Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

BrockLesnar

Unregistered
  • Content Count

    305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About BrockLesnar

  • Rank
    Level 2 Member

Profile Information

  • Religion
    ISLAM (MUSLIM OF Allah SWT, SHIA)

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

4,766 profile views
  1. they banned me from their another forum i was with name of hazrat umar and deleted my comments from hcy kfc forum where they were making fun of hz fatima s.a and prophet muhammad sas by saying prophet sas used to kiss his daughter s.a calling it an adult content nauzubillah they made a topic does anyone of shia fathers do that its an old topic from them [URL Edited]/index.php?showtopic=10214&st=60 but what a perverted mind coward they r? i just posted the response there i said it was in child age of hz fatima s.a+ prophet sas is mehram of zahra s.a not his na mehram any person can kiss his little daughter as babies kids r cute for every father&mother then i posted this hzrat aisha use to teach sexual lessons to na mehram men telling them when circumcize part of penis tpuch the vagina according to sahih muslim nauzubillah does any one of ahlnawasib mother do that ? i specifically asked question to coward mister effendi the topic poster the way he did to shias i asked them does your mother do that? now i am banned for speaking the truth&defending my faith they r happy debating lonely i invite any of them to come here and debate me shames and curses be upon coward nawasib!
  2. JAZAKALLAH BROTHER GOLDENHAWK I ALREADY KNEW THIS BLOG, and thanks for your support remember me in your prayers JAZAKALLAH kher
  3. jazakAllah ameen bro INSHAALLAH, stay bless ameen.
  4. wsalam wrwbrkt goldenhawk brother this taha was already there on tehreef debate thread and he was caliming he is shia and he believe in tehreef i didnt talked to him on thread but after the farid hani and other debators there became unanswerd and unsuccessful to save umar from tehreef they didnt replied me 24+ hrs then this taha messaged me in indbox fst he started praising nasbi debators calling them ocean of knowledge then he praised hani then farid calling them ocean of knowledges then said me to take the talk to indbox of farid of to the thread then i done tabra on umar to check that and said him too the guy didnt then he started defending umar ibn khatab for no reason in my indbox i have attached the screen shot of my indbox you can check in previous comments started calling the narration of malik muwata i quoted for the belief of tehreef e Quran for umar is zaieef weak for what bro?which shia defends umar ibn khtab?specially when its narration of siha sitta?which shia or sunni call them zaieef for no reason? isnt it strange he is shia and he beliefs in tehreef? but he is defending umar ibn khatab for not believing in tehreef calling biggest authentic book siha sittah narration weak even its with strong hard sika chain i think any debator if he is a shia its no need to defend umar ibn khatab, and every shia debator knows narrations of siha is fully authentic for ahlsunnah no shia could defend umar like this by calling siha sitta narrations as zaieef i just took one screenshot of taha to my indbox in post #24 after that they banned me so i couldnt took the others i also prooved narrations r sahih to mrtaha aka fake shia+ other nasbis there(nasbis thinked they will say the narration is zaieef and i will accept they thinked they r talking to an low knowledge ignorant person so they played this trick but failed), then they warned me to not to use tabara or misbehave in indboxes i said them not to disturb me in indbox i didnt send any message to taha again i just sended 3 indboxes once to taha in reply of his mgs to me but after warning i didnt but they played a trick they just showed 1 mgs of mine and issued me the warning not to send again, after that they showed 2 others which were sended before the warning and made me bann of thread by making the excuse that i sended the offensive mgs again in indbox of taha, i didnt use any bad language or misbehaving on their thread. they all r bunch of liars. jazakAllah bro arilexx i try my best to follow it INSHAALLAH
  5. finally i am banned from the forum of cowards, who already lost the debate on tehreef by accepting umar died on haram akida of making tehreef e quran as quoted in previous comments attachments and farid also accepted that umar couldnt even knew how to compile Quran till end of his life which i am attaching in this comment's attachment, then nawasib there started using filthy tricks to send fake akhbari shias in my indbox to defend umar ibn khatab for no reason, and praising the nasbis and their web+ their debators, saying me to take the debate off thread to the indboxes for no reason, they keep people like that on their thread to distract and disturb shias during manazra so it get shia shia manazra and let the nasbis flee, before that they banned me of the thread various scandlous beliefs of shias during discussion, before that i read on their forum they said they wont bann any shia if he misbehaved too like shiachat now c their tricks, even i didnt abused on any forum but responded according to their claims and comments there was plenty much to show those nawasib how they and their forefathers belived on tehreef but they couldnt even defend their own caliph shame on pure coward nasbis of twelvershia aka haqchaaryaar forum just view their web how expert r they of debating and writing alone or with fake sunnis under shias cover who defends ahlsunnah akida for no reason curse of Allah be upon those 3rd class nawasib umar didnot conisdered this verse abrogated as per ahlsunnah he disliked but didnt deemed it haram to do tehreef in book of Allah swt nauzubillah حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مَنِيعٍ، حَدَّثَنَا إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ يُوسُفَ الأَزْرَقُ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ بْنِ أَبِي هِنْدٍ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيَّبِ، عَنْ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ، قَالَ رَجَمَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَرَجَمَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ وَرَجَمْتُ وَلَوْلاَ أَنِّي أَكْرَهُ أَنْ أَزِيدَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ لَكَتَبْتُهُ فِي الْمُصْحَفِ فَإِنِّي قَدْ خَشِيتُ أَنْ تَجِيءَ أَقْوَامٌ فَلاَ يَجِدُونَهُ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ فَيَكْفُرُونَ بِهِ ‏.‏ قَالَ وَفِي الْبَابِ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى حَدِيثُ عُمَرَ حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ وَرُوِيَ مِنْ غَيْرِ وَجْهٍ عَنْ عُمَرَ ‏.‏ jamia tirmizi kitab al hudud 1431 grade sahih darusalam He wanted to add in book of Allah till end of his life as he took oath of Allah swt for adding it but he stopped only coz of fear of people not coz of fear of Allah swt nauzubillah حَدَّثَنِي مَالِك ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيَّبِ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَهُ ، يَقُولُ : لَمَّا صَدَرَ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ مِنْ مِنًى ، أَنَاخَ بِالْأَبْطَحِ ، ثُمَّ كَوَّمَ كَوْمَةً بَطْحَاءَ ، ثُمَّ طَرَحَ عَلَيْهَا رِدَاءَهُ وَاسْتَلْقَى ، ثُمَّ مَدَّ يَدَيْهِ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ ، فَقَالَ : " اللَّهُمَّ كَبِرَتْ سِنِّي ، وَضَعُفَتْ قُوَّتِي ، وَانْتَشَرَتْ رَعِيَّتِي ، فَاقْبِضْنِي إِلَيْكَ غَيْرَ مُضَيِّعٍ وَلَا مُفَرِّطٍ " . ثُمَّ قَدِمَ الْمَدِينَةَ ، فَخَطَبَ النَّاسَ ، فَقَالَ : " أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ ، قَدْ سُنَّتْ لَكُمُ السُّنَنُ ، وَفُرِضَتْ لَكُمُ الْفَرَائِضُ ، وَتُرِكْتُمْ عَلَى الْوَاضِحَةِ إِلَّا أَنْ تَضِلُّوا بِالنَّاسِ يَمِينًا وَشِمَالًا " وَضَرَبَ بِإِحْدَى يَدَيْهِ عَلَى الْأُخْرَى ، ثُمَّ قَالَ : " إِيَّاكُمْ أَنْ تَهْلِكُوا عَنْ آيَةِ الرَّجْمِ . أَنْ يَقُولَ قَائِلٌ : لَا نَجِدُ حَدَّيْنِ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ ، فَقَدْ رَجَمَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ . وَرَجَمْنَا ، وَالَّذِي نَفْسِي بِيَدِهِ ، لَوْلَا أَنْ يَقُولَ النَّاسُ : زَادَ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ تَعَالَى ، لَكَتَبْتُهَا الشَّيْخُ وَالشَّيْخَةُ فَارْجُمُوهُمَا الْبَتَّةَ ، فَإِنَّا قَدْ قَرَأْنَاهَا " . all narrators are sahih(narration of old age of umar) http://library.islamweb.net/hadith/display_hbook.php?bk_no=19&hid=1482&pid=3571 malik muwata umar also died in the belief of tehreef which was purely against the Prophet sas's order coz prophet sas forbid him for adding this verse as per ahlsunnah's sharah of ibn hajar he thinks he knew more then prophet sas nauzubillah Umar said: "When this verse came down I approached the Prophet peace be upon him so I asked him: Should I write it down?' It is as if he hated that" Then Umar said: "Cant you see that if the old man if he commits adultery he does not get the whip, and that if the young man if he commits adultery he gets stoned?" (Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani, Fathul Bari, Kitab: Al Hudood, Bab: Al I'tiraaf bil Zina,Commentary on Hadith no. 6327, Source) FiAman Allah.
  6. finally i am banned from the forum of cowards, who already lost the debate on tehreef by accepting umar died on haram akida of making tehreef e quran as quoted above, then started using filthy tricks to send fake akhbari shias in my indbox to defend umar ibn khatab for no reason, and praising the nasbis and their web+ their debators, saying me to take the debate off thread to the indboxes for no reason, they keep people like that on their thread to distract and disturb shias during manazra so it get shia shia manazra and let the nasbis flee, before that they banned me of the thread various scandlous beliefs of shias during discussion, before that i read on their forum they said they wont bann any shia if he misbehaved too like shiachat now c their tricks, even i didnt abused on any forum but responded according to their claims and comments there was plenty much to show those nawasib how they and their forefathers belived on tehreef but they couldnt even defend their own caliph shame on pure coward nasbis of twelvershia aka haqchaaryaar forum just view their web how expert r they of debating and writing alone or with fake sunnis under shias cover who defends ahlsunnah akida for no reason curse of Allah be upon them FiAman Allah.
  7. this is for the advocate of umar ibn khatab under shia cover on twelvershia net defending him in my indbox all the narrators r sahih http://library.islamweb.net/hadith/display_hbook.php?bk_no=19&hid=1482&pid=3571 what a low life coward nasbis!
  8. salam to every one i have concluded this forum is the forum of loosers, after seeing umar ibn khtab under tehreef they have some fake shias AKA SUNNIS under shia cover on their forum to distract other shias in debate, i get a pvt mgs twice from mr taha the fake shia on their forum who at fst is saying me better i discuss these issue with farid in indbox not on the thread he claims he is shia then he started defending umar ibn khtab in my indbox by calling narration as zaieef what a forum and web of cowards this is under bhurka like their forefathers escaped from battles under bhurka indboxing me as fake shias, but that coward can fool some people in his madrasass not the shian e ali a.s, narration is mentioned with sahih chain malikmuwata sihasittah all narrators r sika what a technique use by nasbis after seeing their beloved caliph the victim of tehreef e Quran. shames be upon them and :yaali: YA ALI A.S
  9. ALIREX brother i can think to peace if they stop their propagandas and foul mouthing about shiaislam have you seen their website? its full of antishia content, brother i donot want to do fasaad with anyone i can be peaceful with normal ahlsunnah but not with naasbis like them i am sorry to say because my heart donot satisfy for making peace with a naasbi. those who deserve peace we welcome them, i respect you my brother thanks for you valueable comment i will try my best for not to waist time with them :) jazakAllah kher.
  10. Malik related to me that Yahya ibn Said heard Said ibn al-Musayyab say, "When umar ibn al-Khattab came from Mina, he made his camel kneel at al-Abtah, and then he gathered a pile of small stones and cast his cloak over them and dropped to the ground. Then he raised his hands to the sky and said, 'O Allah! I have become old and my strength has weakened. My flock is scattered. Take me to You with nothing missed out and without having neglected anything.' Then he went to Madina and addressed the people. He said, 'People! Sunan have been laid down for you. Obligations have been placed upon you. You have been left with a clear way unless you lead people astray right and left.' He struck one of his hands on the other and then said, 'Take care lest you destroy the ayat of stoning so that one will say, "We do not find two hadds in the Book of Allah." The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, stoned, so we have stoned. By He in Whose Hand my self is, had it not been that people would say that umar ibn al-Khattab has added to the Book of Allah ta-ala, we would have written it, "The full-grown man and the full-grown woman, stone them absolutely." We have certainly recited that.'" Malik said, "Yahya ibn Said said Said ibn al-Musayyab said, 'Dhu'l-Hijja had not passed before umar was murdered, may Allah have mercy on him.' " Yahya said that he had heard Malik say, "As for his words 'The full-grown man and the full-grown woman' he meant, 'The man and the woman who have been married, stone them absolutely.' " (Book #41, Hadith #41.1.10) MALIK MUWATA Farid accepted that omar died with haram akida of making additions in HolyQuran(even the verse is not abrogated according omar will proove this later let them deal with it fst) heehee
  11. i am surprised by the admin of there blog they r so foolishly questioning again and again the verse is abrogated abrogated but along with that they r saying its haram to add abrogated verse in Quran but the same question again and again its abrogated abrogated even they say its haram i think they r just a waist of time, any one can read their and mine comments can easily judge they donot have any replies of the narration i quoted in whicH OMAR TOOK AN OATH OF Allah SWT FOR WANTING TO ADD A VERSE IN HOLY QURAN till end of his life nor to my questions to save umar, just their own replies r contradicting themselves.
  12. their forum and web is silence now after seeing mr umar had an haram akida of tehreef more then a day i have no replies from them, but to what i think the real accadamic debate is over now when their debator has accepted hazrat umar died on haram akida belief of making additions in HolyQuran, (they accepted that to add abrogated verse in HolyQuran is haram which omar wanted too till end of his life)(even this verse isnt the abrogated one according to umar i can proove that too, but no need coz they themselves have made fatwah of haram akida for editing it on mighty hazrat umar ) and i can bet if in case for sake of argument some shia there have accepted the way they did(even we dont nor we will INSHAALLAH), they start him insulting that you lost we have prooved your caliph had akida tehreef you rafizi your time is expire you accepted in your claim etc etc LOLZ!
  13. agree brother darthvader :yaali: YA ALI A.S I m surprised how stubborn and stupid people they r They accepted umar wanted to do haram work Till end of his life he wanted to make addition of Verse in Quran nauzubillah, but along wth that Mr hani is blaiming me that its i am the one Who didnt researched on the topic Isnt it funny someone accepting their caliph died on haram akida but still blaiming me to be ignorant of research on respective topic funny!
  14. jazakAllah brother goldenhawk and darthwader, they r trying hard to save umar from tehreef, to search answer of what i quoted heehee but INSHAALLAH i wont leave their beloved caliph without akida e tehreef as per his beliefs ;-)
×
×
  • Create New...