Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Allah Seeker

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Allah Seeker last won the day on June 5

Allah Seeker had the most liked content!

About Allah Seeker

  • Rank
    Level 6 Member

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

4,548 profile views
  1. Get back in here brother, your valuable insights are missed

  2. Well the elite satanics use this knowledge and wisdom to band together for extra strength, while making sure all the other people are socially distanced and not close to their families, and living in dystopian division. Allah orders Muslims to stop fighting so that we don't get weakend, but what do we do? Disobey as usual and then people wonder why the satanics are so successful. Nothing is unfair and they deserve it.
  3. And the list is growing with the grace of God
  4. Marjas can be wrong, and when they are, they should also be corrected.
  5. And you are not qualified to judge whether I'm qualified. Who do you think you are!!!! Real arrogant thing to say
  6. You're the one spreading misguidance, and have no basis for your claim. Just like the verse you mention, does it even talk about allowing this innovation? What does "seeking a means" (ibtegh wasila) have to do with making dua to others than Allah? Anybody with minimal intelligence can see that this verse doesn't even talk about the subject of Dua, but that you simple try to allegorically relate to it indirectly. (See verse 3:7 to see what you are doing) You claim that it was accepted by all sects. How about the sect of the Shia of Ali. So you have a single instance where imam Ali advocated such practice? People like you should be called out at every corner and at every turn! The world must see that Shia Islam does not have this innovation as one of its tenants! This innovation is not part of our shia books or heritage. It's pure innovation and an embarrassing thing that blocks the road to ahlulbayt for most Sunis. And rightfully so! Better to think Omar was good rather than praying to others than Allah!
  7. what about these ones? LINK: Hezbollah retaliates against Israel with a missile; Israel fires back at Lebanon LINK: Hezbollah fires rockets into Israel from Lebanon
  8. I think this guy summarized it well. The former French Foreign minister with lots of courage to come out and say this .. masha Allah (Planned by Israel and Britain)
  9. well, when applied to humans it inevitably becomes racist, because according to this theory there must be some humans who are less evolved from animals than others. Only the Adam and Eve story give us all one ancestor who was fully human, and not some shades of evolution and survival of the fittest story.
  10. Ok thanks for your explanation. May your allergy go away
  11. OK, so you would not mind to have some government or private company alter your DNA artificially. That is interesting 1. If you doubt the legitimacy of my source, then you can check for yourself, or? How do you get your beliefs if you don't check sources for yourself? Here are some more sources for the patent: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606 https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/067396975/publication/WO2020060606A1?called_by=epo.org&q=WO2020060606 and I don't see why the one I posted earlier isn't reliable. What would it take for you to believe this patent? https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2020060606A1/en Or you reject anything and wont even consider any source of anything if it contradicts what you want to believe? Did I post a YouTube? Isn't that weird thing to say? How about sources for the vaccine companies not being liable? Don't you care about getting to the truth? Or you just reject and keep to your beliefs without any base? Tell me if these sources are good enough? I think with you I am truly wasting my time, because you don't seem to care about finding the truth. You just reject whatever you don't agree with emotionally, and don't try to debunk or disprove others. The vaccine courts and lack of liability is all over the internet. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216813/ ncbi isn't good enough for you? Maybe the supreme court website isn't good enough either? Not a credible source? Please tell me what you think? https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf Can you tell me what is wrong with my sources, or are you going to continue your biased approach against me without even bothering to make any kind of respectful effort to care about getting to the truth of this?
  12. do you mind explaining why it is ok for you that vaccine companies are the only business on earth that can't be held liable in a normal court? Sorry if my questions are bothering you
  13. do you understand that the RNA / DNA altering technology actually permanently alters your DNA and makes you basically produce new things, or stop producing things you were born to produce? There is even talk about adding a new Chromosome altogether. You think that's OK? You wouldn't mind having that done to you? It won't be a simple injection, but quite a strange operation.
  14. this is VERY important! maybe we should just shave some off from the edge and keep them in a separate collage or something. I can't just throw them away!
  • Create New...