Syed Ali Mehdi Shah Naqvi

By chance I came across a web saying this: In contrast to a Munkar hadith, if a reliable reporter is found to add something which is not narrated by other authentic sources, the addition is accepted as long as it does not contradict them; and is known as ziyadatu thiqah (an addition by one trustworthy) Ibn `Abdul Barr, Al-Tamhid, 3:32, as quoted by Luqman al-Salafi, Ihtimam al-Muhaddithin bi Naqd al-Hadith, p. 381f. Here is link: https://www.Islamic-awareness.org/hadith/ulum/aape.html#J50 If anyone can find it in book, paste it here it would be of help

As for narration of Atiyah Al Awfi to Abu Saed Al Khudri: They say Atiyah used to goto Al Kalbi and gave him nick Abu Saed and then used to narrate his hadiths and confuse people. Thus based on this, 30+ scholors call him weak. Now how do they know they used to goto him? Who told them that Atiyah used to hear Al Kalbis hadiths? Its Al Kalbi himself. he said Atiyah used to sit with me and gave me kuniyah Abu Saed and I used to tell him hadiths and he said: I will say narrated to me Abu Saed. This accusation comes from well known forger liar Al Kalbi himself. Statment of a liar and forger cannot serve as a proof to weaken a narrator can it? therfore ibn e hajjar called him saduq and call his hadiths Hasan. now ibn e hajar also cakled him Mudalis but we proved that accusation of tadlees is comming from liar and forger Al Kalbi thus not acceptable. therfore this riwyaat is Hasan.

They have habit of calling anything they dislike as Shadd (odd). If something is reported in less reports but by Thiqa narrator who is considered as reliable, (by no means a thiqa can be called a liar/innovator whether Sunni or Shia.) They say since it hasn't appeared in other hadiths thus it makes this addition Shadd (Odd). As far as I have seen, shadd hadith is hadith reported by a sahih chain (thiqa narrators) that goes against the other sahih hadiths. So, its challenge to all people of world, to bring a single sahih hadith, which goes against the hadith: "If you adhere to them you will not be misguided after me" In order to call it shadd, you must give a hadith that does inkaar of this statment. There is no single hadith on Earth that does so. Therefore this hadith is not Shadd but is authentic as big scholors of ahke sunnah has already authenticated it as I showed scans of pages above

At least they accept the portion: Qur'an and Ahlebait will not seperate from each other and will meet me at Hawd. Alot can be proven only from these words of Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم). Ismat of Ahlebait (عليه السلام) is clear from above hadith. If we don't have choice to follow between Qur'an and bible, then we don't have either between Ahlebait (عليه السلام) and others. Also the phrase if you follow them you will not be misguided is genuine phrase which was said by Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) since it appeared in many hadiths also. Now omission of this phrase was necessary from the side of ahle sunnah in order to defend themselves. Else they wouldn't be able to justify their claims. They said: Ali Bin Munzir and Muhammad bin Fuzail Shias thus an addition from the Innovators alone wouldn't serve as a proof. They are good at dieceveing people. They have graded Ali Bin Munzir and Muhammad bin fuzail as Thiqa narrators and not innovators. Plus Bukhari took hadiths of Shias who were reliable and thiqa according to him in his sahih. So this is Usool e hadith. If they still insist that both are innovators, then we can say perhaps its high standard of Sunni ilm e rijal. To call innovators thiqas. Perhaps it can be used as an evidence to call Abu Hurraira innovator since he is also thiqa lolz

Actually they are wrong including you. Above hadiths are from Books of Ahl Sunnah. And Thiqa and seduq narrator is not an innovator whether Shia or Sunni. Bukhari quoted in is sahih from Shias then call those riwayahs weak as well. They like to play with narrators and break as many Usool as they want based upon whom their daddies wrote sahih books

So at least you accept that those people are in opposition to Aima (عليه السلام)

The Above hadith is comming in only two ways. Those salafis have mentioned 30 chains to decieve people that there are some shadd riwayahs that Shia present thus rejected them altogether but one can clearly see that above narration is comming through 2 authentic ways: 1. Yazid Bin Hayyan - Zaid Bin Arqam 2. Abu Tufail - Hudyfah (Though they called Zaid Bin Al-Hassan Munkir Al Hadith) When we present this hadith from Jami-Al Tirimdhi 3786: Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) said on Ara'fah, I am leaving amoung you two things, if you hold fast to them, you will never go astray, Book of Allah and Ahlebait (عليه السلام). they reject this hadith calling Zaid Bin Al Hassan Munkir al Hadith. From chain 26-28 the hadith reported through Zaid Bin Al Hassan - Abu Tufail - Hudayfah Is there favourite version which doesn't have command to follow Ahlebait (عليه السلام) according to them. Point is this hadith has been reported by zaid Bin Hassan which is in accordance with Sahih Hadiths above and also doesn't have words follow ahlebait. This proves that Zaid-Bin-Hassan was honest in his transmission of Hadith of Thaqalayn since he narrated what he heard as it is. Similarly Salafi can't bring one single report a any companion which says Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) didn't say hadith of Thaqalyn on Arafa'h Such a Sahih riwayah, that totally opposes above riwayat is needed to classify above hadith of Zaid Bin Hassan as munkir. Since Zaid Bin Hassan also has tawtheeq thus it would make riwayah Hassan since it opposes no Riwayah rather is inline with Authentic versions of Thaqalyn. Therefore there is not point in denying above riwayah that Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) said that on the day of Araf'ah But they can't accept it since it breaks there main argument. Its famous among all people that Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) left two weighty things Qur'an and Ahlebait (عليه السلام) While these salafis continued to present following hadith without saying that it is shadd or has omissions or has defects in matan: "I am leaving amoung you Book of Allah, if you hold fast to it you will never go Astray" The omision of Ahlebait (عليه السلام) from hadith wouldn't make it defective, wouldnt make matn defective, wouldn't make it odd Rather sahih because it fits there beliefs. But when riwayah comes that goes against them, it has hidden defects, shadd additions, Shia narrators innovators (though they have tawtheeq from Sunni rijal) People with a fair mind can see their hate towards Ahlebait (عليه السلام) Hub e Ali Ibadah Bughz e Ali lanat Ullah

Its about the people who call them ulil Amr. Do you have tolerance for them?

There can be many reasons for lag but not the one you mentioned. Argument made needs to be proved first. If not proved, then this automatically dis proves it. Lags can be due to HardDrive having low health. Or a Low RPM drive running windows 10 or 8.1. Also you should have 4 GB RAM to avoid lag since OS needs 1.2+ and Googl Chrome eats RAM alot. Also re-install the windows if necessary. May I ask you what is your Harddrive usage? Look into task manager! And tell. If its high then it is causing lag.

Qur'an 40:55 47:19 48:2 Anyone who can answer? That Allah may forgive for you what preceded of your sin and what will follow and complete His favor upon you and guide you to a straight path So know, [O Muhammad], that there is no deity except Allah and ask forgiveness for your sin and for the believing men and believing women. And Allah knows of your movement and your resting place So be patient, [O Muhammad]. Indeed, the promise of Allah is truth. And ask forgiveness for your sin and exalt [ Allah ] with praise of your Lord in the evening and the morning.

Like you are giving me example of Syed Dildar Ali, I can give of Sheikh Mashooq Ali who converted to Akhbaris from Maslaq e Usool. Shias converted to Sunnis Sunnis converted to Shias One should rather continue to research till he leaves this world I believe. And research revolves around Qur'an and Hadith. Not anything else

Did I say aql is biddah? If I completely reject use of aql, then you should have replied like that. Use of aql is within defined limits so you don't make something new in deen. Is totally logical. But putting them as source of deriving laws, like Qur'an sunnah ijma and aql, Then its same if you write aql of Qiyas. Since you are using your brain to guess something without any nas.

Isnaad e Hasan Hadith # 1168 Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) was leaving for Tabuk and Mola Ali (عليه السلام) asked him shall I go with you? He (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) said no. And Ali (عليه السلام) started weeping. Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) said are you not pleased that you are to me in same position as Harun (عليه السلام) was to Musa (عليه السلام) but there is no Prophet after me. And its better for me to leave you behind as my Caliph. And you are wali of every momin and momina after me. Whats left now?

Its the case of if. Do you want to say that no fatwas issued by your scholors are against Qur'an and Sunnah? Then I would just say: wake up buddy Many fatawas are there, debated on seperate forums, if I even cite one fatwa here, people will start discussing it instead of general discussion. Dude When a woman marries someone, she is halal for him. But she isn't halal for anyone else is she? Leave it. I don’t want to come to this topic. Let it be general. If you can't find a nas, then better keep quite and wait till our Imam appears. If you have a general hukam from Imam (عليه السلام), then cool! Mazhab e Shia has no room for Qiyas. Also saving ones life isn't a sin is it? Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) went through extreme tortures but he did it to save us from hell fire. So if one does so to donate an organ to someone who can live, its like saving a life, benefitiing humans and can have many general nas from Imam (عليه السلام) addressing it.

No idea brothers why you wrote this. I didn't mention anything except "so called fuqahas" Also refer to previous posts. If you can't call wrong people in your fiqh wrong, then I think we should stop cursing Muawiyah and others as well. Sunnis do the same. If Syed Dildar Ali changed his mind after researching, then its ok. I have also been doing this. I can’t compare myself to him because be was an alim e deen and as you mentioned he refuted Sunnis by writing books. May Allah reward him for that. As far as I have seen, there is no evidence of taqleed neither its logical. Why should I not refer to many Ulima instead of sticking to one and following all his fatawa? He is human and can make mistakes. I better look out what many alim e deen say, then accept what my heart says. As for hadith of Imam Hassan Askari (عليه السلام), prove that its authentic according to your standards.