Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله


Basic Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Religion
    Worshipping the King of Kings

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Alright. Now, I'm a bit confused. The One in Revelation, called "the Word of God" and "King of Kings" is Jesus/YHWH, the same man who I thought Islam calls the prophet Isa. He is the man who will call Himself "King of Kings" who calls Himself God, together with the Father and the Holy Spirit. He knows that only the Most High Elohim can be called the King of Kings, and He claims to be God Himself with this name in the book Revelation. Maybe this is different than Isa then? So, the man who comes and calls Himself "the King of Kings" is the Christ of the Christians, the one who says He "was dead, and is alive again." Obviously the Bible Jesus, Yahushua in Hebrew/Jewish. But this cannot be the same Isa, then, who will come and reign and not call himself the king of kings. If the most awful name is heard, on the future day of resurrection, then it must be that the Bible Jesus, the "King of Kings" then arrives on the scene and calls Himself that. And Isa will already be there, and this man calling himself that must be a different fellow. Also, since Revelation (written way before Mohammad's life) warns that the King of Kings will come and fight against and defeat the two world rulers who will have a one world government and will behead those who will not worship their deity, does that mean that the jews had prophecied about the Mahdi and Isa ruling the world, and wrote down a prophecy that their Messiah King of Kings would defeat the 2 islamic rulers?
  2. I am not familiar with all the Quran and Hadith. If a person sees another person beating up someone else, or whipping someone, and then that person feels protective and gets between the aggressor and intended victim - putting themself in the way of danger, is this course of action or attitude of heart ever recommended or justified by any Hadith or Surah?
  3. One thing I notice, that Quran instructs us that the Torah and Jewish Scriptures at the time of Mohammad's life was accurate: Sura 5:68 (Al-Maida) - "Say: 'People of the Book (Christians and Jews), you stand for nothing until you observe the Torah and the Gospel and that which is revealed to you from your Lord." Another thing we notice is that we have the dead sea scrolls and other copies of "the Book" that was around at that time when Mohammad said that. So we have the versions "not corrupted" that were from that time period where Mohammad says to observe the Torah. Now, those sea scrolls and that Torah also says: "11 I, even I, am YHWH (Adonai, The Lord)And besides Me there is no savior." - Isaiah 43:11 So, if we believe that one, then NO ONE can be our savior or messiah, except for God Himself. Will God share His glory with another? Certainly not.
  4. I have read this, also, regarding the last days: Sahih Bukhari Volume 008, Book 073, Hadith Number 224. Narated By Abu Huraira : Allah's Apostle said, "The most awful name in Allah's sight on the Day of Resurrection, will be (that of) a man calling himself Malik Al-Amlak (the king of kings)." Who is the King of Kings? Is it a reference to the Jewish/Christian book of Revelation, where 2 characters (called the beast and the false prophet) rule the whole earth for 3.5 years, and then after that it is said: "Now I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. And He who sat on him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war. 12 His eyes were like a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns. He had a name written that no one knew except Himself. 13 He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God. 14 And the armies in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, followed Him on white horses. 15 Now out of His mouth goes a sharp sword, that with it He should strike the nations. And He Himself will rule them with a rod of iron. He Himself treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. 16 And He has on His robe and on His banner a name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. 19 And I saw the beast, the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against Him who sat on the horse and against His army. 20 Then the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who worked signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image. These two were cast alive into the lake of fire burning with brimstone." Is this true that this is the same King of Kings? The one called The Word of God? Will He destroy the Mahdi and Isa, calling them a beast and a false prophet? Is this why it is the most awful name?
  5. I have read in Islam that there will be a coming Mahdi that will rule the world with Isa by his side. Is this a well known belief? Or is it more of a rare doctrine?
  6. What is the Islamic stance on Israel? I've heard some Muslim believers who are against Israel and who tell me Allah hates the Jews. Is this true? Why is it? Can someone point me to what the Quran or Hadith say about the Jewish people?
  7. From my study into the topic, I look back to what Mohammad did - if a place was conquered in the name of Allah there, then people would be taken slaves, or executed, or in a few cases left to live their lives but also paying jityza tax. So, females who were living in the conquered land, they were often talen as captives or forcibly married to an Islamic believer, and even before their current husbands had been dealt with (one way or another), it was considered OK to force the captive women to have sex with her new 'husband.' One thing I'm not sure about is whether this would count as marriage, since it seems like maybe it's forcing the woman to commit adultery, and it's not a covenant relationshop between a consenting male and female (covenant relationships take personal vows from both parties). I think sexual slavery is the better term for it. Is sexual slavery OK? When the Most High comes and we see Him on earth, if He finds us keeping sex slaves, will we be embarrassed before Him or feel righteous in the act? I wonder what Mohammad felt about it.
  • Create New...