Jump to content

kamyar

Veteran Member
  • Content Count

    1,337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from habib e najjaar in Farsi (Only) Noha / Latmiyya   
    A very Hemasi (epic) Noha:
    راه کربلا
    https://www.aparat.com/v/FTSjQ/نواهنگ_%26laquo%3Bراه_کربلا%26raquo
  2. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from Jafa'ar in Why I Will No Longer Recite The 3Rd Shahadah   
    I asked him a question but he  haven't answered it yet .
     
    Once again ,Brother Tawheed " Whom should we follow ? Our marjas or your posts ?
     
    In other word , You think the marjas (Ayt Khamenei , Ayt Sistani , Ayt Makarem Shirazi , Ayt Vahid Khorasani , Ayt Javadi Amoli and ... ) are making mistake ? You think they are committing bedas ? You think you are more knowledgeable than they are ?
     
    If yes ,Why you use their Fatawa to prove some of your points ,If Not , Please Stop it here and be more cautious .
     
    As Imam Mahdi wanted us , we should follow our trustful scholars during his gheybah .
  3. Completely Agree
    kamyar got a reaction from Hassan- in British Shi'ism Exposed | The Shirazis, "Imam" Taw   
    I think some of us are neglecting the dangerous and detrimental characteristics of the Shirazi movement/British Shia (whatever its name is). I am going to list some of these dangerous behaviors and characteristics:
    1. They are using Ahlulbayt against Ahlulbayt:
    While it’s clear that Imam Ali corporated with Caliphs, while we know in many cases he helped and even defended them, while we know our Imams asked us to respect Sunnis, pray along with their tribe, visit their sick people, attend their funerals, so on and so forth (Read the contents in this link to see how wide the extent of Islamic Unity is), we are seeing people in this movement saying: ” there is no unity between us and the followers of X and Y who oppressed Ahlulbayt”, “Unity with Sunnis is a political scam”, “Unity doesn’t make sense, unless they follow the path of Ahlulbayt” etc. Clearly these are against what Ahlulbayt did and what Ahlulbayt want us to do.
    The same can be said about their behaviors regarding disrespecting Sunnis’ respected symbols.
    Yes, we too know what they did to Ahlulbayt. We too know who deserves to be cursed. But...
    2. They have a habit of creating controversy over differences:
    Differences between scholars are natural. Scholars have various differences over several issues and or individuals – Irfan, tatbir, Rumi, Wahdat Wojoud, Ibn Arabi, fiqhi issues etc. But you rarely see them making a big deal out of it or make takfir on others. However, you see people in this movement making differences political and even make takfir on other scholars – which comes from their takfiri ideology. They even don’t call Iran, Islamic Republic, but Republic of Iran. This is ridiculous.

    3. They are castrating Shia and making it safe to the oppressors:
    While we are asked to be “اشدا علی الکفار” and “للظالم خصم”, oppressors don’t regard this movement as a danger to them. Shia is identified with its special characteristics in fighting tawaghit and oppressors. Emerging a group among us that is acting against these characteristics is there to distort this identity.
    This is one example, out of many (it's about Shirazis' hussayniah in London):
    It’s not just that. Not only are they benign toward our enemies, but also:
    4. They are regarded as hope for enemies to pursue their goals:
    Fit for enemy's agenda...
    Maybe now we can know where these so many media tool they have come from, can't we?
    We are also seeing them doing what enemies seek in regard to Ummah unity -- a good tool for enemies to add fuel the fire of differences among us and Sunnis.
    5. They, willingly or unwillingly, are endangering the lives of Shias:
    For some Sunnis, being a Shia is a crime -- an unforgivable crime which allows them to kill you. That’s why we are being killed since the very beginning just for being Shia. But there is an important “but” here. For many other Sunnis, being a Shia alone is not considered a crime, but if you disrespect their holy figures then yes, you must be killed.
    I translate remarks by head of a terrorist group in Eastern Iran, named Abdul-Malik Rigi (more than 150 Iranian citizen were killed and more than 300 were injured by this group – let’s not talk about how he was being supported by the US and how he was arrested):
    Also we should not forget when Daeshis were killing Shias in Speicher mass killing, they were shouting “ثار لام المومنین عایشه (blood/revenge for mother of believers Aisha)”
    “ثار لام المومنین عایشه” is a natural respond to “عایشه فی النار’’. Do those who are promoting the ceremonies where these things are being said know the consequences of their activity? Does Sadiq Shirazi know this? Do his sons know this? Do his followers know this?
    If only you knew Persian:
    http://www.ansarclip.ir/video/6582/مستندی-گویا-از-نقش-شیعه-انگلیسی-در-کشتار-شیعیان/
    Add to the list how they are playing with the marjaiaiah position (remember they even advertised for their marja on this very site, does a marja need to be advertised in this way), the picture of Shia they are presenting and …
    Although many other things left to be said about this movement (maybe in another time), its goal, its agenda and its activity, aren’t these things enough for all of us to see this movement as a danger to Islam and Shia?
  4. Thanks
    kamyar got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Thoughts 2018   
    The true home for heart is in the presence of Allah, not this inferior soil!
    For this, those who are abandoned from the true home are restless and anxious, even if their anxiety and restlessness isn’t visible and apparent, but when they pay attention to the depths of their soul, they would see that they are in anxiety.
    Keeping busy with material matters and illusions have kept the human away from heeding God and their truth, so they don’t heed their restlessness and spiritual pains.
    The problem of mankind today is that they assume their tranquility and stability would be achieved by satisfying their desires and lusts. So, they try their best to utilize the world more and more, but they will never reach their want. Because the world of nature isn’t the world of tranquility and stability.
    The material world means the world of waves! In a world based on restlessness where nothing has stability, how can tranquility be achieved?
    Ayatullah Ali Foroughi
    https://t.me/forooghetohid/1891
    ---
    Needless to say, this doesn’t mean tranquility in this world can’t be achieved. It won’t be achieved by these material means -- what we are wrongly trying to use for this matter.
  5. Thanks
    kamyar got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Thoughts 2018   
    The true home for heart is in the presence of Allah, not this inferior soil!
    For this, those who are abandoned from the true home are restless and anxious, even if their anxiety and restlessness isn’t visible and apparent, but when they pay attention to the depths of their soul, they would see that they are in anxiety.
    Keeping busy with material matters and illusions have kept the human away from heeding God and their truth, so they don’t heed their restlessness and spiritual pains.
    The problem of mankind today is that they assume their tranquility and stability would be achieved by satisfying their desires and lusts. So, they try their best to utilize the world more and more, but they will never reach their want. Because the world of nature isn’t the world of tranquility and stability.
    The material world means the world of waves! In a world based on restlessness where nothing has stability, how can tranquility be achieved?
    Ayatullah Ali Foroughi
    https://t.me/forooghetohid/1891
    ---
    Needless to say, this doesn’t mean tranquility in this world can’t be achieved. It won’t be achieved by these material means -- what we are wrongly trying to use for this matter.
  6. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from abuhaydar in Ayatullah Khomeini, Rumors and Allegations   
    I also recommend everyone to watch this video to see how American regime tried to save the dictator Shah:
    http://english.khamenei.ir/news/5436/Video-America-s-last-ditch-effort-to-save-Iran-s-Dictator
    Do you see how criminal these animals in power in the US are? Do you see how they don't consider any constrains in achieving their unjustified goals? Do you see how sad it is to see these people are freely governing a country for decades and except a few individuals no body cares what the regime they are living under is doing all around the world for decades?
    Do you see?
  7. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from Hameedeh in Ayatullah Khomeini, Rumors and Allegations   
    و علیک السلام و رحمت الله  brother/sister,
    I don't think our brother/sister has created this topic for a bad intention. And by "it could be true", he/she means it may be a strategic plan by Imam Khomeini to cheat them. 
    Anyways, No. This is not true. For example if you read "Declassified diplomacy: Washington’s hesitant plans for a military coup in pre-revolution Iran" which talks about General Huyser’s secret mission to Iran, it would be enough to understand that US was having hesitant reactions to the Revolution and was trying to prevent it from happening. They also tried to communicate with Imam Khomeini in this process. The messages exchanged between American officials and Imam Khomeini aren't secret and are available in the Sahifeh Noor (A book consisted of Imam Khomeini's letters, messages, remarks, speech etc.). Here is part of Imam Khomeini's message to Carter, while he's threatening him:"I recommend you to prevent a coup, for if it happens, the people will hold you responsible for it, and it will be detrimental to you. This is my entire message to Carter"
    We have talked about it earlier. For details please refer to these posts:
  8. Thanks
    kamyar got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    When we say something is controversial among a particular group, it means there is controversy about it among them. There are about 70 known marja who have experienced the time of Revolution. Almost nobody among them, except some malum-ul-hal, have dealt with the issue of Welayat Faqih (Imam Khomeini's or any other versions) as Shirazis and other political opponents of the Islamic Revolution are doing so. How many of these 70 known Marja have called the Imam Khomeini's view of the Welayat Faqih a Pharaoh-ic ideology? It's not controversial among them, but some mentioned individuals and groups are making it so, even if there may be differences about the limitation as there are differences on many other various topics among them. Even, there may be differences in Imam Khomeini and Ayatullah Khamenei's view of Welayat Faqih.
    This type of dealing with matters and differences the Shirazi movement possesses comes out of their habit. They do the same in regards to Irfan, Whadat Wojoud, tatbir etc. And our enemies have discovered this habit well and are using it to their benefit.
    These are some of the remarks by him I am going to translate from the Persian subtitle:
    "Then he came and gave an advanced and magic (version) to it (Welayat Faqih). He said that Welayat Faqih is the same as Welayat of Allah...He doesn't say this is my method, but he says this is the best method. Be careful lest anyone talk against the Welayat Faqih, this is your method. Pharaoh said: انا ربکم الاعلی -I am your great god- , then he induced in the mind that Musa and Haroun are wakening this better method. See, this is egoism and narcissism. This is your method... What kind of method is this my dear?! Is "I am your great god" servitude? Is it the best method?! I swear by God that Welayat Faqih is the same as "I am your great god" and not anything else. I swear you by God that this is the same as that. This is exactly that. This is competently the same as that and has no differences. This country is now based on that concept...Welayat Faqih means you are servant. He has written this that the Welayat Faqih's limitation is Welayat of Allah's. Didn't he said that? All the newspapers quoted it. And what does "it's within the Welayat of Rasoulullah" mean? It means they are slaves."
    Anyone with just a little knowledge about Iran knows that he is talking about Imam Khomeini.
    No. This is disrespect to our martyrs. We do not allow someone question the blood of our martyrs like that. Our martyrs are the red line of this country.
    At the beginning of the video I posted, the news teller is making such accusation (he says that Iranian authority has killed Muhammad and Muhammad Reza Shirazi). But he (Hussein Shirazi), while speaking about a scholar named Muhammad Reza, is accusing the establishment of "calling him foreigner and then killing him". When I was posting my last post on this thread I wrongly mixed these two accusations. So the exact accusation he is making against the government is about a scholar whose first name is Muhammad Reza, where he says "First they represent him as a foreigner and then kill him. Even if he is not talking about any particular person and is talking generally, then it will make it worse. Because he is accusing the establishment of having such a method to call other foreigner and then kill him.
    Anyways, him accusing the establishment of killing innocent scholar(s) is still its own place.
    By Iran obviously I mean something done or backed by the government or at least its supporters, as when we say, for example, the US invaded X country we don't mean the whole country of the US did that. And he says "کل بیوت المراجع" and not some of them.
    This is the subpoena that I think it was published by him himself/his supporters:

    -----------
    I didn't talk about all things related to his speech. There is also spreading of misinformation as well as miscalculation in it.
  9. Thanks
    kamyar got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    This is a zerar Husainiah. A Hussainiah backed by even Zionists.
    In Persian we have a somewhat famous sentence which says: In a hussainaiah wherein they don't care fighting against oppressors, even Ibn Ziad would do chest-beating.
    This is an example for such Hussainiah.
    It's one of the reasons, out of many, why we say this is a deviant movement in the Shia community and we all have duty to confront them. I don't know why some don't see these clear proofs which show the nature of this movement.
    What saddens me is to see some people are being affected by these people and this movement. Not that they are many or they can harm the Shia from achieving its final goal (we are triumphantly going forward, no matter what) or anything like this, but for them themselves. 
    As a brotherly suggestion, since I remember some of the first posts by @Mansur Bakhtiari on this website and I am seeing recently he is somehow showing support for this movement and their ideas, I just want you brother to be more cautious. I don't want you to become against all things related to this movement or become a Revolutionary overnight. I just ask you to be more cautious, as you too can ask me the same. That's all. I would like to say the same to our sister @zainabamy.
  10. Thanks
    kamyar got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    This is a zerar Husainiah. A Hussainiah backed by even Zionists.
    In Persian we have a somewhat famous sentence which says: In a hussainaiah wherein they don't care fighting against oppressors, even Ibn Ziad would do chest-beating.
    This is an example for such Hussainiah.
    It's one of the reasons, out of many, why we say this is a deviant movement in the Shia community and we all have duty to confront them. I don't know why some don't see these clear proofs which show the nature of this movement.
    What saddens me is to see some people are being affected by these people and this movement. Not that they are many or they can harm the Shia from achieving its final goal (we are triumphantly going forward, no matter what) or anything like this, but for them themselves. 
    As a brotherly suggestion, since I remember some of the first posts by @Mansur Bakhtiari on this website and I am seeing recently he is somehow showing support for this movement and their ideas, I just want you brother to be more cautious. I don't want you to become against all things related to this movement or become a Revolutionary overnight. I just ask you to be more cautious, as you too can ask me the same. That's all. I would like to say the same to our sister @zainabamy.
  11. Thanks
    kamyar got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    When we say something is controversial among a particular group, it means there is controversy about it among them. There are about 70 known marja who have experienced the time of Revolution. Almost nobody among them, except some malum-ul-hal, have dealt with the issue of Welayat Faqih (Imam Khomeini's or any other versions) as Shirazis and other political opponents of the Islamic Revolution are doing so. How many of these 70 known Marja have called the Imam Khomeini's view of the Welayat Faqih a Pharaoh-ic ideology? It's not controversial among them, but some mentioned individuals and groups are making it so, even if there may be differences about the limitation as there are differences on many other various topics among them. Even, there may be differences in Imam Khomeini and Ayatullah Khamenei's view of Welayat Faqih.
    This type of dealing with matters and differences the Shirazi movement possesses comes out of their habit. They do the same in regards to Irfan, Whadat Wojoud, tatbir etc. And our enemies have discovered this habit well and are using it to their benefit.
    These are some of the remarks by him I am going to translate from the Persian subtitle:
    "Then he came and gave an advanced and magic (version) to it (Welayat Faqih). He said that Welayat Faqih is the same as Welayat of Allah...He doesn't say this is my method, but he says this is the best method. Be careful lest anyone talk against the Welayat Faqih, this is your method. Pharaoh said: انا ربکم الاعلی -I am your great god- , then he induced in the mind that Musa and Haroun are wakening this better method. See, this is egoism and narcissism. This is your method... What kind of method is this my dear?! Is "I am your great god" servitude? Is it the best method?! I swear by God that Welayat Faqih is the same as "I am your great god" and not anything else. I swear you by God that this is the same as that. This is exactly that. This is competently the same as that and has no differences. This country is now based on that concept...Welayat Faqih means you are servant. He has written this that the Welayat Faqih's limitation is Welayat of Allah's. Didn't he said that? All the newspapers quoted it. And what does "it's within the Welayat of Rasoulullah" mean? It means they are slaves."
    Anyone with just a little knowledge about Iran knows that he is talking about Imam Khomeini.
    No. This is disrespect to our martyrs. We do not allow someone question the blood of our martyrs like that. Our martyrs are the red line of this country.
    At the beginning of the video I posted, the news teller is making such accusation (he says that Iranian authority has killed Muhammad and Muhammad Reza Shirazi). But he (Hussein Shirazi), while speaking about a scholar named Muhammad Reza, is accusing the establishment of "calling him foreigner and then killing him". When I was posting my last post on this thread I wrongly mixed these two accusations. So the exact accusation he is making against the government is about a scholar whose first name is Muhammad Reza, where he says "First they represent him as a foreigner and then kill him. Even if he is not talking about any particular person and is talking generally, then it will make it worse. Because he is accusing the establishment of having such a method to call other foreigner and then kill him.
    Anyways, him accusing the establishment of killing innocent scholar(s) is still its own place.
    By Iran obviously I mean something done or backed by the government or at least its supporters, as when we say, for example, the US invaded X country we don't mean the whole country of the US did that. And he says "کل بیوت المراجع" and not some of them.
    This is the subpoena that I think it was published by him himself/his supporters:

    -----------
    I didn't talk about all things related to his speech. There is also spreading of misinformation as well as miscalculation in it.
  12. Thanks
    kamyar got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    When we say something is controversial among a particular group, it means there is controversy about it among them. There are about 70 known marja who have experienced the time of Revolution. Almost nobody among them, except some malum-ul-hal, have dealt with the issue of Welayat Faqih (Imam Khomeini's or any other versions) as Shirazis and other political opponents of the Islamic Revolution are doing so. How many of these 70 known Marja have called the Imam Khomeini's view of the Welayat Faqih a Pharaoh-ic ideology? It's not controversial among them, but some mentioned individuals and groups are making it so, even if there may be differences about the limitation as there are differences on many other various topics among them. Even, there may be differences in Imam Khomeini and Ayatullah Khamenei's view of Welayat Faqih.
    This type of dealing with matters and differences the Shirazi movement possesses comes out of their habit. They do the same in regards to Irfan, Whadat Wojoud, tatbir etc. And our enemies have discovered this habit well and are using it to their benefit.
    These are some of the remarks by him I am going to translate from the Persian subtitle:
    "Then he came and gave an advanced and magic (version) to it (Welayat Faqih). He said that Welayat Faqih is the same as Welayat of Allah...He doesn't say this is my method, but he says this is the best method. Be careful lest anyone talk against the Welayat Faqih, this is your method. Pharaoh said: انا ربکم الاعلی -I am your great god- , then he induced in the mind that Musa and Haroun are wakening this better method. See, this is egoism and narcissism. This is your method... What kind of method is this my dear?! Is "I am your great god" servitude? Is it the best method?! I swear by God that Welayat Faqih is the same as "I am your great god" and not anything else. I swear you by God that this is the same as that. This is exactly that. This is competently the same as that and has no differences. This country is now based on that concept...Welayat Faqih means you are servant. He has written this that the Welayat Faqih's limitation is Welayat of Allah's. Didn't he said that? All the newspapers quoted it. And what does "it's within the Welayat of Rasoulullah" mean? It means they are slaves."
    Anyone with just a little knowledge about Iran knows that he is talking about Imam Khomeini.
    No. This is disrespect to our martyrs. We do not allow someone question the blood of our martyrs like that. Our martyrs are the red line of this country.
    At the beginning of the video I posted, the news teller is making such accusation (he says that Iranian authority has killed Muhammad and Muhammad Reza Shirazi). But he (Hussein Shirazi), while speaking about a scholar named Muhammad Reza, is accusing the establishment of "calling him foreigner and then killing him". When I was posting my last post on this thread I wrongly mixed these two accusations. So the exact accusation he is making against the government is about a scholar whose first name is Muhammad Reza, where he says "First they represent him as a foreigner and then kill him. Even if he is not talking about any particular person and is talking generally, then it will make it worse. Because he is accusing the establishment of having such a method to call other foreigner and then kill him.
    Anyways, him accusing the establishment of killing innocent scholar(s) is still its own place.
    By Iran obviously I mean something done or backed by the government or at least its supporters, as when we say, for example, the US invaded X country we don't mean the whole country of the US did that. And he says "کل بیوت المراجع" and not some of them.
    This is the subpoena that I think it was published by him himself/his supporters:

    -----------
    I didn't talk about all things related to his speech. There is also spreading of misinformation as well as miscalculation in it.
  13. Thanks
    kamyar got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    This is a zerar Husainiah. A Hussainiah backed by even Zionists.
    In Persian we have a somewhat famous sentence which says: In a hussainaiah wherein they don't care fighting against oppressors, even Ibn Ziad would do chest-beating.
    This is an example for such Hussainiah.
    It's one of the reasons, out of many, why we say this is a deviant movement in the Shia community and we all have duty to confront them. I don't know why some don't see these clear proofs which show the nature of this movement.
    What saddens me is to see some people are being affected by these people and this movement. Not that they are many or they can harm the Shia from achieving its final goal (we are triumphantly going forward, no matter what) or anything like this, but for them themselves. 
    As a brotherly suggestion, since I remember some of the first posts by @Mansur Bakhtiari on this website and I am seeing recently he is somehow showing support for this movement and their ideas, I just want you brother to be more cautious. I don't want you to become against all things related to this movement or become a Revolutionary overnight. I just ask you to be more cautious, as you too can ask me the same. That's all. I would like to say the same to our sister @zainabamy.
  14. Thanks
    kamyar got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    When we say something is controversial among a particular group, it means there is controversy about it among them. There are about 70 known marja who have experienced the time of Revolution. Almost nobody among them, except some malum-ul-hal, have dealt with the issue of Welayat Faqih (Imam Khomeini's or any other versions) as Shirazis and other political opponents of the Islamic Revolution are doing so. How many of these 70 known Marja have called the Imam Khomeini's view of the Welayat Faqih a Pharaoh-ic ideology? It's not controversial among them, but some mentioned individuals and groups are making it so, even if there may be differences about the limitation as there are differences on many other various topics among them. Even, there may be differences in Imam Khomeini and Ayatullah Khamenei's view of Welayat Faqih.
    This type of dealing with matters and differences the Shirazi movement possesses comes out of their habit. They do the same in regards to Irfan, Whadat Wojoud, tatbir etc. And our enemies have discovered this habit well and are using it to their benefit.
    These are some of the remarks by him I am going to translate from the Persian subtitle:
    "Then he came and gave an advanced and magic (version) to it (Welayat Faqih). He said that Welayat Faqih is the same as Welayat of Allah...He doesn't say this is my method, but he says this is the best method. Be careful lest anyone talk against the Welayat Faqih, this is your method. Pharaoh said: انا ربکم الاعلی -I am your great god- , then he induced in the mind that Musa and Haroun are wakening this better method. See, this is egoism and narcissism. This is your method... What kind of method is this my dear?! Is "I am your great god" servitude? Is it the best method?! I swear by God that Welayat Faqih is the same as "I am your great god" and not anything else. I swear you by God that this is the same as that. This is exactly that. This is competently the same as that and has no differences. This country is now based on that concept...Welayat Faqih means you are servant. He has written this that the Welayat Faqih's limitation is Welayat of Allah's. Didn't he said that? All the newspapers quoted it. And what does "it's within the Welayat of Rasoulullah" mean? It means they are slaves."
    Anyone with just a little knowledge about Iran knows that he is talking about Imam Khomeini.
    No. This is disrespect to our martyrs. We do not allow someone question the blood of our martyrs like that. Our martyrs are the red line of this country.
    At the beginning of the video I posted, the news teller is making such accusation (he says that Iranian authority has killed Muhammad and Muhammad Reza Shirazi). But he (Hussein Shirazi), while speaking about a scholar named Muhammad Reza, is accusing the establishment of "calling him foreigner and then killing him". When I was posting my last post on this thread I wrongly mixed these two accusations. So the exact accusation he is making against the government is about a scholar whose first name is Muhammad Reza, where he says "First they represent him as a foreigner and then kill him. Even if he is not talking about any particular person and is talking generally, then it will make it worse. Because he is accusing the establishment of having such a method to call other foreigner and then kill him.
    Anyways, him accusing the establishment of killing innocent scholar(s) is still its own place.
    By Iran obviously I mean something done or backed by the government or at least its supporters, as when we say, for example, the US invaded X country we don't mean the whole country of the US did that. And he says "کل بیوت المراجع" and not some of them.
    This is the subpoena that I think it was published by him himself/his supporters:

    -----------
    I didn't talk about all things related to his speech. There is also spreading of misinformation as well as miscalculation in it.
  15. Like
    kamyar reacted to Ashvazdanghe in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    If you saw Mokhtarnamah people's like Shirazi cult were 5 column of enemies & cause of destabilizing & defeat of shias against enemies of Ahlulbayt (as) 
  16. Like
    kamyar reacted to abuhaydar in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    ruining shiism is worse than ruining salafism
  17. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from Intellectual Resistance in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    Some points regarding some posts here:
    1. The Welayat Faqih principle isn't a controversial theory among almost all the Shia scholars. Some anti-Iran individuals to attack the establishment in Iran are making it controversial, since the establishment of the Islamic Revolution is based on this principle.
    2. Criticizing Welayat Faqih or even the Leader himself isn't a crime. People are not being arrested for just criticizing Welayat Faqih or the Leader. I can provide you many links and sources wherein people have criticized Welayat Faqih and the Leader himself. There are even cases when people are criticizing Ayatullah Khamenei in his presence and front of him in his Beit (Imam Khomeini Hosseiniyeh, where he delivers speech) and elsewhere. He, Ayatullah Khamenei, is advocate of being criticized (although I don’t know why some think they know and handle things better than him) and the evidence as well showing this has happened.
    3. Hussein Shirazi is not just talking about the theory. He is claiming that Imam Khomeini used this theory to fool people. He quotes Imam Khomeini's remarks as well as Pharoah's, and then he talks about their procedures and claims that he (Imam Khomeini) used the same method Pharaoh did to fool people. He also uses other examples. Actually he is talking about the topic of "using procedures to change concepts" and presents some examples to prove that Iranian establishment is doing so. He also questions the phrase "Sacred Defense" we use for our Sacred Defense against the Saddam during the war. He also uses the issue of tatbir claiming Iranian establishment is using the same method he was talking about. These are some, and not all, of the accusations he makes against Iran. He also accuses Iran of killing his family members. He also accuses Iran of attacking the house of all maraja, while almost all the maraja have been supporter of the establishment.
    These things are not coming out of the mouth of Maryam Rajavi or Saudi officials. These accusations are being made by a scholar, a taqwa-less one.
    4. I too don't insist that him being arrested was necessary. But it doesn't mean it was unjustified. He made false accusations so he was summoned to appear in court. He refused (in the second time) and he was arrested. This is natural and justifiable.
    Please don't change the fact by saying he was just expressing his opinions. I can accuse anyone I want of anything I want and say if someone says these things they will confront him and then when they arrest me, I say: "did you see I was right? Them arresting me proved my points!" This is illogical.
  18. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from Intellectual Resistance in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    Some points regarding some posts here:
    1. The Welayat Faqih principle isn't a controversial theory among almost all the Shia scholars. Some anti-Iran individuals to attack the establishment in Iran are making it controversial, since the establishment of the Islamic Revolution is based on this principle.
    2. Criticizing Welayat Faqih or even the Leader himself isn't a crime. People are not being arrested for just criticizing Welayat Faqih or the Leader. I can provide you many links and sources wherein people have criticized Welayat Faqih and the Leader himself. There are even cases when people are criticizing Ayatullah Khamenei in his presence and front of him in his Beit (Imam Khomeini Hosseiniyeh, where he delivers speech) and elsewhere. He, Ayatullah Khamenei, is advocate of being criticized (although I don’t know why some think they know and handle things better than him) and the evidence as well showing this has happened.
    3. Hussein Shirazi is not just talking about the theory. He is claiming that Imam Khomeini used this theory to fool people. He quotes Imam Khomeini's remarks as well as Pharoah's, and then he talks about their procedures and claims that he (Imam Khomeini) used the same method Pharaoh did to fool people. He also uses other examples. Actually he is talking about the topic of "using procedures to change concepts" and presents some examples to prove that Iranian establishment is doing so. He also questions the phrase "Sacred Defense" we use for our Sacred Defense against the Saddam during the war. He also uses the issue of tatbir claiming Iranian establishment is using the same method he was talking about. These are some, and not all, of the accusations he makes against Iran. He also accuses Iran of killing his family members. He also accuses Iran of attacking the house of all maraja, while almost all the maraja have been supporter of the establishment.
    These things are not coming out of the mouth of Maryam Rajavi or Saudi officials. These accusations are being made by a scholar, a taqwa-less one.
    4. I too don't insist that him being arrested was necessary. But it doesn't mean it was unjustified. He made false accusations so he was summoned to appear in court. He refused (in the second time) and he was arrested. This is natural and justifiable.
    Please don't change the fact by saying he was just expressing his opinions. I can accuse anyone I want of anything I want and say if someone says these things they will confront him and then when they arrest me, I say: "did you see I was right? Them arresting me proved my points!" This is illogical.
  19. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from Intellectual Resistance in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    Some points regarding some posts here:
    1. The Welayat Faqih principle isn't a controversial theory among almost all the Shia scholars. Some anti-Iran individuals to attack the establishment in Iran are making it controversial, since the establishment of the Islamic Revolution is based on this principle.
    2. Criticizing Welayat Faqih or even the Leader himself isn't a crime. People are not being arrested for just criticizing Welayat Faqih or the Leader. I can provide you many links and sources wherein people have criticized Welayat Faqih and the Leader himself. There are even cases when people are criticizing Ayatullah Khamenei in his presence and front of him in his Beit (Imam Khomeini Hosseiniyeh, where he delivers speech) and elsewhere. He, Ayatullah Khamenei, is advocate of being criticized (although I don’t know why some think they know and handle things better than him) and the evidence as well showing this has happened.
    3. Hussein Shirazi is not just talking about the theory. He is claiming that Imam Khomeini used this theory to fool people. He quotes Imam Khomeini's remarks as well as Pharoah's, and then he talks about their procedures and claims that he (Imam Khomeini) used the same method Pharaoh did to fool people. He also uses other examples. Actually he is talking about the topic of "using procedures to change concepts" and presents some examples to prove that Iranian establishment is doing so. He also questions the phrase "Sacred Defense" we use for our Sacred Defense against the Saddam during the war. He also uses the issue of tatbir claiming Iranian establishment is using the same method he was talking about. These are some, and not all, of the accusations he makes against Iran. He also accuses Iran of killing his family members. He also accuses Iran of attacking the house of all maraja, while almost all the maraja have been supporter of the establishment.
    These things are not coming out of the mouth of Maryam Rajavi or Saudi officials. These accusations are being made by a scholar, a taqwa-less one.
    4. I too don't insist that him being arrested was necessary. But it doesn't mean it was unjustified. He made false accusations so he was summoned to appear in court. He refused (in the second time) and he was arrested. This is natural and justifiable.
    Please don't change the fact by saying he was just expressing his opinions. I can accuse anyone I want of anything I want and say if someone says these things they will confront him and then when they arrest me, I say: "did you see I was right? Them arresting me proved my points!" This is illogical.
  20. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from Intellectual Resistance in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    Some points regarding some posts here:
    1. The Welayat Faqih principle isn't a controversial theory among almost all the Shia scholars. Some anti-Iran individuals to attack the establishment in Iran are making it controversial, since the establishment of the Islamic Revolution is based on this principle.
    2. Criticizing Welayat Faqih or even the Leader himself isn't a crime. People are not being arrested for just criticizing Welayat Faqih or the Leader. I can provide you many links and sources wherein people have criticized Welayat Faqih and the Leader himself. There are even cases when people are criticizing Ayatullah Khamenei in his presence and front of him in his Beit (Imam Khomeini Hosseiniyeh, where he delivers speech) and elsewhere. He, Ayatullah Khamenei, is advocate of being criticized (although I don’t know why some think they know and handle things better than him) and the evidence as well showing this has happened.
    3. Hussein Shirazi is not just talking about the theory. He is claiming that Imam Khomeini used this theory to fool people. He quotes Imam Khomeini's remarks as well as Pharoah's, and then he talks about their procedures and claims that he (Imam Khomeini) used the same method Pharaoh did to fool people. He also uses other examples. Actually he is talking about the topic of "using procedures to change concepts" and presents some examples to prove that Iranian establishment is doing so. He also questions the phrase "Sacred Defense" we use for our Sacred Defense against the Saddam during the war. He also uses the issue of tatbir claiming Iranian establishment is using the same method he was talking about. These are some, and not all, of the accusations he makes against Iran. He also accuses Iran of killing his family members. He also accuses Iran of attacking the house of all maraja, while almost all the maraja have been supporter of the establishment.
    These things are not coming out of the mouth of Maryam Rajavi or Saudi officials. These accusations are being made by a scholar, a taqwa-less one.
    4. I too don't insist that him being arrested was necessary. But it doesn't mean it was unjustified. He made false accusations so he was summoned to appear in court. He refused (in the second time) and he was arrested. This is natural and justifiable.
    Please don't change the fact by saying he was just expressing his opinions. I can accuse anyone I want of anything I want and say if someone says these things they will confront him and then when they arrest me, I say: "did you see I was right? Them arresting me proved my points!" This is illogical.
  21. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from Intellectual Resistance in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    Some points regarding some posts here:
    1. The Welayat Faqih principle isn't a controversial theory among almost all the Shia scholars. Some anti-Iran individuals to attack the establishment in Iran are making it controversial, since the establishment of the Islamic Revolution is based on this principle.
    2. Criticizing Welayat Faqih or even the Leader himself isn't a crime. People are not being arrested for just criticizing Welayat Faqih or the Leader. I can provide you many links and sources wherein people have criticized Welayat Faqih and the Leader himself. There are even cases when people are criticizing Ayatullah Khamenei in his presence and front of him in his Beit (Imam Khomeini Hosseiniyeh, where he delivers speech) and elsewhere. He, Ayatullah Khamenei, is advocate of being criticized (although I don’t know why some think they know and handle things better than him) and the evidence as well showing this has happened.
    3. Hussein Shirazi is not just talking about the theory. He is claiming that Imam Khomeini used this theory to fool people. He quotes Imam Khomeini's remarks as well as Pharoah's, and then he talks about their procedures and claims that he (Imam Khomeini) used the same method Pharaoh did to fool people. He also uses other examples. Actually he is talking about the topic of "using procedures to change concepts" and presents some examples to prove that Iranian establishment is doing so. He also questions the phrase "Sacred Defense" we use for our Sacred Defense against the Saddam during the war. He also uses the issue of tatbir claiming Iranian establishment is using the same method he was talking about. These are some, and not all, of the accusations he makes against Iran. He also accuses Iran of killing his family members. He also accuses Iran of attacking the house of all maraja, while almost all the maraja have been supporter of the establishment.
    These things are not coming out of the mouth of Maryam Rajavi or Saudi officials. These accusations are being made by a scholar, a taqwa-less one.
    4. I too don't insist that him being arrested was necessary. But it doesn't mean it was unjustified. He made false accusations so he was summoned to appear in court. He refused (in the second time) and he was arrested. This is natural and justifiable.
    Please don't change the fact by saying he was just expressing his opinions. I can accuse anyone I want of anything I want and say if someone says these things they will confront him and then when they arrest me, I say: "did you see I was right? Them arresting me proved my points!" This is illogical.
  22. Like
    kamyar reacted to Hassan- in Ayatollah Shirazi's Son is arrested   
    These shirazi followers can whine, shout and curse the supreme leader all they want lol, that's all they're good for. Meanwhile the real men led by the supreme leader and Sayed Nasrallah are saving Islam on the front lines. 
  23. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from baradar_jackson in Iranians Openly Declare Atheism   
    Twitter!
    When we talk about Iran, Iranians and Twitter we should know the following facts.
    Twitter was banned for Iranians by the Twitter itself until recently. It means creating a Twitter account while living in Iran was almost impossible, since Twitter hadn’t included Iran Dialing Code in the registering process, while to register you need to enter your cellphone number. This has been one of the two major reasons why most/many of the Iranian on Twitter are not living in Iran, and we should know that some of the Iranians abroad are not a good sample to evaluate Iran and Iranians. Another reason for the matter is the fact that Twitter is still banned in Iran by the government, which creates an obstacle for Iranians to create a Twitter account and use it, although people can use VPN to pass the obstacle. These are the main reasons that have made twitter hangout for some of the worse kinds of Iranians who are living abroad.
    Here is an example to prove the point above. In Instagram, which is not banned for Iranians, Ayatullah Khamenei’s account is followed by about 1.8 M members, while the followers of Ayatullah Khamenei’s Farsi account of Twitter equates to just about 120 K. Also, while many of his account’s posts on Instagram get more than 100 K likes or sometimes more than 200 K and even about 300-350 K, the Twitter account’s posts gets around 1 or at most about 2 or 3 k likes.
    www.twitter.com/khamenei_fa
    https://www.instagram.com/khamenei_ir/
    However, after the ban was lifted by Twitter for Iranians, there are more Revolutionaries and Hizbullahis active there, in a way that it was admitted by a BBC Farsi Analyst:

    Translation: Revolutionaries have conquered some embankments in the Twitter front, 2 K likes for spreading hatred (No need here to know what he means by spreading hatred)
     As far as I know the likes reached about 4 K, if the number matter.
    This is why Revolutionaries are questioning the Twitter being banned by the government, since this has made the twitter a stronghold for Monarchists, disbelievers, MKO terrorists and other "worst kinds of Iranians" that you hardly see them in Iran in the real life. I don’t say these people don’t exist in Iran. What I am saying is that you see them hardly, since they are so few. Polls, both conducted by Iranians and by non-Iranian institutes, also prove these points.
    Another important matter is that there are also many cases and proofs which show that these people on social media, maybe mainly on Twitter, are organised and use fake accounts, robot etc.
    I also have heard that Saudis are behind some of these kinds of activities. I haven’t seen any proof for that.
    Most probably they are fake users. Don't take them seriously. They are funny and are being made fun of (Farsi Video):
    http://ansarclip.ir/video/10096/توییت-نما---16-اسفند-96---خدا-رو-شکر-تئیستم/

    A serious "Thank God I am an atheist!"
  24. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from baradar_jackson in Iranians Openly Declare Atheism   
    Twitter!
    When we talk about Iran, Iranians and Twitter we should know the following facts.
    Twitter was banned for Iranians by the Twitter itself until recently. It means creating a Twitter account while living in Iran was almost impossible, since Twitter hadn’t included Iran Dialing Code in the registering process, while to register you need to enter your cellphone number. This has been one of the two major reasons why most/many of the Iranian on Twitter are not living in Iran, and we should know that some of the Iranians abroad are not a good sample to evaluate Iran and Iranians. Another reason for the matter is the fact that Twitter is still banned in Iran by the government, which creates an obstacle for Iranians to create a Twitter account and use it, although people can use VPN to pass the obstacle. These are the main reasons that have made twitter hangout for some of the worse kinds of Iranians who are living abroad.
    Here is an example to prove the point above. In Instagram, which is not banned for Iranians, Ayatullah Khamenei’s account is followed by about 1.8 M members, while the followers of Ayatullah Khamenei’s Farsi account of Twitter equates to just about 120 K. Also, while many of his account’s posts on Instagram get more than 100 K likes or sometimes more than 200 K and even about 300-350 K, the Twitter account’s posts gets around 1 or at most about 2 or 3 k likes.
    www.twitter.com/khamenei_fa
    https://www.instagram.com/khamenei_ir/
    However, after the ban was lifted by Twitter for Iranians, there are more Revolutionaries and Hizbullahis active there, in a way that it was admitted by a BBC Farsi Analyst:

    Translation: Revolutionaries have conquered some embankments in the Twitter front, 2 K likes for spreading hatred (No need here to know what he means by spreading hatred)
     As far as I know the likes reached about 4 K, if the number matter.
    This is why Revolutionaries are questioning the Twitter being banned by the government, since this has made the twitter a stronghold for Monarchists, disbelievers, MKO terrorists and other "worst kinds of Iranians" that you hardly see them in Iran in the real life. I don’t say these people don’t exist in Iran. What I am saying is that you see them hardly, since they are so few. Polls, both conducted by Iranians and by non-Iranian institutes, also prove these points.
    Another important matter is that there are also many cases and proofs which show that these people on social media, maybe mainly on Twitter, are organised and use fake accounts, robot etc.
    I also have heard that Saudis are behind some of these kinds of activities. I haven’t seen any proof for that.
    Most probably they are fake users. Don't take them seriously. They are funny and are being made fun of (Farsi Video):
    http://ansarclip.ir/video/10096/توییت-نما---16-اسفند-96---خدا-رو-شکر-تئیستم/

    A serious "Thank God I am an atheist!"
  25. Like
    kamyar got a reaction from baradar_jackson in Iranians Openly Declare Atheism   
    Twitter!
    When we talk about Iran, Iranians and Twitter we should know the following facts.
    Twitter was banned for Iranians by the Twitter itself until recently. It means creating a Twitter account while living in Iran was almost impossible, since Twitter hadn’t included Iran Dialing Code in the registering process, while to register you need to enter your cellphone number. This has been one of the two major reasons why most/many of the Iranian on Twitter are not living in Iran, and we should know that some of the Iranians abroad are not a good sample to evaluate Iran and Iranians. Another reason for the matter is the fact that Twitter is still banned in Iran by the government, which creates an obstacle for Iranians to create a Twitter account and use it, although people can use VPN to pass the obstacle. These are the main reasons that have made twitter hangout for some of the worse kinds of Iranians who are living abroad.
    Here is an example to prove the point above. In Instagram, which is not banned for Iranians, Ayatullah Khamenei’s account is followed by about 1.8 M members, while the followers of Ayatullah Khamenei’s Farsi account of Twitter equates to just about 120 K. Also, while many of his account’s posts on Instagram get more than 100 K likes or sometimes more than 200 K and even about 300-350 K, the Twitter account’s posts gets around 1 or at most about 2 or 3 k likes.
    www.twitter.com/khamenei_fa
    https://www.instagram.com/khamenei_ir/
    However, after the ban was lifted by Twitter for Iranians, there are more Revolutionaries and Hizbullahis active there, in a way that it was admitted by a BBC Farsi Analyst:

    Translation: Revolutionaries have conquered some embankments in the Twitter front, 2 K likes for spreading hatred (No need here to know what he means by spreading hatred)
     As far as I know the likes reached about 4 K, if the number matter.
    This is why Revolutionaries are questioning the Twitter being banned by the government, since this has made the twitter a stronghold for Monarchists, disbelievers, MKO terrorists and other "worst kinds of Iranians" that you hardly see them in Iran in the real life. I don’t say these people don’t exist in Iran. What I am saying is that you see them hardly, since they are so few. Polls, both conducted by Iranians and by non-Iranian institutes, also prove these points.
    Another important matter is that there are also many cases and proofs which show that these people on social media, maybe mainly on Twitter, are organised and use fake accounts, robot etc.
    I also have heard that Saudis are behind some of these kinds of activities. I haven’t seen any proof for that.
    Most probably they are fake users. Don't take them seriously. They are funny and are being made fun of (Farsi Video):
    http://ansarclip.ir/video/10096/توییت-نما---16-اسفند-96---خدا-رو-شکر-تئیستم/

    A serious "Thank God I am an atheist!"
×