Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

anwarjami

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Jamhuriyat woh tarxe hukumat hai ki jisme bando ko gina karte hain, tuala nahi karte
  2. salam, I appreciate your idea of unity to the extant that the Muslims should be united. But i dont agree with the idea that the majority will be right. Majority can be right as well as wrong. Also, I object to your use of the word "slandering" regarding Shia objections on Shaikhain. The attitude of Shaikhain towards Bibi Fatima after the death of the Holy Prophet is unpardonable. Due to this fact we can never accept them as pious or righteous. If you are pragmatic enough to accept the follies of your leaders, that wil form a foundation of unity. This should not be a problem for you becoz as per your acknowledgement Shaikhain were not Masoom and hence prone to mistakes and waywardness. Salam Jami
  3. asak. Im ashamed to read this thread. i never knew that ppl here could be so ignorant of history. and if u dont even knw how to spell it (mughal)( as henna herself says) what right u have to comment on such matters? The mughals united india for the first time in its history. thye gave culture to india which was till then the abode of paganic and hindu culture. they gave the greatest gift, islam, to india. althgh muslims had come to india 500 years prior to mughals, islam took REAL shape in india during the golden reign of the mughals. Mughals gave the best civil administration in india, a fact acknowledged even by hindu and british historians. Mughal rule was good for everyone. the period was relatively free of civil wars, strife and struggles and india was mostly united. the period was the golden age for literature, music and arts. Aurangzeb alamgir is a much maligned figure of history. his only fault was that he was a pious muslim. history is full of the facts that he was generous to every one. he gave grants even to hindu temples. he lived a simple, and austere life. he is hated by historians only becouse he followed shariah to the last word. had he been a "secular" king like akbar he would also have been feted by the historians. may i request you to read authentic history rather than repeating the motivated slandering of aurangzeb by hindu and british historians. i king is a king and has to be a tyrant. thats what monarchy is all about. thats why islam calls for khilafat/imamat and not mulookiyat. the mughals were as much tyrants than any other king in history. what would you call the shiite safavi kings of persia who were equally tyrants? the issue of shias in this whole discussion is ridiculous. shias are as much a part and parcel of muslim society in india like any other muslim. shias were never a monolithic community in india nor they are today. they never had seperate existence from other muslims. so all these stories of persecution of shias under mughals are pure fiction. In fact shias came to india during mughals only because humaun had regained the throne of india with the help of irani king and alongwith him came many shias. shias actualy flourished under the mughals. otherwise how come u find so many shiite aristocrats and zamindar family in india. who made them zamindar....the british or hindus? its frightening to note that ppl here find it "unfortunate" that hindu kings were defeated by muslims, simply because "shias" appear in the story. (i can tell you with full authencity that this story is pure fiction that muhammad bin qasim came to india to hunt shias). He came to india to spread tauheed.may Allah bless his soul. wassalam anwar
  4. why ppl are trying to prove that pakistan is not an islamic state?....whats yr problem with pakistan?....its the only country which has contained the hindu expansion towards west asia....for yr knowledge pakistan has never fought any 8 year long war with any muslim country...i think that makes it more islamic than the obvious name.!!!!!!.... wassalam anwar
  5. salam all, what a stupid thgt that anybody who disrespects imam khomeini will not go to heaven!!!!!......can anybody say with certainty that imam khomeini himself will go to heaven....(althgh most probably he will!)...u see..i mean that it cant be said with certainty......what has happened to ppl here....they dont knw what they are talking abt.....did imam khomieni ever mention that he met imam mahdi (as)....i think its just a guess.....how can we assume things just like that????.... wassalam anwar
  6. salam all, anyone u thinks syed woman cant marry a non-syed or vice versa is negating the quran..for quran bans marriage of muslim women to kafirs.....and obviously non-syeds are not kafirs...... this racist attitude of syeds towards non-syeds is very unfortunate as it negates the very principle of the 14 masoomeen..... its so sad to see shiite youth entertaining such thghts.!! wassalam anwar
  7. salam Ba7rainiyah ..i think u shld lodge a complaint aginst the prof with the university authority....actually no book in the world has such things to say abt the prophet..its just plain lie.....ask for references and he will fail to deliver.. wassalam anwar
  8. Assalamualaikum, Most of the syeds suffer from superiority complex. This debate of sayyid-non sayyid should not be given much importance. All muslims are equal. The distinction lies in Taqwa. (Im sure all of the those who are involved in this debate know that this issue pertains more to marriage than khums!!!!!!) If somebody believes that he will go to heaven sraight just because he belongs to a certain lineage, should knw that this is basically a jewish thought. wassalam anwar
  9. assalamu alaikum, what prompted you to publicise this 7 year old fatwa now? anwar
  10. salam all, banning qamazani and zanjeer is okay..as these are unislamic and paganic practices...but suspending islamic laws is bad on the part of iranian judiciary....and that to please the west???....!!!!...imam khumaini must be turning in his grave..!!!.. i hope imam khamanie will not let muslims down on this issue and will reinstate the shariah law of stoning of adulteres. wassalam anwar
  11. salam all, diluting islam to pacify the west is wrong. when quran says "flog" it means flog......when hadith says "stone" it means "stone"..... there were easier swifter ways at the time of Prophet also...what can be easier than chopping of head by a sword?....coming from a good swodsman, it could be swifter even than shooting!! but the prophet said "stone the adulterer"...not "chop off his head"... the idea of stoning is to make exemplery punishment to deter others from following suit...thats why there is the provision that a section of the masses from among the muslims be a witness to the flogging/stoning.... we dont expect the Islamic republic of Iran to dilute/amend/suspend islamic laws to please westerners or their own women parliamentarians... if these reports are true then imam khamanei must intervene and revoke any such orders.... wassalam anwar
  12. salam all, one hadeeth is qouted by preachers stating that hazrat ali is the teacher of hazrat jibraeel... to me this hadeeth seems highly exaggerated, .and far fetched..rather fictitious...becoz jibraeel being the closest of all angels to god and being the custodian of the quran in its descention has a very high stature...and since he is an angel having abode in heavens would not need any "education" from any bashar... more so becoz even the meeting of jibraeel with the propet himself is very rare...and there is no discription of any meeting between imam ali and jibraeel in any of the well known books... may be anyone having sound knowledge of hadeeth can shed more light on it... wassalam
  13. salam who hates poets here and why?
  14. salam all, and let us accept one bitter fact.....wahabbis are not that bad as we think they are... let us introspect whether the wahabi criticism of some shia practices are really so baseless and unfounded? wassalam
  15. salam all, iran-pakistan friendship is the second best thing that can happen to the muslim world after iran-saudi friendship....if that comes through....may Allah make all of them united against common enemies. wassalam
×
×
  • Create New...