Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله


Advanced Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John_313

  1. On 3/19/2018 at 7:37 AM, Ashvazdanghe said:

    Interpretation of seeing Imam Ali (AS) in dream Mohammad bin Sirin says: If you see the Imam Ali (AS) is in a dream, well-balanced and open-minded, reason that will have knowledge and dignity, courage and generosity, and if he sees him alive in a city, is the reason that justice  and piety is revealed. If you se Hazrat Fatima (AS) in asleep, the reason for shame, asceticism and righteousness, and if you saw that she was open and graceful, would be a reason for the people of that city to rely on the Quran and the science of learning and charisma. There is goodness and blessing there.


    mother Umm Salama (ra) always was supporter of Lady Fatima (sa) ,I think she was in dream as representative of Lady Fatima (sa) .

    •green color

    Seeing this color in a dream shows that a person is seeking independence and self-esteem and, through personal efforts, seeks to raise his own values.

    Green in sleep is a sign of physical and mental health and a sense of security.

    The green color is a sign that a person is not interested in taking new steps to fix his problem and constantly blaming others.

    • blue

    colorThe blue color in the dream feels calm and peace, affects, coincides with the environment and escapes romance because of the feeling of failure and suffer.


    In the words of the new dream interruption, the bride cloth symbolizes the opening of a new chapter in life that we face. The joy of having to wear bridal wear suggests putting aside depression. Islamic scholars have interpreted the concept of wearing wedding dresses for married and single women.


    Jazakallahu khair

  2. A brother asked me the following question:

    On dream interpretation

    A Man saw Master Ali (May Allah Be Pleased with him) in Dream wearing green clothes. Master Ali (May Allah be Please with him) gave ride to him on a green Car.

    The same man after some years saw Mother Umm-e-Salama (May Allah Be Pleased with her) in dream wearing blue bridal dress.

    Imam Ali was Happy with him.
    the man was born on 13th Rajab (Birthday of Imam Ali).

  3. 3 hours ago, repenter said:

    You guys saw that Shirazi had too little legitimate punch so you keep trying to link some sort of connection to Khorasani and Sistani, yet they don't give you even a single thought, or even a mention. I persobally asked ayatollah khorasanis son why his dad never mentions the shirazis and his answer was: "He doesn't care enough to comment on them". Same thing Allahyari tried doing when he saw that people questioned his legitimacy, he tried have this imagenary connection to Khorasani. They, both Sistani and Khorasani, are busy resisting the real enemy, they don't have time for a bunch of cakecutters and balloon blowers doing dress up, specially when their leader says the queen of England is a sayyeda, daughter of Zahra and from ahlul bayt.

    Have some shame!

    Shirazis have a great legitimacy. That’s why they have many muqallids lol. 

    “You guys”? Who are these “You guys”? I hope you “persobally” present proof, instead of lies.

    Teacher of Ayatollah Sistani and Khorasani (ha), and the most prominent scholar of his time, as well as a rival of Ayatollah Shirazi (ra), Ayatollah Khoei (ra) said about him:

    "If we had only three like Sayed Mohammed Al Shirazi, we would have controlled the world. "

    Source: Leaders of Religious and Politcal Thoughts in Najaf al Ashraf, Dr. Sh. Mohammed Hussain Sagheer, p235

    Full of speculation, and I really feel sad for you for claiming your last statement. This is very hypocritical. Seriously? You have to come up with ridiculousness and lies?

    3 hours ago, kirtc said:


    guide them? guide yourself first.. you dont know up from down 

    I don’t guide others, Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى guides whom He سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى wills. We’re only means.

    Very disingenuous. I challenge you [EDIT] to call out Abu Bakr and Umar, the same way you call out the respected Shirazi ulama.

  4. On 3/10/2018 at 6:05 PM, Intellectual Resistance said:

    When i warned people about the so-called 'Rafida' Shia defence youtube channel, i was rebuked. Look at who it is,  at the very last row, the man who is tall with full black and a black turban. Look at the man in white Amamah to the pictorial left of Yasser al-Habib. Two major hosts on 'Rafida' channel.  These individuals should not get any support from us, even if they debate Sunnis.

    [Mod Note: Images removed.]

    Wow. You’re very ignorant indeed. 


    Even if they were, you would prevent our brothers from supporting means to guide Sunnis into the Path of Ahlulbayt (asws)?

    This is very dishonest.

    On 3/10/2018 at 7:20 PM, Ashvazdanghe said:

    Salam he never insulted sunni muslims & Ayt Shirazi that was Marja just believed to council and supporting Tatbir but his brothers after his death deceived people & form their cult.

    Firstly, neither do we insult Sunnis.

    Secondly, how dare you call it a “cult”. Ya Jaahil, go learn English properly, then accuse Shirazis.

    On 3/10/2018 at 6:03 AM, mesbah said:

    I didn't know one is allowed to create and operate his own militia group in London:


    It’s possibly a rally or Arbaeen walk. Could you provide the source?

  5. @Intellectual Resistance

    As’salamu alaikum 

    I’m going to respond very quickly. You kinda committed a specific fallacy akhi. The brother Mohammed cited very interesting sources which are relevant to such discussions, unlike arguments from experience.

    Otherwise I can as well recall from experience. Most Sunnis I have spoken to (without insulting their symbols) takfired me because I didn’t accept the 3 “Khulafa”. Remember, not because of Tatbir or La'na, but because I said Imam Ali (as) was the first Khalif.

    Anyways, all best akhi, and may Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى guide your family! Allahuma sali ala Muhammad wa ali Muhammad! Ameen!

  6. 2 hours ago, kirtc said:

    really no difference between shirazis and wahhabis.. 

    Wow. I challenge you to say no difference between Abu Bakr and Abu Lahab.

    WaAllahi the lie and hypocrisy is strong with this one.

    2 hours ago, kirtc said:

    WF is the only working shia govt resisting Zionism, and helping the oppressed. All shia who work against them are working against themselves.. you dont have to love WF, or be part of it.. no one is asking you to. It is a working, functioning govt. that has saved countries, and shias across the world.

    I’m not against Wilayah al-Faqih (like I was before). Since you’re very knowledgeable, can you tell me the difference between Absolute Wilayatul Faqih and Shuratul Fuqaha? Akhi, you cannot have a Shuratul Fuqaha without having Absolute Wilayah al Faqih.

    Smh. I clearly said that I respect the I.R of Iran.

  7. 2 minutes ago, Ashvazdanghe said:

    We don't rely on them because we know their Coward & Betrayal  nature through these years but we don't need any more hatred among Shia Sunni Muslims. even if Sunni countries stay neutral  & don't do anything it is better for us. 

    Nice logic tbh. 

    We don’t need “Sunni”-Shi'a hatred. We need Shi'a-Shi'a hatred.

  8. Wow


    Don’t listen to such Iranian propaganda. Though I have respect for Iran, some people in this Forum are hypocritical. They refuse to call the enemies of Ahlulbayt (asws) liars and bad people, yet call a marja taqleed. Call Abu Bakr and Umar a liar, and you’ll see the reaction of the mods.

    12 hours ago, Ashvazdanghe said:

    I'm agree with his arrest. The problem is not just criticism Wilayat Faqih his lectures & actions caused many death of Shia muslims in Iraq & Syria by Wahhabists & ISIS 

    What the heck is Islamic Unity

    WaAllahi, Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى is patient with people like you. People who can’t even write properly English, try to spread “Islamic Pulse” videos, known for their roots. 

    I have responded to such claims so many times, I’ll not bother responding anymore. I challenge anyone who has enmity towards Shirazi ulama to PM me.

    Btw, as per your info, Absolute Wilayah al Faqih is part of the Shirazi theory of governance, except that they believe in the application of Shura i.e Shura al Fuqaha. Your ignorance exceeds the limits akhi.

  9. 5 hours ago, andres said:

    A chromosome error sometimes result in a human that actually is neither male or female. What shall they be called?

    “Now in 1959 when the karyotype of Klinefelter [a male who is XXY] and Turner [a female who has one X] syndromes was discovered, it became clear that in humans it was the presence or the absence of the Y chromosome that's sex determining. Because all Klinefelters that have a Y are male, whereas Turners, who have no Y, are females. So it's not a dosage or the number of X's, it's really the presence or absence of the Y.”


    7 hours ago, andres said:

    Buy there are. 5% or so are born with this sexual instinct.

    Born with this instinct?

    Studies say otherwise:



    Debunking the so called “scientific evidence” that homosexuality is firm by birth:


    The Conservative position is that your gender or sex is defined by your biological means (XX and XY chromosomes). We have seen that socially Marxist apologists tend to claim that biological means don’t define your gender. However, if biology doesn’t stop us from changing gender or sex, then what stops us from changing age, or even identifying as an animal, moreover a banana?

    To suggest that a man can become a woman by means of genitalia mutilation is ridiculous (imagine if I chopped off my hand, that implies absolutely nothing). 

  10. @andres

    [MOD NOTE: removed image that contained an inappropriate word]

    Homosexuality is a very unhealthy behavior:




    Does it really seem strange that homosexuals are 3% of the population, yet 55% of HIV carries, 82% of syphylis cases, 20% of HBV cases, 37% of Anal Cancer and 78% have a STD?

    Furthermore, I don’t really understand any moral basis under Secular or Atheistic ground.

    As far as we’re concerned, there’s yet to be found a rational source for morality. Principles such as the democratic one have failed for the reason that more implications would arise, was slavery justified and morally right back then when the majority agreed to such terms? Or the Liberal principal of consequence portraying everything to be morally right, unless effecting others. Is incest morally right as it effects none but those who commit it? Or the self-damage principal which advocates for damaging actions being morally wrong, is drinking your father’s sperm morally right as it has no damage (on the contrary, it gives you proteins)?

    Furthermore, more problems would arise as Objective Morality (the belief that Absolute Moral Good and Evil exists) cannot be grounded upon humans as it requires an all-knowing and infallible source (such as God). Otherwise, humans are not all-knowing nor infallible, hence they cannot claim Absolute Moral certainty nor perfection.

    The only option left is Subjective Morality (or moral relativism) which all Non-Theists hold to, since there’s no other way of judging morality on Atheistic or Secular grounds. However, if there’s no Objective Truth in morality (what moral relativism argues for), then why would you argue something which you don’t believe to be Absolute Truth, moreover, you admit that that’s not Absolute True Morality to begin with. Therefore there’s no philosophical basis upon which Pro-Homosexual advocates can rely to defend their ethical reasoning.





    On 12/15/2017 at 8:05 PM, mohammad nadeem said:

    S. A,  I have been having debate with akhbaris on the matter of taqleed,  I need strong evidence to support my stand,  please assist if someone knows? 

    Wa alaikum salam

    In a famous hadith, `Umar ibn Hanzalah asked Imam Ja`far as-Sadiq, peace be upon him, about the legality of two Shi'ahs seeking a verdict from an illegitimate ruler in a dispute over a debt or a legacy. The Imam's answer was that it was absolutely forbidden to do so. 

    Then Ibn Hanzalah asked what the two should do, and the Imam replied: "They must seek out one of you who narrates our traditions, who is versed in what is permissible and what is forbidden, who is well-acquainted with our laws and ordinances, and accept him as judge and arbiter, for I appoint him as judge over you. If the ruling which he based on our laws is rejected, this rejection will be tantamount to ignoring the order of Allah and rejecting us is the same as rejecting Allah, and this is the same as polytheism."

    Shaykh al-Kulayni, Furu`u 'l-Kafi, vol. 7, p. 412.

    In another tradition from Imam Ja'far as-Sadiq, this time narrated by Imam Hasan al-`Askari, peace be upon them, he says, "...but if there is anyone among the fuqaha' who is in control over his own self, protects his religion, suppresses his evil desires and is obedient to the commands of his Master, then the people should follow him."

    Shaykh at-Tabarsi, al-Ihtijaj, vo. 2, p. 263.

    A third hadith is from the Present Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi, peace be upon him, who said in a reply to Ishaq ibn Ya'qub: "As far as newly occurring circumstances are concerned, you should turn (for guidance) to the narrators of our ahadith, for they are my proof over you just as I am Allah's proof."

    Shaykh at-Tabarsi, al-Ihtijaj, vo. 2 , p. 283

  12. If there was no free will, life would be completely determined by God, hence pointless because it wouldn’t be an effect of our decisions, then why create life in the first place? Therefore God created a life with purpose and worthy, rather than one in which our decisions play no role and is fully determined. For there to be free will we must be capable of both moral good and moral evil (the absence of good).

    If an all-good God has a very good reason  (creating and worthy life with purpose namely free will) for allowing the absence of good (evil) then there is no paradox because the concept of allowing the absence of good for a good reason does not contradict His all-good nature.

  13. 21 hours ago, Follower of Truth said:

    There is no doubt that Quran is the undisputed and universally accepted source of all denominations of Islam which each resorts to as authoritative source. It is believed to Word of God Himself. A revelation to mankind through the final messenger of God. It explains and interprets what is to believed and practiced to attain the ultimate salvation. All the fundamental tenets and creeds universally accepted by all denominations of Islam is mentioned and explained in the Quran in details like Tawhid, Risalah, Akhirah etc. Belief in Allah, His angels, His books, His messengers and other necessary tenets and beliefs are mentioned with underlying logic and explanation throughout the whole Quran. Moreover all necessary practice like salat, sawm, zakat, hajj, jihad are mentioned all over the scripture.


    The foundation of ithna ashari shia belief is the doctrine of Imamah which separates it from other muslim denominations. This belief is not an ordinary belief. It is considered the foundation of the religion. In twelver circle it is considered as important as Tawhid and Risalah. Rejecting it is considered kufr and without believing it one not be a mumin or believer. According to some shia scholars a rejecter of imamah is a kafir and according to other shia scholars he is apparently muslim in this world but kafir in the hereafter and go to hellfire. So how important this belief in imamah is! But ironically we fail to find a single mention of this belief in the whole quran. Such an important belief but Allah failed to mention it in His final Book and Testament to mankind till judgement day! Whereas each fundamentals of religion is expounded in the whole quran quite clearly and distinctly again and again.


    For argument’s sake lets assume that shia belief in imamah is true. Lets assume first three caliphs were hypocrites and usurpers and ali (as) was rightlful successor to prophet Muhammad (pbuh) immediately after his death and this successorship continued for 11 successive persons from among his descendants. But even if this is true we can not make it any fundamental aspect of religion absence of which will make faith nullified and upon which salvation depends. Because if really the matter was so then in that case it is impossible that He will not mention it in His book thus pave the way for the people to be led astray and go to hell. It never can be regarded among fundamentals of religion.


    Apparently this seemed embarrassing to shia scholars from the classical era. So a significant amount of scholars ended up with the belief of tahreef, that is a portion of the quran mentioning imamah belief has been omitted away by the companions when quran was canonized during the reign of Uthman ibn Affan. However those scholars who refrained from belief in tahreef resorted to a reckless and ridiculous effort to find some stuff in the quran. Thus they claimed about some ayats to be reference to Ali (as)’s authority and successorship though no normal people knowing Arabic will think of such meaning after reading those ayats. It is impossible for a non-shia to know about a doctrine (imamah) without which his religion is bound to be doomed and nullified and without which he will enter hell even if he believes all other fundamentals of religion and stick to the whole quran. Why Allah will do such injustice?


    Some will try to explain it away by arguing that from hadith of prophet we came to know about it. And prophet’s order is like Allah’s order even if it is not in the quran. This would be true if the matter, though not in the quran but found in hadith, is not fundamental aspect of religion. As I previously said it is impossible that a matter is essential for salvation but it has no place God’s final revelation thus exposing those to vulnerability to be misled whereas we all important creeds and practices are mentioned in the quran repeatedly and clearly. Hadith can be explanation and elaboration of quran. But of course a basis should be in quran for an important matter of religion. For example salat is mentioned in the quran again and again in the quran with its importance, significance and virtues. But ritual details are found in prophetic traditions. Same is true for all other matters. But in case of imamah even no mention of this belief even for once!


    Assalamu alaikum

    The concept is clearly mentioned.

    Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى is always the one choosing the Khalif such as Adem, Dawood, Harun (asws) etc. Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى didn’t let the people (Surah al-Baqarah 2:247) nor the angles (Surah al-Baqarah 2:30) to elect their Khalif, for they’re not competent in this regard.

    Furthermore, Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى also states:

    O you who believe! obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority from among you; then if you quarrel about anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the last day; this is better and very good in the end.
    (Surah an-Nisa, 4:59)

    Clearly, Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى is the only One who is Competent on choosing the Khalif, if the verse above implies that any Authority is to be obeyed, then what about Tyrants?

    As per as per more details, this link might help you know what you’re looking for:


    If you’re looking for the names of the Imams (asws) then our response is that not everything has to be clearly mentioned in the Noble Qur’an. For instance, there are over 6000 “Sunni” Ahadeeth concerning Imam al-Mahdi (asws), and all your ulama say that if someone denies Imam al-Mahdi (asws) then he’s a kafir, now where is Imam al-Mahdi (asws) clearly mentioned in the Noble Qur’an for “Sunnis” to issue such ruling?

    Therefore by this principle we may conclude that if Imamah is proven by your Ahadeeth then you shouldn’t have any problem with accepting it.

  14. On 12/5/2017 at 4:10 PM, Al Hadi said:

    He insulted Sayed hassan those 2 personalities and more here’s proof


    theres more btw not just what’s on this video. 

    [Edit] Sheikh al-Habib (ha) didn’t insult Ayatollah Sayed Sistani (ha), nor does the video suggest so (if you watched it carefully, which you probably didn’t). On the contrary, Sheikh al-Habib actually praised Ayatollah Sayed Sistani (ha), for instance:



    10 hours ago, Ashvazdanghe said:


    https://www.youtube.com/embed/F0llKrVTDHs?feature=oembed" width="459">



    It is ridiculous to suggest that Shi’as are getting killed because of open la’na (curse), there is no such case. The reason Shi’as are getting killed is because they’re not “Sunni”, simple. It is even more ridiculous to suggest that the Shi’a will not get oppressed if they stopped open curse. I’m not against taqiyya, but that’s not taqiyya, rather, that’s propagating “Sunni” beliefs:




    Taqiyya is only used when your or someone else’s life is at threat (and that not based on assumption), otherwise it’s haram. Again, claiming that stopping open la’na will stop our killing is hilarious.

    Ammar Nakshawani is very ignorant and he is a liar. Like when he says that Imams haven’t cursed those “personalities”, not only have our Imams (asws) cursed them, they cursed them in prayer (publicy).

    10 hours ago, Ashvazdanghe said:

    I seriously don’t understand your position, there is a problem with exposing your scholars with deviant beliefs (with evidence cited), yet falsely accusing and insulting Shirazis (which are a great ulama with a huge impact and history) is acceptable? Hmm, weird... What’s even more weird is that these “Western Agents” have criticized each other, and that there is no evidence to state that these great personalities are “Western Agents”. For more exposure to your logical fallacies, check out my posts. ^

    I guess Ammar Nakshawani is Western Agent now. He lived in the West, and also praised Ayatollah Sayed Sadiq Shirazi (ha):


    Furthermore, I have more implications with Ammar Nakshawani, how come Ammar insults Sheikh Yasser al-Habib (ha) because of allowing public curse, yet he praises Ayatollah Sayed Sadiq Shirazi (hafidhahullah) who also allows public curse? What hypocrisy from his side, Sheikh al-Habib (ha) is a disgrace to this Ummah, but may Allah lengthen the life of Sayed Sadiq Shirazi who also teaches the same things:


    hahaha lol

    9 hours ago, Ashvazdanghe said:

    This is what wahhabists&ISIS are saying about Shias because of Yaser al Habib


    Anti-Majos, anything more original? Anyways, as a counter argument, I will also present you a video of what Wahhabis say about Shi’as because of Khamenei:


    Conclusion: your last point is irrelevant because Wahhabis are still going to hate or say bad things about you even if you are Khamenei, whether you’re Shi’a or Maturidi, whether you’re Sufi or Asharite.

  15. Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) also insulted Ayatollah Sayed Muhammad Shirazi (rahimahullah) and Ayatollah Sayed Sadiq Shirazi (hafidhahullah). I have seen that vid, and I don’t hold a lot unto Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) in many issues. Sheikh Yasser al-Habib (hafidhahullah) is more knowledgeable in this respect. Look how Sheikh al-Habib (ha) praised Ayatollah Sayed Sistani (hafidhahullah):



    However, Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) is young, and I like your idea of emailing him.

    On 12/2/2017 at 1:53 AM, Mansur Bakhtiari said:

    The specific statement was not even from Sayed Sistani, but of a publisher affiliated with his office!!! This is completely unacceptable and should be condemned immediately.

    I understand your position and I agree with you, that was in no way directly affiliated with Ayatollah Sayed Sistani (ha) himself, also considering his statement for allowing public curse. Still, Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) is a great source for arguments against the mukhalifeen and I hope Allah steadfasts him on the Deen of Ahlulbayt (as). 


    Anyways, these guys accusing Sheikh Yasser al-Habib (ha) together with Shirazis and Hassan Allahyari to be Western Agents, don’t you find it weird that Western Agents are criticizing one another (like Allahyari criticised both Shirazis and Sheikh al-Habib)? Also, a Western founded Network such as BBC, why would they portray their agent as an evil person, furthermore, why would Western founded news networks theorize and “expose” their agent and his “wealth” (in regards to Sheikh al-Habib)? -btw remember, these same news networks deem that Ayatollah Khomeini was supported by Jimmy Carter to wage his Revolution- This and many more logical arguments can be found in this post I made some time ago:


    12 hours ago, 786:) said:

    So let me make sure I understand..You are claiming Abu Bakr killed Lady Fatima (AS). Now you mean to tell me Imam Ali (AS) did not try to bring justice on the death of his beloved wife (further so the daughter of the Holy Prophet (SAW))?

    Hmm, using the emotional appeal?

    Your allegation can easily be answered by Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) himself:


  16. 8 hours ago, SunniBrother said:

    Okay I am curious about Shia form of mysticism. We Sunnis have Sufism and Tariqas. What are the types of mysticism practiced by Shias and I would like a brief explanation about them and their practices.

    The Irfan (mysticism) Ahlulbayt (as) teached is different from what Sufi Orders or Tariqats teach.

    Check out these links:



    We recommend leaving the worldy attractions aside and focus on Allah and religious affairs, however, many Sufi beliefs are deviant. Example, Wahdatul Wujood contradicts our teachings. We believe that Allah is separated from His creation and His creation is not a manifestation of Him, contrary from what Sufi Orders believe.

    Narrated from Imam Al Sadiq (as): "God is absolutely independent of all His creatures and all His creatures have absolutely nothing in common with Him. And to whatsoever the expression ‘thing’ is applicable is a creature except God and God is the Creator of everything, blessed is He, naught is as His likeness and He is the All-Hearing and All-Seeing”. (al-Kafi, vol. 1, p. 82)


    <span>A group of our companions from Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Khalid al-Barqi from his father from an-Nadhr b. Suwayd from Yahya al-Halbi from Ibn Miskan from Zurara b. A`yan. He said: I heard Abu `Abdillah (as) saying: Verily Allah is devoid (khilw) of His creation and His creation is devoid of Him. Everything upon which there befalls a name, save for Allah, is a creature and Allah is the Creator of every thing. Blessed (be He) Who there is nothing like Him and He is the Hearing, the Seeing\

    Many Shi'a scholars have condemned such beliefs, especially Shirazis and their likes.

    Even our Imams (as) have condemned Sufis:

    It has also been reported that Al-Hussain bin Abul Khattab said: “One day, I was with Abul Hassan al-Hadi (peace be upon him) in the mosque of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his pure family) when some of his companions, among whom was Abu Hashim al-Ja’fari, came to him. Abu Hashim was an eloquent man and had a high position near Imam al-Hadi (peace be upon him). “While we were standing, a group of Sufis came into the mosque. They sat in a corner of the mosque and began saying ‘La Ilaha Illallah’ (i.e. there is no God but Allah). Imam al-Hadi (peace be upon him) turned towards his companions and said to them: ‘Do not pay attention to these deceivers for they are allies of the Devils and destroyers of the bases of religion. ‘They become ascetic to relieve their bodies and watch to hunt cattle…they do not practice rites except to deceive people, and do not decrease food except to…cheat the fool…their worships are but dancing and clapping, and their praises are but singing. No one follows them except the stupid, and no one believes in them except the fool. Whoever went to visit any of them alive or dead as if he went to visit Satan and idolaters, and whoever supported any of them, as if he supported, Mu’awiya, Yazid, and Abu Sufyan…’ “Then one of the companions said, ‘Even if he acknowledges your rights?’ Imam al-Hadi (peace be upon him) scolded him and SHOUTED: ‘Do not say that! He, who acknowledges our rights, does not disobey us. Do you not know that they are the worst group of Sufis?! Though all Sufis are dissentient to us and their way is contrary to ours. They are but Christians and magi of this nation. They do their best to put out the light of Allah with their mouths, and Allah will not consent save to perfect His light, though the unbelievers are averse…’” (Hadiqatul Shi’ah, by al-Ardabili, p. 602).

    When Imam al-Sadiq (peace be upon him) was asked about Sufis, he answered: “they are our enemies, whoever is inclined towards them then he's one of them and will be resurrected with them. There will be people who claim they love us but they are inclined towards them and they try to be like them, call themselves with their name, and say what they say, whoever is inclined towards them he's not from us and we are innocent from him and whoever rejects them and refutes them he's like someone who performed Jihad against the disbelievers with the messenger of Allah (peace be upon him and his pure family)” (Safinatul Bihar, by al-Muhadith al-Qummi, vol. 2, p. 57).

    “Their wealthy pillage the provision of their poor. Their young precede their old, and every ignorant to them is an authority, and every assignee to them is poor. They do not differentiate between the sincere and the doubtful, nor do they know the sheep from wolves. Their scholars are the most evil of God’s creation on the face of earth, because they incline towards Philosophy and Sufism. By Allah! They are of the enemies and people of distortion. They exaggerate in their love for our opponents and they misguide our Shi’a and Followers.” (Safinatul Bihar, By al-Muhadith al-Qummi, vol. 2, p. 58).



  17. 1 hour ago, Yahya313 said:

    My Lord. You truly have never read the Quran.

    And do not insult those they invoke other than Allah, lest they insult Allah in enmity without knowledge. Thus We have made pleasing to every community their deeds. Then to their Lord is their return, and He will inform them about what they used to do. (6:108)

    Ya Allah, when will these people try to use rationality. Sheikh Yasser Al Habib (ha) answers the same argument you used in this video:

    Brother, what I don't understand from you is how can you not believe in Sahih Ahadeeth?

  18. @Yahya313

    What's your religious education? I sincerely cannot believe what you just wrote, has come from a Shi'a.

    If you love good, then you should hate evil. If you praise good, then you should insult evil. It's not possible for someone to agree upon two contradictions. You have to enjoy good and forbid evil.

    What's your point for claiming that the Ahadeeth isn't Sahih? No, Sheikh Yasser Al Habib didn't teach it to me. What's missing in the chain, or how does it contradict the Holy Qur'an?

    The prophet (sawa) was sent to spread mercy and destroy tyranny, praise mercy and demonize tyranny. Haven't you read the Noble Qur'an? So then, why do you call me for demonizing the enemies (tyrants) of Ahlulbayt (as)?

    Surely those who disbelieve and die while they are disbelievers, these it is on whom is the curse of Allah and the angels and men all; (2:161)

    (As for) these, their reward is that upon them is the curse of Allah and the angels and of men, all together. (3:87)

    Surely those who conceal the clear proofs and the guidance that We revealed after We made it clear in the Book for men, these it is whom Allah shall curse, and those who curse shall curse them (too). (2:159)

    But whoever disputes with you in this matter after what has come to you of knowledge, then say: Come let us call our sons and your sons and our women and your women and our near people and your near people, then let us be earnest in prayer, and pray for the curse of Allah on the liars. (3:61)

  • Create New...