Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

skylight1

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    2,608
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by skylight1

  1. Because Shia Chat is only partly real - a significant (minority, for now) are virtual who won't get even a bare hearing in a real situation, but given the mod. situation on Shia Chat they get a forum
  2. not to worry, we are proceeding - and IRI has been proceeding for the past 31 years with or (mostly) without the imperialist dogs and their zionist keepers todays speech http://gadebate.un.org/Portals/1/statements/634208557381562500IR_en.pdf
  3. link to President Ahmadinejad's speech (transcript) on 9/21/2010 http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/debate/IR_en.pdf
  4. http://www.voltairenet.org/article167041.html The calls for Koran burnings by certain US clergymen on the occasion of the ninth anniversary of the September 11 attacks, shook the Muslim world. The reactions to the announcement differ according to the culture. In the western world, it is regarded as a provocation which should not be overdramatized. True, the Koran is a sacred book, but it’s only paper, after all. Inversely, in the Islamic world, the burning of the Koran is perceived as an attempt to disconnect man from the sacred teachings and to deny him salvation. This gives rise to uncontrollable emotional reactions which are considered by the West as religious hysteria. Nothing like it could ever happen in Europe, and much less in France, a country steeped in militant secularism for more than a century. And yet … Mobilizing public opinion French author Bernard-Henri Levy [1] recently alerted the French public to the case of Sakineh Mohammad-Ashtanni, a young Iranian woman reportedly condemned to death by stoning for committing adultery. He launched a signature campaign through the Internet to put pressure on the Iranian authorities, urging them to stop this barbaric act. In close touch with both the victim’s son, a resident of Tabriz, and the victim’s lawyer, Javid Hustan Kian, who has recently settled in France to flee the Iranian regime, Mr. Levy didn’t skimp on any of the details: stoning - a practice which was interrupted through a moratorium - has been revived on President Ahmadinejad’s initiative. Ms. Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani could be put to death at the end of Ramadan. Meanwhile, the prison warden, riled by the media scandal, ordered her to be lashed 99 times. The French essayist concentrates his attacks on the mode of execution, observing: “Why stoning? Isn’t there another way of killing in Iran? Because it is the most abominable of all. Because an aggression against a person’s face, a deluge of stones cast at an innocent and bare face, the refinement of cruelty to the point of encoding the size of the stones to guarantee the victim’s protracted suffering, represent a rare composite of inhumanity and barbarity. And because this way of obliterating a face, of exploding the flesh and reducing it to a bloody magma, of bombarding it until it transforms into a blob, symbolizes much more than a simple execution. Stoning is not just a death sentence. Stoning is the extermination of a flesh that was put on trial, albeit somewhat retroactively, for having been a flesh, and that flesh in particular: the flesh of a young and beautiful woman, one who was both loved and a lover, who possibly also experienced the happiness of loving and of being loved.” President Sarkozy endorsed Levy’s allegations during the annual conference of French Ambassadors [2]. After his speech he declared that the condemned woman would henceforth fall under “under the responsibility of France”. Numerous associations and high-profile personalities quickly joined in the movement and more than 140 000 signatures were collected. France’s Prime Minister François Fillon turned up in the newsroom of the main public television channel to express his feelings of solidarity with Sakineh, “sister of us all”. Meanwhile, former French Secretary for human rights Rama Yade stated that from that moment on France was considering this case as a “personal affair”. Mystification Although they may not know it, the emotive reaction of the French people is tightly associated with the religious side of their collective subconscious. Whether Christian or not, the French have been marked by the story of Jesus and the adulteress. Lets us briefly recall the myth [3]. The Pharisees, a group of arrogant Jews, wanted to put Jesus in an embarrassing situation. They brought a woman to him who had been caught committing adultery. According to the laws of Moses, the woman should have been stoned, but that cruel prescription had luckily been abandoned. The Pharisees asked Jesus to decide what had to be done. If he approved of her stoning, they would regard him as a fanatic. If, on the contrary, he refused to punish her, he would be accused of going against the law. But Jesus saved the woman by affirming: “let he who is without sin, cast the first stone”. Jesus reversed the dilemma: if the Pharisees stone her, it is because they think of themselves as pure. If they don’t, they are the ones violating the law. And, the book states: “they gradually withdrew, beginning with the elders”. In western thought, this myth constitutes the cornerstone of the separation between civil and religious law. The adulteress committed a sin and is therefore accountable only to God. She did not commit a crime and therefore cannot be judged by man. The French people see the announced stoning of Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani as an outrageous regression. The Islamic Republic of Iran must be a religious regime enforcing the Law of Moses as revised by the Koran, the Sharia. The Mollahs must be a bunch of phallocratic fanatics who repress women’s love affairs outside marriage and keep them subject to men. Blinded by their own obscurantism, they even go so far as to kill them in the most horrible way. This is what should be considered as collective religious hysteria since, in such circumstances, the normal behavior of sensible people should have been to verify the accusations, something that no one had bothered to do all this time. Questions Having himself signed the aforementioned petition, the leader of France’s Anti-Zionist Party, Dieudonné M’bala M’bala - who happened to be in Tehran for a film project – was willing to mediate in favor of the condemned woman. He requested an audience and was received by Ali Zadeh, vice-president of the Judicial Council and spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice. The interview was truly a model of its kind. While Mr. Zadeh was wondering whether his interlocutor, a humorist by profession, was in fact joking when voicing his concerns, M’bala kept asking the Iranian official to repeat the answers to his questions, since he could hardly believe he had been the prey of such a gross manipulation. After overthrowing the dictatorship of Shah Reza Pahlevi, the Islamic Republic made it a priority to put an end to authoritarian abuses by establishing the rule of law in the most rigorous way possible. For those cases tried in a criminal court, an appeal mechanism has existed in the Iranian judicial system for a long time. At any rate, the Court of Appeals, as a rule, automatically verifies the legality of the procedure. In this respect, the Iranian judicial system offers superior guarantees to those of French courts, and the mistakes are far less frequent. This being said, the convictions are still particularly harsh. In particular, the death penalty is applied. Instead of diminishing the amount of convictions, the Islamic Republic has chosen to restrict their enforcement. The forgiveness of the victims or their families is enough to obtain the annulment of the execution. Due to the existence of that provision and to its widespread application, the presidential pardon does not exist. Capital punishment is often pronounced, but is rarely executed. The Iranian judicial system provides for a delay of 5-years before executing the sentence, trusting that the victim will forgive the offender who will thus be pardoned and immediately liberated. In practice, executions are applied mainly to big drug traffickers, terrorists and child murderers. The death penalty is normally executed by hanging in public. There are reasons to hope that the Islamic revolution will continue making progress and may soon abolish the death penalty. In any case, it is a fact that the Iranian Constitution recognizes the separation of powers. The judicial system is independent and president Ahmadinejad doesn’t have any say in a judicial decision, whichever it may be. Manipulations In the specific case of Sakineh, everything that was reported by Bernard-Henry Levy and endorsed by President Sarkozy is false. 1. This lady has not been tried for adultery but for murder. As it happens, there is no conviction for adultery in Iran. Instead of revoking this type of incrimination, the law has subordinated the establishment of the facts to a series of conditions which are impossible to satisfy. “Four people have to witness the adultery at the same time” [4]. 2. The Republic of Islam does not recognize the Sharia, but – only and exclusively- the law passed by the representatives of the people sitting in Parliament. 3. Ms. Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani administered a drug to her husband and got her lover, Issa Tahen, to kill him while he was asleep. The “diabolical lovers” have already been tried in the first and secondary instances and were sentenced to death in both. The Court did not establish any discrimination between the two genders. It is important to note that the indictment does not even mention the intimate relations between the accused, precisely because it is impossible to prove they actually existed according to the Iranian law, even when the family members attest to such a relationship. 4. The death penalty is likely to be executed by hanging. Stoning - which still prevailed under the Shah’s rule and was maintained for a number of years after his overthrow - has been abolished by the Islamic Revolution. Irritated by the statements of Bernard-Henry Levy and Nicolas Sarkozy, the vice-president of the Iranian Judicial Council told Dieudonné M’bala M’bala that he defies these Zionist figures to find one single text of contemporary Iranian law that contemplates stoning. 5. The sentence is currently being examined by the Court of Appeals, which has to scrutinize the legality of each and every detail of the procedure. If any irregularity is found, the trial will be declared null and void. This examination procedure triggers the provisional suspension of the sentence. Since the final judgment has not yet been pronounced, the defendant still enjoys the presumption of innocence, and furthermore, there was never any question of executing her at the end of Ramadan. 6. Ms. Mohammadi-Ashtiani’s defense attorney, Mr. Javid Hustan Kian, is an impostor. He is linked with the son of the accused, but has never been appointed by Ms. Mohammadi-Astiani and has never been in touch with her. Javid Hustan Kian is member of the People’s Mujahidin, a terrorist organization that enjoys the protection of Israel and of the neo-conservatives [5]. 7. The son of the accused lives generally in Tabriz. He is free to have as many telephone conversations with Mr. Levy as he likes in order to denigrate his own country, which denotes the free and democratic nature of his government. In sum, nothing, absolutely nothing, of what Levy and Sarkozy have said about Ms. Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani’s story is true. Bernard-Henry Levy might have repeated, in good faith, false accusations to buttress his crusade against Iran. However, President Sarkozy can hardly resort to the same alibi. Officials of the French Foreign Service, the most prestigious in the world, must surely have provided him with all the relevant reports on the case. Therefore, Sarkozy deliberately lied to French public opinion, probably to be able to justify post facto the harsh sanctions adopted against Iran to the detriment of the French economy itself, already seriously affected by his policies. Thierry Meyssan French political analyst, founder and chairman of the Voltaire Network and the Axis for Peace conference. He publishes columns dealing with international relations in daily newspapers and weekly magazines in Arabic, Spanish and Russian. Last books published in English : 9/11 the Big Lie and Pentagate. [1] See our file on Bernard-Henri Levy, Réseau Voltaire [2] Speech by Nicolas Sarkozy at the annual Ambassadors of France’ Conference, Voltaire Network, 25 August 2010. [3] In this context, the term myth must be understood in the most neutral sense. Whether or not one believes in the sacred scriptures, the story of the adulterous woman is part of western symbolism. [4] For the same type of disinformation, see Pour diaboliser l’Iran, « Rue 89 » confond crimes pédophiles et homosexualité (To demonize Iran, "Rue 89" amalgamates crimes of pedophelia with homosexuality), Réseau Voltaire, 13 July 2007. [5] See our file Mujahedin-e Khalq, Voltaire Network.
  5. You two sweethearts need to go find an agnostic/atheist board to hang out on... i mean are agnostics and atheists really that boring that you need to come and do it all on Shi'a Chat?! :!!!:
  6. awesome Also cool: Indian Country, Oklahoma
  7. There is hardly calm in the US - it is plain unwilling for relatively intelligent people to see the situation. IRI's perception is a problem that the US has to deal with, Iran has already earned respect amongst vast numbers of people all over the world - from Latin America to the mid-east to east Asia. Those who view Iran as a "pariah state" such as the US regime, and the Zionist entity, well given the state these societies are in now, their views hardly matters. I should note that Venezuela established a small program to help low income people of the north east coast to provide them with low cost heating (I don't think the program is still in place at this time.) Similar, smaller scale programs to begin with, maybe trust building measures, could also be established by Iran to help out lower income people of the US. Now, some will say that Iran needs to help its neighbors first, and that the US is a "first world" country etc.etc. I of-course, disagree with that notion, because I consider the US to be rapidly third worldizing - and there are huge regions of the country that are now clearly third world. Check out California, there are regions that have over 30% unemployment rate - the numbers for other counties are all mostly in double digits, and be aware these are official numbers, and don't reflect those who have just given up looking for a job, and living off a family member, or sleeping in their cars. This is a horrendous situation, and it is high time people came to terms with it, and began ask for help sooner than later, before things end up going beyond the point of no return.
  8. [ I understand the United States quite well, enough to see what many commentators (that u might glibly dismiss) have already noted, that the third worldization of the US is not just "wishful thinking" it is already a fact. Devastated communities that once used to only dot the country, have now become entire regions. But where do you suppose I'm suggesting a wish for chaos? I'm suggesting that IRI and other independent nations come to the aid of the US to rescue it from chaos, because the US can no longer do it on its own - the loonies who think that the US is better than the entire planet are going to turn themselves on American society, and destroy it from within. In fact it is *you* who by ignoring reality as it has already unfolded who is wishing massive chaos on the US. If you keep thinking of the US as more "advanced" than other nations, and don't need IRI and other independent nations' aid, then you are in for some trouble. Shias should not be so haughty that they refuse possible aid from fellow Shias in Iran, and allow the country of their residence to go down in chaotic flames. All that I am suggesting that, in return for stabilizing the US, there be verifiable disarmament on a worldwide scale. With the US main production being arms and wars, of-course the US will have to go someways to comply with such a possible disarmament. The lunatics such as Bush-Obama warmongers, who may refuse to disarm can be closely monitored by a world body. None of this impossible, and really the only hope for the people of the US, so that in fact America can enjoy a stable family oriented society. And not the porn filled immoral violent poverty stricken society that it has become.
  9. "Saudi" money is not going to last that long, nor is Chinese money, both are dependent on US consumers' spending and being addicted to shopping. With changes in US consumers perception about the economy, they are not spending much - so that recycled money is going to all dry up very quickly, as poverty takes its grips, and large sections of the US become desolate and detroitified. Iran, and other independent nations have their own internal economic structures that are not as susceptible to the third worldization of the US. As such, over the mid-term (and even short term) Iran and other independent nations can develop an effective bail out plan for the US - with the condition, of-course that the US disarms. And I'm not saying that only the US disarms, but it could be part of a general worldwide disarmament. Given that the US's main product at this time (aside from porn) are weapons, of-couse US will suffer a bit, but with some help from IRI and other like minded nations, it could come out pretty well.
  10. I think terrorism - including state terrorism such as those executed by the US/Zionist entity - may always exist, but they can be minimized. Now, of-course, if u have criminals pretending to fight other criminals to create a smokescreen for their own crimes, well thats not gonna lead to any solution, thats for sure. check this: http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/fremstad160910.html
  11. ^ agreed (except for the smoking, and "atheist" part)
  12. No point in talking with u then, since you seem to think guys like Obama-Bush-Zionist creeps are OK to "police" the world. However, it is possible to keep some arms available so long as they are under strict UN security. Oh the US / "west" is not just in decline, they've already declined, its a matter of them getting their societies straight (with some aid from relatively stable societies) or you are gonna see people turn on each other like never before. All these nuts propping up, thats just the beginning. Question is if the US/"west" will wake up, or will they go down in their own flames. Yes, of-course Iran has not perfected its economic system, it has problems - one of which are the subsidies that end up subsidising the well off - that has to be fixed. But sure, Iran and other nations together could provide aid to the US, if it could lead to a more peaceful world, the condition being that the US agrees to disarms. See, the US obviously cannot continue its predatory behaviors forever, it costs $$$ - and unlike in prior wars, these wars are not leading to a war-boom economy, in fact quite the opposite. Iran could agree to give a portion of its peace dividend as aid to the US (the aid would have to also be monitored of-course).
  13. ^ oh i'm not putting in us vs. them at all, in fact, I'm suggesting that Iran could provide aid to the "western" third world nations, such as the US. But b/4 doing so, Iran and other nations do need to make it conditional I think, including disarmament of the US. I would agree that, if the US agrees to a verifiable disarmament in exchange for aid, then other nations should also follow suit. Those countries that refuse to disarm, they should be placed under close UN supervision. The thing is the US needs the IRI and other nations far more, and if it (the US) refuses to join the civilized world, it will be to its own serious detriment, as internal conditions worsen, and people start to seriously turn on each other.
  14. Cool, let the new world order (the real one) begin ... meanwhile, in the US (the old decaying world order) the number of people in poverty is the highest ever --- 14.3% and that's being seriously conservative 'cause the rate is determined using a seriously outdated formula! Maybe Turkey, Iran, Syria, Venezuela and other such countries could also consider developing an aid program for "western" third world nations such as the US? Not directly with the state, maybe with NGOs ?
  15. ^ Rushdie lost a lot, frankly I don't expect u to understand, but for others, Imam Khomeini stand clarified basic Islamic principles for Muslims, and non-Muslims alike. For those who think that insults to our Prophet (pbuh) to our Qur'an can just be ignored - these people have no political understanding (to say the least). Of-course Islam is going to be insulted by the kufr and zalim - those who oppress not only Muslims but just about anyone who dares to question their imperial rule. We are not Zionists that we become like dogs, and just take on worldly masters. So long as Muslims take a stand based on Islamic principals we will be attacked. Get used to it, or bail out, if it is getting to hot for you.
  16. Thank you for the link, some of the others on that list are also interesting...
  17. Aside from all that he serves as a US representative to rotten whabbi type dictatorships in the "mid-east" - and then calls himself a "moderate." Of-course the guy is "moderate" so long as he serves his US government masters. I did not know that Rauf is a member of the CFR, I know he and his wife Daisy Khan spoke at the CFR, but is he actually a member? Could you please link to your source? Thanks
  18. The Zionist entity has nukes, the US has tons of nukes, and the only country to have ever used on to slaughter hundreds of thousands of civillians, and killed more hundreds of thousands with so-called "conventional weapons" just in the past few years. Iran does not have nukes. The problem is with the Zionist entity, and the US-Euro empire, not the Islamic Republic, deal with it, and get real. Castro appears to be quickly losing his grip on reality, if indeed that is what he said, and the council on foreign relations person is not just twisting his words. Here is Fidel Castro's clarification on the topic - u can use google to translate it, if you don't understand Spanish - but he specifically addresses the issue of "jews suffering the most" how Muslims have been oppressed (I do wish he, and others in Latin America would mention Native Americans ) ... I also think that Fidel Castro should have never invited fraudulent "journalists" from the Council of Foreign Relations, a pro-empire outfit, to interview him... he should've know that his words would be taken out of context, and twisted by such people. La Habana, septiembre 10 - Todas las aclaratorias en torno a la interpretación periodística del periodista Jeffrey Goldberg, ubicando sus respuestas en contexto, las ofreció durante este viernes el Comandante Fidel Castro. Mensaje en la presentación de “La contraofensiva estratégica” Estamos en un momento excepcional de la Historia humana. En estos días se cumplen los plazos concedidos por el Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas para que Irán cumpla las exigencias, dictadas por Estados Unidos, relacionadas con las investigaciones nucleares, y el enriquecimiento de uranio para fines médicos y la producción de energía eléctrica. Es lo único que se le puede probar. El temor de que busca la producción de armamento nuclear, es sólo una suposición. En torno al delicado problema, Estados Unidos y sus aliados occidentales, entre ellos, dos de las cinco potencias nucleares con derecho a veto, Francia y el Reino Unido, apoyados por las potencias capitalistas más ricas y desarrolladas del mundo, han promovido un número creciente de sanciones contra Irán, un rico país petrolero y de religión musulmana. Hoy las medidas aprobadas incluyen la inspección de sus mercantes, y durísimas sanciones económicas que conducen a la estrangulación de su economía. He seguido de cerca los graves peligros que encierra aquella situación, ya que de producirse un estallido bélico en ese punto, la guerra rápidamente se tornaría nuclear, de consecuencias letales para el resto del planeta. No buscaba publicidad o sensacionalismo al señalar esos peligros. Sencillamente, alertar a la opinión mundial con la esperanza de que, advertida de tan grave peligro, pueda contribuir a evitarlo. Al menos, se ha logrado atraer la atención sobre un problema que ni siquiera se mencionaba en los grandes medios de opinión mundial. Ello me obliga a utilizar una parte del tiempo destinado al lanzamiento de este libro, en cuya publicación trabajamos con ahínco. No quería que coincidiera con los días 7 y 9. En el primero se cumplen los 90 días dispuestos por el Consejo de Seguridad, para conocer si Irán cumplió o no, con el requisito de autorizar la inspección de sus mercantes. La otra fecha, señala el cumplimiento de los tres meses de plazo señalados en la Resolución del 9 de junio, posiblemente dicho plazo era la intención del Consejo. Hasta ahora, sólo tenemos la insólita declaración del Director General de la OIEA (Organización Internacional de Energía Atómica), el japonés Yukiya Amano, un hombre de los yankis. Este echó toda la leña al fuego y, como Poncio Pilato, se lavó las manos. Un portavoz del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de Irán comenta con merecido desprecio su declaración. Un despacho noticioso de la agencia EFE, señala que su afirmación de que “‘Nuestros amigos no deben preocuparse, ya que no creemos que nuestra región esté en condiciones para nuevas aventuras militares’, e ‘Irán está totalmente preparado para responder frente a cualquier invasión militar’ era una obvia referencia al líder cubano Fidel Castro, ‘quien alertó de la posibilidad de un ataque nuclear israelí a Irán con el apoyo de Estados Unidos’.” Las noticias sobre el tema se suceden, y se mezclan con otras de notable repercusión. El periodista Jeffrey Goldberg, de la revista The Atlantic, ya conocido por nuestro público, publica partes de la larga entrevista sostenida conmigo, algunos de cuyos puntos interesantes ha ido programando, antes de un futuro y extenso artículo. “Hubo muchas cosas extrañas durante mi reciente estancia en la Habana, [...] -cuenta él- pero una de las más inusuales fue el nivel de auto examen de Fidel Castro. [...] pero el hecho de que Castro estuviera dispuesto a admitir que había cometido un error en un momento crucial de la Crisis de los Misiles en Cuba parecía algo verdaderamente sorprendente [...] que se arrepentía de haberle pedido a Jruschov que lanzara los cohetes nucleares contra los Estados Unidos.” Es cierto, que me abordó el tema y me hizo la pregunta. Textualmente, como él lo expone en una primera parte de su reportaje, sus palabras fueron: “Le pregunté: En cierto momento parecía lógico que usted le recomendara a los soviéticos que bombardeasen a los Estados Unidos. ¿Lo que usted recomendó aún le parece lógico en estos momentos? Fidel respondió: Después de haber visto lo que he visto, y no valía la pena en lo absoluto.” Yo le había explicado bien, y consta por escrito, el contenido del mensaje “…si Estados Unidos invadía a Cuba, país con armas nucleares rusas, en esas circunstancias no debía dejarse dar el primer golpe, como el que asestaron a la URSS cuando el 22 de junio de 1941, el ejército alemán y todas las fuerzas de Europa atacaron a la URSS.” Puede observarse que de esa breve alusión al tema, en la segunda parte de la entrega al público de esa noticia, el lector no podría percatarse de que “si Estados Unidos invadía a Cuba, país con armas nucleares rusas”, en ese caso yo recomendaba impedir que el enemigo asestara el primer golpe, ni tampoco de la profunda ironía de mi respuesta “…de haber sabido lo que ahora sé…”, en obvia referencia a la traición cometida por un Presidente de Rusia que, saturado de sustancia etílica, entregó a Estados Unidos los más importantes secretos militares de aquel país. En otro momento de la conversación Goldberg cuenta: “le pregunté si él creía que el modelo cubano era algo que aún valía la pena exportar.” Es evidente que esa pregunta llevaba implícita la teoría de que Cuba exportaba la Revolución. Le respondo “El modelo cubano ya no funciona ni siquiera para nosotros.” Se lo expresé sin amargura ni preocupación. Me divierto ahora al ver cómo él lo interpretó al pie de la letra, y consultó, por lo que dice, con Julia Sweig, analista del CFR que lo acompañó, y elaboró la teoría que expuso. Pero lo real es que mi respuesta significaba exactamente lo contrario de lo que ambos periodistas norteamericanos interpretaron sobre el modelo cubano. Mi idea, como todo el mundo conoce, es que el sistema capitalista ya no sirve ni para Estados Unidos ni para el mundo, al que conduce de crisis en crisis, que son cada vez más graves, globales y repetidas, de las cuales no puede escapar. Cómo podría servir semejante sistema para un país socialista como Cuba. Muchos amigos árabes, al escuchar que me entrevisté con Goldberg, se preocuparon y enviaron mensajes señalándolo como “el mayor defensor del Sionismo”. De todo esto se puede deducir la gran confusión que existe en el mundo. Espero, por ello, que lo que les cuento sobre mi pensamiento sea útil. Las ideas expuestas por mí, están contenidas en 333 Reflexiones, vean que casualidad, y de ellas, las últimas 26 están referidas exclusivamente a los problemas del medio ambiente y al inminente peligro de una conflagración nuclear. Ahora debo añadir en muy breve síntesis. Siempre he condenado el Holocausto. En las Reflexiones “El discurso de Obama en el Cairo”, “El zarpazo al acecho” y “La opinión de un experto”, lo expuse con toda claridad. Nunca he sido enemigo del pueblo hebreo, en el que admiro su capacidad de resistir durante dos mil años la dispersión y la persecución. Muchos de los más brillantes talentos, Carlos Marx y Albert Einstein, fueron judíos, porque es una nación en la que los más inteligentes sobrevivían, en virtud de una Ley natural. En nuestro país, y en el mundo, fueron perseguidos y calumniados. Pero esto es sólo un fragmento de las ideas que defiendo. Ellos no fueron los únicos perseguidos y calumniados por sus creencias. Los musulmanes, durante bastante más de 12 siglos, fueron atacados y perseguidos por los cristianos europeos, debido a sus creencias, como lo habían sido los primeros cristianos en la antigua Roma antes de convertirse en la religión oficial de aquel imperio. La historia debe ser admitida y recordada tal como es, con sus trágicas realidades y sus feroces guerras. De eso he hablado y, por ello, con toda razón explico los peligros que hoy corre la humanidad, cuando estas se han transformado en el mayor riesgo de suicidio para nuestra frágil especie. Si a eso le añadiera una guerra con Irán, aunque fuese de carácter convencional, más valdría que Estados Unidos apagara la luz y se despidiera. ¿Cómo podría resistir una guerra contra 1 500 millones de musulmanes? Defender la paz no significa, para un verdadero revolucionario, renunciar a los principios de justicia, sin los cuales, la vida humana y la sociedad carecerían de sentido. Sigo pensando que Goldberg es un gran periodista, capaz de exponer con amenidad y maestría sus puntos de vista, que obligan a debatir. No inventa frases, las transfiere y las interpreta. No mencionaré el contenido de otros muchos aspectos de nuestras conversaciones. Respetaré la confidencialidad de los temas que abordamos, mientras espero con interés su extenso artículo. Las actuales noticias que llegan en torrente de todas partes, me obligan a cumplimentar su presentación con estas palabras, cuyos gérmenes están contenidos en el libro de “La contraofensiva estratégica” que acabo de presentar. Considero que todos los pueblos tienen derecho a la paz y al disfrute de los bienes y recursos naturales del planeta. Es una vergüenza lo que está sucediendo con la población en muchos países de África, donde se ven millones de niños, mujeres y hombres esqueléticos entre sus habitantes a causa de la falta de alimentos, de agua y de medicinas. Son asombrosas las noticias gráficas que llegan del Oriente Medio, donde los palestinos son privados de sus tierras, sus casas son demolidas por monstruosos equipos y, hombres, mujeres y niños, bombardeados con fósforo vivo y otros medios de exterminio, así como dantescas las escenas de familias exterminadas por las bombas lanzadas sobre los poblados afganos y paquistaníes, por aviones sin pilotos, y los iraquíes, que mueren después de años de guerra, y más de un millón de vidas sacrificadas en esa contienda impuesta por un Presidente de Estados Unidos. Lo último que podía esperarse eran las noticias de la expulsión de los gitanos franceses, víctimas de la crueldad de la extrema derecha francesa, que eleva ya a siete mil de ellos, las víctimas de otra especie de holocausto racial. Es elemental la enérgica protesta de los franceses, a los cuales, simultáneamente, los millonarios limitan el derecho a la jubilación, a la vez que reducen las posibilidades de empleo. De Estados Unidos llegan noticias de un pastor del estado de la Florida, que se propone quemar en su propia iglesia, el Libro Sagrado del Corán. Hasta los jefes militares yankis y europeos en misiones punitivas de guerra se estremecieron ante una noticia que consideraban riesgosa para sus soldados. Walter Martínez, el prestigioso periodista del programa Dossier de Venezolana de Televisión, estaba asombrado de tanta locura. Ayer, jueves 9, en horas de la noche, llegaron noticias de que el pastor había desistido. Sería necesario saber lo que le dijeron los agentes del FBI que lo visitaron “para persuadirlo”. Fue un descomunal show mediático, un caos, cosas propias de un imperio que se hunde. Agradezco a todos ustedes la atención prestada. Septiembre 10 de 2010
  19. The world maybe getting "smaller" because of technology, but the natural world, where we take our date from, i.e. the moon, how the earth revolves around the sun, how the earth is shaped etc., is the same, practically unchanged. Islam is not only about figuring out a date to celebrate together, but also just as important, is the process of figuring out the date that helps us re-connect with the natural world (looking up at the sky for the moon, even if with optical aids) - this is even more important given that so many of us have a difficult time even removing ourselves from staring at the flat screen imac running 64bit snow leopard!
  20. H.I. Sayyed Jawad Naqvi on the response to the attacks on Al Quds Day, Quetta http://shiatv.net/view_video.php?viewkey=c6f5c4c313118ab39ee3
  21. this sounds like a high school debate exercise, where people take up "sides" just for the exercise of opposing or defending some topic, not really something that they actually agree with ... what would the point be of such a debate, sounds a bit hypocritical to me, frankly - people taking on positions they do not believe in ... fine for high school debates, but not really for actually learning or presenting one's point of view.. but enjoy :)
  22. I don't think the issue would be solved by restricting migration out of the country - that might make some of these people all the more curious and want to leave. I think what should realize is that there have always been people who will think that the grass is greener on the other side - especially with all the propaganda that flows into Iran, it is way way more than what the US / West-Europeans did to the former Soviet Union. But because of the many very good policies on part of the IRI , vast majority of the population remain supportive of the IRI. I think the way to counter this is to make education more holistic in Iran, not separate, the teaching of technical subjects from the social-religious values ... the problems often begin when people are only focused on single areas of their lives, and begin to loose other values.
×
×
  • Create New...