haidermpr

Their meat are halal & are something between red & white meat & are delicious  I don't try ostriche egg because it's very big & it's doesn't sell in stores but it's meat available in Iranian store 
Hen described by Imam Ali (عليه السلام) as pig of birds although it's meat is halal but it eat everything on ground & its body stores all ample drugs in its meat but meat of duck recommended as medicine the best halal meat is for birds that can fly or have ability of semi flight light duck also it narrated that daughter of Imam Ali (عليه السلام) was keeping ducks in her house that Imam Ali (عليه السلام) advised her before his last going to mosque before his martyrdom that she takes care of ducks well or releases them that eat from natural wild sources .

it not true many people around Imam Hasan were from Khawarij that they were Quranists & didn't believe to Imamate that when Imam Hasan moved to fight with Muawiah (la) they betrayed him & injured him seriously before start of battle also in addition to Khawarij there were some people with him because they were just against Muawiah (la) that this group fooled with bribing of Muawiah & betrayed to Imam Hasan that some of them joined to Muawiah or left army of Imam Hasan (عليه السلام) right before start of battle also in Karbala people like as Zuhair ibn Qain (رضي الله عنه) were from Uthmanists (Shias of Uthman ) that was blaming all Imams for death of Uthman but about one day before Ashura his mindset after speaking with Imam Hussain (عليه السلام) changed & people like Hurr (رضي الله عنه) were neutral to both sides until last minute also last two martyres of Karbal were from Khawarij that joined to Imam Hussain (عليه السلام) but were repeating Khawarij slogan until their martyrdom. 

Thanks for info.. though they don't have enough information I am looking for!!!!
Thanks once again

There is nothing like Unity of Allah in Islamic teachings like Christianity and other polytheistic religions of world. 
Islam calls for Tawhid that is Oneness of Allah and not Unity of different things. If we believe that He is someone who came into existence or will come in future as unity of this or that, then we are on wrong path.. 
Oneness of Allah I.e. Tawheed is completely different from Unity as explained by Maula Ali (عليه السلام) himself in different sermons-
"He who assigns to Him (different) conditions does not believe in His Oneness, nor does he who likens Him grasp His reality. He who illustrates Him does not signify Him. He who points at Him and imagines Him does not mean Him. Everything that is known through itself has been created, and everything that exists by virtue of other things is the effect (of a cause). He works but not with the help of instruments. He fixes measures but not with the activity of thinking. He is rich but not by acquisition." Najhjul Balagha sermon No 186
https://www.al-Islam.org/nahjul-balagha-part-1-sermons/sermon-186-he-who-assigns-him-different-conditions-does-not-believe
"The foremost in religion is the acknowledgement of Him, the perfection of acknowledging Him is to testify Him, the perfection of testifying Him is to believe in His Oneness, the perfection of believing in His Oneness is to regard Him Pure, and the perfection of His purity is to deny Him attributes, because every attribute is a proof that it is different from that to which it is attributed and everything to which something is attributed is different from the attribute.
Thus whoever attaches attributes to Allah recognises His like, and whoever recognises His like regards Him two; and whoever regards Him as two recognises parts for Him; and whoever recognises parts for Him mistook Him; and whoever mistook Him pointed at Him; and whoever pointed at Him admitted limitations for Him; and whoever admitted limitations for Him numbered Him. Whoever said: ‘In what is He?’, held that He is contained; and whoever said: ‘On what is He?’, held He is not on something else." Nahjul balagha sermon No 1
https://www.al-Islam.org/nahjul-balagha-part-1-sermons/sermon-1-praise-due-Allah-whose-worth-cannot-be-descrive
NOTE: Kindly go through above links and try to comprehend things written in those sermons of Maula Ali (عليه السلام).

Salam you & every Sunni person can pray in the way that get used to it in congregation prayer with Shias ,we also listen to qunoot of Imam but we don't say Ameen in any part of prayer also you can pray with folded hands & without turban  like as usual while you are praying in Shia congregation prayer & your prayer is valid as we even can pray behind of a Sunni Imam that prays in Sunni style but with Shia rulling for ourselves .

If Imam Mahdi (aj) has any child so his enemies can trace him from his children because like other real fathers he doesn't leave them alone also his children from birth must raise in pious environment & know their importance & duty from begining not as fake person claim that he came suddenly to them & bring them out of ignorance nauzubillah he doesn't break any religious rulling so his children must be special from childhood but Al-Hasan the fake Yamani has normal life with all sons that other people & suddenly claimed himself his son without any real proof & always relied on confirmation other ignorant people ,also idea of cleaning up my from all sins in one night just comes from Sunni belief that says Imam Mahdi (aj) is a normal person that in one night will repents & becomes a pious person A,that fake Yani uses this idea to call himelf his son that has no place in Shia belief.

Again & again you stick everything to Al-Hasan (the fake Yamani ) while he doesn't has any relationship to Ahlulnayt except that childish tree drawing & a fake will ,all of these hadiths just refers to attributes of persons not any specific person with certain name 

Please check the following links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qasem_Soleimani
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Qasem_Soleimani
Regards

The person who comes before Imam al Mahdi (عليه السلام)

I think we have discussed enough on this subject of Yamani and Ahmed al Hasan not only on this portal but on several places. 
There is no doubt that this man is nothing more than Imposter. There are also information in several hadiths that false Mehdi will come before the True one. 
Yamani will rise along with Khorasani and Sufyani like beads of rosary in Rajab according to narrations on this subject so where are other two namely Khorasani and Sufyani?
Their rising time is Rajab according to narrations in majority of hadith books, kindly enlighten us when this man stood up? 
Yamani will rise against oppression and will call towards guidance, he will fight against oppressive regime/s, how many wars had been fought by this man and his follower?
After the rise of Yamani, Khorasani and Sufyani in the month of Rajab, Imam Mehdi (عجّل الله تعالى فرجه الشريف) will rise in month of Moharram. 
This man is liar and imposter and I don't believe in this man. There is no logic in accepting him as Yamani. 

Here are rulings of praying behind a Sunni Imam according to Ayatullah Sistani-Kindly go through the link
https://www.Sistani.org/english/qa/search/2856/

I know that...I am not saying that he was 100% pro Iranian but he wanted good relation with Iranian regime. His stance irked his team mates in Ikhwan and government in big way. Many of them resigned simply because of this reason..

Morsi was having both sides of spectrum like all of us. he did some good and some bad during his little tenure of approximately one year in power of Presidentship.
He was part of Ikhwan movement and hence you can’t take him as pro Shia. Though he wanted to have good relation with anti Zionist lobby including Iran and Hamas. Hamas itself part of Ikhwan but Iran is supporting that faction of Ikhwan. he tried to have good relations with Iranian nation and because of that wahabist started opposing him tooth and nail. Kindly read the link..
https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-Africa/2013/05/04/pious-politics
He also openly supported Hamas contradicting the previous position of Egyptian regime. 
He was completely against Syrian regime of Assad and wanted to throw him out and just because of that he attended rallies where call for Jihad were made against Syrian President.
We all know that none of the nations in today's world are 100% Islamic. All of them are Muslim nations among them some are trying to follow Islam upto 80-90% whereas there are other that are trampling all Islamic teachings. So looking every thing in today's world with binary is not good.
 

He's not, I can tell. Salafis wouldn't take the time to speak to a Shia, they would just scream "kafir" over and over again like a deranged parrot.
 
You should treat people here with respect, especially since we helped with your questions. This really disappoints me.

I don’t mind any sect
if somebody is siding with the enemies of the Ahlul Bayt (عليه السلام) then to me they are useless regardless of what sect they follow!
so all chill here ! 

I know that...I am not saying that he was 100% pro Iranian but he wanted good relation with Iranian regime. His stance irked his team mates in Ikhwan and government in big way. Many of them resigned simply because of this reason..

I disagree wit this part when he invited to Iran by Ahmadinejad in Iran he spoke against Iran & Iranians in live broadcast that broadcasts from IRIB & repeated mix of anti Shia idea of Ikhwanis & wahabists inside Iran. 

Morsi was having both sides of spectrum like all of us. he did some good and some bad during his little tenure of approximately one year in power of Presidentship.
He was part of Ikhwan movement and hence you can’t take him as pro Shia. Though he wanted to have good relation with anti Zionist lobby including Iran and Hamas. Hamas itself part of Ikhwan but Iran is supporting that faction of Ikhwan. he tried to have good relations with Iranian nation and because of that wahabist started opposing him tooth and nail. Kindly read the link..
https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-Africa/2013/05/04/pious-politics
He also openly supported Hamas contradicting the previous position of Egyptian regime. 
He was completely against Syrian regime of Assad and wanted to throw him out and just because of that he attended rallies where call for Jihad were made against Syrian President.
We all know that none of the nations in today's world are 100% Islamic. All of them are Muslim nations among them some are trying to follow Islam upto 80-90% whereas there are other that are trampling all Islamic teachings. So looking every thing in today's world with binary is not good.
 

brother @Ashvazdanghe you are 100% right...
I do support your view on this.. They are Zionist slaves and agents who are attacking Islam on the name of Islam. they are no more different that Baghdadi and Osama. Shame on these imposters. 

you are mixing & mistaking people that were enemies of Ahlul Bayt (عليه السلام) wit people that are safeguarding the right of Ahlul Bayt the main goal of fake Yamani the al-Hasan guy from opposing Marjas & scholars was to let ISIS/Daesh attack & take all of Iraq while people were in internal war between themselves to follow a marja or Not so it's obvious that al-Hasan was agaent of Zionism & Sufyani (la) 
it's their false assumption to stand against any Imam even they deny returning of Imam Hussain (عليه السلام) after reappearance of Imam Mahdi (aj) because they say every Imam must return after 12 sons of Imam Mahdi (aj) that they call their leader as one of them , all of their refernces to such hadiths based on editing & forging Hadiths in their favor the mentioning to sons of Imam Mahdi (aj) comes from weak hadiths like as Hadith of will of Prophet Muhammad (pbu) that comes from from very weak Hadiths 
 
 Hujjah of Allah  (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) clearly described in Shia Hadiths & he doesn't have at least one of these attributes , your problem is that you don't know or read the history even during time of Imam Sadiq (عليه السلام) many people around him calimed same things like al-Hasan but at the end all of them exposed as frauds even know in Iran & Pakistan even in Yemen between Houthis we have same frauds that are claiming that they are Yamani or Mahdi why you don't follow them !?

I think we have discussed enough on this subject of Yamani and Ahmed al Hasan not only on this portal but on several places. 
There is no doubt that this man is nothing more than Imposter. There are also information in several hadiths that false Mehdi will come before the True one. 
Yamani will rise along with Khorasani and Sufyani like beads of rosary in Rajab according to narrations on this subject so where are other two namely Khorasani and Sufyani?
Their rising time is Rajab according to narrations in majority of hadith books, kindly enlighten us when this man stood up? 
Yamani will rise against oppression and will call towards guidance, he will fight against oppressive regime/s, how many wars had been fought by this man and his follower?
After the rise of Yamani, Khorasani and Sufyani in the month of Rajab, Imam Mehdi (عجّل الله تعالى فرجه الشريف) will rise in month of Moharram. 
This man is liar and imposter and I don't believe in this man. There is no logic in accepting him as Yamani. 

فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ
“And we did not send any Apostle before you (O’ Muhammad) except that they too were but (mortal) men to whom We granted inspiration: if you realize this not ask of those who possess the Message. (We sent them) with Clear Signs and Books of prophecies; and We have sent down unto you (also) the Message; that you may explain clearly to men what is sent for them so that maybe they make ponder upon this.”
 
“It is not right that the true believers in Islam all go forth (to the battle field to fight a defensive battle) – rather, why does not a group from amongst them go forth to become specialists in religious learning (develop Tafaqquh in the Din) and after completing their studies, return back to their own community and warn them (so that they will have fear of Allah)?”
Imam Al-Hujjah Al-Qa`im (may Allah hasten his return) has said: “As for those events that will occur in the future, (for the answer on how to deal with them), refer to those people who narrate our sayings (Ahadith) since surely they (the ‘Ulama) are my proof over you and I am the proof of Allah
This is proof from the holy Qur'an and also ahadiths that explain about Taqleed and following marja3. This is also in reply to your other thread but now I am on this thread and I’m not bothered to go back to the other one bc it’s too long
Anyway, I’m assuming you have another interpretation for these quranic verses and ahadith.
Is it now also forbidden to listen to maraji3 lectures? Because Ahmad al Hassan said it is shirk to blindly follow a scholar, and since shirk is a big sin I’d assume that even listening to one could be haram according to his assumptions. 
That’s like saying it was wrong for ayatollah Sistani, May Allah prolong his life, to make a fatwa stating that it is permissible to fight against dae3sh for the sake of Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى). If it weren’t for that fatwa he made then Iraq would have almost been completely destroyed. When he issued that fatwa, they began fighting and now they only remain around the borders. Are you going to say that it was now wrong that he made a fatwa that saved Iraq? 
also please explain the fact that the yamani is apparently out now, what about the khorasani and the sufyani? Where are they now? Bc there’s a narration which says that they’ll come in the same year, same month, same day. But according to his followers, he only announced him being here but hasn’t actually appeared. Technically if he states that he is out there telling people that he’s the yamani, that basically means he has already appeared, but is obviously hiding. Heck there’s even rumours he’s in Australia like ..?
 

The Ismaili have tried this. But their present Imam, their 49th, has no progeny despite many efforts and all and therefore the Ismaili customized system of imamate is about to collapse for them.
In the Qur'an, the word "Imam" is mentioned exactly 12 times.

Salam from Prophet Muhammad (pbu) to last Imam (عليه السلام) all are Mahdis when it talks about offspring of Mahdi , talks from first Mahdi that is Prophet Muhmmad (pbu) & Imam hussain (عليه السلام) is son of Prophet Muhammad (pbu) based on narrations that both Sunni & Shia agreed on it.
there is no objection that he will have a son that can be leader of people but they will have lesser position than all Imams that back to life in Raj'a & his sons will be their viziers as Imams like as position of Imam Khomeini (رضي الله عنه) or Imam Khamanei  that can be leader of nations under command of infallible Imams that will be among people 
this completely wrong hadith 7 has no value specially that comes from Abu Huraira that narrated based on Israelites 
 
 
really you take a hdith from Abu Huraira as hujjah 
this is also wrong because Imam Mahdi (aj) is from sons Imam Husaain (عليه السلام) anyway from mother side the wife of Imam sajjad (عليه السلام) was from daughters of Imam Hasan (عليه السلام)
Fātimah bint al-Hasan ibn ‘Alī (Arabic: فاطمة بنت الـحسن بن علي‎) was a daughter of Hasan ibn ‘Alī and Umm Ishaq bint Talha.[1] She was married to ‘Alī ibn Husayn (fourth Twelver Imām), and became the mother of Muhammad al-Bāqir (fifth TwelverImām). Her kunya was Umm ‘Abd Allāh[2] and she was referred to as, "as-Siddīqa" ("the very truthful one") by ‘Alī ibn Husayn.[3] It has also been reported that her features were such, that no one in the family of Hasan ibn ‘Alī looked like her.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatimah_bint_Hasan
'Umar: The mother of Zayd and 'Umar was a maid
http://en.wikishia.net/view/Zayd_b._al-Imam_al-Sajjad_(a)
Lineage
Zayd is the son of 'Ali b. al-Husayn (a), the fourth Imam of Shi'a Muslims. His mother's name was stated differently: Jayda, Jayd, Haydan, and Hawra' are the most famous ones. She was a concubine, who was bought by al-Mukhtar al-Thaqafi; she was respected highly by al-Mukhtar that he gave her as a gift to Imam al-Sajjad (a). Imam al-Sajjad (a) had other children except Zayd; 'Ali, 'Umar, and Khadija, from her.[3]
http://en.wikishia.net/view/Zayd_b._al-Imam_al-Sajjad_(a)
 
 

Salam the bold part changed by al-Hasan but it's mentioned in original one that title of is flag is Albei'ah lel'Allah البيعه لله but al-Hasan changed it to his name  after everyone knows his flag is false flag but Ahmed never mentioned  in any hadith so he & his fans can use this name to fool people 
 
you misunderstand it Mansoor Al-Yamani will come after defeat of Turks and Romans  not with them ,Mansoor means that he won't defeat in any bottle that he & Khorasani from Iran will join to each other in Iraq to defeat Sufyani after that Sufyani conquers Iraq after defeating of Turks & Romans.
it's another false editing of Al-Hasan in Shia hadiths in his favor name of Ahmed or Ahmad never mentioned in any original  hadith about Imam Mahdi (aj) also all Imams were Mahdi's but the tweleve Imam is Qaim & after that the all Imams will return as Mahdi not his son that first of them is Imam Hussain (عليه السلام) also some hadiths mentioned that Prophet Muhammd (pbu) will back again to  be last Mahdi (title of all Ahlul Bayt (as))  and after his death judgment day will start this is the source of fabrication of Al-Hasan the fake Yamani for refering to name of Ahmed (Ahmad)