Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله


Basic Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Rāfiḍah, (Arabic: “Rejectors”), broadly, Shīʿite Muslims who reject (rafḍ) the caliphate of Muḥammad’s two successors Abū Bakr and ʿUmar. Many Muslim scholars, however, have stated that the term Rāfiḍah cannot be applied to the Shīʿites in general but only to the extremists among them who believe in the divine right of ʿAlī to succeed Muḥammad
  • Religion

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

972 profile views

HalalCartman's Achievements


Newbie (1/14)



  1. saw the video looked surreal there were some huddled up people he shot them and than came back and shot the bodies. Thing is some crazy people are applauding him and saying he could've been more efficient. Some people are so twisted to thinking actually that Muslims are a threat that will exterminate their countries and what not. These people actually believe that by taking Koran out of context and using anecdotal evidence to them, in their basements and in their twisted minds the Muslims are actually villains or boogeymen.
  2. Ah.. this is perfect i did not know a internet version existed of this version I cant think of anything better good luck!
  3. Salaam, Please please Sister pick up or order the print version of Mualana Muhammed Ali's Editorial not only is handing over a print version of Koran I feel much more a refined way as a friend to give it to them (if you are certain they will treat it with respect). But this editorial explains soooo much in footnotes especially for arguments that deface islam today (cant stress the importance of this!) it is soo good I dont read arabic but I can tell you the editorial uses shia sources (not sure how good the arabic transalation is) and I believe dont quote me on this it explains that some ayas that sunnis look at differently therefore may be interpreted differently (doesnt go into sunni explanations) this I believe is a more holistic approach to the Quaran. Please consider my advice on this sister it may he the most important and great thing that happens to your friend. I found that an app may be a cop out as having a book in front of you with concise editorial is like have a tutor with.you you cannot close a book nor can you take an app as seriously as print I hope you make the right decision in your eyes. Wasalaam,
  4. Agreed and this is why Islam caters on a both subjective and objective level, but how can such a condition exist what is its reasoning? In shia Islam empathy is the core, however does this mean a psychopath is born without the possibility of understanding/feeling the religion? There must be at least one instance where the masoom addressed something like this or similar.
  5. I would like to know view on Psychopathy and psychopaths regarding people who were born without empathy. In Islam our core principles are based off of empathy and caring for others. How can can Islam cater to one who has no emotion? These people do exist, and are very good at hiding their psychopathy and its not like in the movies where all of them are killers. Their brains simply function on a different level than the average human, they can feel nothing on an emotional level. I am particularily talking about those who are born with this condition. Also they still know right from wrong but chose to only benefit themselves, do we have any ahadith on this or saying from the ahlulbayt? Maybe a brother/sister with psychopathy can pitch in?
  6. according to sheikh we know that the sunni hadith is falsfied and through cross reference of both shia and sunni sources It would be no less than 19 (bare minimum no pun intended). Its pretty good we solved one case in one day! Thoughts? should we move on?
  7. But would that not be considered lying according to the video/sheikh (repost) therefore forbidden if it comes to the point to ask our own viewpoint would that not be contradictory as a whole muslim body? Btw I agree with you 100% above is food for thought only difference is I would not wait to be asked for my view point rather after giving point #1 I would say "but" than offer my own view point #2.
  8. ***** WATCH IT WILL CLEAR UP ALOT******* meant for english speaking audience
  9. Now since everyone is delving into the Ayesha topic lets get to the mid-leveled specifics. Currently there are two types of defenses or point of views. Logic based on Culture and time/history Shiite textual/The shia argument While both are great there can be problems with either or so let me produce my claims: For the first perception It would be wonderful to offer to say more analytical types of people (Lets for a second forget which one you may believe to be right). While this may be a great argument it would maybe disturb more emotional based people,people whom already come with a negative disposition and believe in every corner of there heart and mind moslems or the new word which is all the rave "mudslimes" (-.- so funny right... right?) are mislead barbarians , so right off the bat not disputing Ayesha's age may make one think that all your trying to do is justify Ayesha age for your own beliefs. The second perception offers a clean cut answer to abridge it we can say that starting since the Prophets time (PBUHAHP) many political implications,internal power struggles caused certain individuals including Ayesha to grow hatred and plot against him (PBUHAHP ). So we can determine that the heavily romanticized and oh so heart throbbing recount of her "Marriage" is fake. This is included with many many other citations and resources we know are the devil in the details and the reason our Islam has been tainted and is in the State it is in know. The Problem with number two is that unlike number one which is Sect neutral causes a great dis-balance and insecurity with the Cuni sect. Yes you can stand with this point being sect selective but then one can turn around and say hey this is a Sunni Shia debate and after calling you out they can go after the Cuni brother/sister who was left out in the cold the dumbfounded Sunni gets REKT and becomes fuel for the propaganda machine and inches that much closer to its objective. DIVIDE AND CONQUER has always been the name of the game brothers and sisters! (If things have been unclear for perception #2 watch above video with sheikh).
  10. Thanks for the AC Brown Videos, isn't it awesome that some like him exists giving lectures in a university you'd least expect at least imo.
  11. Your signature is amazing and powerful! I will read al Kafi thanks brother!

    1. Ali-F


      Thank you, brother. I am glad that you liked it.


  12. Salaam, Today I would like to speak about the Elephant Camel in the Room. As we know for approximately the past two decades (especially) Islam's media image has been filled with malaise. In today's world it is ever so easy to connect to the internet and digest information, in consequence it easy to presume that you have superior knowledge in certain subjects or area, Islam I believe is one of the least spared when it comes to pseudo intellectual trolls posting oh so very much one this religion. You know what I speak of, the Rapist,Raider,Pedo etc...Moon worshipper? Before losing track on the vast creativity, ignorance and hate filled garbage, I want to focus on a new emerging class some may have already seen it rear its ugly head, do you know what I speak of? I am speaking about the "Bourgeoisie, look at these Muslim apologists will they never learn ?" class. I hope everyone can debate together to deconstruct these arguments. It is vital given the situation and its rapid growth. thanks in advance! I will play Iblis's Advocate please join the conversation "haters" included Here are two sites I suggest before starting https://sites.google.com/site/islamicthreatsimplified/islamic-muslim-apologists--who-are-they http://www.***.org/Authors/Arlandson/ten_reasons.htm the below will be the first point this one nicks at me the most at the moment (it is pulled from the second site) I hope all can provide a clear defense. 4. Muhammad aggressively attacks Meccan caravans. A year or so after Muhammad’s Hijrah from Mecca to Medina in 622, he attacks Meccan caravans six times, and sent out a punitive expedition three-days away against an Arab tribe that stole some Medinan grazing camels (or cattle), totaling seven raids. W. Montgomery Watt, a highly reputable Western Islamologist who writes in favor of Muhammad and whose two-volume history of early Islam (Muhammad at Mecca (1953) and Muhammad at Medina(1956)) has won wide acceptance, tells us why geography matters: The chief point to notice is that the Muslims took the offensive. With one exception the seven expeditions were directed against Meccan caravans. The geographical situation lent itself to this. Caravans from Mecca to Syria had to pass between Medina and the coast. Even if they kept as close to the Red Sea as possible, they had to pass within about eighty miles of Medina, and, while at this distance from the enemy base, would be twice as far from their own base. (Muhammad at Medina, emphasis added, p. 2) It must be emphatically stated that the Meccans never sent a force up to the doorstep of Medina at this time—they did later on when they were fed up with Muhammad’s aggressions. It is true that the Meccans gathered forces to protect their caravans, but when Muhammad confronted them, they were many days’ journeys away from Medina, often more than eighty miles. (Medina and Mecca are around 200-250 miles from each other, taking seven to eleven days of travel by foot, horse, or camel.) Hence, two Muslim scholar-apologists are misleading when they assert that the caravans "passed through" Medina, adding that the Muslims haphazardly sought for whatever spoils they could get, whereas the Meccans mobilized for war (Isma’il R. al-Faruqi and Lois Lamya’al Faruqi, The Cultural Atlas of Islam, New York: Macmillan, 1986, 134). Rather, it is more accurate to say that the Muslims were aggressively harassing the Meccans. To complete the picture of expeditions, raids and wars in Muhammad’s life from 622 to 632, Watt totals up the number that Muhammad either sent out or went out on: seventy-four (Muhammad at Medina, pp. 2; 339-43). They range from negotiations (only a few compared to the violent expeditions), to small assassination hit squads, to the conquest of Mecca with 10,000 jihadists, and to the confrontation of Byzantine Christians (who never showed up), with 30,000 holy warriors to Tabuk (see below). For a fuller account of these six early aggressive attacks against Meccan caravans, go to this article, which explains more thoroughly why these attacks are not defensive. Thus, aggressive military violence sits at the heart of early Islam—in Muhammad’s life and in the Quran. Islam is therefore not the religion of peace Salaam,
  • Create New...