Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Rectify

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    187
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rectify

  1. We are all special brother but descendants of Hazrat Fatima (عليه السلام) carry a more elevated position physically
  2. I was actually saying that lineage constitutes for around 20% in the make up of a high level believer. Simply saying I’m from a high lineage is not good enough. You have to work for it. I was implying that the other factors were: 1) Natural ability to understand wilayat e Ali which was determined on the day of covenant. Every creature accepted wilayat e Ali in different degrees. Some accepted faster than others. The faster ones were more elevated than the slow ones. 2) Intention of the heart. Having clean intentions towards your neighbour 3) The mother of the believer. Lineage, aspects and deeds of the mother. 4) The teacher (murshad) of the individual. 5) And of course the lineage of the believer. Imam Sadiq (عليه السلام) said the lineage of the 313 generals of Imam mehdi (عليه السلام) will be written on their swords (al ghayba by numani).
  3. Wasalam Bismillah hir Rahman nir raheem The fact that for 125 years no mosque pointed towards Mecca according to archaeology is very strong evidence. 125 years from today (2019) would be 1894 which is a very long time. Dan Gibson does say that there’s no doubt about medina but he places a question mark over Mecca. He also says the actual battle of badr was also in Jordan.....
  4. It was still in a different direction to Jerusalem....
  5. Wasalam According to archaeology the qibla was finalised In 822 AD. I appreciate references from books but archaeology and independent sources are far more convincing in my view. I completely agree I think dan Gibson should also focus on how Jesus was married as opposed to being crucified on the cross which the da vinci code portrays. So maybe billions of Christians are also following the wrong religion?
  6. Christianity isn’t perfect either I mean they can’t even agree on whether Jesus was married or not as dan browns da vinci code sheds light on this topic however I don’t wish to make this discussion an Islam vs Christianity discussion. I believe there are historians that have presented strong proof that the qibla could be Petra due to archaeology. Brother to simply blame geographical errors or folk astronomy is naieve on the part of dan king since there’s many countries where the masjids were facing Petra and some of those civilisations were advanced enough to determine the qibla direction definitely....
  7. I would say it’s quite naieve to suggest they didn’t know their geography since the masjids that actually faced Petra were from far off civilisations like China and Tunisia....
  8. Brother the mosques mentioned are the earliest mosques after rasulullah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم). The qibla was finalised in 822 AD, and all mosques built after 822 AD pointed towards Mecca. Shias never had a Mosque in those days as they had to be in taqiyyah due to oppression. You mentioned the shrine of Imam Hussein (عليه السلام) and Hazrat Abbas (عليه السلام) they were built 700-800 years after in around 1500-1600 AD during the Safavid rule and nadir shah. Archaeology proves that even mosques in China pointed towards Petra for at least 125 years after rasulullah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم). To simply suggest that the Arabs didn’t know their geography is quite naïve considering the Egyptians were able to build pyramids accurately aligned with stars many thousands of years before rasulullah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم). So the civilisation when Islam came was more advanced than the Egyptian times....
  9. Well maybe because the qibla was towards that direction (Jerusalem) and by turning a few degrees towards Petra Allah didn’t want to change it too much just a little bit I guess.
  10. No it concerns the physical association through blood. Although it’s not just about lineage but lineage is a portion in make up of an individual. There are other factors like for example who your mother is, your natural ability to understand the guardianship of Imam Ali (عليه السلام) which was determined on the day of covenant (the day before we were born), the intention of the heart, who your teacher is, and of course your lineage through fathers side....
  11. Brother 1921 or 1850’s is very recent history in considering rasulullah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) lived 1400 years ago. A real syed can prove he’s a syed from his lineage which is connected to ancient shrines and landmark places from over 1000 years ago. There are places in India and Pakistan that are landmark sites in the UNESCO list of heritage sites such as uch sharif, Makli Hill, bilot sharif which have records all the genuine syeds worldwide. Also, Uzbekistan has many landmark UNESCO listed sites where syeds migrated and there’s even a cemetery in Bukhara Uzbekistan named wilayat e Ali. On a personal level, I’m a 29th descendant of syed Ali uraidhi (son of Imam Sadiq (as)). Saudis detonated the shrine of syed Ali uraidhi in 2002. I’ve attached a couple of pics below to further explain this topic. To prove your a syed in reality is a whole different ball game simply getting a family tree on paper anyone can do. Rest assured king Abdullah of Jordan is not a syed quite simply because he has blue eyes but if we want to further investigate his lineage you will clearly see it’s not associated with any any landmark sites. The fact that he’s associated with the Saudis who are number 1 enemy of syeds just shows who he really is....
  12. Sufyani will kill his mother when sufyanis mother will reveal his true ancestry. King Abdullah of Jordan’ mother is a British woman who was the daughter of a British army captain. She divorced king Abdullah of Jordan’s father king Hussein but still retains the title of a princess in Jordan (princess muna) Someone with blue eyes can’t be a syed according to science as almost all (around 99%) people with blue eyes descend from a caveman in northwest Spain around 4-10,000 years ago. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080130170343.htm So one part of the Hadith has come true, and of course his father divorced his mother. I think king Abdullah of Jordan’s mother is out of favour with king Abdullah. I’ve seen very few pics of him with his mother online. He’s always running after his Palestinian wife. Also, the fact that king Hussein divorced princess muna does partially fulfill that Hadith prophecy he just has to bury her alive now....
  13. I would like to add some further depth to this discussion. I’ve done a lot of research on the signs of the coming of Imam mehdi (عليه السلام). My belief is king Abdullah of Jordan is the sufyani who will fight Imam mehdi (عليه السلام). Could the Jordanian government be hiding the actual Islam? Since their ruler is the descendant of Abu sufyan? And when Imam mehdi (عليه السلام) reappears he (عليه السلام) will restore the qibla and maqam e ibrahim to its actual location? Ive actually read an interview of king Abdullah of Jordan to a western newspaper where he said only 10% of Petra has actually been discovered and apparently if any researchers or historians want to research Petra in depth they have to get approval from the Jordanian authorities which most of the time is a rejection. I’ve left a few pictures with ahadith to contemplate over....
  14. Well perhaps there could be another Islam not the Saudi version?
  15. Dan Gibson has his own YouTube channel and he suggests the actual locations of safa and marwa which were two or three days distance between each other as well as the actual Zam-Zam. He seems pretty convinced this was the actual qibla....
  16. I’ll have a look at dan kings book but Gibson argues from the archaeological point of view. He even lists the mosques facing Petra up to 125 years after the martyrdom of rasulullah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم). Some of the mosques that face Petra are like from China and Tunisia. Not to mention obviously masjid al aqsa and the grand mosque in Damascus. Was this geographical ignorance worldwide?
  17. Wasalam the Hadith I read from Bihar al anwar volume 52 says qibla and not maqam e ibrahim and yes maqam e ibrahim will also be restored by Imam mehdi (عليه السلام) according to ahadith. Its interesting that maqam e ibrahim is also in the wrong place....
  18. Interesting so bakka means to Crowd in. Is that the word used in the Qur'an or with the single k? Yes but you know a lot of the information about the crack in the Kaaba is hearsay. What if the Saudis are just trying to spread this rumour to make fun of the Shias? I mean they’ve got rid of most of the holy Shia sites it wouldn’t surprise me if they’re behind this rumour....
  19. Two ahadith come to mind one being from Bihar al shear volume 52 where maula Sadiq (عليه السلام) said when Imam mehdi reappears he will restore the qibla of Hazrat Noah (عليه السلام) Another Hadith from mafatih al jinan where Imam Baqir (عليه السلام) when instructing on how to recite a dua said go to the balcony of your house and face towards Karbala So perhaps in some duas it’s better to face Karbala and not Mecca? By the way the Qur'an mentions becca not Mecca. Becca means place of weeping. Perhaps for Imam Hussein (عليه السلام)? Interesting how Muslims started to change the qibla around 30-40 years after martyrdom of Imam Hussein (عليه السلام). First kill the grandson of rasulullah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) then change the qibla subhanallah
  20. On the flip side of the coin how is there a crack then on the Kaaba where maula Ali (عليه السلام) was born opposite hajar e aswad if qibla is towards Petra? Perhaps maula Ali (عليه السلام) was born in the Kaaba in Petra which was destroyed and Saudis invented a crack in the Kaaba in Mecca to legitimise the Theory that Kaaba is indeed from Mecca? The motives of Banu Umayyah to move to Mecca from Petra might be to discredit the hardwork of rasulullah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)? Or maybe qibla always been in Mecca? Who knows
  21. I truly believe aside from books there are other sources of knowledge. Archaeology being one of them as well as independent sources (non Muslim) since both of these type of sources of knowledge are unbiased and in all honesty quite convincing. My question is how can they all guess towards Petra? Another issue arises and that is Mecca is described as hilly with sheep’s. That could not be possible in Mecca as Mecca was barren and in fertile. Also, Mecca never existed as a place on the oldest maps. The early mosques facing Petra and not even one mosque facing Mecca before 725 AD as well as Mecca being barren and infertile for sheep’s and hills as well as Mecca not existing on maps gives dan Gibson a strong case I’d say....
  22. Well he relies heavily on archaeology. For example he says the following mosques which were the earliest Islamic mosques were built facing Petra not Mecca: 1) The grand mosque of sana in Yemen built in 705 AD facing Petra 2) Al Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem built in 709 AD facing Petra 3) Damascus mosque built in 709 AD facing Petra 4) Ribat Fortress Mosque in Tunisia built in 770 AD facing Petra 5) Grand mosque of Guangzhou in China built in 630 AD facing Petra 6) Mushata Mosque in Amman built in 743 AD still faces Petra 7) Humeima Mosque in southwestern Jordan faced Petra 8) The grand mosque of ba’albaek in Lebanon built facing Petra Dan Gibson further goes on to say that Mecca has not been mentioned in the holy Qur'an instead “masjid al haram” has been mentioned which was in Petra.
  23. Salam Has anyone heard of the actual qibla being Petra? Apparently according to historian dan Gibson all mosques for at least 125 years after the martyrdom of rasulullah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) pointed towards Petra and Abdullah ibn zubayr changed the qibla to Mecca in Saudi Arabia. It wasn’t until 822 AD the qibla direction was finalised towards Mecca?!?! Also dan Gibson argues that Mecca is described as fertile land in the Qur'an where camel and sheep can eat with hills and Mecca was barren and inhabitable land in the times of Hazrat ibrahim (عليه السلام) and in fact dan Gibson goes on to say Mecca never even existed in any of the old maps. In regards to zamzam water he says the actual Zam-Zam is in Petra and the current Zam-Zam has been proven harmful to health and causes cancer. What do you guys think?
×
×
  • Create New...