Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

humanbeing101

Advanced Member
  • Content Count

    740
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Muhammad Al-Hurr in British Shi'ism Exposed   
  2. Like
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Anti-Majos   
    You know, it's actually sad. Polemics is one thing & even strong/passionate polemics shouldn't allow you to laugh at victims of a terrorist attack. The irony too is that they accuse shias of taqiya, well here it appears to be the case that they are doing some extreme form of taqiya or have some extreme cognitive dissonance at play. 'Anti-Majos' still defends using that video, not only that. They still claim they weren't laughing at the victims. What were they laughing at then with all those laughing emojis posted on the video whilst it was playing? It's on one their recent videos in a reply to me:
     
     
    The second point is that removing the laughing emojis or making a point of shias doing shirk in a time of hardship doesn't make using that video in that way anymore justifiable. It's not morally justifiable to make a political or religious point of victims of a terrorist attack whilst it is happening & being recorded. Why? For starters, where is the actual human empathy? Not asking about, 1) Whether they survived. 2)Asking about their trauma. etc... Or to put it in anothe way, do you think they'd be ok if it was the other way around? If their relatives/family members were victims of a terrorist attack & some christian or athiest comes along and decries, "why are they praying to allah" or any action that is islamic that they are doing. I highly doubt they'd be ok with that or won't be upset by that. 
     
     
     
  3. Like
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from AmirioTheMuzzy in Anti-Majos   
    You know, it's actually sad. Polemics is one thing & even strong/passionate polemics shouldn't allow you to laugh at victims of a terrorist attack. The irony too is that they accuse shias of taqiya, well here it appears to be the case that they are doing some extreme form of taqiya or have some extreme cognitive dissonance at play. 'Anti-Majos' still defends using that video, not only that. They still claim they weren't laughing at the victims. What were they laughing at then with all those laughing emojis posted on the video whilst it was playing? It's on one their recent videos in a reply to me:
     
     
    The second point is that removing the laughing emojis or making a point of shias doing shirk in a time of hardship doesn't make using that video in that way anymore justifiable. It's not morally justifiable to make a political or religious point of victims of a terrorist attack whilst it is happening & being recorded. Why? For starters, where is the actual human empathy? Not asking about, 1) Whether they survived. 2)Asking about their trauma. etc... Or to put it in anothe way, do you think they'd be ok if it was the other way around? If their relatives/family members were victims of a terrorist attack & some christian or athiest comes along and decries, "why are they praying to allah" or any action that is islamic that they are doing. I highly doubt they'd be ok with that or won't be upset by that. 
     
     
     
  4. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from OrthodoxTruth in British Shi'ism Exposed   
  5. Like
  6. Like
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from AmirioTheMuzzy in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    Kheti Beti again. It's clear you guys are simply interested in being Assadists because you completely again ignored the point and evidence given for the fact Assad assisted those very same jihadists you claim he fought against.
    You guys keep asking "who should rule Syria", I literally stated a decentralized libertarian confederation should exist there but again you ignore a point you cannot answer.
     
    Anyway may Allah guide you if you are sincere and may Allah destroy you if you are just a supporter of the taghuts.
     
  7. My Prayers
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    Kheti Beti again. It's clear you guys are simply interested in being Assadists because you completely again ignored the point and evidence given for the fact Assad assisted those very same jihadists you claim he fought against.
    You guys keep asking "who should rule Syria", I literally stated a decentralized libertarian confederation should exist there but again you ignore a point you cannot answer.
     
    Anyway may Allah guide you if you are sincere and may Allah destroy you if you are just a supporter of the taghuts.
     
  8. Like
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    It's clear this isn't going anywhere, anyway Allah sa'adek.
  9. Sad
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    It's crazy I'm telling you Baathis killed my relatives aaah but "so what". Baathism is rooted in Nazism... aaah "so what". Baathis released the jihadis aaah "so what". 
    Kheti Beti...
  10. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    Except this is found in numerous academic books and journal articles. Here is one by Dr.. Rajan and the publish is 'Routledge':

     

  11. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    I literally showed you and with a reference Assad released those same very Jihadists from his prisons. 
     
    You should also know Baathism has its roots in Nazism, it imported the ultra-nationalist model of the fascists from Europe into own model of rule. Yes it also has Marxist-Leninist influences too. Reference:


     
    I would like a model of rule in Syria that is fundamentally Libertarian in nature. A decentralized confederation/federation of communes where Syrians without dictators or representatives can dictate their own lives. Sunnis, Shias, Alawis, Christians etc.. alike jointly. The Syrian state is a European construct and the structure of the Syrian state is also a European construct, namely the Westphalian state-system. Reference:
     


  12. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Revert1963 in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    Assad is a taghut and should not be supported by Shias. 
  13. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Revert1963 in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    I don't even believe Syria should exist as a political entity. 
  14. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Soldiers and Saffron in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    I don't even believe Syria should exist as a political entity. 
  15. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from hasanhh in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    I don't even believe Syria should exist as a political entity. 
  16. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    I don't even believe Syria should exist as a political entity. 
  17. Sad
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    It's relevant because it will demonstrate whether you have actually lived under Baathi rule or have had family under Baathi rule. Baathis killed many of my people and any justification of their rule is immoral. 
  18. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    Assad is a taghut and should not be supported by Shias. 
  19. Disagree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Soldiers and Saffron in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    Assad is a taghut and should not be supported by Shias. 
  20. Partially Agree
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Propaganda_of_the_Deed in Bashar ʿal-Assad   
    Assad is a taghut and should not be supported by Shias. 
  21. Like
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from AmirioTheMuzzy in Sunni/Shia Debate-Mohammed Hijab vs Sayyid Haamid   
    I'd say Sayyid Haamid definately asked him questions that Muhammed couldn't answer. 
  22. Confused
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Husayni in Reports: Gunfire outside Saudi king's home   
    Fake news.
  23. Like
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Hameedeh in Reports: Gunfire outside Saudi king's home   
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/04/saudi-gunfire-police-shoot-toy-drone-royal-palace-180421201413596.html
  24. Like
    humanbeing101 reacted to Hameedeh in Reports: Gunfire outside Saudi king's home   
    The news story has a link to Saudi Press Agency that no longer exists. They removed it. Were the gunshots from the drone itself or the body guards or police were shooting at the drone?
  25. Like
    humanbeing101 got a reaction from Hameedeh in Reports: Gunfire outside Saudi king's home   
    I don't but so far no evidence suggests it is A)a coup B)Near the Palace C)or the source of these videos. Notice it is all Qataris and Saudi opposition posting them. I'm not saying it cannot be a coup but I just haven't seen anything to convince me it is. 
×
×
  • Create New...