Syed Ali Mehdi Shah Naqvi

Plus mai sadke jawaan teriyan chalaan tay Majlisi added to it in tashahud? Ok. What about Tehzeeb al Ahkam? Did Tusi add to it as well?

Nope i cannot explain. But same can be found in almost every tashahud Ashadu an lailaha illalah hu wah da hu la shareeka la hu wa ashadu anna Muhammad an abdu hu wa rasoolu and then wa ashadu anna rabbi ne'mar'rab wa anna Muhammad an ne'mar'rasool This is short version of tashahud from Al Faqih by Sadooq and even in this Imam repeated Testimonies.

Lol. Majlisi was Thiqa and trustworthy. If he added third testimony in adhan, how come sheikh Sadooq spoke against it 100s of years before his birth? Sheikh Sadooq had ilm-ul-ghaib?

Point is, you people aren't a judge. Everyone is responsible for his actions. Anyways superiority has been given to descendants of Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) over others.

Its proven via authentic chains (According to ulima like Taqi Majlisi) that Imam Sadiq (عليه السلام) recited different Tashahuds. He (عليه السلام) also recited one with two testimonies and also the one with four testimonies. And same imam said: Whenever you say shahadatein, say ali un wali ullah. Plus hadith of Al Kafi states: recite in tashahud what seems best, if it was fixed, people would've been killed! And what would have killed people? This is a clear indication that there was something in tashahud, if recited, could've put shias in danger. I doubt if that hadith of Tehzeeb is for Namaz e Janazah since Halabi asked about "Salat" and this doesn't exlcude "Salat" we recite 5 times a day or Mustahab Salat. Keeping in view all these hadiths, Many Ulima has narrated Tashahud from Fiqh e Raza that Imam Raza (عليه السلام) recited Tashahud and testified to wilayat e Ali (عليه السلام).

I know very well ulima here suggest its regarding salawat . But how did you derive that meaning? Any prove? Hadith indicates that taking names are allowed but Mustahab and darood on Aal e Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) is wajib after tashahud not Mustahab. Contrary to this, imam said recite what seems best. Thread discusses Mustahab izkaar of tashahud so clearly anything more than 2 testimonies is Mustahab. Marry daughters of mothers? Lolz no thanks!

By the way, it has been proven that adding to tashahud is recomended and sunnah but Mustahab since Imams added to it and it was never fixed. And fatawa against addition, or calling it an innovation are false and baseless and against teachings of Aima (عليه السلام). thus such ulima should never be trusted again and their taqleed is also invalid as per conditions mentioned in hadith of Taqleed by Imam Al Askari (عليه السلام). WS

Definitely Mosaq chain has non twelver but Thiqa narrator. And such a hadith is authentic. Plus its the same hadith, and definitely i said that its Mustahab to say anything more than 2 testimonies. And this is fatwa of Sadooq, Hamza bin Abdul Aziz etc. The 2nd part is as authentic, just as the 1st part. In which Imams gave 4 different testimonies and Hadith of Imam Baqir (عليه السلام) from Al Faqih has 6 different testimonies in it. Thus its sunnah to add to Tashahud since its better and Tashahud isn't fixed. In Al Kafi imam said if it was fixed, people would have been killed. And this hadith indicates taqqiyah. The reason we insist on 3rd testimony of wilayah since many narrations address it .

Haza Bughz e Ali?

You should go and ask Abuzar what is the difference between him and a Syed and he'll tell you. He was slave of Syeds of his time. And who are you? Who are you to take away an honor given to Syeds by Allah? There is a complete background for this and Salman Al Farsi wasn't a Syed. He was persian. You yourself stated this hadith proves his closeness to Ahlebait else if he literally was from Ahlebait (عليه السلام), then Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) would have took him along with 4 infallibles for Mubahila. And Salaman achieved the staus as a slave of syeds of his time. There are hadiths and ayahs contrary to your view. Indeed, Allah chose Adam and Noah and the family of Abraham and the family of 'Imran over the worlds - Al Imran 33 And there are hadiths even in Sihaah that can be used to prove it. Allah has preferred family of Prophets, and their respect is higher than that of others due to their lineage except for the ones who are dis believers. They are like Abu Jahil and Son of Noah.

It makes sense.

Mufti Muneeb Ur Rehman has confirmed it. Plus its famous all over the internet.

According to standards of your ulima, Imams innovated tashahud. Not according to me. Sahih us Sanad hadith proves tashahud isn't fixed and can have additional testimonies, this giving additional testimonies is Sunnah while your ulima call it biddah, or some say stay away from it. Some hadiths have mentioned that one should immediately say ali un ameer al momineen wali ullah whenever he says muhamamd ur rasool ullah . so as a shia, you should recite it.

What if i prove? I think You are aware of narration of Bakar Bin Habeeb in Al-kafi. I don't think i have to quote that hadith.

Fatwa of Sadooq is simple: Tashahud is complete with two testimonies and any more than that, is ibadah, not biddah, just like ulima of yours claim today. Thus fatawas of your ulima contradict fatwas of classical shias and Imams.