man made false theory (not a scientific rule), they won't find a conclusion ever. I really don't find this argument effective, so earlier I politely asked you to put this aside. And again requesting you, if you can, then skip this "definiton" part and answer my previous 3 questions. Maybe there will be a point on which we both can agree on. Otherwise we should stop here. Thank you anyway for your responses.

I have given references from textbooks that are taught in medical schools. But as we are not agreeing on definition of mutations. Its not going to end the dispute. So lets put this aside. Now tell me, as the evolutionary process is continuous there should have been an intermediatory phase of an evolving organism. A monkey doesn't turns into a human overnight, right? So, why we can't see any of these creatures that is half the way of evolving to human? Like a HUMONKEY perhaps. And also, human are existing for a long time. Why they are not evolving to a different species? And lastly, why there is life in Earth only? Why not on other planets that we know? Don't tell me that those planets lack water. As the evolution says life was created by its own and nature selects how to survive, so life can be created on other planets too that lacks water, by a different mechanism perhaps. But why we can't see the success of nature on other planets?

varities of mutation

Mutation always causes disease whether classic disease or complex.

Definition of mutation. Variation that causes disease are called mutation.

You got me wrong. I didn't asked why there is an existence of lower species. Exshia stated, "The new species can be equally as developed or even less developed." So, I asked in the evolutionary process why there will be a rise of new less developed species from a relatively higher species? This is contradictory to laws of natural selection. The examples you are refering to, like eye colors, that is not due to mutation. Instead its the different promoter and different expression of genes that leads to different eye colors. As for bears, they are genotypically different. Not mutated. Take a polar bear from arctic and let it live in a rainforest for thousand years. See, if you can note a genetic difference on its offsprings. Or the polar bear gives birth to a dog maybe, due to changing its normal habitat. Practically that won't happen ever. Lol. I understand, that mostly you are refering to exchange of genetic materials in homologus allele or genetic recombination. I would not call that as a mutation. I would like to define mutation as any type of insertion, deletion, reversion or translocation of bases that changes the DNA from its normal variants. And these always leads to disorders. Recombination results in expression of genes on different level, but that does not change an organism to a different one neither changes its main function. To change a total function of an organism or to convert it into an another species you must change the sequence of bases, insert, delete or add a whole different chromosome. Ever wonder why different animals have different number of chromsomes? Ever wonder why changes in the number of chromosomes leads to cytogenic disorders but never to any beneficial effects? Apoptosis is not always successful to prevent mutations. And hence cancer occurs. But not all mutations cause cancer. Oh dear. Genetic mutation leads to thousands of other diseases that are not cancers. Infact we are in an era where scientists are trying relate almost every disease to genetic changes. And soon there will be drugs for all diseases that will work on genetic level, not on cellular level like currently available drugs. Well, if this is not enough for you to believe that genetic changes leads to diseases then there is nothing to discuss about.

Rasul s.a. wanted to declare Imam Ali's (عليه السلام). guardianship at Hajj. But He anticipated that Quraysh tribe will deny his declaration and make chaos. As there were other ayats and confirmations from Rasul s.a. regarding Imam Ali (عليه السلام). but still people showed enmity against Imam Ali (عليه السلام). even when Rasul s.a. was alive!! If He declared Imam Ali's (عليه السلام). guardianship on his sermon there would have been rebellion and apostatic movement. So instead of loud declaration in his last sermon Rasul s.a. emphasized greatly on holding on two things after him, Qur'an & Ahle bayt (عليه السلام). and told people to pay homage to Imam Ali (عليه السلام). And then during returnig to medina, this ayat was revealed. “O Messenger! Deliver what bas been revealed to you from your Lord; and if you do it not, then you have not delivered His message, and Allah will protect you from the people; surely Allah will not guide the unbelieving people.” [Surah al-Ma`idah 5:67] So Rasul s.a. stopped at ghadeer e khum and ordered people gather around. Then the rest we know, the famous declaration- "Man kuntu maola, fahaaza Ali un maola."

This is exactly what I said. As OP asked, "sperm - fetus - baby" if this is a proof for evolution? To what I said that its maturation not evolution. Thank you for clearing my point. As per evolutionists, evolution occurs in a population to survive with the environment, then why there will be a less developed species in the process of evoltuion? Instead nature is supposed to select the best species for survival. So your above statement also gives a point to refute the "evolution theory", proving that this natural selection theory is controversial & unnatural itself. Thanks again for giving another point against evolution theory. Yes, and gives rise to "mendelian disorders", ends up producing genetically affected offsprings. Actually mutation is a constant process that is occuring in our cells every single moments. But there are lot of mechanisms I.e. Med1 gene, p53, NER etc that prevents our DNA to mutate or repairs the mutated DNA and protects the original sequence. And there is this Apoptosis/cellular suicide when everythings fails to prevent the mutation. Huh? Nature has this much animosity towards mutation that it orders the mutated cells to commit suicide? Think deeply. You will know what nature permits and what doesn not. This condition is referred as "Incomplete penetrance" in medicine. These genetically mutated organism may not have any effect/disease but their offspring may have fatal conditions & eventually they will die. Death of an affected person results in end of passing severely mutated gene to offsprings. This is how nature selects. Haha. So nature doesn't tolerate any change in the genotype positively. And nature doesn't want to interfere with the sequence of genes and chromosome numbers that was determined by God. So, we can say, what darwin or others refer as "natural selection" is itself controversial in many ways. A complete illogical, impractical & deceptive theory without any scientific evidence.

@starlight

Nah, can't do these hard workouts. I am good with what I have.

While I agree with the part that men should lower their gaze, but I don't think this will decrease the tendency of non-hijabi woman to show off their beauty. As it is not the only reason for women to put away their hijab. Well, a non-hijabi woman doesn't seek attentions from pious men & pious men don't cast lustful gaze. So, these type of women will eventually get the ego boost they need from like mineded men, doesn't matter what pious men do.

Easiest way to stop a crime - just decriminalise it. Legalisation of drugs may reduce some crimes apparently but in long run it won't be helpful at all. Instead other crimes will increase drastically.

As a general rule, najasat spreads through wetness. But do you wash leather products with other garments? You are supposed to wash them seperately.