Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Yahya2004

Advanced Member
  • Content Count

    557
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Yahya2004

  • Rank
    burnout

Profile Information

  • Religion
    ماكو

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

3,982 profile views
  1. You do know that your Shari3 definition doesn't fall under the Hadith you quoted as the Sabab of that Hadith was that Khalid b.al-Walid did sabb of Abd al-Rahman b. Auf to which the Prophet Muhammad (s) rebuked Khalid with those words; hence either Khalid was a disbeliever of the context is not as inclusive as the shari3 definition
  2. Purely for the sake of academic integrity- allow me to present a response to the claims of Dr. Ahmed al-Wa'eli which contain evidence to suggest that he was not representing the madhhab himself in his claim presented in this video: The above videos are in Arabic; please note- I do not know enough about 'Abd al-Haleem al-Ghizzi to discuss his credibility or lack of- therefore I am not endorsing him, I am merely presenting his refutation of Dr. Wa'eli.
  3. Your Ahlus Sunnah Faqih Imam al-Sarkhsy didnt view things that way: Your Imam here, actually admits this is tantamount to Tahreef since the Goat ate the ayaat after the Death of the Prophet. I've underlined where he said this, furthermore he states the Shias probably fabricated this hadith, which shows he didnt trust the Science of Rijaal that the Sunnis were peddling. (al-Mabsoot, volume 5, page 134) Imam al-Qurtubi, your Mufassir equally feels just as embarassed and blames this on Shi'as and Mulhids (Atheists) showing he thought it was Tahreef also and probably didnt trust your hadith scie
  4. Response: 1) Najashi states in regards to Aban b. Uthman that he narrated from both Abi Abdullah (ya3ni al-Sadiq as) and Abi al-Hassan (namely Imam Musa b. Jafar as): Thats firstly a bit uncharacteristic of a messianic sect who believes that Imam al-Sadiq (as) was the Mahdi and that Imamate ceased after him. This would lead us to question that he was from the Sect of the Nawusiyyah, as Sayyed al-Khoei articulates in his great work al-Mu'jam (may Allah elevate his station): Mu'jam volume 1, page 146 What may further help us in this are the words of Muhaqiq al-Ardibili (QS) who states in his M
  5. If you are referring to Malangs, then yes to both questions. Secondly anyone who abuses a Shi'a Marja'a (unless the so-called Marja'a has left Tashayyu and been discredited by Ahl al-'Ilm) is most likely a rabble rousing idiot. As for misguiding people, I'd agree that this forum has become a source for misguidance, however I believe that applies also to unqualified statements made from people such as yourself (earlier and now qualified Alhamdulillah) which condemns ALL Akhbaris as a Cult. In Essence, Yes, I believe that Pseudo Akhbaris especially the idiots who have that Akhbari website mislea
  6. Orion, I personally don't include Muhammad Ameen al-Astarabadi in the same box as the other greats I mentioned, however, look how our contemporary 'Ulema in Qom praise even him: This is from a published version of his book "al-Fawa'id al-Madaniyyah" It's published by: مؤسسة النشر الإسلامي Thats a renowned publisher based in Qom, To view more of their renowned publications click here: http://www.ketabname.com/main2/lists/from_this_publisher.php?id=386&chlang=ar& Look at the appelation added to the Scholar's name at the end: الفوائد المدنية لفخر المحدثين وقدوة المجددين المولى محمد أمين ا
  7. Yusuf al-Bahrani goes out his way to defend al-Astarabadi in his Magnus Opum "Hada'iq al-Nadhira", secondly he didnt have to qualify that, its like me saying "CURSE ON ALL RATIONALISTS" (Not something I'm doing, its an example) then someone being like "Dude, why are you cursing Sharif al-Murtada amongst others" then I respond: "Prove to me Sharif al-Murtada belonged to the Nawbakhti school of Rationalism" my colleage would respond: "I don't need to as you cursed all rationalists without clarifying or specifying"
  8. This website really is turning into a cess pit of deviance, we have laypeople like Orion condemning some of our classical 'Ulema and other laypeople attacking the contemporary 'Ulema. Look at how our Maraja'a like Sayyed Muhammad Husayn Tabataba'i al-Hakeem (HA) discusses 'Ulema after referring to them as Akhbaris: http://www.alhakeem.com/arabic/rsael/osol/index.htm he praises them with Quds Sirrihim, something one only says for Praised 'Ulema. Now we have this kid Orion calling Akhbaris a Cult, thats disrespectful to the two Majlisis, Hurr al-Amili and Yusuf al-Bahrani (QS) amongst others. Z
  9. Actually he was a Maliki Scholar.... Please don't post inaccurate information about history, as I've observed you have a tendency to do sister.
  10. ......Do you consider the Amman message which accepts Ibadhi Kharijis and people who dont pray such as Aga Khani Isma'ilis as Muslims to be respresentative of the Imams (as)? (Follow up question, so why are you implementing it?)
  11. Salaam 'Alaikum, I truthfully mean no intended harm to Farid (who is very akhlaqi and usually very polite and civil in his dealings with Shias) but Bro, it seems like your hiding with the post I have just quoted, you have insinuated that you are driven by your desire to defend Abu Hurairah al-Dowsi al-Yamani, because you feel Shias have made him the butt of every joke etc. Yet, it seems to me that this is just all secondary to you debating someone on the status on Ibrahim b. Hashim, why hide behind the pretense of your love for Abu Hurairah. Just to give an example, if I would claim that the
  12. I believe its due to your relatively low post count, they used to have a rule that one requires 25-50 posts taqreeban before they can PM. Mind you they may have just removed PM all together, I'm not too sure. This website goes down and modifies every 2 months approximately.

  13. Yeah well, just trying to promote the site :)

    How come you can't have private correspondence in this forum??

×
×
  • Create New...