Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Abal Faadhil

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Religion

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The sealing of prophethood has always been regarded as one of the fundamental components of belief in Islam; it negates the possibility of the emergence of any Messenger after the Prophet of Islam. In any discussion of Islam, we cannot overlook the role played in it by the sealing of prophethood with the Prophet Muhammad. What Muslim is there who does not immediately think of the Prophet's aspect as seal whenever he call him to mind, or who has any doubt that the Qur’an is the final revealed message of God? No religion is known to us that like Islam proclaims the sealing of revelation, nor any heavenly personality who has claimed eternal validity for his message. More than fourteen centuries have passed since the rise of Islam, and throughout this period the Prophet of Islam has always been regarded as the Seal of the Prophets. He perfected existing laws, and with the rich content of his own logical and thorough program of action, he demonstrated the ultimate value inherent in all the prophetic missions. By contrast with other schools of religious thought, the validity of which was restricted to a certain time or place, Islam represents a comprehensive summation of all prophetic messages, and it recognizes no boundaries, whether spatial or temporal. The Qur’an itself also depicts the brilliant visage of Muhammad, upon whom be peace and blessings, as the one by means of whom the gate of prophethood has been closed. How can we solve the apparent contradiction between the need for Prophets as the condition for the vitality of human existence, on the one hand, and the permanent sealing of prophethood, on the other? How can we reconcile the principle of the immutability of the ordinances of Islam with the principle of social development and the everlasting search for new concepts and norms? Industrial and technological developments have turned the human being into a creature always desiring novelty, and wishing to connect every aspect of his life to new principles and institutions. How can such a human being organize his social life and development on the basis of a religion that originated more than fourteen centuries ago and summons the human being to recognize a series of fixed and unchanging values? Having expounded the doctrine of the sealing of prophethood, Islam itself provides the answers to these questions. One of the reasons for the sending of new Prophets was the corruptions and distortions that had crept into the teachings and books of their predecessors, with the result that they lost their efficacy in the guidance of the human being. But once the human being reaches a stage in his growth where he can preserve the norms and teachings of religion from corruption or change and propagate them in their authentic form, the most fundamental reason for the sending of new Prophets disappears. The age in which the Prophet of Islam made his appearance thus differs completely from the ages in which earlier Prophets had emerged: the human being had reached a level of intellectual maturity which permitted the sealing of prophethood. The attainment of maturity by society, the rise of science and learning, and the human being's acquisition of the ability to preserve and propagate heavenly religion - all this meant that an essential precondition for the sealing of prophethood had been met. It was now possible for the duty of propagating religion and guiding people to be entrusted to scholars and learned persons. From now on, it was up to the human being to preserve his historical heritage and spiritual achievements and to protect the final revelation from corruption by seeking aid in the Qur’an itself and drawing on his cultural and social maturity. Instead of the responsibility being placed on a single individual, the message was now entrusted to a collectivity. As the Qur’an says: "There should be a group among you who summon to virtue and enjoin good upon them and restrain them from evil." (3:104) In his social development, the human being reaches a stage where he no longer stands in need of repeated surgical intervention and is instead ready for a form of permanent prophethood where human beings shape their own destiny on the basis of clear vision, correct choice and reflection on the contents of revelation. Under such conditions, a social and intellectual order is needed that will free the thoughts and acts of human beings from the wearying and stultifying burden of attachment and give shape and direction to their constant exertions in the realm of both thought and action. The eternal miracle that is the Noble Qur’an sets forth the main principles of such a system by following which human being is able to advance. Among all the heavenly books the Qur’an is the only one to have withstood the ravages of time so that we have in our possession a complete and uncorrupted text clearly reflecting its abundantly creative teachings . The Qur’an itself proclaims: "We it is Who have sent down this Qur’an and We it is Who will protect it." (15:9) This verse indicates that the most important reason for the sending of new Prophets no longer obtains. In addition, we should be aware that belief in all the Prophets signifies belief in a continuous historical process, one which began with history itself and the origins of human society has expressed itself in a struggle between truth and falsehood and will continue until the final triumph of the former over the latter. In each age, the Prophets have advanced the awareness and maturity of human beings in accordance with the circumstances and capacities of society. Differences with respect to certain laws and ordinances do not touch on the fundamental principles and nature of religion because this apparent lack of harmony relates to subsidiary matters, not fundamental concern connected with the very nature of religion. To correct deviations in thought and belief is possible, in fact, only if a variety of programs of action, each congruent with a set of objective realities, are adopted. If an apparent lack of harmony can be observed in the methods followed by the Prophets in the course of their continuous efforts, this has no connection with their fundamental aim. There is no contradiction among their missions with respect to the principal goal - changing and forming anew the thoughts of human beings who had lost touch with reality and were living in darkness, both culturally and socially. The Glorious Qur’an says: "After earlier Prophets, We sent Jesus, son of Mary; he confirmed the Torah brought by Moses." (5:46) https://www.al-islam.org/seal-prophets-and-his-message-sayyid-mujtaba-musavi-lari/lesson-twenty-sealing-prophethood
  2. The Holy Prophet Muhammad (S) is the last of the divine prophets. After His Eminence, no other prophet is going to be sent by God. The Prophet of Islam, from the beginning of his mission, introduced himself as the seal of the prophets and was accepted by the Muslims as such. The subject of finality of prophethood in the Islamic milieu is considered to be an important matter and it is not in need of evidence. Finality is mentioned in the Holy Quran as well as books of traditions. It is mentioned in Quran that: مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَآ أَحَدٍ مِّن رِّجَالِكُمْ وَلَكِن رَّسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِ‏ّ شَىْ‏ءٍ عَلِيماً “Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Apostle of Allah and the Last of the prophets; and Allah is cognizant of all things.” (33:40) If the Arabic word of KH-T-M is recited with vowel ‘I’ on ‘T”, as some reciters have done this, it would imply one who ends something; thus it clearly shows that The Holy Prophet Muhammad (S) is the last of the prophets. But if it is recited with the vowel ‘A’ on ‘T’ it denotes a thing with which something ends. Ring and seal are also called as such, because they are placed at the end of a letter and indicate the end of it. According to the second possibility also, it is concluded from the verse that the Holy Prophet (S) is the last prophet, because he is introduced as a seal, which has come at the end of the letter of prophethood. Therefore, no other prophet is to appear after him. Thus the finality of the Prophet of Islam is nicely concluded from the above verse as the Muslims of the early period of Islam also understood it in this meaning and did not have any doubt in the finality of the prophethood of His Eminence. Other verses also exist in this regard, but there is no need to mention them here. A large number of traditions also exist with regard to finality of prophethood and some of them are mentioned below: Saad Ibn Abi Waqqas has narrated from his father that the Messenger of Allah (S) said to Imam Ali (a.s.): You are to me as Harun was to Musa (a.s.), except that there is no prophet after me.1 The above tradition is known as “the tradition of position” (Hadith Manzila) and is recorded in Shia and Sunni books through various channels and it proves that no other prophet is to come after the Prophet of Islam. It is narrated from Abu Huraira that he said: The Messenger of Allah (S) said: I have been sent for all the people of the world and prophethood has ended with me.2 Abu Amama has narrated from the Holy Prophet (S) that he said: O people, no prophet is to come after me and there is no nation (Ummah) after you. So worship Allah, perform the five daily ritual prayers, observe the fasts of the month of Ramadan, perform the Hajj of Kaaba and pay the Zakat of your wealth, so that your selves are purified. Also obey the ones who are vested with authority among you so that you may enter Paradise.3 Amirul Momineen (a.s.) said: Almighty Allah sent the Holy Prophet (S) at a time when no prophet existed on the earth and there was a time gap between them and discord had developed among the people. Thus by sending him, He ended prophethood and revelation came to an end.4 It is concluded from his tradition and others like it that The Holy Prophet Muhammad (S) is the seal of prophets and that after him no other prophet came and nor any prophet is going to come. It was also stated previously that the Prophet of Islam, at the beginning of his mission, introduced himself as the seal of prophets and all those who accepted his prophethood they also accepted the finality of his prophethood. Therefore no separate evidence is required to prove the finality of the Prophet of Islam 1. Sahih Muslim, Vol. 4, Pg. 1870. 2. At-Tabaqatul Kubra, Vol. 1, Pg. 192. 3. Wasailush Shia, Vol. 1, Pg. 23. 4. Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 129.
  3. 1. Thanks for acknowledging your ignorance about Prophet Shees (as). An independent investigator would study about a subject which he is unaware of instead of commenting about it and also drawing baised conclusions from it in favour of his own ideology. This is for your claim of being an independent investigator. Secondly for rejection of Gulam Ahmed Qadiani you insist on fruits being measured. (Please refer your post on December 21) For being measured the fruits should be seen and also be attributed to the originator. But when you talk about Prophet Shees(as) (about whom by your own confession you don't know much) you make a wild assumption that his fruits showed after his death!!!! Mr. Hamza is this an approach of an independent investigator? An independent investigator will look at facts impartially and will make conclusions on their basis. In your case you are justifying everything just to confirm to your innovative ideology. You don't adopt the Shia approach. Shia approach is that they believe in the 12th Imam being alive and present. The Shia believe Prophet Muhammad(saw) to be the last Prophet. Shias believe in physical Resurrection unlike the Baha'i. And this is another reason for your disbelief other than khatamiyat. Its good that you have confessed that you excommunicate your members.( just like a cult would do.) It is good that you don't have a government any where in the world other wise you would have made life hell for anyone who left your cult just as you make life hell for those you excommunicate. Steven Scholl an ex-Bahai says ...I received a letter from a Baha’i Continental Counsellor indicating that I was under threat of being declared a Covenant-breaker, the impact on me personally was less than on my family. My wife is a Baha’i as are many of her family members, . . . The very real threat of being declared a Covenant breaker meant my wife had to face the decision of joining me as a heretic or divorcing me so that she could maintain her relationships with her family and other lifelong friends. Since [my wife] had no intention of divorcing me, the choices then extended out to her family. Her sister would not refuse to socialize with us so she would automatically be declared a covenant breaker along with her husband and children. Many of my close Baha’i friends would also be faced with the decision of maintaining friendships or joining me as a heretic. The whole thing is absurd and quite medieval. But it does raise the issue which you point out so well; how anyone would want to belong to a group which is willing to act this way and be so cruel is beyond me. That is why I voluntarily left the religion. Not in order to escape punishment but because the Baha’i community had become such an unhealthy place spiritually. I was terribly saddened that my spiritual home of 25 years had turned into a prison and nightmare.................. Web: http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Scholl3 2. As regards Unity, You have said in your latest post that: "Baha'u'llah's purpose was not unity, really. Unity of mankind is an inevitable process. Baha'u'llah came as a mubashir and a nadhir, a warner of a proclaimer of happy tidings to all." However on 22nd December you said: "The Baha'i Faith's emphasis on unity is the fruit of the religion. His calls to the world leaders to unite before the world wars is a call for unity. And, now... look at this! We live in shame as we haven't answered the calls of God himself. (I am not saying Baha'u'llah is God, but his message is from God.)" Your own words contradict your own words. This is shows that your claim of independent research is just a ploy to come amongst the Shia and do propaganda about your cult. And you deserve to be called a cult as by rejecting Khatamiyat, Mahdaviyat as well physical Resurrection and adopting a barbaric and medivial practice like excommunication you no longer deserve to be called a faith. 3. Again thanks for confessing that 'Bahaullah' never mentioned what you have previously mentioned about "Nabi" and "Resool". You have previously boasted about your knowledge of Arabic. Definately you must then be knowing that the word "Nabiyyen" in the verse 40 of Surah Ahzab is a plural of "Nabi" means He(saw) was the last of the Prophets and not just the last Prophet. So your wild and irrational argument that every Nabi is a first as well the last Prophet falls flat on its face. I am also surprised that you are still harping on your invalid interpretation of Nabi and Resool inspite of very clear and categorical traditions quoted previously about Anbiya being the bigger group and every Resool being a Nabi and not vice versa. Thus the last Nabi will automatically be the last Resool also. As per principles of independent research one must first put forward convincing evidence for rejection of the adversary's proof before continuing to harp on one's own ideas. By failing to reply to the Shia idea of Nabi and Resool and ignoring evidence in its support you have once again put a question mark about your integrity as an independent investigator. 4. Again thanks for scoring a self goal by confessing that the interpretation of Nabi and Resool is made up by the Baha'is and Bahaullah never mentioned it. So if the Baha'i expect from the Shia that they should not understand their religion from the Ahlulbait(AS) but from the UHJ, it's a long hope which will never see the day of light. 5. Regarding the lone tradition about which you have continued harping inspite of evidence being presented for the weakness in its chain as well as presence of innumerable reliable traditions to the contrary again exposes your insincerity in the investigation of truth. You expect us to accept your innovative interpretation of Nabi and Resool but reject our interpretation supported by innumerable reliable evidences!!! Indeed poor is your judgement!!!
  4. Mr. Hamzah, I am not able to find your answers/comments to a few questions posted by the group members. To refresh your memory and to save you from the trouble of going through all the posts, given below are the unanswered queries 1) If Mirza Gulam Ahmed Qadiani did not play an active role then what about the role of Hazrat Shees (as) who was not able to contribute anything. Will you reject him as well and rejecting him is rejecting Quran? 2) You say that Bahaullah came for unity but this isnt something new. And since his coming the disunity in the world has increased, does that mean he has failed in his mission? 3) Your question about Khatemiyat was answered by Shiawarrior313 and your silence seems to have approved his point 4) Why your whimsical interpretation about Rasool and Nabi not been presented by any Muslim in their long history? 5) Your silence on the false tradition quoted by you regarding Imam Mahdi (atfs) bringing a new book also confirms your inadequate knowledge is inspired by the Baha'i cult Kindly share your views on the above queries with appropriate and authentic books. Thank you
  5. 325. It is haraam, as an obligatory precaution, to touch the Name of Allah or His special Attributes without Wudhu, in whichever language they may have been written. And it is also better not to touch, without Wudhu, the names of the holy Prophet of Isla m, the holy Imams and Janabe Fatima Zahra (peace be upon them). Rule No 325 of Taudhiul Masael of Ayatullah Sistani (DZ)
  6. Kitab al Irshad by Sheikh Mufeed (AR) - Incidences from the lives of all Imams in one book
  7. One should be careful that he/she does not touch the Holy Names of Allah (SWT), Prophet (SAWS), Fatima Zahra (SA) and Imams (AS) without Wudhu
  8. https://www.al-islam.org/story-of-the-holy-kaaba-and-its-people-shabbar Another book - Ali, The Miracle of Mohammad
  9. If you visit www.al-islam.org you will see a section on History and Politics. There you will find sub-sections on Holy Prophet SAWS, Imam Ali AS and other Imams. You will find books on Life history of 14 Masoomeens which are good to start with E.g. The Message, Hayat al Quloob, Kitab al Irshad, Books of A. Baqar Sharrif, Books of Allama Syed Saeed Akhtar Rizvi etc are good to start with
  10. WS. Yes, DigitalUmmah has given some useful link for beginners. I would just like to add a few points 1. Do not try and read everything in a day. Let your efforts be small but continuous and in a disciplined way 2. Read traditions, incidents, incidents, miracles, exegesis of Ahlul Bait (a.s.) as much as possible as only they are the right source of knowledge 3. If possible, find a partner with whom you can read, discuss and share your learnings and vice versa. It will keep you motivated in this noble path 4. Last but not the least, seek help from Imam Wali Asr (atfs) who is the inheritor of Allah's knowledge I pray for your success InshaAllah
  11. May Allah hasten the reappearance of Imam Mahdi (atfs)
  12. Marjas are those who have done deep study in religion and can be deemed as experts in the matters of religion. Since everyone cannot attain that level they follow the Marjas for their day to day Islamic laws. Its like referring a doctor for your ailment. Just as a doctor is an expert in medical practice, anyone who has any issues may refer to the doctor
  13. My first reply - To complete the argument
  14. Imams did not get revelations as Quran was already revealed and they were protecters and teachers of Quran. However, whatever they spoke, was from the side of Allah Imams did not bring a new Shariah unlike the Prophets Imam can see angels. There are many incidents which prove it
  15. Miracles are one of the instruments to prove the claim of a Messenger/Prophet. There are various other things that you can put in front of him. Many atheists came in the Holy presence of our respected Imams (especially Imam Jafar al Sadiq (as)) and they proved the existence of God through rational discussions. You can use one of them.
  • Create New...