MuhammadFreeman

"I don't see Iraqis as humans" ~American dude http://www.dailymail.co.United Kingdom/news/article-1340207/I-didnt-think-Iraqis-humans-says-U-S-soldier-raped-14-year-old-girl-killing-her-family.html?ito=feeds-newsxml There's a lot you can, and should do. Start by declaring all of the US military and its subfactions as lying murderous rapist terrorists. You'll lose 90% of your white friends this way, I know I did, but you'll have taken a stand for the truth.

The Prophet (s) asks a married woman to suckle another man: Narrated in Sahih Muslim: Sahla daughter of Suhail came to Allah's Messenger (s) and said: Allah's Messenger, I swear by Allah that I see in the face of Abu Hudhaifa* (the signs of disgust) on account of entering of Salim (in the house), *Abu Hudhaifa was her husband and salim was their male servant. whereupon Allah's Messenger (s) said: “Suckle him.” She (Sahla bint Suhail) said: “He has a BEARD.” But he (again) said: “Suckle him, and it would remove what is there (expression of disgust) on the face of Abu Hudhaifa.” She said: “(I did that) and, by Allah, I did not see (any sign of disgust) on the face of Abu Hadhaifa.” Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Hadith No 3428. The Prophet humiliates himself in public. Quoting Sahih Al Bukhari, Narrated by Jabir ibn Abdullah (r): While Allah's Apostle was carrying stones with the people of Mecca for (the building of) the Ka'ba wearing an Izar (waist-sheet cover), his uncle Al-'Abbas said to him: "O my nephew! (It would be better) if you take off your Izar and put it over your shoulders underneath the stones." So he took off his Izar and put it over his shoulders, but he fell unconscious and since then he had never been seen naked. Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, Hadith No 360. Prophet Musa (a) slaps the angel of death (a) and injures his eye. Sahih al Bukhari: Narrated Abu Huraira: The angel of death was sent to Moses and when he went to him, Moses slapped him severely, spoiling one of his eyes. The angel went back to his Lord, and said, “You sent me to a slave who does not want to die.” Sahih al Bukhari, Volume 2, Book 23, Hadith 423. Sahih Muslim says that his eye was knocked out, book 30, #5851 And this next one is just plain retarded: Sahih al Bukhari & Muslim, Book 3, Number 0669, Narrated by Abu Hurayra: Banu Israeel used to take a bath naked, and they looked at the private parts of one another. Moses (a), however, took a bath alone, and they said (tauntingly): “By Allah, nothing prohibits Moses to take a bath along with us, but scrotal hernia.” He (Moses) once went for a bath and placed his clothes on a stone but the stone ran away with his clothes. Moses ran after it saying: “O stone, my clothes, O stone, my clothes” And Banu Isra'il had the chance to see the private parts of Moses, and said : “By Allah, Moses does not suffer from any ailment.” The stone then stopped, till Moses had been seen by them, and he then took hold of his clothes and began to beat the stone. Abu Hurayra said: “By Allah, there are still six or seven marks on that stone made by Moses”. ^^ All of those hadith are "sahih". However, if there's any hadith that contradicts the Salafi Jihadi doctrine, it is immediately "not Sahih".

Wrong. Many "real Sunnis" support Israel. To say someone isn't a "real Sunni" because they have a soft spot for Wahabism is a textbook example of the No True Scotsman fallacy. In modern times, Wahabism and Sunnism are one and the same. Sunnis will tell you that "Wahabism" isn't a thing, they're just Sunnis. If I travel to Egypt, I'll most likely be beheaded by one of the mullahs for my stance against Umar and Abu Bakr (The head of IS in Iraq is literally named Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi) Those Sunnis who are "friendly towards the Shia" in the West can't espouse the same rhetoric they do in Saudi because they'll get arrested for promoting terrorism. Also, Westernized Muslims tend to not know jackshi-- about sectarianism and the struggle of the Shia.

That's because the killers were given medals by America so it was clear the courts would never find him guilty

He said 12er Shias are Muslim. The rest I'm assuming are "kafir kafir Shia kafir" Yes, I posted about this before and I'll keep talking about it until Sunnis let go of their terrorist ways, which might take the rest of my life.

On Islamreligion.com, they have a chat feature for Muslims and non-Muslims inquiring about Islam. So I asked a simple question: "I was wondering what your position is on Shiism, do you agree with the position of many scholars that Shias are "apostates" that "deserve to be executed"?" They wrote many paragraphs (copy pasted) about the initial divide and how Shias split and all that. Interestingly, this website looks Westernized, so of course it doesn't use any of the slurs that Sunnis tend to use when describing the Shia, like "rafida" or "mushrikeen". However, they do promote the "No sects in Islam" thing, where they pretend like there are no sects, and that Sunni Islamic interpretation is the only Islam. I try to ask again: "do you agree with the fatwas that they're "apostates" who "deserve to be executed"?" And they say, "I gave you my answer above." No more answers as I tried to push them for one. Of course, there was no need for me to ask. The Sunni position is clear, not a single prominent Sunni scholar has a fatwa that Shias are Muslim. A majority of them believe they are "apostates" and "rafida" (rejectors [of terrorism]) who "deserve to be executed"

Just the surah. No alhamdulillahi rabbi lalameen like the Pakistani Shia do The correct way is the way the Saudi Shia tend to do it, nothing added after the surah

Saying "ameen" out loud after Surah al-Fatihah in your prayers is not Islamic. In the Qur'an, the phrase "Ameen" does not appear after the end of Al-Fatihah. After finishing your fatihah recitation, anything extra you add is not from the Qur'an, it's from yourself. It's a serious sin (and dishonest) to add your own words when reciting from the Qur'an. Al-Fatihah does not have "ameen" in it, so it makes no sense to say it after reciting it. Case closed.

Shaykh ‘Abdullah ibn Jibreen: The Shia's veneration of Ali is "major shirk and apostasy from Islam, for which they deserve to be executed" And here they are putting it into practice: Imam Malik: Shia are apostates. Punishment for apostasy: "If someone changes his religion - then strike off his head" Ibn Taymia and Muhammad ibn Wahab: Shia are worse than Jews and Christians. Both called Shias apostates, and have the position that apostates must get the death penalty (As-Sarim al-Maslool 'ala Shatim ar-Rasool 3/696) There are many many more examples. The point is that these guys are influential leaders and very reputed in the Sunni community. If this wasn't a belief of Sunnis, they wouldn't be asking people "Are you Shia" before executing them.

Sunni scholars believe Shias are apostates that deserve to be killed. That's the main point I disagree with them on. Otherwise the major point of contention is the role of the "companions"

Shia Muslims are often accused by Sunnis to be "secret Jews" or "friends of the Jews". The Ibn Saba conspiracy theories say that Shiism has a Jewish origin. Now, Jews were the believers of Ibrahim ((صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)), which means that their books have some legitimacy. Similarities with the Jews is not necessarily a bad thing. HOWEVER There are fundamental issues if Muslims choose to ally themselves with Zionists, especially while these Muslims are leading coalitions against other Muslim states (Like Yemen). Qur'an 5:51 says to not take non Muslims as allies. Some translations say they meant "friends", but the Arabic word is "awliya", which, in most Islamic contexts, means helper or protector. Coalitions have been made with states like Israel with other Sunni Arab nations. But the smoking gun was when Avichai Adraee, the IDF Spokesperson for the Arabic media, quoted IS propaganda in June 2018 The only Muslims to have had done more than pay lip service to the Palestinians were Shiite militants in Lebanon who actually fought against Israel. Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahab, a well known Sunni scholar who has inspired Sunnis worldwide, held the view that Shias were worse "than Jews and Christians". Of course, I haven't stated the obvious elephant in the room regarding the Israel-Sunni alliance, and that is, the shared goal of being a front against Iran. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/mar/19/why-Israel-quietly-cosying-up-to-gulf-monarchies-Saudi-arabia-uae

He was spared the death penalty because AmeriKKKa feared a backlash from the troop supporters and white nationalists who have a strong hold of the country

I lack the money and skills to immigrate. I have no intention of leaving Arabia

Millions of Muslims today wouldn't want a guy like bin Laden on currency, and understand that 911 was wrong. Yet we have people in the West who see no wrong with the British Hitler Winston Churchill, responsible for orchestrating famines in India because he "hate[d] Indians", called them a "beastly people with a beastly religion". Killed four million in India. Said "pashtuns need to recognize the superiority of [the white] race", and "all those who resist will be killed without quarter" in Afghanistan. Admitted and was proud about genocide there too. Churchill sent thugs in Ireland to terrorize the Irish and put them in concentration camps, from which the modern Irish resistance was born (God bless the IRA) Anyway, his crimes would form an encyclopedia and I want to get on with my posts. So, in America, Thomas Jefferson is revered as some liberal saint. In reality, he was a slave owning pedophile rapist, and I mean it objectively. He owned slaves, that makes him a slave owner. He fathered children of Sally Hemmings when she was 14, that makes him a pedophile. Sally Hemmings was a slave girl, that makes him a rapist as slaves can't really consent to sex. Therefore, Jefferson was a slave owning pedophile rapist. Oh, and he was also a white supremacist because he believed only "free white persons" could migrate to the US. So far, we've concluded that the British revere a genocidal white supremacist, as do the Americans. Let's just ignore the bloody history of white supremacist terrorism in America for the first few centuries, because white people get seriously butthurt about history. In recent times, America justify the nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Innocent children, wildlife, insects, animals, etc were all atomized as collective punishment, so America could show off its powers. The radiation's poisoning is still observed in babies who are born with mutations today. US military personnel who get ill from the radiation when visiting Japan get paid a lifetime of handouts stolen from the taxpayers. Meanwhile, the Japanese victims get nothing. Apparently chemical mutagens only affect white people, that was their consistent belief as they used Agent Orange in Vietnam and Korea. Also the belief when they used depleted uranium, white phosphorus munitions in Fallujah, Syria, Palestine. It's all terrorism. They want to talk about how "brainwashed Pakistani Muslims support death to apostates", but don't even see the hypocrisy behind supporting terrorism and saying it was justified.

It all depends on how "apostates" are classified, and if you're classifying 200 million people as apostates, it would take centuries of war crimes to bring them to fruition, which is precisely what's happening in the Middle East right now. It's about context. KJV translation Bible sites shouldn't be removed, for example, when they quote that witches should be put to death, for example, because that's part of ancient scripture. This is actually some Saudi guy saying Shias should be killed