Jump to content
In the Name of God بسم الله


Advanced Member
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Religion
    Ithnā Ash'eri Rāfīdhí Shi'a Islam
  • Favorite Subjects
    Defending classical Theism and Islam

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

6,587 profile views

John_313's Achievements


Newbie (1/14)



  1. @kingkhanwc You can find a clarification here: https://ia802805.us.archive.org/16/items/RealRebuttalToTheIslamicDilemma/Real Rebuttal to the Islamic Dilemma.pdf
  2. A brother asked me the following question: On dream interpretation A Man saw Master Ali (May Allah Be Pleased with him) in Dream wearing green clothes. Master Ali (May Allah be Please with him) gave ride to him on a green Car. The same man after some years saw Mother Umm-e-Salama (May Allah Be Pleased with her) in dream wearing blue bridal dress. Imam Ali was Happy with him. the man was born on 13th Rajab (Birthday of Imam Ali).
  3. Actually, the beard is wajib according to many Fuqaha akhi.
  4. Shirazis have a great legitimacy. That’s why they have many muqallids lol. “You guys”? Who are these “You guys”? I hope you “persobally” present proof, instead of lies. Teacher of Ayatollah Sistani and Khorasani (ha), and the most prominent scholar of his time, as well as a rival of Ayatollah Shirazi (ra), Ayatollah Khoei (ra) said about him: "If we had only three like Sayed Mohammed Al Shirazi, we would have controlled the world. " Source: Leaders of Religious and Politcal Thoughts in Najaf al Ashraf, Dr. Sh. Mohammed Hussain Sagheer, p235 Full of speculation, and I really feel sad for you for claiming your last statement. This is very hypocritical. Seriously? You have to come up with ridiculousness and lies? I don’t guide others, Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى guides whom He سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى wills. We’re only means. Very disingenuous. I challenge you [EDIT] to call out Abu Bakr and Umar, the same way you call out the respected Shirazi ulama.
  5. Wow. You’re very ignorant indeed. Even if they were, you would prevent our brothers from supporting means to guide Sunnis into the Path of Ahlulbayt (asws)? This is very dishonest. Firstly, neither do we insult Sunnis. Secondly, how dare you call it a “cult”. Ya Jaahil, go learn English properly, then accuse Shirazis. It’s possibly a rally or Arbaeen walk. Could you provide the source?
  6. @Intellectual Resistance As’salamu alaikum I’m going to respond very quickly. You kinda committed a specific fallacy akhi. The brother Mohammed cited very interesting sources which are relevant to such discussions, unlike arguments from experience. Otherwise I can as well recall from experience. Most Sunnis I have spoken to (without insulting their symbols) takfired me because I didn’t accept the 3 “Khulafa”. Remember, not because of Tatbir or La'na, but because I said Imam Ali (as) was the first Khalif. Anyways, all best akhi, and may Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى guide your family! Allahuma sali ala Muhammad wa ali Muhammad! Ameen!
  7. Wow. I challenge you to say no difference between Abu Bakr and Abu Lahab. WaAllahi the lie and hypocrisy is strong with this one. I’m not against Wilayah al-Faqih (like I was before). Since you’re very knowledgeable, can you tell me the difference between Absolute Wilayatul Faqih and Shuratul Fuqaha? Akhi, you cannot have a Shuratul Fuqaha without having Absolute Wilayah al Faqih. Smh. I clearly said that I respect the I.R of Iran.
  8. Nice logic tbh. We don’t need “Sunni”-Shi'a hatred. We need Shi'a-Shi'a hatred.
  9. Wow @MuslimahAK Don’t listen to such Iranian propaganda. Though I have respect for Iran, some people in this Forum are hypocritical. They refuse to call the enemies of Ahlulbayt (asws) liars and bad people, yet call a marja taqleed. Call Abu Bakr and Umar a liar, and you’ll see the reaction of the mods. WaAllahi, Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى is patient with people like you. People who can’t even write properly English, try to spread “Islamic Pulse” videos, known for their roots. I have responded to such claims so many times, I’ll not bother responding anymore. I challenge anyone who has enmity towards Shirazi ulama to PM me. Btw, as per your info, Absolute Wilayah al Faqih is part of the Shirazi theory of governance, except that they believe in the application of Shura i.e Shura al Fuqaha. Your ignorance exceeds the limits akhi.
  10. “Now in 1959 when the karyotype of Klinefelter [a male who is XXY] and Turner [a female who has one X] syndromes was discovered, it became clear that in humans it was the presence or the absence of the Y chromosome that's sex determining. Because all Klinefelters that have a Y are male, whereas Turners, who have no Y, are females. So it's not a dosage or the number of X's, it's really the presence or absence of the Y.” https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/q-a-mixed-sex-biology/ Born with this instinct? Studies say otherwise: Debunking the so called “scientific evidence” that homosexuality is firm by birth: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/is-homosexuality-a-choice/ The Conservative position is that your gender or sex is defined by your biological means (XX and XY chromosomes). We have seen that socially Marxist apologists tend to claim that biological means don’t define your gender. However, if biology doesn’t stop us from changing gender or sex, then what stops us from changing age, or even identifying as an animal, moreover a banana? To suggest that a man can become a woman by means of genitalia mutilation is ridiculous (imagine if I chopped off my hand, that implies absolutely nothing).
  11. @andres [MOD NOTE: removed image that contained an inappropriate word] Homosexuality is a very unhealthy behavior: http://www.icna.org/diseases-related-to-homosexuality/ Does it really seem strange that homosexuals are 3% of the population, yet 55% of HIV carries, 82% of syphylis cases, 20% of HBV cases, 37% of Anal Cancer and 78% have a STD? Furthermore, I don’t really understand any moral basis under Secular or Atheistic ground. As far as we’re concerned, there’s yet to be found a rational source for morality. Principles such as the democratic one have failed for the reason that more implications would arise, was slavery justified and morally right back then when the majority agreed to such terms? Or the Liberal principal of consequence portraying everything to be morally right, unless effecting others. Is incest morally right as it effects none but those who commit it? Or the self-damage principal which advocates for damaging actions being morally wrong, is drinking your father’s sperm morally right as it has no damage (on the contrary, it gives you proteins)? Furthermore, more problems would arise as Objective Morality (the belief that Absolute Moral Good and Evil exists) cannot be grounded upon humans as it requires an all-knowing and infallible source (such as God). Otherwise, humans are not all-knowing nor infallible, hence they cannot claim Absolute Moral certainty nor perfection. The only option left is Subjective Morality (or moral relativism) which all Non-Theists hold to, since there’s no other way of judging morality on Atheistic or Secular grounds. However, if there’s no Objective Truth in morality (what moral relativism argues for), then why would you argue something which you don’t believe to be Absolute Truth, moreover, you admit that that’s not Absolute True Morality to begin with. Therefore there’s no philosophical basis upon which Pro-Homosexual advocates can rely to defend their ethical reasoning.
  12. Wa alaikum salam In a famous hadith, `Umar ibn Hanzalah asked Imam Ja`far as-Sadiq, peace be upon him, about the legality of two Shi'ahs seeking a verdict from an illegitimate ruler in a dispute over a debt or a legacy. The Imam's answer was that it was absolutely forbidden to do so. Then Ibn Hanzalah asked what the two should do, and the Imam replied: "They must seek out one of you who narrates our traditions, who is versed in what is permissible and what is forbidden, who is well-acquainted with our laws and ordinances, and accept him as judge and arbiter, for I appoint him as judge over you. If the ruling which he based on our laws is rejected, this rejection will be tantamount to ignoring the order of Allah and rejecting us is the same as rejecting Allah, and this is the same as polytheism." Shaykh al-Kulayni, Furu`u 'l-Kafi, vol. 7, p. 412. In another tradition from Imam Ja'far as-Sadiq, this time narrated by Imam Hasan al-`Askari, peace be upon them, he says, "...but if there is anyone among the fuqaha' who is in control over his own self, protects his religion, suppresses his evil desires and is obedient to the commands of his Master, then the people should follow him." Shaykh at-Tabarsi, al-Ihtijaj, vo. 2, p. 263. A third hadith is from the Present Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi, peace be upon him, who said in a reply to Ishaq ibn Ya'qub: "As far as newly occurring circumstances are concerned, you should turn (for guidance) to the narrators of our ahadith, for they are my proof over you just as I am Allah's proof." Shaykh at-Tabarsi, al-Ihtijaj, vo. 2 , p. 283
  13. Wa alaikum salam Simple. We didn’t disunite, they disunited from us.
  • Create New...