Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Jaafar al-Shibli

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Jaafar al-Shibli

  1. Attention: Upon reading any material from this account, it should be kept in mind, that any posts associated with this account are no longer valid to the author.

    1. Muhammed Ali

      Muhammed Ali

      Why was it so sudden?

  2. I'm failing to recognize your presumption. Subjective. Many members fail to recognize the standard rules of this forum, which for the most part, are Islamic. The above derives from a certain amount of view-time, at your end.
  3. Feisal_90 banned. For blasphemy towards Allāh. You said you are an atheist and joined the forum to inquire about what you cannot understand. Perhaps you can learn a thing or two about standard good mannerism, and incorporate such in your 'decent human principles'.
  4. السلام عليكم Concerning your second request, denied without question. All members who have received a ban or any form of restriction, was upon grounds of violating forum rules and policy, each violation is explicitly independent, and a penalty is given under distinct conditions, with a warning prior. Should these members return, they must do so with a formal apology, and a proposition will be established for agreement. Any previously banned/ penalized members associated with your account, through IP-Addresses or any form of explicit indication, your account will be permanently banned
  5. `al-salam `Alykum I have written a somewhat in depth analysis of the verse Here: http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235032749-good-women-are-for-good-men/#comment-2842575
  6. السلام عليكم According to the Shīʿah ḥadīth, this name was given by Allāh (عَزَّ وَ جَلَّ), to the people of Fir’awn, who rejected Fir’awn and entered the religion of Prophet Mūsā [a.s]. The Imām [a.s] deemed this name as blessings, Allāh had given, specifically for those who take from their sayings and do not attribute lies to them. I can quote those narratives for you, but I strongly encourage you to put some effort into your research, to avoid apparent mistakes, such as the above. The Imām [a.s] had never accepted them as legitimate Islamic Caliphates. There is m
  7. السلام عليكم A post I made not long ago might be of benefit [link].
  8. "One only dies once, and if one does not die well, a good opportunity is lost and will not present itself again.” -Jose Rizal (letter to Mariano Ponce, 1890), Noli Me Tangere, pg. 10. The catastrophe of misusing time, that which was idle, and will not return.
  9. الفاتحة على روح المرحوم علي نقي al-Fātiḥa upon the soul, the late ‘Ali Naqi بِسْمِ الله الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ "In the name of Allah , the Entirely Merciful, the Especially Merciful. الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ The Entirely Merciful, the Especially Merciful, مَالِكِ يَوْمِ الدِّينِ Sovereign of the Day of Recompense. إِيَّاكَ نَعْبُدُ وَإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِينُ It is You we worship and You we ask for help. اهدِنَا الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيمَ Guide us to the straight path - صِرَاطَ الَّذِينَ أَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِمْ غَيْرِ الْمَغْضُوبِ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلاَ الضَّالِّينَ The path of those upon whom
  10. السلام عليكم Please refer to my post here: [link]. A another informative post by a good brother here [link]. The topic was previously discussed in that thread. As for your question, it's clearly an output due to your lack of comprehension and contemplation on the matter. You are aware these same aḥādīth exist in Sunnī literature, right? The first post linked should mention these sources. Wa `al-salam
  11. السلام عليكم Here is the ḥadīth in sunnī literature: أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو زَكَرِيَّا يَحْيَى بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الْعَنْبَرِيُّ ، ثنا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ السَّلامِ ، ثنا بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ ، أَنْبَأَ جَرِيرٌ ، عَنِ الأَعْمَشِ ، عَنْ أَبِي ظَبْيَانَ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ رَضِيَ الله عَنْهُمَا ، قَالَ : " إِنَّ أَوَّلَ شَيْءٍ خَلْقَهُ الله الْقَلَمُ ، فَقَالَ لَهُ : اكْتُبْ ، فَقَالَ : وَمَا أَكْتُبُ ؟ فَقَالَ : الْقَدَرُ ، فَجَرَى مِنْ ذَلِكَ الْيَوْمِ بِمَا هُوَ كَائِنٌ إِلَى أَنْ تَقُومَ السَّاعَةُ ، قَالَ : وَكَانَ عَرْشُهُ عَلَى الْمَاءِ ، فَارْتَفَع
  12. Banned: Thicksheikh, Banned. Any form of blasphemy towards Islam or the Prophet SA, whether it be implicit or explicit will not be tolerated. Read the rules and policy before posting in the forums. http://www.shiachat.com/forum/guidelines/
  13. السلام عليكم I'm all in for political discussions, and the aftermath of these recent events. However, the thread has been derailed and turned into reciprocating arguments, that include: Off-topic replies.Personal remarks.Derogatory language.Abusive behavior.Objectionable content. Upon which a warning had already been given, indicating the unacceptable behavior. Posts that include the above have been removed and the thread is now reopened. However, should such behavior continue, the thread will be permanently locked, with the accompany of warnings and further consequences. Wa `al-salam
  14. السلام عليكم Millions? The Iranian and Iraqi currency isn't that extortionate in comparison to First-World countries. The money in those shrines are given as charity, and often spread among the workers and staff who support and manage the shrine. Usually, around the sanctuary, there are boxes of donations, that are delivered to impoverished areas, poverty-stricken families, and charity organizations. When you fail to provide compelling evidence (In a previous post [link]) for classical Shīʿah scholars professing in Tahrīf (distortion) al-Qurān, you take refuge
  15. السلام عليكم 1.`Āṣif al-Muḥsinī: “It is axiomatic that the report of a liar is nullified in evidence and nullified in its authenticity of consideration, and including the report that is dubious in its truth and untruth. Hence, inevitably every report or saying must be considered, from the acquisition of its truth with knowledge of absolute conscious definite reliability (al-Wijdānī); or with traditional (‘Urfī) knowledge, that is: assurance, for it is a rational proof, like the knowledge in the intellect (‘Aql), and is not deterred from the lawgiver [islamic], but acted upon by the Prophet
  16. Claim? Perhaps you are not well acquainted with the two schools (al-`Akhbārīyah and al-Uṣūlīyah), in their approach and proposed principles in jurisprudence [deduction]. You can start by reading an introduction to ‘Ilm al-Uṣūl/Uṣūl al-Fiqh by an Uṣūlī scholar (e.g.,al-Khū’ī, al-`Arākī, al-Tabāṭabā’ī, etc..), and authored works by `Akhbārī's, such as al-Istrābādī and al-Hurr al-`Āmilī.
  17. [Auto-Reply] This issue has been marked as "Resolved". If you have reasons to believe it's not, reply below
  18. السلام عليكم This Campaign has taken its course and results are finalized. For further comments or inquirers concerning the wining candidates and their proposals, they have each separately created a thread highlighting their gratitude and final words: starlight: http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235033438-thank-you-everyone/ magma: http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235033440-weve-made-shiachat-great-again/ We thank all members for their participation. Thread locked.
  19. السلام عليكم Both narratives are deemed ḍa‘īf (weak) per al-Khū’ī's standards. First ḥadīth mentioned in al-Ṣadūq Thawāb al-A‘māl, pg. 89, ḍa‘īf (weak), due to Bashīr al-Dahān and Ṣālḥ b. ‘Uqba. The former is considered Majhūl (unknown) to al-Khū’ī (see: al-Jawāhirī's al Mufīd, person. 1184, pg. 89), while the latter is considered Thiqah (trustworthy), however only upon the basis of al-Khū’ī's view of Tafsīr al-Qumī (see: al-Jawāhirī's al-Mufīd, person. 5840, pg. 273), which is very weak because the Tafsīr itself is not reliably established, and it was also said al-Khū’ī retracted his view l
  20. There is no Mu'tabr (reliable) rout to the Zīyārah of `Ashurā. However, some scholars deem the Zīyārah reliable collaboratively upon inclusion of various routs. This was previously discussed: http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235005122-investigation-of-ziyarat-ashura/. While other scholars have issues with specific parts of the Zīyārah, such as the specific cursing (La‘an) at the third segment (e.g., Sayed Kamāl al-Ḥaydarī [link]).
  21. I said: ',on a particular day (e.i.,`Arba‘īn)', and I was referring to the narrations in question. As for both these narratives, they are ḍa‘īf (weak). Bashī al-Dahān is Majhūl (unknown) per Shīʿah standards (see: al-Jawāhirī's al Mufīd, person. 1184, pg. 89), additionally, with other complications within their Sanad. Wa `al-salam
  22. السلام عليكم Because of the gravity of this topic, I'm moving this to the Thinkers discourse for the benefit. Only serious replies will be allowed.
  23. This is invalid. Those narrations are affirming the Zīyārah to Imam al-Ḥusayn generally, and not specifically, on a particular day (e.i.,`Arba‘īn). There are no aḥādīth on the Zīyārah of `Arba‘īn. Wa `al-salam ‘Alykum
  • Create New...