Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
ShiaChat.com
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

أبو فاطمة المحمدي

Unregistered
  • Content Count

    956
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

أبو فاطمة المحمدي last won the day on April 6 2016

أبو فاطمة المحمدي had the most liked content!

5 Followers

About أبو فاطمة المحمدي

  • Rank
    Level 3 Member

Profile Information

  • Religion
    الإسلام

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

3,685 profile views
  1. The reports, on the apparent, attribute the errors to Abu Hurayrah. If you want to claim that he was not responsible, then you have to provide the proof. That is common sense. In other words, Prophet Sulayman - according to you - slept with 100 women in 12 hours - that is roughly 8 minutes per session. Masha Allah! How many minutes would it take to undress and dress? How many minutes would foreplay take? How many minutes would moving from room to room consume?
  2. In such a case, we go with the obvious. Abu Hurayrah gave the contradictory figures. How is it possible?
  3. Would you help us out, in that case? Which of the sub-narrators was responsible for the errors? And, besides, do you seriously believe that Prophet Sulayman slept with 100 women in one night?
  4. Farid can't stop lying. Can he? I quoted the sahih hadith of Imam al-Rida (peace be upon him) which orders us to reject any hadith which contradicts the Qur'an, or the mutawatir Sunnah, or reality. But, yeah, the hadith is not worth replying to - because the Nasibi has no reply to it. Unlike in the religion of the Nawasib, the human-made, fallible rijal system does not determine absolute truth for us. It is useful. But, we have other tools which supersede rijal in a lot of cases. In any case, I did not quote those ahadith in reply to the liar, Farid. His servant, Abul Hussain, can check t
  5. As-Salam 'Alaikum, It is my assumption that most - if not all ShiaChat members - are aware of the Sunni belief that Abu Hurayrah possessed an infallible hyper-memory. He never forgot anything he ever heard from the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him and his family), especially after the latter supposedly prayed for him. The Ahl al-Sunnah consider Abu Hurayrah to be an extremely knowledgeable Sahabi, and his ahadith form the bedrock of Sunni Islam itself. This great scholar, in this hadith of Sahih Muslim, shared part of his rare knowledge with us: حدثني أبو الربيع العتكي وأبو كامل
  6. Does that really matter? Would it have made any difference if he had been a Sahabi? Would a lie become true simply because a Sahabi had narrated it? Besides, he accepted Islam during the lifetime of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his family). However, it is not recorded that he met the Messenger of Allah. Well, why has al-Bukhari recorded it in his Sahih? He declared explicitly that the she-monkey committed adultery. This claim of his was either true or a false accusation against an innocent monkey . Al-Bukhari obviously recorded the athar because he believed 'Amr's accusation
  7. Actually, he declared explicitly that the she-monkey had committed adultery. He did not mention that as a guesswork or his "interpretation." He gave it as a fact. The question is whether he was lying or telling the truth - about the adultery of the she-monkey. Where is the chain of narration of this? He declared explicitly that she had committed adultery. He did not say: "I think..." or "It seems ..." He said, "She had committed adultery." There is a difference between these statements. Animals and birds talking do occur due to Allah's miracles, and His beloved ser
  8. If it suggests that all monkeys today are descendants of the Israelites, then it is certainly a fabrication. That is my judgment on it.
  9. You mentioned that hadith first. I would think you were going to quote it. Anyway, I have no reason to spend my precious time searching for a fabricated hadith.
  10. I already told you. If a hadith contradicts reality, it is a fabrication. If you think that monkeys started existing only 4000 years ago, then there is nothing I can do about that.
  11. حدثني محمد بن قولويه، والحسين بن الحسن بن بندار القمي، قالا :حدثنا سعد بن عبد الله، قال: حدثني محمد بن عيسى بن عبيد، عن يونس بن عبد الرحمن، ان بعض أصحابنا سأله وأنا حاضر، فقال له: يا أبا محمد ما أشدك في الحديث، وأكثر انكارك لما يرويه أصحابنا، فما الذي يحملك على رد الأحاديث؟ فقال: حدثني هشام بن الحكم أنه سمع أبا عبد الله عليه السلام يقول: لا تقبلوا علينا حديثا الا ما وافق القرآن والسنة، أو تجدون معه شاهدا من أحاديثنا المتقدمة، فان المغيرة بن سعيد لعنه الله دس في كتب أصحاب أبي أحاديث لم يحدث بها أبي، فاتقوا الله ولا تقبلوا علينا ما خالف قول ربنا تعالى وسنة نبينا صلى الله عليه وآله فانا إذا حدثنا
  12. According to a sahih hadith of Imam al-Rida (peace be upon him), any hadith that contradicts the Qur'an, or contradicts reality, is a fabrication.
  13. Well, according to our reports, when Allah transforms anyone into an animal, he dies within three days, without leaving any offspring. 'Allamah al-Majlisi, may Allah be pleased with him, stated this in his Bihar: أقول: قد ورد في أخبارنا أيضا موافقا لما روي عن ابن عباس، كما في تفسير العسكري عليه السلام: كانوا كذلك ثلاثة أيام، ثم بعث الله عليهم ريحا ومطرا فجر بهم إلى البحر وما بقي مسخ بعد ثلاثة أيام، وأما التي ترون من هذه المصورات بصورها فإنما هي أشباهها لاهي بأعيانها ولا من نسلها. وروى الصدوق في العلل بإسناده عن عبد الله بن الفضل قال: قلت لأبي عبد الله عليه السلام قول الله عز وجل
  14. It is from Tarikh Baghdad of al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, vol. 13, p. 422.
×
×
  • Create New...