Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Urwatul Wuthqa

Unregistered
  • Content Count

    4,051
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Urwatul Wuthqa last won the day on February 20

Urwatul Wuthqa had the most liked content!

About Urwatul Wuthqa

  • Rank
    Level 6 Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Masjid I.e., Earth
  • Religion
    Islam
  • Mood
    Romantic

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

12,338 profile views
  1. Some people express their "nijasat" as well as "khabathat" in this way. Since they themselves are Yateem of Abu Sufiyan and copy Umar, they think that even Imams behave like them. What a rijs such mentality is!!! Thinking that Imam Hussain (عليه السلام) was unaware of his duty & behavior towards the Imam of time. To "Challenge" the Ulil Amr (Imam of time), is not the way & teaching of Ahlul Bayt asws. It is however a sunnat of Umar. And history of hudaybiyah mentions how he challenged the peace treaty done by Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)
  2. Now I can understand who is behind this whole thing!! Anyway, the so called "evidence" has been refuted if people just see the quoted parts (before & after) by brother @S.M.H.A.
  3. I don't really need to say anything after this confession of "one of the reasons". Despite the fact that there are alsothe reports which mentions the offer of Abu Sufiyan to support Imam Ali (عليه السلام) Time to quote few paragraphs from al-Islam.org "History provides contradictory situations about peace and war but if someone wants to study the true ideas of the Imam (عليه السلام) about peace and war, then he should concentrate on the above sermon. Imam (عليه السلام) had shown his firm determination to fight on despite the disobedience, differences, treachery, many incidents, including the attack on his camp and the murderous attack on himself, provided the soldiers were willing to fight according to his command. This means that whatever has been publicized about Imam Hasan (عليه السلام) himself wanting peace is not correct! The conclusion is that the true Islamic caliph, the grandson of the Holy Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم), being the Imam, did not deviate from the basic divine law which directs to fight the rebellious group till they return to the right path as commanded by Almighty Allah. In accordance with this very firm Islamic law, his father had fought with Muawiya and the Imam (عليه السلام) also followed the same divine law step by step till the end. Thus he was not satisfied with peace with Muawiya and had made it clear to the people that there was neither respect nor justice in it. However, when they wanted to accept it despite this explanation, the Imam (عليه السلام) could not force them to fight on. So, he took the bitter pill of the offer of peace by Muawiya." https://www.al-Islam.org/Imam-Hasan-and-caliphate-qurrat-ul-ain-abidiy/maskin-madain Lets see firs the words; I will discuss the evidence provided for this claim later. Challenged!!!! What??? A note to moderators: I would like to see what you will do to this person who have insulted me and have said the highlighted words for Imam Hussain (عليه السلام). Either set me free to teach him a lesson in return or take action please. Furthermore, I just want to say the following in my own language: ناکام تمنا دل، اس سوچ میں رہتا ہے یوں ہوتا تو کیا ہوتا، یوں ہوتا تو کیا ہوتا
  4. Dealing with "Miskeen": Surah Al-Insan, Verse 8: وَيُطْعِمُونَ الطَّعَامَ عَلَىٰ حُبِّهِ مِسْكِينًا وَيَتِيمًا وَأَسِيرًا And they give food out of love for Him to the poor and the orphan and the captive: (English - Shakir) Dealing with Jahil: Surah Al-Furqan, Verse 63: وَعِبَادُ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الَّذِينَ يَمْشُونَ عَلَى الْأَرْضِ هَوْنًا وَإِذَا خَاطَبَهُمُ الْجَاهِلُونَ قَالُوا سَلَامًا And the servants of the Beneficent Allah are they who walk on the Earth in humbleness, and when the ignorant address them, they say: Peace. (English - Shakir) A gift to all those who call themselves follower of Ahlul Bayt.
  5. Although I can respond to all of what you have displayed but in this month of patience, I will not going to lose it. May Almighty Lord teach you how to deal with a "miskeen" and "jahil" like me! I am in debt of these words and will return you back with double intensity when I deemed necessary.
  6. These three must be thankful to Imam Ali (عليه السلام) that he never raised his sword against them. Otherwise you will see them running like Amr bin Al-As ran from the battle of Siffin. Secondly, Imam Ali (عليه السلام) fought with Marhab who was a famous warrior, Imam Ali (عليه السلام) fought with Amr bin Abdawad, a famous warrior etc, the three you named above are famous for something else for instance climbing the mountain, 2000 meters sprint etc. "he didn't have sufficient followers", by this assertion, do you want to protect Abu Sufiyan (L) who offered Imam Ali (عليه السلام) to rise against Abu Bakr & Co & assured of his complete cooperation? If it was a plan of God that Imam Ali (عليه السلام) should raise against the first one, you would have seen him fighting alone with no fear whatsoever. Both of them were rebels at that very time (in Jamal & Siffin), to fight with them was his duty. Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) did a treaty with Kuffar too while some stupids think that he should have fight. Are you copying Umar? Here you do think that Imam Hussain (عليه السلام) was unaware of the term "Zibhin Azeem", you do believe that he was totally unaware of Karbala.
  7. Qur'an is dhikr, Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) is dhikr, Ahlul Bayt as are the Ahlul Dhikr. The bearers of the Minniyat of Rasool. We cannot in any way call them Rasool. They are the Mukhlas, Mustafa & Mujtaba "SERVANTS" of Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) and nothing more.
  8. Alaikas-Salam, Can you please post your question is simple way. What exactly is your query? Yes we know Qur'an do mention the wilayat-e-Amirul Mo'mineen (عليه السلام) in several places. What I have mentioned is another aspect of Ahlul Bayt (asws), that is they all are Qur'an-e-Natiq within themselves.
  9. Most welcome! and as always you are failed to grasp the message as well the answer in my post. Wassalam.
  10. Sister, As far as I have understood what he wanted to say is that "Wa in lam taf'al fama ballaghta risalateh" (and if you do not, then you have not conveyed His message) the "message" here (I.e., wilayat e Imam Ali (عليه السلام)) is more than Qur'an itself.
  11. Which verse was revealed after Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) acted upon 5:67 and announced the wilayah of Imam Ali (عليه السلام) in the famous sermon of Ghadeer? "Al Yowma akmalto lakum deenokum wa atmamto alaikum ne'mati" Have you considered what this verse would mean? And what Qur'an Al-Hakeem itself is? وَإِنَّهُ لَحَقُّ الْيَقِينِ {51} [Shakir 69:51] And most surely it is the true certainty [Pickthal 69:51] And lo! it is absolute truth. [Yusufali 69:51] But verily it is Truth of assured certainty. وَإِنَّهُ فِي أُمِّ الْكِتَابِ لَدَيْنَا لَعَلِيٌّ حَكِيمٌ 43:4
  12. If by "same person" you mean "kullona Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)" then yes they all are. And what makes 12 Imams Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم), is that they are the bearers of the "minniyat" of Rasool Allah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) I can see that you have built this question on assumption. So try to figure out the answer by assumptions which would not lead you to truth or perhaps anywhere. Do you think that Imam Ali (عليه السلام) and Imam Hassan (عليه السلام) were unaware of "zibhin azeem"? Do you think that Imam Hussain (عليه السلام) unaware of "zibhin azeem"? Every Imam follow the divine commands and act according to divine plans. Thats the simplest answer I can give even though I am sure that you will try to bring more assumptions.
  13. The address itself starts at individual level "whoever" This one too giving clear impression of night prayers being performed individually by Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)
×
×
  • Create New...