Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Ali Hadi.

Advanced Member
  • Content Count

    208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ali Hadi.

  • Rank
    Level 2 Member

Profile Information

  • Religion
    الثقلين

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1,658 profile views
  1. You're fairly accurate in literal sense. What it means is be specific about the positioning - so for example to say "he's not in this room".
  2. "So those who pray with him ensure that they are prepared for prayer"
  3. All narrators are reliable up to al-Qasim ibn Yahya - who has been given tadh`if by Ibn al-Ghada'iri, however al-Saduq did say that what he narrated (ziyarat al-Husayn) was of the greatest reliability [إنّها أصحّ الزيارات عنده رواية] - this probably prevails due to the issue of whether Dhu`afaa' Ibn al-Ghadha'iri was actually authored by him. Al-Hasan ibn Rashid is also a grey area. He was also given tadh`if by Ibn al-Ghadhai'ri but if you accept the tawthiq `aam of Tafsir al-Qummi (weak argument) then he'd be reliable.
  4. بسمه تعالى Often the answer to this question is given to be along the lines of "to prevent the bloodshed of the Muslims" and "he did not have sufficient support". I believe a sufficient reply to this would be that why did he not fight like al-Husayn عليه السلام did? And if he were to die, then so be it - he would be a shaheed and the oppressors would receive what they deserve on the day of judgement. Narrations in al-Saduq's `Ilal al-Shara'i`, I believe, distinguish the difference between the situation of Imam al-Husayn عليه السلام and Imam `Ali عليه السلام. ٨ - أخبرني علي بن حاتم قال: ح
  5. What if your wife was like the wives of Nooh and Loot عليهما السلام? As for the verses of Surat `Abasa - even if it was revealed about the Prophet صلى الله عليه و آله, which is the view of some scholars like al-Saduq رحمه الله, it is believed that it doesn't take anything away from their `ismah. Simply frowning at a blind man who interrupts you is rather forfeiting an opportunity to do good, and isn't necessarily a sin in itself.
  6. بسمه تعالى Bukhari's tadlees to cover up the sins of some of the "companions" is so obvious it's not even funny. Examples include `Umar denying the Prophet the pen and paper he wanted, Samurah ibn Jundub selling alcohol etc.
  7. بسمه تعالى That is not the question. That question is as to whether it is impermissible. The narration from Rijal al-Kashi does not state that what Amir al-Mu'mineen عليه السلام did was wrong.
  8. بسمه تعالى Why do you have such an obsession with Persians? As you will probably know each author of the six canonical Sunni books was a Persian. For that exact reason, you reject the idea of a Mehdi. Why the double standards? Your fiqhi narrations were almost completely compiled by Persians. Why does that not lead you to reject your fiqh as well? Looking at narrations with such a subjective ideology will only leave you entangled in your own cycle of ignorance and rejection.
  9. 1) No where in the Qur'an does it prohibit the punishment of burning with fire. 2) Sahih al-Bukhari is of no relevance to us, especially if it narrated by the nasibi slave of Ibn Abbas.
  10. I, and I'm sure others as well, would appreciate it if a mod/admin moved his two threads which have polluted this otherwise fine subforum.
  11. This is your problem right there. As far as I can tell you don't understand Arabic, you haven't properly studied foundational sources but you've read a few history books and all of a sudden no sect is correct but you are. You criticise hadiths saying that they were fabricated for an agenda but in reality your infallible history books are derived from hadith and contextual evidences.
  12. What your saying makes no difference. Tirmidhi, Nasa'i, Abu Dawood, and Ibn Majah all narrated from hardcore rawafidh who cursed Abu Bakr and `Umar, and pledged their allegiance to the family of the Prophet. As for the definitions of tashayyu` and rafdh, by the definition of Ibn Hajar to elevate `Ali over the first two is rafdh, and by the definition of al-Dhahabi, rafdh is the shatm and la`n and sabb of Abu Bakr and `Umar. These Shi`is and rawafidh narrate thousands of narrations in your books. As for nawasib in our books the ratio is tiny relative to the amount of Shi`i narrated content in
  13. Why does virtually every Sunni scholar narrate from rawafidh?
  14. بسمه تعالى Interestingly, I'm pretty sure you're the guy who would argue that we believe al-Kafi is completely mu`tabar because of the view of Hurr al-`Amili. Why the sudden change of heart? Do you just change your principles when you feel like it, or when you're backed into a corner? As for it being "careful or careless" of us to analyse the chains of narrations, rather than to just blindly accept (i.e. Bukhari and Muslim), it seems more like the former to me. Well she did launch a war against `Ali عليه السلام in which she sat on her camel and caused the death of thousands.
  15. Relax akhi. Just an observation though - perhaps our most famous book, which is Kitab al-Kafi, has not even been half translated on that website - only the usul [vols 1 and 2]. On a general note I reiterate what Abu Tufayl said and that is, not only is the beauty of Arabic something that cannot be translated to other languages, but also the very specific meanings are sometimes very hard to translate. That's why you see some people here say "rough translation..." when they attempt to translate from Arabic to English. If you learn Arabic properly, there is not a single book which is out of you
×
×
  • Create New...