Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله


Advanced Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About justAnothermuslim

  • Rank
    Level 1 Member

Profile Information

  • Religion

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

851 profile views
  1. @hasanhh I am just a layman. However, I read and try to understand those who know. So take this with a pinch of salt. let’s say originally, Virus-A produces antigen-A. Using the gene-editing technology known as CRISPR-cas9 , a virologist can insert DNA blueprints for antibodies into Virus-A so that the infected cells will produce antibody-B. This has been done. Using the same technique, a virologist can insert DNA blueprint for antigen-X into Virus-A, thus essentially creating a new virus-X. The sky’s the limit, according to the print, which is a bit scary to me since it can be abused for nefarious goal.
  2. People do have a choice after all, according to Bill Gates. Will I take a shot? Only after Mr Gates, Dr Fauci and the rest of top executives of BigPharma be the first to take the vaccine in a publicly televised ceremony. Then after enough time to develop immunity has passed, they should expose themselves to the virus and show the vaccine works. With such foolproof evidence of vaccine’s safety and effectiveness, it would be hard for anybody to deny themselves the clear benefits of the Covid vaccine. https://www.rt.com/usa/493068-gates-vaccine-consent-coronavirus/ Boasting that “the logistics in the US are not an issue at all,” Gates bragged that “we can get this thing out there” before acknowledging that “you’ll have a ‘choice’ whether you take the vaccine or not, so there’s that final hurdle.”
  3. This is a 2015 news. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/10/health/protection-without-a-vaccine.html
  4. Pediatricians advocate every children should be vaccinated, except those with medical-immunization-exemption. https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/immunizations/Pages/vaccine-hesitant-parents.aspx While vaccine-hesitant’s belief is more aligned towards AAPS (Association Of American Physicians dan Surgeons) https://aapsonline.org/measles-outbreak-and-federal-vaccine-mandates/ The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. So dear brothers and sisters, to me it’s a sort of a "battle" of the experts. The only difference between them and us is that, there’s no belying flying around between them. Who’s right? Or both are wrong?
  5. Got some "error" so i couldn't watch the video. Anyway i found this: One of the more interesting questions Mr. Kennedy asked Dr. Deisher was why the manufacturers of vaccines switched from exclusively using animal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines, to start using aborted fetal tissue some years back. Dr. Deisher’s reply was that the industry we getting a lot of pressure from the animal rights movement to stop using animals for experimentation. Mr. Kennedy was shocked, and stated: It’s kind of weird to think that the animal rights activists have more clout with the vaccine companies than do the anti-abortion activists. Dr. Deisher replied: They do. And you know what’s really alarming is the lack of outcry over human babies born alive at five to six months old so that their hearts can be obtained beating. And they have to be beating to be used in the research that’s being done. If the heart has stopped beating, it’s not useful. You cannot use it. And so these babies are delivered alive, and their hearts cut out without anesthesia. I wouldn’t do that to a mouse…. If the bold part is true, then it’s a satanic act whichever way you look at it.
  6. Some are coincidence theorists. Some are conspiracy theorists. i guess i like to be in the middle ground. i believe, let those who like, believe and let those who like, disbelieve. The world will be a lot more peaceful.
  7. Singapore https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/singapore/ Last updated: June 12, 2020, 23:09 GMT Total Case: 39,850 Total Infection (35% of TC): 53,757 Total Recovered: 28,040 Total Death: 25 Recovery Rate: 70.36% Case Fatality Rate (CFR): 0.06% Infection Fatality Rate (IFR): 0.04% Don’t worry too much about the “high” numbers in some countries. Stay safe. For USA, I found these explanations: 1. A primary reason the numbers are so sky-high is doctors and coroners are encouraged to say just about every cause of death is covid19 if corona was in present in any way. 2. The Covid-19 testing is not accurate. The CDC itself state that the RT PCR tests are not a diagnostic tool and result in “presumptive positives,” a.k.a an assumption. A positive PCR test doesn’t necessarily means you’re infected with a full-bodied SARS-Cov-2 virus. 3. CDC has been combining active infection rates with those that detect recovery from Covid-19, further bloating the numbers. 4. Pre-existing conditions are not even considered as a cause of death when it comes to signing off on a death certificate. I think, most people miss the fact that we’re more than just a piece of meat. Read on... But what is assiduously avoided at all cost is any reference to our most potent defense against any virus; our body’s natural immune system. Try as I might I couldn’t find anything about this first line of defense on the World Health Organizations (WHO) website or Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website. It’s as if it doesn’t exist and is completely irrelevant. If these organizations were genuinely concerned about the health of citizens they would obviously discuss the vital role a healthy immune system plays in protecting us from illnesses. But since they don’t its obvious some other motive is at work, at least to me, and I strongly suspect to other critical thinkers as well. https://www.zerohedge.com/health/we-dont-need-no-stinking-vaccine-covid-19
  8. i do agree. what do you think about this video: Any truth with it? i'm still searching the opposing view to it. https://www.brighteon.com/90a12f14-e560-4199-b93e-a677c67ec4e6 Here’s the full transcript of this video segment: Apolline de Malherbe (French broadcaster): But it’s hard to understand why scientists would voluntarily give bias to studies Dr. Philippe Douste-Blazy: Exactly! That’s the great question. That the great question we are all asking ourselves, finally, and you know those Chatham House lectures in London. Apolline de Malherbe: Remind us what is this all about? This is extremely interesting. Dr. Philippe Douste-Blazy: These are meetings that are completely behind closed doors, only with experts. No one can record, no one is taking any pictures. It’s only between experts. Apolline de Malherbe: Top secret. Dr. Philippe Douste-Blazy: Top secret. But still. there was a meeting the other day, of the directors of scientific journals, like The Lancet, The New England Journal of Medicine… Apolline de Malherbe: The Lancet, which is that journal which published this study we are talking about… Dr. Philippe Douste-Blazy: These are extraordinary journals. When it’s written in Lancet, it’s “written in Lancet”. So that’s why… Here, we’re talking about something very important this discussion that happened. And it ended up leaked: The Lancet’s boss, Horton, said: “Now we are not going to be able to, basically, if this continues, publish any more clinical research data, because the pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful today and are able to use such methodologies, as to have us accept papers which are apparently methodologically perfect but which, in reality, manage to conclude what they want to conclude… This is very, very serious! Apolline de Malherbe: But what you are telling us is very serious! That would mean that it is the pharmaceutical companies that are putting pressure on, including financial pressure, I guess on the scientific results! But you understand, who can we trust anymore today? Dr. Philippe Douste-Blazy: Indeed, that’s why I allow myself to tell you about it, because it is one of the greatest subjects… never anyone could have believed. I have been doing research for 20 years in my life. I never thought the boss of The Lancet could say that and the boss of the New England Journal of Medicine too. He even said it was “criminal”, the word was used by them. That is, if you will, when there is an outbreak like the COVID, in reality, there are people… us, we see ‘mortality’, when you are a doctor or yourself, you see ‘suffering’. And there are people who see ‘dollars’, that’s it.
  9. After a prolonged tug of war with officials at the CDC, they acknowledged in Federal Court that CDC has no scientific basis for claiming, as it does on its website, and in public declarations, that “vaccines do not cause autism.” The Emperor has no clothes. The basis for the incessant, widely made claims that “vaccines are safe and effective; vaccines do not cause autism” has no basis in science — There is NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER. This acknowledgement provides added confirmation to the acknowledgement in December 2019, by a consortium of highest level international vaccine authorities. They acknowledged the lack of vaccine safety science. https://ahrp.org/cdc-conceded-in-federal-court-it-has-no-scientific-studies-to-support-its-claim-that-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/
  10. Durability of covid-19’s vaccine, is predicted by Dr Fauci to be 3 to 6 months to always less than a year. If such is the case, IMO mRNA Antibody Therapy, in the vein of mRNA-1944 which will turn the body into an antibody factory is more appropriate than the like of mRNA-1273 which will turn the body into an antigen factory. But of course this will mean less tons of money to the vaccine manufacturer, going by the current 6.692,686 covid-19 infections. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/02/dr-anthony-fauci-says-theres-a-chance-coronavirus-vaccine-may-not-provide-immunity-for-very-long.html If Covid-19 acts like other coronaviruses, “it likely isn’t going to be a long duration of immunity,” Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said during an interview Tuesday evening with JAMA Editor Howard Bauchner. “When you look at the history of coronaviruses, the common coronaviruses that cause the common cold, the reports in the literature are that the durability of immunity that’s protective ranges from three to six months to almost always less than a year,” he said. “That’s not a lot of durability and protection.”
  11. salam i do agree with that they know. i think the article is telling us that their narratives failed under further scrutiny. In matters concerning security or fear, i shouldn't be spreading news about it, if my understanding of Quran [4:83] is correct.
  12. India, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Singapore and a few other countries has less than 10 deaths/million population. This translated into less than 0.001% fatality rate. What is the fatality rate for seasonal flu? So, very contagious, yes. But not that fatal (at least true in the countries mentioned above). Why then so much fear/panic is being generated? This begs the question: Is this a matter of who’s wearing a tinfoil hat or who’s more gullible to whatever narratives being fed on? So do take all the necessary precautions to minimize the risk of being infected or infecting others if we’re one of those asymptomatic cases. Being stressful is not to our advantage. Stay safe. What? Wait! Doesn’t the vaccine industry call the IgG a “protective antibody”? Isn’t this the marker of immunity they assess after you’ve had an infection with measles or chickenpox or mumps to determine if you are immune to future infections? Isn’t this the marker of induced immunity they are trying to achieve by administering a vaccine? If the FDA does not know if an IgG antibody to SARS-CoV-2 after recovering from the infection is protective against a future infection, then they certainly don’t know if an antibody caused by a vaccine will prevent infection either. Doesn’t this completely eliminate the theory that antibodies afford protection and antibodies from vaccines are necessary to keep you from getting sick? https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/health-freedom/covid19-testing-what-are-we-doing-what-does-it-mean/
  13. yeah, some times, people use them interchangeably. Some say SARS-Cov-2 refers to the name of the virus while Covid-19 refers to disease it causes. Whatever it is, i won't be surprised if there will be SARS-Cov-3, SARS-Cov4 and so on with their associated diseases covid-20, covid-21 and so on, in future.
  14. When this mRNA vaccine is available (which will turn my body into an antigen manufacturing unit), and I pay for the treatment, it’s still dependent on my inborn immune system to produce the appropriate antibody. At this moment, I believe my immune system is still working properly, Insya Allah. So the payment is not a waste of money. Of course, I believe there will be a sort of “booster” for those with weakened inborn immune system. Have you not smelled a rat yet? Well, personally i’ve not but ChildrenHealthDefence had. Not sure if this is good or bad. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/a-timeline-pandemic-and-erosion-of-freedoms-have-been-decades-in-the-making/ From the moment of “COVID-19’s” naming—and particularly since the imposition of unprecedented restrictions on “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”—some people have smelled a rat. And with each passing week, the smell becomes worse. A growing chorus of ordinary citizens and world-renowned medical and scientific experts is raising questions about matters ranging from the coronavirus’s origins to the rationale for continued lockdowns (see here, here and here). The mainstream media have shown themselves only too ready to lob ad hominem attacks against any and all such non-conformists. However, one does not have to be insensitive to the illness and deaths associated with COVID-19 to recognize that powerful agendas are riding on the coattails of SARS-CoV-2.
  15. I think he’s pushing the theory of herd immunity where after, say 95% of the population has been immunized (naturally or thru vaccination), the chances of an epidemic is nil. However, according the article below this theory is flawed. https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the The herd immunity argument has always been inconsistent. On the one hand, the theory goes, people who cannot receive vaccines for whatever reason are protected from the disease through a high level of vaccination in the rest of society. On the other hand, the theory continues, parents who don’t vaccinate their children put the health of wider society at risk. How can a handful of people not getting vaccinated be protected from getting sick, while at the same time being so disease-ridden that they make others sick? This doesn’t make sense. . . Vaccines may have a place in our medical arsenal, but they are not the silver bullet they’re portrayed to be. Year after year the pharmaceutical industry, looking for lucrative new profit centers, churns out new vaccines. They use pseudo-science to convince the public that these products are safe and effective, and they use public shaming to convince the citizenry that non-compliance is a public health threat. This entire racket completely falls apart with a close examination of the herd immunity myth. Until we are honest in our assessment of both the safety and efficacy of vaccines, kids will continue to be hurt, rights will continue to be trampled, and mythology will continue to trump science.
  • Create New...