haidermpr

Salam ,I don't think all of them are bad people ,but always a group of far rights of them are acting very harshly against Islam , they are very active at social media which affected other Hindus of overseas even I saw in a Bollywood movie that they portraited  Nader Shah & his army as representative of Iranian muslims as  enemies of Sikhs , I know Indians don't have a good memory from him but it was a bad incident  , but the moderate majority side is silent & neutral  although we have respect toward all Indians ,also persons from ancestors of Imam Khomeini (ra) were preaching Shia Islam at Kashmir that nowadays Anti Iranian regime & Anti shia channels are accusing him that he was an Indian & emblem of Iran flag inspired from Sikhs flag.
Sikhs in Iran
https://qz.com/573080/irans-sikhs-get-a-better-deal-than-many-other-minorities/      (it's a little biased text but good to raed)
https://www.quora.com/What-is-it-like-to-live-in-Iran-as-a-Sikh
 

 
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-emblem-of-Iran-resemble-the-Sikh-Khanda-symbol-so-much
http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Guru_Nanak_in_Iran
 
 

@Ashvazdanghe you can't decide everything based on social media and in media narratives.. you need to experience ground realities. 
Just recently They tried to break the harmony in Aligarh Muslim University-AMU,majority of people and universities extended full support to AMU. that is the beauty of India..
 

It is well known fact that whole Kashmir is disputed one and none can deny that fact..even in UN it was accepted by India what else you want me to say...
till the time plebiscite is not happening the Kashmir which signed the instrument of accession will remain part of India...
and for plebiscite to be happened Pakistan must leave the land of Kashmir and hand over it to international bodies...

Ahh not again brother.
 
Seriously non of them were able to answer your whataboutery ?? Or is it that you kept on blaming Pakistan for everything & evaded a simple question which I will be repeating again. Is India ready to acknowledge that kashmir is a dispute ? 
 
 
1) Pakistan should indeed vacate the land it is illegally occupying, which is why I consider it to be Pakistan occupied kashmir instead of azad Kashmir but both the countries have to first acknowledge that it's a dispute & Kashmiris have to be given the right to self determination.  Is India ready to do so ? 
 
2) kashmiri separatist have always been suppressed by India establishment, even those who seek independence from both occupying nations. International community has been condemning grave human rights violations by Indian forces in kashmir & have always called for the dispute to be settled. 
 
3) I am glad you brought Sheikh Abdullah in conversation, why was he jailed just 6 years after the accession. India even betrayed their own loyalists & you wonder why Kashmir don't support India. Yes there should be a plebiscite otherwise this dispute will never end. 
 
 
 
4) Indeed plebiscite was not a part of the instrument of accession.
 
5&6) The Kashmiri struggle to independence turned militant after decades of suppression by the Indian state from 1953 arrest of sheikh Abdullah to rigging 1987 elections in which Syed Sallhudin ( Mohammad yusuf shah) fought elections along with other separatist leaders such as Yasin Malik. 
It was never about religion. The largest group of armed men in 1989 was that of JKLF which has been demanding Independence from both countries from the very first day. 
 

Do you know anything about Kashmir issue or just came here to comment?
I had discussed with many people on this website and on several other open social media platforms regarding the Kashmir and none are able to answer the true issues...
Yes, certainly certain sections of forces with collusion of political parties are doing atrocities on people of Kashmir and I surely condemn and oppose all those...
There are certain other questions which need to be answered--
Why Pakistan had not vacated occupied land of Kashmir since its occupation?
Why Kashmiri people and muslim at large never condemned the illegal occupation of Kashmir by Pakistan?
India didn't occupy Kashmir by force instead it was annexed with approval of Shaikh Abdullah who was the main leader of muslim in Kashmir of that time and King of Kashmir so why India need to let it go without plebiscite?
Plebiscite was never part of declaration of annexation instead it was offered by Indian PM Nehru for your information..
Why militancy was started with color of religion against state/government and who were behind this militancy?
What is about religion in Kashmir independence movement?
why India as government should not expel all its muslim inhabitants on same religious line as people believe Kashmir as majority muslim state should get freedom from India?
 

I SWEAR the following is true:
When I was sunni in Saudi Arabia in Grade 9 I remember my hardcore salafi teacher telling us about Umar how some ppl used to do this and that during the time of Jahilliya, and he quoted that last hadith there (about worshipping a idol of dates and burying daughter) BUT HE ONLY TOLD US THE FIRST PART i.e the part about worshiping the date idol and NOT the 2nd part about burying his daughter alive. Now why would he just quote half a hadith there? Unless of course if in fact he is ashamed of that 2nd part.

He just try to cover truth by making false excuses & refuting true history that accepted by high ranking  sunni schoolars also he always changes his mind between Wahabism & Sunnism & not a reliable person.
He speaks in press tv as moderate sunni but other day in Arabic media prompts wahabism ideology.
He is for me like Ahmad deedat that one day was praising Iran revolution &the other day was attacking to shia islam & Imam Khomeini  (ra) 

863 حدثنا عَبْدَانُ بن أَحْمَدَ ثنا الْحُسَيْنُ بن مَهْدِيٍّ الأُبُلِّيُّ ثنا عبد الرَّزَّاقِ أنا إِسْرَائِيلُ ثنا سِمَاكُ بن حَرْبٍ قال سَمِعْتَ النُّعْمَانَ بن بَشِيرٍ يقول سمعت عُمَرَ بن الْخَطَّابِ يقول وَسُئِلَ عن قَوْلِهِ وإذا الموؤودة سئلت قال جاء قَيْسُ بن عَاصِمٍ إلي رسول اللَّهِ صلي اللَّهُ عليه وسلم قال إني وَأَدَتُ ثَمَانِيَ بناتٍ لي في الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ قال اعتق عن كل وَاحِدَةٍ منها رَقَبَةً قلت إني صَاحِبُ إِبِلٍ قال اهْدِ إن شِئْتَ عن كل وَاحِدَةٍ مِنْهُنَّ بَدَنَةً .
Naiman ibn Bashir says that I heard from Omar ibn Khattab about the interpretation of the verse, "and I have been praised," which said: Qays ibn 'Asim said to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), and said: "During my time of ignorance, I made my eight daughters alive to the grave, what can I do? The Imam said: release one slave for each of them.I (Omar) said: I was a shepherd camel, the Prophet said: if you want to donate a camel to each of them.
Al-Tabarani, Abu-Qasim Sulaiman bin Ahmad bin Ayoub (Death 360 AH), Al Mujam Al Kabir, v 18 p 337, investigation: Hamdi bin Abdulmajeed Salafi, publisher: Al-Zahra Library - Mosul, second edition, 1404 H-1983 .
الطبراني، ابوالقاسم سليمان بن أحمد بن أيوب (متوفاي360هـ)، المعجم الكبير، ج 18 ص 337، تحقيق: حمدي بن عبدالمجيد السلفي، ناشر: مكتبة الزهراء - الموصل، الطبعة: الثانية، 1404هـ - 1983م.
رواه البزار والطبراني ورجال البزار رجال الصحيح غير حسين بن مهدي الأيلي وهو ثقة .
 
راويان صحيح بخاري هستند؛ غير از حسين بن مهدي أيلي كه او نيز ثقه است.
الهيثمي، ابوالحسن نور الدين علي بن أبي بكر (متوفاي 807 هـ)، مجمع الزوائد ومنبع الفوائد، ج 7 ص 134 ، ناشر: دار الريان للتراث/ دار الكتاب العربي - القاهرة، بيروت - 1407هـ.
 
نووي شافعي در كتاب المجموع مي نويسد:
Nouvi Shafei in book of Al'Majmu
وَرُوِيَ عَنْ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ أَنَّهُ قَالَ : يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ، إِنِّي وَأَدْتُ فِي الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ
فَقَالَ : أَعْتِقْ عَنْ كُلِّ مَوْؤُودٍ رَقَبَةً .
والموؤودةُ البنتُ المقتولةِ عندما تَوَلَّدَ ، كان أهلُ الجاهليةِ يفعلونَ ذلك مخافةَ العارِ والفقرِ.
It has been narrated from Umar ibn Khattab, saying: "O Messenger of Allah! I was boriyng in grave for my daughters during the era of ignorance (what to do?). The Prophet said: release one slave to every girl who has been boried in grave.
Mouvade say to girl were killed at the time of birth. The people of the era of ignorance were doing this for fear of poverty and stigma.
النووي الشافعي، محيي الدين أبو زكريا يحيي بن شرف بن مر بن جمعة بن حزام (متوفاي676 هـ)، المجموع، ج 19 ، ص 187 ، ناشر: دار الفكر للطباعة والنشر والتوزيع، التكملة الثانية.
 
ماوردي بصري شافعي نيز در كتاب الحاوي الكبير مي نويسد:
Maverdi Basri Shafei in book of Alhavi 'Al Kabir
وَرُوِيَ عَنْ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ أَنَّهُ قَالَ : يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ، إِنِّي وَأَدْتُ فِي الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ. فَقَالَ : أَعْتِقْ عَنْ كُلِّ مَوْؤُودٍ رَقَبَةً .
وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ الْعَرَبَ فِي الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ كَانَتْ تَحْفِرُ تَحْتَ الْحَامِلِ إِذَا ضَرَبَهَا الطَّلْقُ حُفَيْرَةً يَسْقُطُ فِيهَا وَلَدُهَا إِذَا وَضَعَتْهُ ، فَإِنْ كَانَ ذَكَرًا أَخْرَجُوهُ مِنْهَا ، وَإِنْ كَانَ أُنْثَي تُرِكَتْ فِي حُفْرَتِهَا ، وَطُمَّ التُّرَابُ عَلَيْهَا حَتَّي تَمُوتَ ، وَهَذَا قَتْلُ عَمْدٍ ، وَقَدْ أُوجِبَتْ فِيهِ الْكَفَّارَةُ.
 
It is narrated from Omar ibn Khattab that he said: O Messenger of Allah! In my era of ignorance, I was boriying alive my daughters (what to do)? The Prophet (sa) said: "Let a slave be given to every girl who has boried alive." And this is because the Arabs burst in the yoke, under the feet of the pregnant woman, when he was giving birth, his child fell into that pit, then he would be brought out if he was a boy; And if he were a girl, they would throw in the same pit, and poured the soil upon him to die. This is a deliberate assassination, and it is a matter of Kaffarah.
الماوردي البصري الشافعي، أبو الحسن علي بن محمد بن حبيب (متوفاي450هـ)، الحاوي الكبير في فقه مذهب الإمام الشافعي وهو شرح مختصر المزني، ج 13 ص 67 ، تحقيق الشيخ علي محمد معوض - الشيخ عادل أحمد عبد الموجود، ناشر: دار الكتب العلمية - بيروت - لبنان، الطبعة: الأولي، 1419 هـ -1999م.
محمد امين شنقيطي متوفاي1393هـ در أضواء البيان و تميمي حنبلي متوفاي1225هـ در الفواكه العذاب نوشته اند:
Mohamad Amin Shanqiti died 1393H in Azwa Al Bayan & Tamimi Hanbali in Al Favaka Al Azab
وقد جاءَ عن عمرَ رضي الله عنه قولُه : أمرانِ في الجاهليةِ . أحدُهما : يُبْكِيْنِي والآخرُ يُضْحِكُنِي .
أما الذي يبكيني : فقد ذَهبتُ بابنةٍ لي لِوَأْدِها ، فكنتُ أحفَرُ لها الحفرةَ وتَنْفُضُ الترابَ عن لِحْيَتِي وهي لا تدري ماذا أريدُ لها ، فإذا تَذَكّرتُ ذلك بَكَيْتُ .
والأخري : كنت أصْنَعُ إلهًا من التمرِ أضَعُهُ عند رأسي يَحْرُسُنِي لَيلاً ، فإذا أصْبَحْتُ مُعَافًي أكلتُه ، فإذا تَذَكرت ذلك ضَحِكْتُ من نَفْسِي .
It's been said from Omar: "I have two memories of the era of ignorance, one of them crisin ng me and the other laughing.
"But the memory that cries to me is that: I went to burrow my daughter alive; I pit him for it; but she cut off the soils from the beard; while I did not know what the intention was For him When I remember this memory, I cry.
But another: I made a god of dates, at night I put it up on my head to protect me; when I was eating in the morning when I was hungry, I ate it. When I remember this memory, I laugh at myself
الجكني الشنقيطي، محمد الأمين بن محمد بن المختار (متوفاي 1393هـ.)، أضواء البيان في إيضاح القرآن بالقرآن، ج 8 ص 439، تحقيق: مكتب البحوث والدراسات، ناشر: دار الفكر للطباعة والنشر. - بيروت. - 1415هـ - 1995م.
التميمي الحنبلي، حمد بن ناصر بن عثمان آل معمر (متوفاي 1225هـ)، الفواكه العذاب في الرد علي من لم يحكم السنة والكتاب، ج 9 ص 80 ، طبق برنامه الجامع الكبير.
http://www.valiasr-aj.com/persian/shownews.php?idnews=5070

It is a cultural Iranian people don’t like men wear shorts it’s a sign of disrespect & insult to other people at public .men only wear shorts at beachs of seas or their home when they don’t have any guest 

what is currently shows as Sharia Laws is just interruption of extremist wahabist not the real Sharia law even at Iran shartia law can not be applies completely if it was completely was practiced ,we didnt need additional man made laws the complete version of it ,inshaAllah will practice at time of Imam Mahdi (aj) 

Wa alaikum as salam,
Simple Answer is No for your question as we don't believe in killing anyone unless they unleash their terrors and we fight for our defense
We as followers of Prophet (saww) and Imam Ali (as) have certain rules regarding everything in life...Since your question is about killing enemies of Islam and Ahlebait (as) is concerned-- Look into history and find the ways of tackling such people by Imams (as) of AhleBait (as) 
Maula Ali (as) didn't wage war against first 3 caliphs though all were oppressors of his position and wealth/property of Fatima (sa) to save the Ummah from schism (breaking into sects/parts) and he advised all of them from time to time on different matters..
When Maula Ali (as) accepted caliphate after assassination of 3rd caliph as people were adamant to make him caliph, he accepted caliphate with certain preconditions regarding Justice and equality and humanity..
Banu Umayya and their allies in oppression revolted against Maula Ali (as) as they didn't want the implementation of true face of caliphate which was based on Justice..Maula Ali (as) fought different wars against these renegades only to save Islam and true face of caliphate and that too when these groups attacked muslim nation in different places and killed people..
Ibn Umar was one of the enemy of Maula Ali (as) and he didn't pledge allegiance when whole of Medina was pledging allegiance but Maula didn't attack/insult or kill him instead he had provided him amnesty..
Kharijites were also slandering and cursing but Maula didn't stop or attacked them till the time they didn't start their oppression and tyranny..Even few companions of Maula asked the permission to stop them at-least from coming to Masajid but Maula didn't give them permission to do so..Maula debated with reason and logic with all these groups who have revolted against his righteous caliphate but their hearts were hardened and they didn't get the light of Truth..
Yes, when they attacked and started killing muslim and plundering their properties Maula fought with them and defeated them..
and we are also following same ideology..of patience till the time others not attacking us ...
 

I don't want to take the name of author with bad words as his parents named him with 2 illustrious figures of Islam......
Great to know that people here are ready to support a parrot who did nothing good except supporting his Zionist/Wahabi masters and spreading their versions to be heard from a muslim. 
I have lot many Syrian friends following different ideologies and sects and all of them are in support of Assad and his government. I don't understand why people will support any dictator when they have a chance to overthrow him with the help of powerful NATO group. 
Ok, Don't believe me or any other person, but watch the people's faces and their smile after getting liberated from any besieged towns of Syria held by so called moderate rebels cum terrorists in any part of Syria and that will tell you truth. 
People are still not able to digest the fact that there was no civilian uprising against Assad as propaganda machinery fooled the world to believe instead it was plan of CIA to topple Assad government by funding the terrorists/rebels either from muslim brotehrhood or mercenaries brought from across the world to be trained in Jordan and Turkey whereas arms and ammunition were provided by AmeriKKKa and Europe..
Assad remained lone Arab leader (as head of state) who is opposing the Zionist apartheid regime of Israhell and western world banking system as Syria is not indebted to world bank...
This didn't go well with Zionist world order and hence they planned to topple Assad and install a puppet government at the helm of affairs in Syria so that they can plunder natural resources and enslave Syrian people..
Assad did the same thing which any independent head of state will do when some terrorist groups would try to wreck havoc in its country..No independent nation will allow massacring of its own people by some beasts exported from all over the world.....

What’s the Saudi modernization all about? Shocking information revealed (from sunni brother PRAECURASATOR)
 
 

I would like to answer this question in completely different perspective-
First of all I would like to tell you that I am neither an Iranian nor ever visited but surely will visit one day Insha Allah. 
Problem with majority of muslim umma'h was/is always with righteous people or with the people who used to try to be righteous but they never dared to question or challenge the rulers who were/are oppressors/tyrants. 
I am not saying that there are no problems in Iran or they cant be tackled and solved...
Do you remember Mukhtar e Thakafi and his government? He was the first person in history who tried to build nation based on teachings of AhleBait (as). People who were repenting for not supporting Imam Husain (as) helped him to take revenge of Karbala and he and his army did that with courage and elan. though people of Kufa later on deserted him, even his close associates and army men not supported him against Banu Zubair invasion on Kufa. 
learn from history and try to solve the issue in whatever way you/me or we can do rather accusing and helping the enemies of Islam as people did same in different era..

It seems to me too just because of that I asked this question. But issue is that we cant make timeline before the rise of Sufyani...

The original quote which is part of a speech made in 1979:
    "No wise person would sacrifice his young offspring for [say] affordable housing. People [on the contrary] want everything for their young offspring. Human being wants economy for his own self; it would therefore be unwise for him to spare his life in order to improve economy [...] Those who keep bringing up economy and find economy the infrastructure of everything -not knowing what human[ity] means- think of human being as an animal who is defined by means of food and clothes[...] Those who find economy the infrastructure of everything, find human beings animals. Animal too sacrifices everything for its economy and economy is its sole infrastructure. A donkey too considers economy as its only infrastructure. These people did not realize what human being [truly] is."

This argument is as unimpressive as it could be. A load of baseless slander and unfounded allegations against the leadership.
Won't corruption still persist if there was a regime change in Iran? Or are you trying to suggest that somehow the people's hearts would change magically?
The Shah loved the people? How uninformed a person has to be to make such a comment! How he was selling out his country's lands and resources to the imperialists, massacring crowds upon crowds, and siphoning off national wealth to his private bank accounts in the West shows just how much he 'loved' his people.
I find it amusing that the only people who favor the destruction and collapse of the Islamic Republic are the pseudo-Shia taqleedi secularist-modernists, fugitive royalists living in the States, left-liberal fifth columnists, hawkish imperialists and pro-imperialists, the nawasib, the self-obsessed phony intellectuals, and the intellectually-dysfunctional, emotional-wreck hormonal teenagers who can't tell apart Imam Ali (as) from Imam Ali ar-Rida (as) or Ali an-Naqi al-Hadi (as). They don't have a modicum of knowledge about Islam or the Ja'fari madhab, don't know a scratch about the affairs of the Shia, and struggle to do their wajibat, but they salivate at the slightest opportunity to slander the Islamic republic, and go about spreading their garbage all over the internet.
Nobody is saying the administrative system is perfect. It has lots of leakages and problems and needs vital reforms. Constructive criticism is way different from unfounded slander and libel. I know there are gaping holes in the system, but I also know that the reason why the Zionists are not dancing in Beirut, the reason why the shrines in Najaf, Karbala, Samrarra, Baghdad,and Damascus have not been razed to the ground like al-Baqi,the reason why the Shia in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bahrain have not been exterminated,and in fact, the reason why the Shia have a mention in the Western academia and a backbone in international relations today is the Islamic Republic and the Blessed Revolution of Imam al-Khumayni [rh].
And those who are saying that the Shariah of Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى ought not to be implemented just because it causes inconvenience to some munafiqeen and dunderheads need to prepare themselves for  the Night in the Grave. Do the Imperialists bother about our consent when they send money from our taxes to fund our enemy nations over and above our loud protests? Did Switzerland bother to seek the consent of Muslims before she banned minarets throughout the length and breadth of her territory? Did France bother to seek the Muslims' consent before banning hijab, or forcing Muslim shopkeepers and restaurant owners to sell pork and alcohol in their establishments on the peril of being denied their licences, and forcing women to shake hands with unrelated men? They are very clear about these policies- if you don't like our laws, don't sign up to live here. Muslims too need to reply likewise to the fifth columnists- if you don't like the laws, feel free to leave.
I am always at the forefront of opposing blind opposition to the West, nor do I believe in the 'clash of civilizations' nonsense. There are many features of the Western civilization that I admire - the regard for institutions, the deep regard for knowledge and learning for the sake of knowledge itself, past any vulgar utilitarian or status-quoist concern, and the robust tradition of private philanthropy and welfarism. All the same, I feel little reason to change my beliefs and convictions just because they don't happen to appeal to secular liberal sensibilities.

Salam it seems he thinks that Imam Mahdi (aj) will reappear during this time line.

I would like to answer this question in completely different perspective-
First of all I would like to tell you that I am neither an Iranian nor ever visited but surely will visit one day Insha Allah. 
Problem with majority of muslim umma'h was/is always with righteous people or with the people who used to try to be righteous but they never dared to question or challenge the rulers who were/are oppressors/tyrants. 
I am not saying that there are no problems in Iran or they cant be tackled and solved...
Do you remember Mukhtar e Thakafi and his government? He was the first person in history who tried to build nation based on teachings of AhleBait (as). People who were repenting for not supporting Imam Husain (as) helped him to take revenge of Karbala and he and his army did that with courage and elan. though people of Kufa later on deserted him, even his close associates and army men not supported him against Banu Zubair invasion on Kufa. 
learn from history and try to solve the issue in whatever way you/me or we can do rather accusing and helping the enemies of Islam as people did same in different era..

I would like to answer this question in completely different perspective-
First of all I would like to tell you that I am neither an Iranian nor ever visited but surely will visit one day Insha Allah. 
Problem with majority of muslim umma'h was/is always with righteous people or with the people who used to try to be righteous but they never dared to question or challenge the rulers who were/are oppressors/tyrants. 
I am not saying that there are no problems in Iran or they cant be tackled and solved...
Do you remember Mukhtar e Thakafi and his government? He was the first person in history who tried to build nation based on teachings of AhleBait (as). People who were repenting for not supporting Imam Husain (as) helped him to take revenge of Karbala and he and his army did that with courage and elan. though people of Kufa later on deserted him, even his close associates and army men not supported him against Banu Zubair invasion on Kufa. 
learn from history and try to solve the issue in whatever way you/me or we can do rather accusing and helping the enemies of Islam as people did same in different era..

@RiseOrDie I have a question for you as you have started this discussion. Why a timeline of 2017-2024 after the subject of discussion?

As a Persian, I don’t agree with half of what you are saying:
Brother, as a Muslim, don’t accuse any one of anything (unless proven) , that’s a sin. You said that about the leaders.
Then you say shah loved his people and didn’t steal ?! Did you know when he wanted to depart from Iran he stole about estimation 1 billion dollars of jewelry of our country with himself in his airplane?! Did you know by that money his son here in America and his wife in France are having a luxurious life?!

Thanks for sharing brother.
And here is a letter from your living Imam (ajtfs):
خبرني جماعة، عن أبي محمد التلعكبري، عن أحمد بن علي الرازي، عن الحسين بن علي (1) القمي، قال: حدثني محمد بن علي بن بنان (2) الطلحي الآبي، عن علي بن محمد بن عبدة النيسابوري، قال: حدثني علي بن إبراهيم الرازي، قال: حدثني الشيخ الموثوق (3) به بمدينة السلام قال: تشاجر ابن أبي غانم القزويني وجماعة من الشيعة في الخلف، فذكر ابن أبي غانم أن أبا محمد عليه السلام مضى ولا خلف له، ثم إنهم كتبوا في ذلك كتابا وأنفذوه إلى الناحية، وأعلموه (4) بما تشاجروا فيه، فورد جواب كتابهم بخطه عليه وعلى آبائه السلام. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم عافانا الله وإياكم من الضلالة (5) والفتن، ووهب لنا ولكم روح اليقين، وأجارنا وإياكم من سوء المنقلب أنه أنهي إلي ارتياب جماعة منكم في الدين، وما دخلهم من الشك والحيرة في ولاة أمورهم، فغمنا ذلك لكم لا لنا، وساءنا فيكم لا فينا، لان الله معنا ولا فاقة بنا إلى غيره، والحق معنا فلن يوحشنا من قعد عنا، ونحن صنائع ربنا، والخلق بعد صنائعنا. يا هؤلاء ! ما لكم في الريب تترددون، وفي الحيرة تنعكسون (6) ؟ أو ما سمعتم الله عزوجل يقول: (يا أيها الذين آمنوا أطيعوا الله وأطيعوا الرسول وأولي =
الامر منكم) (1) ؟ أوما علمتم ما جاءت به الآثار مما يكون ويحدث في أئمتكم عن (2) الماضين والباقين منهم عليهم السلام ؟ أوما رأيتم كيف جعل الله لكم معاقل تأوون إليها، وأعلاما تهتدون بها من لدن آدم عليه السلام إلى أن ظهر الماضي عليه السلام، كلما غاب علم بدا علم، وإذا أفل نجم طلع نجم ؟ فلما قبضه الله إليه ظننتم أن الله تعالى أبطل دينه، وقطع السبب بينه وبين خلقه، كلا ما كان ذلك ولا يكون حتى تقوم الساعة، ويظهر أمر الله سبحانه وهم كارهون. وإن الماضي عليه السلام مضى سعيدا فقيدا على منهاج آبائه عليهم السلام حذو النعل بالنعل، وفينا وصيته وعلمه، ومن هو خلفه ومن هو يسد مسده، لا ينازعنا موضعه إلا ظالم آثم، ولا يدعيه دوننا إلا جاحد كافر، ولولا أن أمر الله تعالى لا يغلب، وسره لا يظهر ولا يعلن، لظهر لكم من حقنا ما تبين (3) منه عقولكم، ويزيل شكوككم، لكنه ما شاء الله كان، ولكل أجل كتاب. فاتقوا الله وسلموا لنا، وردوا الامر إلينا، فعلينا الاصدار كما كان منا الايراد، ولا تحاولوا كشف ما غطي عنكم ولا تميلوا عن اليمين، وتعدلوا إلى الشمال، واجعلوا قصدكم إلينا بالمودة على السنة الواضحة، فقد نصحت لكم، والله شاهد علي وعليكم، ولولا ما عندنا من محبة صلاحكم ورحمتكم، والاشفاق عليكم، لكنا عن مخاطبتكم في شغل فيما قد امتحنا به من منازعة الظالم العتل (4) الضال المتتابع في غيه، المضاد لربه، الداعي ما ليس له، الجاحد حق من افترض الله طاعته، الظالم الغاصب. وفي ابنة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم لي أسوة حسنة وسيردي الجاهل رداءة (5) عمله، وسيعلم الكافر لمن عقبى الدار، عصمنا الله وإياكم من المهالك
والاسواء، والآفات والعاهات كلها برحمته، فإنه ولي ذلك والقادر على ما يشاء، وكان لنا ولكم وليا وحافظا، والسلام على جميع الاوصياء والاولياء والمؤمنين ورحمة الله وبركاته، وصلى الله على محمد وآله وسلم تسليما (1).
"In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful.
May Allah protect us and you from misguidance and sedition, and give us and you the spirit of certainty, and deliver us and you from capsizing evil.
I am prohibited from entrusting some of you with the religion; those who have entertained doubt and perplexity regarding the Masters of their Affairs. So we have shrouded it from you, not from us; and we have deprived you, not ourselves - for Allah is with us, and we are in need of no one other than Him. The truth is with us, so we are never alone no matter who sits with us. We are the invention of our Lord, and the creation came after our existence.
O you! Why do you hesitate in doubt and contrast [the truth] in perplexity? Have you not heard the saying of Allah, 'O you who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger and the Masters of the Order from you' (4:59). Do you not know of the corpus that has come and the narrations of your Imams, past and present? Do you not see how Allah created secure strongholds for you, as well as guiding signs from the beginning of Adam to the end of the previous [Imam]? Whenever knowledge would disappear, knowledge would recommence, and whenever a star would set, a star would rise. So when Allah caused him to pass away, did you think that Allah abolished His religion, and severed the connection between Him and His creation? Nay, that did not happen, and that will not be until the Hour will rise and the Order of Allah becomes manifest even if they are averse.
Surely, the previous [Imam] passed away happy, and he passed away upon the way of his forefathers, who followed in the footsteps of their predecessors. In us is his testament and his knowledge - his successor is from him. None will dispute our position to him except a sinning oppressor, and no one will call to him without us except an ungrateful disbeliever. The Order of Allah cannot be defeated, and His mystery does not appear nor is it announced. We will manifest what appears from our right through your intellects, and your doubts will fall, but whatever Allah wills shall happen, and every thing has its ordained time. So fear Allah, surrender to us, and return the Order to us. It is our responsibility to distribute [wealth to the needy], just as we would receive the revenues. And do not try to uncover what has shrouded you, and do not deviate from the right to the left. Make your intention towards us, and love the clear Sunna.
I have advised you, and Allah is the Witness over me and over you. Had we not loved your well-being, been merciful towards you, and been compassionate towards you, we would have addressed you in full regarding our trials from this coarse oppressor (the Caliph), who follows his own desire, who contradicts his Lord, who calls to what is not his, who denies the right of he whom Allah has obligated obedience to; the unjust usurper. And in the daughter of the Messenger of Allah is a good example for me. The ignorant wishes to destroy his deeds, but the disbeliever will come to know who the house shall go to.
May Allah protect us and you from destruction and evils, and all pests and impairments through His mercy, for He is the Guardian who can do whatever He wills, and He is our and your Guardian and Sustainer. Peace be upon all of the deputies, masters, and believers, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings. May Allah bless Muhammad and His Family, and grant them peace." (Shaykh al-Tusi's Kitab al-Ghayba, pages 285-287)

'In the Name of Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى , the Beneficent, the Merciful. Having said that, l (as) ask your Lord سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى to grant you all good health. It is for you all to have tenderness, dignity and tranquility, and it is for you to be bashful and keep yourselves clear, just as the righteous people before you have done. It is for you to be courteous with the people of falsehood. You will bear injustices from them, and beware of disputing with them  in what is between you and them. When you sit with them, and are alone with them  and argue your differences with them, there is no way out for you but to sit with them and be alone with them, and argue with them by the dissimulation which Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى has Ordered you for, that you should take to it regarding what is between you and them. 

So if you are tested with that from them, that they wish to harm you and you can  recognize abhorrence in their faces, and if Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى , the High does not Dispel them away from you, they would rob you. And what is in their chests of enmity and hatred  is much more than what they display to you. Your gatherings and their gatherings  are one and the same, but your spirits and their spirits are different. You will not  reconcile with them and you will never lover them, ever, and they will never love you  as well. Surely Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى the High has Honored you all with the truth and Made you  to visualize it, and did not Make them to be deserving of it. 

Be courteous to them and be patient with them, for they have no courtesy to you nor  do they have patience over anything, and some of them are obsessed with tricking  the others, for the enemies of Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى have the ability to keep you from the truth.  Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى Protects you from that, so fear Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى and hold back your tongues except  from the good, and beware of letting your tongues to slip into speaking that which is false, and the slanderous, and the sinful, and the violation. So if you were to hold  back your tongues from what is disliked by Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى , from what He سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى has Forbidden  you from, it would be better for you with your Lord سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى than letting your tongues slip  into what is disliked by Him سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى and what He سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى has Prohibited you from. 
Al-Kafi Chapter: 1, Hadith: 14449, Number: 1

Introduction of Dajjal
http://www.alameli.net/
Emerging of Dajjal
https://youtu.be/nIn_-tprF14