Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله


Advanced Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Logic1234

  1. Perhaps you can explain to me the difference between "Taoubah" & "Toubatan Nasooha".
  2. May Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) grant us the toufeeq of "Toubatan Nasooha". ( تَوْبَةً نَصُوحًا)
  3. Stoning to death itself is another ijtihad. He deemed mut'ah as zina.
  4. Hadith of Sahih Muslim is quoted above Can you read his words: فَلَنْ أُوتَى بِرَجُلٍ نَكَحَ امْرَأَةً إِلَى أَجَلٍ إِلاَّ رَجَمْتُهُ بِالْحِجَارَةِ And any person would come to me with a marriage of appointed duration (Mut'a), I would stone him (to death). Both the texts are taken from your source i.e., https://muflihun.com/muslim/7/2801
  5. فَلَنْ أُوتَى بِرَجُلٍ نَكَحَ امْرَأَةً إِلَى أَجَلٍ إِلاَّ رَجَمْتُهُ بِالْحِجَارَةِ ‏ And any person would come to me with a marriage of appointed duration (Mut'a), I would stone him (to death).
  6. حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى، وَابْنُ، بَشَّارٍ قَالَ ابْنُ الْمُثَنَّى حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍ، حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ قَتَادَةَ، يُحَدِّثُ عَنْ أَبِي نَضْرَةَ، قَالَ كَانَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ يَأْمُرُ بِالْمُتْعَةِ وَكَانَ ابْنُ الزُّبَيْرِ يَنْهَى عَنْهَا قَالَ فَذَكَرْتُ ذَلِكَ لِجَابِرِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ فَقَالَ عَلَى يَدَىَّ دَارَ الْحَدِيثُ تَمَتَّعْنَا مَعَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏.‏ فَلَمَّا قَامَ عُمَرُ قَالَ إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ يُحِلُّ لِرَسُولِهِ مَا شَاءَ بِمَا شَاءَ وَإِنَّ الْقُرْآنَ قَدْ نَزَلَ مَنَازِلَهُ فَأَتِمُّوا الْحَجَّ وَالْعُمْ
  7. Was he unaware of the verse of Quran (Surah al Maida verse 5) too?
  8. So you need more. Now understand the link:
  9. If this is not sufficient, here is another: Perhaps you need more, here we go: Do you want more?
  10. I don't know why you are rejecting Umar's own testimony. Here are few ahadith: If you say ibn Abbas was not there in Khyber, here is another:
  11. I have just edited my comment to add more material to it. I am expecting that you perhaps would like to edit your comment too.
  12. I would like to add one more of his wrong ijtihid. Surah Talaq of the Quran stipulates that there is no such thing as an impromptu triple divorce at one instance, rather the recital must take place over tree periods (Al-Qur’an Surah 65, verse 1), yet Khalifa Umar ruled that his subjects could divorce their wives by uttering the divorce recital in triplicate on one occasion. Interestingly his ijtihad never stopped here, he did away with the need of witnesses altogether, he entitled a man to utter the divorce immediately, without the need for a time to reflect or summon witnesses.
  13. وَالْمُحْصَنَاتُ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ إِلَّا مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ ۖ كِتَابَ اللَّهِ عَلَيْكُمْ ۚ وَأُحِلَّ لَكُمْ مَا وَرَاءَ ذَٰلِكُمْ أَنْ تَبْتَغُوا بِأَمْوَالِكُمْ مُحْصِنِينَ غَيْرَ مُسَافِحِينَ ۚ فَمَا اسْتَمْتَعْتُمْ بِهِ مِنْهُنَّ فَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ فَرِيضَةً ۚ وَلَا جُنَاحَ عَلَيْكُمْ فِيمَا تَرَاضَيْتُمْ بِهِ مِنْ بَعْدِ الْفَرِيضَةِ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيمًا حَكِيمًا {24} [Shakir 4:24] And all married women except those whom your right hands possess (this is) Allah's ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides those, provided that you seek (them) wi
  14. Not only He has mentioned them "directly" (not by their names) but also have quoted their words too in Qur'an. Who said "We belongs to God & to Him shall we return" as quoted by God in Quran by stating "Qalu"? Verse 22:78 specifically mentioning them. (مِّلَّةَ أَبِيكُمْ إِبْرَاهِيمَ) Someone would say "millat" here means religion & this verse is mentioning Muslims in general, in that case the problem would arise in the phrase "لِيَكُونَ الرَّسُولُ شَهِيدًا عَلَيْكُمْ وَتَكُونُوا شُهَدَاء عَلَى النَّاسِ" (that the Messenger may be a bearer of witness to you, and you may be bea
  15. There is a verse in Quran: "God & His Angels bless the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)" (33:56), do you have any estimate how many times do they bless? How many seconds/minutes/hours they bless? So that I can keep myself within limits. And there is another verse in Quran which says: وَرَفَعْنَا لَكَ ذِكْرَكَ (94:4 Do you have any idea of how much did Allah "raised high" his reputation/remembrance/dignity? So that I can maintain those limits. I am just trying to understand your concept of "over-glorifying". Ok, We Understand God as our "Mowla". What if God makes
  16. No. ghayb is not certitude. Certitude at one stage (Ayn Al-Yaqeen),help one to actually see the unseen like seeing the light of the flames of a fire, after having merely heard a description of that fire. The highest level of certitude I know is called "Haqq ul Yaqeen" (Truth of Certainty), which for instance, is like being consumed by the flames of that blazing fire. Things which we know as ghayb, can be accessed via 1. Knowledge of certainty 2. Eye of certainty 3. Truth of certainty As Quran states "Nay! if you had known with a certain knowledge (ilm al yaqeen), You should
  17. I was thinking to ask the same question I often wonder what is that level of certainty after which certainty/knowledge doesn't increase even if the veils are removed!
  18. It implies that you think that you have the right to dispute with the "ulil amr" and you may hence disobey them. If that is the case, why there is the command to obey them? For instance, Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) has made it clear to not obey parents if they command you to do shirk. (وَإِن جَاهَدَاكَ عَلَىٰ أَن تُشْرِكَ بِي مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ فَلَا تُطِعْهُمَا), can you show us any such command of Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) for Ulil Amr which give the impression that anywhere we are allowed to dispute or disobey them? Where the word تَنَازَعْتُمْ showing the right of di
  19. This question reminds me hadith & manzilah. Were Prophet Musa (عليه السلام) & Haroon (عليه السلام) not the two leaders at the same time?
  20. When it comes to LOOKING an act of acting like animals. Its all about how we are looking at it. If I were to see someone acting like dog or lion, I would not say that he is acting like them, I would go forward and try to know which dog or lion he was pretending to be and would try to understand what is so special in that dog & that lion that this man has decided to act like him. Irrespective of his action, he would remain a human for me. I would try to figure out what message that human wants to deliver to other humans. So Shehbaz Qalander said " For a dog laying in the street of m
  21. Pardon me! But I am not defending anyone. I am just questioning the possible ways of looking an act.
  22. I don't know why you have skipped these questions? @Ali_Hussain
  23. Not said that. Please don't act like that. I have just asked you a logical question. It is not necessary that we understand things negatively like you are doing at the moment. I have not said that. And if you are so hasty in making conclusions just answer what was Prophet Suleman (عليه السلام) doing when he was "talking" to that bird? Perhaps you would lodge the same claim as he is acting like bird.
  24. By the way, biologically, we all act like animals, we eat, we drink, we sleep etc. We do all those things which animals do perhaps that's why we have warmly accepted ourselves as "haywan e natiq". The barking of dog is basically nothing more than his way to speak. Consider yourself in the court of Prophet Suleman (عليه السلام) for a while, where he was talking to a bird. What would be your reaction? Did he talked with bird in his own language or in the language of bird? How would you see his act of making noise like birds if he talked with him in the language of that bird? Would you say
  • Create New...