Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Shahzeb Siddiq al-Salafi

Basic Members
  • Content Count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

411 profile views
  1. ”We have now come to understand that there is no such thing as ‘moderate Islam’,” Lt Col Dooley said in the presentation last July. ”It is therefore time for the United States to make our true intentions clear. This barbaric ideology will no longer be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its self-destruction.” -------------- We hate Americas foreign policy. In March 2017, hundreds of Muslim civilians were killed by American-led airstrike, I think this is a legit reason to chant "death to America". America is in a mess. They've a massive debt and they are not winning in Iraq and Afghanistan. They've wasted so much money and as a result got nothing out of it.
  2. Democracy is a tool for the rich to get richer and avoid taxes, while the middle class has to pay it, if not then he or she will be imprisoned. The law has to be equal for all. Disbelievers claim that democracy is all about equality, this is something that they've been fed by the media and their corrupt leaders. But, this is far from the truth. Why do a mother have to work and pay her taxes? A sum of money from her taxes go to prisoners so they can be fed and clothed. Imagine, a rapist, rape someone's daughter and then her parents go to work and pay taxes so the rapists and pedophiles can be fed and clothed. What kind of justice is this? Shari'ah is only barbaric to rapists, robbers, murderers etc... if you're not one of them, then why be scared?
  3. http://anonhq.com/breaking-u-s-led-coalition-force-hits-civilian-shelter-in-mosul-over-130-feared-dead-video/
  4. @Hamzah J. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) is the last of the Prophets, there's no Prophet and Messenger after him.This is attested by the Qur'aan, Shi'ah sources and Sunni sources, thus we have a unity with regards to this... Then the cults like baha'iyyah and Ahamdiyyah comes along and try to change the interpretation (and reject the sahih ahaadith) because it's a stumbling block for their evil propaganda. مَن كنتُ مَولاهُ فعليٌّ مَولاهُ وسَمِعتُهُ يقولُ أنتَ منِّي بمنزلةِ هارونَ مِن موسَى إلَّا أنَّهُ لا نبيَّ بعدي وسَمِعتُهُ يقولُ لأُعطيَنَّ الرَّايةَ اليومَ رجلًا يحبُّ اللَّهَ ورسولَهُ الراوي:سعد بن أبي وقاص المحدث:الألباني المصدر:صحيح ابن ماجه الجزء أو الصفحة:98 حكم المحدث:صحيح نت مني بمنزلةِ هارونَ من موسى . إلا أنه لا نبيَّ بعدي الراوي:سعد بن أبي وقاص المحدث:مسلم المصدر:صحيح مسلم الجزء أو الصفحة:2404 حكم المحدث:صحيح (Tafsir al-Baghaawi - 33:40, Tafsir Ibn al-Jawziy - 33:40) يريد لو لم أختم به النبيين لجعلت له ابناً يكون بعده نبياً (Tafsir al-Baghaawi - 33:40) وروي عن عطاء عن ابن عباس: أن الله تعالى لما حكم أن لا نبي بعده لم يعطه ولداً ذكراً يصير رجْلاً Hassan al-Basri, who was a man amongst the salaf, said: "وخاتم النبيين قال: ختم الله النبيين بمحمد صلى الله عليه وسلم، وكان آخر من بعث" - Ad-Durr al-Manthuur - 33:40
  5. All praise belongs to Allah, he has no rival, no partner and Muhammad is his Servant and his Messenger that was sent with guidance and the religion of truth that it will overcome / prevail over all other religions and systems. May peace be upon his ahl al-bayt, his companions and the believers collectively. The disbelievers who assert that it’s impossible to establish the sharee’ah in our countries are liars. It’s possible if our rulers were not sellouts, especially lapdogs of the west. The reason for it being impossible today is because the Muslims don’t care about their religion anymore and accumulate wealth as if that wealth will go with them in their graves when they die (E.g. The PM of Pakistan – Nawaz Sharif). We imitate the disbelievers and celebrate their festivals (Christmas, Easter and so forth). The disbelievers want us to think that Sharee’ah can’t be established, that it’s impossible, people like Andres. But, these disbelievers don’t even know one percent about the religion. How the rulings are derived and from what sources. They just know how to talk big, speaking on behalf of Muslims. Don’t let them fool you. If they are peaceful people, then stop invading our countries and poking your noses in our businesses. Leave us alone. We didn’t start this war, you came into our countries and started to bomb us. Sent drone strikes to Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. And do you think that we can easily forget this, even if you say sorry? How many innocent Muslims do you’ve in your guantanamo bay? Innocent people that were tortured? This is their lovely democracy! War in Islam should not be waged for the sole purpose of shedding blood or seeking vengeance. If the Muslims capture them and take them to a place that has been prepared for them, they should not harm them or torture them with beatings, depriving them of food and water, leaving them out in the sun or the cold, burning them with fire, or putting covers over their mouths, ears and eyes and putting them in cages like animals. Rather they should treat them with kindness and mercy, feed them well and encourage them to enter Islam. In the Qur’aan, Allaah says of the righteous (interpretation of the meaning): “And they give food, in spite of their love for it (or for the love of Him), to the Miskeen (the poor), the orphan, and the captive, (Saying): ‘We feed you seeking Allaah’s Countenance only. We wish for no reward, nor thanks from you’” [al-Insaan 76:8-9] Ibn Katheer (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “Ibn ‘Abbaas said: in those days their prisoners were mushrikeen; on the day of Badr the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) commanded them to be kind to their prisoners, so they used to put them before themselves when it came to food… Mujaahid said, this refers to the one who is detained, i.e., they would give food to these prisoners even though they themselves desired it and loved it.” They don’t have set of laws that they follow strictly, they can null and void their own laws when they see it fit to do that, but as Muslims following the Sharee’ah we can’t remove or null anything since it’s divinely revealed. We can’t disobey God and his Messenger. The democratic countries (i.e., Christian nations) "give full freedom", you can do anything that doesn't harm anyone, music is permissible, zina is permissible as long as the both parties consent, riba' is permissible, homosexuality & same-sex marriage is permissible, alcohol is permissible, rapists are thrown in prisons, whilst in Sharee'ah the punishment is death for the rapist, women are half naked and used in entertainment. This is democracy, this is freedom according to them. And they want this for the Muslims, we leave the Sharee'ah aside and establish their kuffar laws - This is what they want. They also use liberal Muslims for their advantage. Today we have Muslims who support LGBT (Astaghfirullah!). The Prophet (S.A.W) said: "You will imitate the nations before you very closely to the extent that if they went into a lizard's hole, you would enter it as well” his companions, may Allaah be pleased with them, inquired: “(Do you mean) the Jews and Christians, O Messenger of Allaah?” He sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam replied: "Who else?” (Bukhaari & Muslim). May Allah azza wa jall guide us, protect us from the kuffar, Ameen!
  6. Jizyah is what is taken from the People of the Book – and from the mushrikeen, according to some scholars – every year, in return for their being allowed to settle in Muslim lands, and in return for protecting them against those who would commit aggression against them. The word jizyah comes from the word jazaa’ (recompense). It is as if it is a recompense for us allowing them to live in our land and for us protecting their lives, property and dependents. See: Tawdeeh al-Ahkaam min Buloogh al-Maraam by al-‘Allaamah ‘Abdullah al-Bassaam (3/437); Lisaan al-‘Arab (14/146); Tahdheeb al-Asma’ wa’l-Lughaat by an-Nawawi (3/51); al-Mawsoo‘ah al-Kuwaitiyyah(15/149). The fuqaha’ are unanimously agreed that jizyah may be accepted from the People of the Book, and from the Magians (Zoroastrians). However, they differed concerning mushrikeen (polytheists) and idol worshippers, and also differed concerning the categories of People of the Book and Zoroastrians from whom jizyah may be accepted. The majority of Shaafa‘i and Hanbali fuqaha’ are of the view that it cannot be accepted from mushrikeen at all; nothing can be accepted from them except their becoming Muslim or being fought. The Hanafis and some of the Maalikis said: Jizyah may be accepted from the mushrikeen, except the mushrikeen among the Arabs. Al-Awzaa‘i – whose view is more likely to be correct according to the Maaliki scholars – said: It may be accepted from all the disbelievers, including the mushrikeen and idol worshippers, whether they are Arabs or non-Arabs, and whether they are Qurashis or non-Qurashis. This view is more likely to be correct. The evidence for that is the hadith of Buraydah that was narrated by Muslim in his Saheeh (1731): When the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) appointed commanders for an army or expedition, he would advise them personally to fear Allah, may He be exalted, and to be good to those of the Muslims who were under their command. Then he said: “Fight in the name of Allah… When you meet your enemy among the polytheists, offer them three options, and whichever one they choose, accept it from them and refrain from (fighting) them. Invite them to Islam and if they respond, then accept it from them and refrain from (fighting) them. Then invite them to migrate from their land to the land of the Muhaajireen (Madinah), and tell them that if they do that, they will have the same rights and duties as the muhaajiroon have. If they refuse to leave, then tell them that they are like the Muslim Bedouin and subject to the same rulings as the believers, but they will have no share of the booty and spoils, unless they strive in jihad alongside the Muslims. If they refuse, then ask them to pay jizyah. If they respond, then accept it from them and refrain from (fighting) them….” The evidence here is that he said “your enemy among the polytheists” and this is in general terms. That is also indicated by the fact that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) accepted jizyah from the Magians (Zoroastrians) of Hajar, as it says in Saheeh al-Bukhaari (3157), even though they were not People of the Book. This indicates that it may be taken from any disbeliever, and the meaning indicates that, because if it is permissible to take it from People of the Book and from the Zoroastrians, then others are like them, because the purpose is to allow the disbeliever to continue following his religion within a particular framework, and that is applicable to all disbelievers. Based on that, if one of the polytheists asks us to accept the jizyah from him and allow him to continue to follow his religion, and we see that there is a purpose to be served by that, then we may do that. This is the view favoured by Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him). Ash-Sharh al-Mumti‘ (8/58) For more information, please see: al-Mawsoo‘ah al-Kuwaitiyyah (15/166) With regard to the rate of jizyah, the fuqaha’ differed concerning the exact rate, and there are several views. The first view: is that the wealthy man should pay forty-eight dirhams per year, the man of moderate means should pay twenty-four dirhams, and the poor man who is able to work should pay twelve dirhams. This is the view of Abu Haneefah, and of Ahmad according to one report. The second view: Maalik said that people who use gold as currency should pay four dinars and people who use silver as currency should pay forty dirhams, and there is no differentiation in that regard between rich and poor. The third view: ash-Shaafa‘i said: The minimum rate of jizyah is one pure gold dinar, and there is no maximum limit. There is no differentiation between rich and poor. Perhaps the most likely to be correct is the view that concerning the jizyah, it should be decided by the ruler, who may increase it or decrease it according to the ability of ahl adh-dhimmah to pay it, and according to what he sees fit. This was narrated from Imam Ahmad. Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Imam Ahmad did not give a set amount for the jizyah, according to the more sound of the two reports narrated from him. End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (35/350) See also: Ahkaam Ahl adh-Dhimmah by Ibn al-Qayyim (1/123-128) Jizyah is only to be accepted from adult men who are able to work. Jizyah is not taken from boys who have not yet reached the age of puberty, or women, or from the insane. There is no difference of scholarly opinion on this point. It is also not taken from very old men, the blind or the chronically sick. And it is not taken from the poor who are unable to pay it. For more information, please see: al-Mughni (13/216-221) and al-Mawsoo‘ah al-Kuwaitiyyah (15/149 ff)
  7. Allah forbids His believing servants from having Jews and Christians as friends, because they are the enemies of Islam and its people, may Allah curse them. Allah then states that they are friends of each other and He gives a warning threat to those who do this, ﴿وَمَن يَتَوَلَّهُمْ مِّنكُمْ فَإِنَّهُ مِنْهُمْ﴾ (And if any among you befriends them, then surely he is one of them.) Ibn Abi Hatim recorded that `Umar ordered Abu Musa Al-Ash`ari to send him on one sheet of balance the count of what he took in and what he spent. Abu Musa then had a Christian scribe, and he was able to comply with `Umar's demand. `Umar liked what he saw and exclaimed, "This scribe is proficient. Would you read in the Masjid a letter that came to us from Ash-Sham'' Abu Musa said, `He cannot.'' `Umar said, "Is he not pure'' Abu Musa said, "No, but he is Christian.'' Abu Musa said, "So `Umar admonished me and poked my thigh (with his finger), saying, `Drive him out (from Al-Madinah).' He then recited, ﴿يَـأَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ لاَ تَتَّخِذُواْ الْيَهُودَ وَالنَّصَـرَى أَوْلِيَآءَ﴾ (O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as friends...)'' Then he reported that `Abdullah bin `Utbah said, "Let one of you beware that he might be a Jew or a Christian, while unaware.'' The narrator of this statement said, "We thought that he was referring to the Ayah, ﴿يَـأَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ لاَ تَتَّخِذُواْ الْيَهُودَ وَالنَّصَـرَى أَوْلِيَآءَ﴾ (O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as friends, )'' Allah said, ﴿فَتَرَى الَّذِينَ فِى قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ﴾ (And you see those in whose hearts there is a disease...) A disease of doubt, hesitation and hypocrisy. ﴿يُسَـرِعُونَ فِيهِمْ﴾ (they hurry to their friendship,) meaning, they rush to offer them their friendship and allegiances in secret and in public, ﴿يَقُولُونَ نَخْشَى أَن تُصِيبَنَا دَآئِرَةٌ﴾ (saying: "We fear lest some misfortune of a disaster may befall us.") They thus offer this excuse for their friendship and allegiances to the disbelievers, saying that they fear that the disbelievers might defeat the Muslims, so they want to be in favor with the Jews and Christians, to use this favor for their benefit in that eventuality! Allah replied, ﴿فَعَسَى اللَّهُ أَن يَأْتِىَ بِالْفَتْحِ﴾ (Perhaps Allah may bring a victory...) referring to the conquering of Makkah, according to As-Suddi. ﴿أَوْ أَمْرٍ مِّنْ عِندِهِ﴾ (or a decision according to His will) requiring the Jews and Christians to pay the Jizyah, as As-Suddi stated, ﴿فَيُصْبِحُواْ﴾ (Then they will become) meaning, the hypocrites who gave their friendship to the Jews and Christians, will become, ﴿عَلَى مَآ أَسَرُّواْ فِى أَنفُسِهِمْ﴾ (for what they have been keeping as a secret in themselves) of allegiances, ﴿نَـدِمِينَ﴾ (regretful,) for their friendship with the Jews and Christians which did not benefit them or protect them from any harm. Rather, it was nothing but harm, as Allah exposed their true reality to His faithful servants in this life, although they tried to conceal it. When the signs that exposed their hypocrisy were compiled against them, their matter became clear to Allah's faithful servants. So the believers were amazed at these hypocrites who pretended to be believers, swearing to their faithfulness, yet their claims were all lies and deceit. This is why Allah said, ﴿وَيَقُولُ الَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ أَهُـؤُلاءِ الَّذِينَ أَقْسَمُواْ بِاللَّهِ جَهْدَ أَيْمَـنِهِمْ إِنَّهُمْ لَمَعَكُمْ حَبِطَتْ أَعْمَـلُهُمْ فَأَصْبَحُواْ خَـسِرِينَ ﴾ (And those who believe will say, "Are these the men who swore their strongest oaths by Allah that they were with you'' All that they did has been in vain, and they have become the losers.) Shaykh al-Shanqeeti (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: In this verse Allaah tells us that whoever takes the Jews and Christians as friends is one of them because of his taking them as friends. Elsewhere Allaah states that taking them as friends incurs the wrath of Allaah and His eternal punishment, and that if the one who takes them as friends was a true believer he would not have taken them as friends. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “You see many of them taking the disbelievers as their Awliyaa’ (protectors and helpers). Evil indeed is that which their ownselves have sent forward before them; for that (reason) Allaah’s Wrath fell upon them, and in torment they will abide. 81. And had they believed in Allaah, and in the Prophet (Muhammad) and in what has been revealed to him, never would they have taken them (the disbelievers) as Awliyaa’ (protectors and helpers); but many of them are the Faasiqoon (rebellious, disobedient to Allaah)” [al-Maa’idah 5:80-81]
  8. Um, the persons of the trinity coexist, while the different forms of water can't, Can water be ice, liquid and steam at the same time? Furthermore, you've proved yourself a heretic, I hope that you do study the trinity meticulously before saying anything that might prove that you're not that well informed about the trinity. It might be between two phases i.e., when ice melt and become water, but this can't be coexistence, but somewhat a transformation. Do the persons in the trinity transform?
×
×
  • Create New...