Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Fahad Sani

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fahad Sani

  1. Yes. Its very shocking to see the blindness, dumbness and ignorance of Al-Islam.org, of shia Tafasir and of their followers. Here is the full verse. Aal Imran 83. Are they looking for a religion other than the Deen (religion and Way of Life) of Allah knowing well that everything in the heavens and in the earth, willingly or unwillingly, has submitted to Him? And to Him they shall all return. And it refers to Allah swt. Not to shia 12th Imam. To better understand consider verses from 81 to 85. As they are also explained in shia Tafsir Mizan. http://www.almizan.org/
  2. Lets make it simple. Shia version of ghadir starts with revelation of Maida 67. Sermon of ghadir is not yet delivered. Maida 67 says: ۞ يَا أَيُّهَا الرَّسُولُ بَلِّغْ مَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكَ مِنْ رَبِّكَ ۖ وَإِنْ لَمْ تَفْعَلْ فَمَا بَلَّغْتَ رِسَالَتَهُ ۚ وَاللَّهُ يَعْصِمُكَ مِنَ النَّاسِ ۗ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يَهْدِي الْقَوْمَ الْكَافِرِينَ Malik: O Rasool! Deliver the message which has been revealed to you from your Rabb, and if you do not, you are not doing justice to your mission. Allah will protect you from the mischief of the people. Rest assured that Allah will not
  3. In Quran Allah swt commanded us to send salawat on Prophet s.a.w.w. In the same Quran Allah swt also commanded us to send greetings as Assalam o Alaikum to each other when we meet, which translate as peace be unto you. And we also send the same greetings to engraved people when we visit them. In Aal e Muhammad, pious believers or followers are also included. Word aal is very broad in meaning. Word aal in Quran is also used in both meanings, i.e both for followers and for progeny and also for wives as well.
  4. Brother, with this post you have again proved the thing, for which I got banned for three days. Read the narration carefully, there is not a single direct statement of Imam Ali a.s in it. Except when he said YES in answer to a question. It was actually Abbas r.a who first called Imam Ali a.s as liar, sinful, dishonest. And Umar a.s just repeated the same words of Abbas r.a in assumption. Meaning that if Abbas r.a view on Ali a.s is correct then Abu bakr a.s he himself to be also described as same. Abbas r.a said this since he was in dispute with Ali a.s regarding property. So was sai
  5. There are two interpretations on ghadir. Shia version says wilayah as authority/imamate. Sunni version says WIlayah as love/muwadat. Shia version has many flaws. One big flaw according to me is the revelation of Maida 67. The starting point of ghadir from shia perspective. Below is the brief truth about what exactly happened at ghadir. Also ghadir is no where in nahjul balagha. Its not used by Imam Ali a.s as an argument for his divine imamate. Sermon 3 shiqshiqyh is also free from ghadir. This also proves Imam Ali a.s himself did not consider it as divine appointment.
  6. Whatever is in bihar ul anwar is from previous books of tashayyu. Its like all previous shia books combined in one. Just like kutub arba combined in book Wasail shia. Check this. Links from previous books are also there. http://ablibrary.net/فارسی/کتابها/7645_بحار الأنوار(29)/صفحه_545 Job of a historian is to collect data not to authenticate. They have just given their opinion. Same ibn Hadid and other mutazillah said sermon 226 is in praise of Umar a.s. So, then also accept this from historians. Sayed Razi who compiled nahjul balagha was not even a historian. He just colle
  7. Anything else from shia books in praise of sahabah. Esp from Prophet s.a.w.w himself?
  8. Its not about merely narrations but their acceptance by Majlisi and his personal comments and conclusions out of such narrations. Here is the bottom line. from http://wilayat.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1983:concept-of-ahlubait-regarding-sheikhain&catid=155&lang=en&Itemid=115 SUMMARY OF THESE AHADEETH:- � from bihar-ul-anwar, vol 8, page 366 قال الصادق عليه السلام : من شك في كفر أعدائنا والظالمين لنا فهو كافر whosoever doubts kufr of our enemies and those who did zulm to us, he is himself kafir. Is this not takfir of ah
  9. 1. This entire chapter is about boasters/ghullat. I just shared few narrations on what is considered as ghuluw. Book Uyun Akhbar Reza, Chapter 46, Author Shaikh Sadooq. https://www.al-islam.org/uyun-akhbar-ar-ridha-volume-2-shaykh-saduq/chapter-46-what-has-been-narrated-ar-ridha-regarding 2. What about classic scholars. And the king of muqassirs Shaikh Sadooq. Baqir Majlisi is not primary source of knowledge. Here actually you are picking. Same Baqir Majlisi also believed in tahreef in Quran. WIll you accept this. Wilayat e Takwiniyah and taqqiyah, both can not exist at sam
  10. This is ignorance. I am not following them blindly or accepting their each and every thing. I had clarified this umpteen times but it seems you are still confused or stubborn to accept. I never said I believe Allah has a physical body naoozbillah min zalik. Allah will be seen on judgement day or in heaven but how, no body knows. May be Allah make us capable of this. For Allah nothing is impossible. We have very little knowledge about what exactly and how will happen on judgement day. True interpretation of all such verses and ahadith is only with Allah swt. Yes He swt can n
  11. Its not confusion. But truthfulness, justice, impartiality, fair play.
  12. Even today I am on Imam Ali a.s side. Alhamdulilah. I am following him in all aspects. He never did takfir of those who opposed him nor he called any of those a hypocrite or mushrik. He treated all those with respect. I am both his shia and a follower of ahlul sunnah. I also accept and acknowledge authentic ahadith of prophet s.a.w.w in praise of others.
  13. This is not merely on the basis of narrations present in books of majlisi but mostly on his acceptance of such narrations, personal comments and opinions which are everywhere in his books like Haq ul Yaqin, Jilal Ul Uyun, Ain ul Hayat etc. And books of majlisi are not classic shia books. Check yourself from his books. http://shiamultimedia.com/urdubooks2.html http://www.ziyaraat.net/findbook.asp?Tema=All&srchwhat=All&orderby=titulo&idioma=All&submit=Display+Books&Escritor=Allama Syed Muhammad Baqar Majlisi
  14. On Shaikh Sadooq as well? If he is not a muqassir then there is no any muqassir. Source: Book Uyun Akhbar Reza, Chapter 46, Author Shaikh Sadooq. https://www.al-islam.org/uyun-akhbar-ar-ridha-volume-2-shaykh-saduq/chapter-46-what-has-been-narrated-ar-ridha-regarding IMAM ALI REZA A.S says… Those who believe in transmigration or reincarnation are unbelievers. 46-2 Muhammad ibn Musa al-Mutawakkil - may God be pleased with him - narrated that Ali ibn Ibrahim ibn Hashem quoted on the authority of his father, on the authority of Ali ibn Ma’bad, on the authority of Al-Husay
  15. Its a man made story. Not authentic from any angle. Neither in terms of isnaad nor in terms of other historical events. Zubair r.a was son in law of Hz. Abu Bakr a.s. He did not oppose ABu Bakr a.s by force. But he did this to Imam Ali a.s in Jamal. But later he realized his mistake and left the battle ans was killed. Ali and al Zubair were asked about the baya’ah and they said: “We were only angry because we were late for the consultation, we see Abu Bakr as the most deserving of the people to this position after the Apostle of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam), h
  16. Popular shia website wilayat.net in one of its article on defense of Zurarah (one of the main shia hadith narrator) said: حدثني حمدويه، قال حدثني محمد بن عيسى، عن يونس، عن مسمع كردين أبي سيار، قال : سمعت أبا عبد الله (عليه السلام) يقول لعن الله بريدا و لعن الله زرارة Abu Abdullah (alaihi salam) said: “May Allah curse Buraydah and may Allah curse Zurarah. Hadith is weak. Reason: "Whatever Muhammad b. Isa narrated exceptionally from the books of Yunus is not reliable. LINK But when same Muhammad bin Isa narrated from same Yunus in criticism on Abu Bakr a.s and Umar a.s
  17. Same thing is also confirmed by a popular shia website wilayat.net HERE So, the belief of Yasir Habib, Baqir Majlisi and Wilayat.net is same i.e Abu Bakr a.s and Umar a.s both were unbelievers (Kafir) and also those who love them and support them, in other words all followers of ahlul sunnah are unbelievers. Then, how Baqir Majlisi and wilayat.net are different than Yasir Habib.
  18. Yasir Habib, whom majority of twelvers do not like and acknowledge, is no different than Allama Baqir Majlisi of past. Below are some proofs out of hundred available from books of Baqir Majlisi, which are no different than what Yasir Habib say in his lectures and in public gatherings. It has been narrated in Taqrib al Muarif from the freed slave of Ali bin Hussain (i.e Imam Zain ul Abideen) that he asked the Imam, I have the right over you, inform me about Abu Bakr and Umar. Imam said : Both of them are unbelievers, and whoever loves them is also unbeliever [meaning all sunnis
  19. You are still in doubts. In many threads I have said Imam Ali a.s was on haq based on many prophetic ahadith and Umm Aisha s.a, Talha r.a, Zubair r.a were in error. So whose side I would be.
  20. Dont derail the thread. If you dont have anything to say about main topic then do not post. Every caliph was used to give sermon on every friday. But the data was not compiled and preserved, so we have only few sermons from first three caliphs. We have many sermons from Imam Ali a.s. But point is that how many of them are truly authentic. In case of sermon 3, truth is in front of you in the OP.
  21. This is ignorance. All transmissions or chains end up at Ibn Abbas r.a. Its called as a sermon but not narrated by any other viewer present there. This shows that its a lie which is only attributed to Ibn Abbas r.a. This do not make it mutawatir, even if it has thousand chains, as all are from only one narrator. Its source or originator is only one. On the other hand we have hundreds of narrations from same Ibn Abbas r.a in praise and support of first three caliphs and their caliphate. And in terms of authenticity they are much more strong than sermon 3. Or its just because he is spe
  22. @The Straight Path @skyweb1987 Baqir Majlisi collected all versions of this sermon in bihar ul anwar, not just one or two chains. And none of them is sahih. See the links in OP for verification. Authenticity is important not the views of scholars or their personal acceptance. Same ibn Hadid in his commentary on sermon 226 that these words of Imam Ali a.s were in praise of Umar a.s during his janaza. There are so many big contradictions in nahjul balgha. All can not be true. Many sermons are fabrications. And from OP its crystal clear that sermon 3 is a fabrication.
  23. All sahabah were present at ghadir and had the same knowledge about ghadir. Its not only about Abu bakr and Umar. Thats why in shia books it is written except 3,4 or 7 all rejected wilayah (as leadership only) of Ali a.s and became apostates. No one of them opposed caliphate of Abu bkr and Umar. Infact they all gave bayah wholeheartedly and served them. "Heya Molakum" here is used with reference to hell. Nothing to do with ghadir etc. Your interpretation is based on personal choice only. In this way anybody can prove anything from any verse of Quran.
  • Create New...