Jump to content

monad

Unregistered
  • Content Count

    1,883
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by monad

  1. what stage are you at?. The masonic, Illuminati stage?. Flat earth vs round Earth? Colonies on mars? List goes on - If you are wanting to make some points, make some, but making one lined childish remarks to infer your newly found secret knowledge that makes you think you are above the rest of the theists means jack. You are still a slave like the rest, who has to follow the laws of those you detest. so shut up or speak up properly. child.
  2. Buddy, we are dealing with zombies here. The topic keeps changing course constantly, which implies that the majority cannot comprehend the true objective. some of the females here are not interested in facts, they keep inferring their childish emotions and claiming that there is as some form of righteous indignation. The fact was, a female defense lawyer somehow got the alleged victims underwear as evidence?. if not : the male is claiming that this is what she wore, he would have not known it, if it was rape in a muddied alleyway. Alleyways are generally have low lighting Well, geegolly, let me think. Hyper aggressive male who is in a heightened sexual mode. observers two women of the same height, body language, one is dressed with light clothing the other with jeans and a coat. Who do you think his target will be?. The one where he can rip the cloths of far easily or not?. Do you actually use that head of yours to think?. There is a substantial body of indirect evidence suggesting that sexual attractions occur with increased frequency during states of strong emotion. For example, heterosexual love has been observed to be associated both with hate (James, 1910; Suttie, 193S) and with pain (Ellis, 1936). A connection between "aggression" and sexual attraction is supported by Tinbergen's (1954) observations of intermixed courting and aggression behaviors in various animal species, and a series of experiments conducted by Barclay have indicated the existence of a similar phenomenon in human behavior. Plenty of research out there, but as usual no one is interested in fact, they are driven by emotions. she is not a victim. The court acquitted the male. If you are claiming she is victim because a female lawyer used underwear as potential evidence and feelings got hurt, then we must examine all forms of evidence ever being used as evidence. Case close.
  3. perhaps if you learn read properly, I do not have to waste my time re-writing the same nonsense. All you had to write is that you acknowledge I was right from the first post. That take courage. But being a female you can't do that. Because females have to right even when they are wrong and admitting that you are wrong would demean the whole post.
  4. why don't you go and do a stake out at the town or city centre, where most of the clubs are. I am sure observational experience might be educational. The context is in regards to behavior.
  5. This is comical. I tried to find Khadim the video, and I ended up many sites with the same discussions. It all follows the same trend. The females simply cannot not understand the rational points being made. the females seems to change the whole point made into something that is not even related to the subject matter. How is that even possible. You have taken my responses to infer that I am claiming she was being punished for wearing poor choice of clothing? understand the context. I suggest some books on anthropology. Desmond Morris - People Watching is a good start. I will write this in baby language. She went out dressed provocatively. Why?. Because she has the freedom too?. So are we stating while she was dressing up, she said OHHH, I feel the liberties of this great nation, where I can dress in a short skirt, so that the sun will glim off my newly shaved legs?. I will add a tad bit of cleavage, with extra perfume, to smell like a lovely garden in paris, and red lipstick, just like the lushes red tulips of Holland. Duuhhh, all of this is done to for the purpose of attraction. Males do the same. And then they all get together in a setting where they will be in a loud and dark room, drinking alcohol, dancing, all eyeing out the next potential love and having to get very close to each other just to speak. After having their laughs, and in a state of heightened sexual arousal and intoxication, what do you think hyper will occur?. Someone will be taken advantage off. That is a fact. So, there is nothing about provocation, especially when seduction is involved. As I have pointed out, the female do not want to comprehend the whole picture, they are whining about under garments being used as a possible coercive evidence, while none of them, even like me know the language of the law. Why do you always try to be different for the sake of having an alternative point of view? Let's all shame these rapists and be firm against them. Islam tells us that we should show compassion to a woman. It literally goes against the Quran for a man to even consider using force during sexual Intercourse. Bro, seriously. read the above. It went from rape, to not being rape, too omg, under wear was used as evidence, cant do that in a LAW OF COURT WHERE THE OBJECTIVE IS TO FIND EVIDENCE, think of the victim, this is inferring the male is already a rapist - to now what? monad is stating she deserved it?.
  6. dude, It was a video next to the article, probably on the Irish post. Remove it if you want. I am not going to google it just for this. Thanks. to edit : if the pants were being used as evidence or being used as coercive evidence, then there must be validity for it being used. It does not matter what age anyone is in there, the objective is justice. Find the truth. Ohh please don't wave that knife I used to kill or used for killing, I find it offensive?. We can clearly see, the females are barraging on feelings as there is nothing else to actually grasp. It is a court, what do they expect to happen in there?. You have lawyers whose main objective is to defend and attack.
  7. I appreciate the imitative adult response, however it is nothing but manipulative. Leaving aside the particulars of this case, in Ireland women are allowed to wear what they like and men are not allowed rape anyone under any circumstances. It is clear and there is no confusion about it. This case is controversial because, at least as it has been presented, it challenged this simple common sense assumption. Men are responsible for their own behavior. It seems using rational isn't a strong point here. This is not about dress code but the new papers have made it as that. A particular point as been used as the main discourse of claiming the not guilty point. Clearly the evidence in court was in favor of the man, and knowing if the public had such evidence they too would probably side with the male. I suggest you take your nonsensical associative bias regarding the freedom of western idealism regarding the liberties of females to do what they will and what want somewhere it has tangible value. A social club setting might entail, I hear at the local Irish bar must be a great insight for wild life anthropologists. If men must be responsible then so must women. I do not see anyone stating the obvious as written early. What made her think it was okay to date a guy 10 years older then her. The age of consent in Ireland is 17. For all we know she felt guilty for what she did and the only way to save face was to accuse someone for rape. Again none of us have evidence.
  8. yes, different articles seem to present it with alterations. However I still blame the 17year old. She went out on a date with an older guy and decided to dress in a particular way to be more appealing. She clearly was not wear those items by it self, so something led him to believe she was seducing him, and that were his signals to follow through. Of course in her mind, she was still playing the innocent little girl, playing dress up, imitating the magazine and movie covers. He was most likely a hyper aggressive male, thus the ability to seduce her on a date. He won her from the countless of males that thought or decided to ask her out, but he did it. That is a sign of his aggressive nature and not showing his confidence. The nonsense regarding controlling desires, also falls back on the females. It works two way to initiate something, females want it both ways. I suggest stop using humans rights to justify emotional opinion. He was acquitted, as the evidence was on his side. The articles are nothing but sensationalism, to get the females in a uproar. I wrote bohoo, knowing that the discussions would be nothing but conjecture, as we have no evidence.
  9. O W N A G E time x2 A: The defense lawyer was female. Elizabeth O’Connell <--- female! Elizabeth O’Connell asked jurors at Cork Central Criminal Court last week to consider the teen had worn “A, B , C.” “Does the evidence out-rule the possibility that she was attracted to the defendant and was open to meeting someone and being with someone?” O’Connell asked jurors during closing arguments. “You have to look at the way she was dressed,” she added. The assault happened while she was a sleep, ( from the video ) and then it goes to some misogynistic diatribe. A jury of eight men and four women acquitted the man unanimously after deliberating for 90 minutes, that is 1h30min. Questions : What was she doing sleeping in a bed with a male, not wanting to consummate but in her underwear?. Getting a tan from the ceiling lights? Did she not expect, that there is a possibility intercourse will happen?. This isn't a movie. Do women think they can do what they will, even with seduction and expect males to be subjugated?. We are dealing with biology and body language. Ohh please, let us share a bed naked, but you better behave like a good saint and not touch me. There were four women in the jury who could have abstained or given a different verdict. The evidence was against the female. The feminists have taken this out of context and are using the underwear to ignore whatever other reasons where that lead to this intercourse without permission. Carry on discussing nonsense. As usual the females need something to be hysterical about. EVIDENCE is king in the courtroom, yes, not queen but king.
  10. boohoo,. A: no article as been presented. B : An article is not what was presented inside a court, this implies we are not told the true nature of the evidence. Articles are sensationalism so that you can go and the owner can twiddle their thumbs because you made them rich..
  11. monad

    Being Socially Awkward

    Netflix has better stories. Vice and RT has more realistic ones. Writing/speaking the truth generally makes one hard to deal with, as they do not conform to pretense. Humans are good at using each other, and they do it best with sweet words and kindness. Obviously to let the guard down before they strike you to further their own preservation.
  12. monad

    Sister cheated on her husband

    I think the OP is actually implying that they too have no interest in religion and advising someone is problematic as they then have to study what they wish to stay away from. I doubt it is difficult to give advice. to guide someone. Hey bro, I am finding this situation difficult, however as you have realised a mistake and wish to part take a new path, I suggest a visit to this site. www.al-islam.org and spend the next few years learning. If you have any questions you can join Shiachat and discuss issue that you may have. However side note - you will both burn in hell.
  13. monad

    Being Socially Awkward

    What does this have to do with the problem the op has?, unless you intended to tell her, perhaps she should read self help books, get some Tony poppins, Brian lazy, Les orange, dale Turniple drugs into her system. But you did not, you self aggrandized your self. I suggest you readdress your Dyer quote on this. It must be a delusion to think you are envied for being socially able, perhaps they were competitive females as your self wanting status. I get on well in all circles, even in my silence. I enjoy observing the fools with their pretense of existing. You should just come off clean and state that you are the upper class, and those others, i,e me- the peasant class are the ill educated, lazy, indolent and are not interested in growth. In fact you could go far as to claim, your superiority even to the closeness to God. After all, your sighs and neighs have been answered. Your circles are clown jesters fighting for prestige and status. Knowing the nature of existence, they were fortunate to have accumulated X, be it in fame or fortune. Your lifestyle is based on who can claim the highest position to whatever methods are employed and if achieved it is then associated via God, his saints or virtue. So, no, there is no self betterment for virtue, it is based on social hierarchy. I am sure you all manipulate each other extensively for that dopamine fix. I got promoted, nice, me too, me three, not me, I bought a new car, me too, I am going too as well, er, nice dress its new, its designer, weeee mine isnt, I bought it from a chairty shop, I have money but I like to give back, weeeee, I just came from holiday, weeee, I am going to one as well, weeeee, I already have three this year, weeee, I am pregnant, me too, but you are a guy?, so, guys can get pregnant too, hur hur, have some food, weeeee, so lets discuss x, y ,z, weeeee, omg you are so smart, i know, weee. Later that evening in each families private conversation What follow is : did you see what he/she said to be, think they are better then us, see what they were dressed like, you see what they spoke like, talked off, they are not wealthy, just ordinary folk from this family and so and so so . This is your competitive circles. Like I wrote I have been in them, from friends, families to individuals I do not know. Judging is part of human nature, it is what allows us to make decisions. Do not take these self help gurus to be the truth, they are sales men/women. whatever they write or speak off, has been written much more profoundly from those whom they copy it from. They are like drug dealers, selling snippets of emotional rhetoric to get the crowd hyped. O W N E D!
  14. monad

    Half men half women beginning

    Learn to google first. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuch Trangender or mix gender through birth is no different then someone born with a disability. somewhere the genes went wrong. They are not evil, in fact they must suffer immensely not knowing their true gender or like a disabled person not feeling or having the ability to be able bodied to be good slaves or despots. To claim it is due to their parents evil, is nonsense, just ill educated contrived oppression and justification for class war fair and responsibilities.
  15. monad

    Things God can't Do?

    waste time on shiachat?. What does it mean God can and cannot do?. Cannot do or won't do, and what evidence does one have to imply God has done, will do, can do apart from the words spoken or written from ones own mind.
  16. What has energy has motion. Atoms are in constant motion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom Into the same rivers we step and do not step, we are and are not. (Heraclitus Homericus) It is not possible to step twice into the same river according to Heraclitus, or to come into contact twice with a mortal being in the same state. (Plutarch)
  17. monad

    Trying to get married

    Arabs tend to hate each other. Someone shed light on this. 1400years + and the arabs are still stuck there. I am picking Arabs as supposedly they had more time on Islam then we dirty heathen had.
  18. monad

    Being Socially Awkward

    I'd say you hype too much. Your praise yourself more then discuss something. I don't blame you, I have been in such circles and it is a habit among ts the competitive types. me me me me me me me. Enjoy it, just not my thing. I think all socially awkward people should burn in hell. Enjoy. To those claiming they are socially awkward. It boils down to social skills, experience, exposures to deal with similar situations until experiences builds knowledge to overcome the challenges. The more you spend time within your self, you miss out on those skills you admire so much. Generally genius's tend to be socially awkward, as they are inverted into seeking or doing something productive. If one is placed in this social isolate condition due to whatever circumstance, you must self educate and distract your self. Balance. However if you want to build this skill set, have no fear, have courage, remember you are just dealing with another human, but as always use tact. No need to be cool or you end up a fool. Be true to your self and find those who respect you for you and not for what you are or have. Drink sprite.
  19. monad

    A question to the sisters

    Females always pm me and harass me. Many have a restraining order. I suggest we stop treating the assumed females alias to be weak. We have this mindset that our poor innocent muslims females have to be weak. why this poor conditioning?. You can be a female and still be assertive and make decisions, like placing or ignoring a nonsensical comment, instead of becoming hysterical and having a cake eating binge.
  20. Corresponding not so fun at all fact: some males actually do that. It is probably a good idea to demand testing for sexually transmissible diseases before considering an individual for marriage. It would be pretty awful for a young woman to have her health ruined by one of these males. Any of you know why SOME males do it?. Do you think they do it because its what they want, or there must be a reason as to why a particular set of men attempt such risky behavior?. Every year you will get articles on major newspapers regarding prostitution, either as a negative or positive. To women willingly doing, it to women coerced into it. In the comment sections whether there or on any other site, the men who use such women always tend to be the rejects of society with the added bonus of having disposable income. So selling sex is bought by rejects, men with access cash, addicts, or married men who have no chance of intercourse with their wives or men who love their wives, but need someone to abuse on the side. They see women who sell sex as lesser then normal women, thus allowing them to be violent or do things to them which they would not do to their loved ones. Chances of getting one of this as a practicing theist is very rare. Again we are looking at statistics. And to the women, they either do it, because its easy money, addictions, trafficking or coercion or simply put poverty. When muta is given as an option, it based on the current climate, where the mix relationships between male and female is much more open. Thus the probability of developing one is higher then for individuals who restrict themselves from such interactions. Anything is harmful and has risks involved but, it is a reasonable proposition for a particular type of personality. We know, only a small percentage will even attempt it and generally knowing such types, their behavior is always an indication of their personal trait. Of course early marriages should be the first priority, however, the parents and elders have other vested interested and the young generation does not understand the word NO anymore. They are spoilt and comfortable to some extent. Once again, it is a particular type of personality that will come online and break their silence regarding their self abuse, where as others with some reasonable intellect, may do it or not, but are silent and tactful in that manner. I doubt the females are duped, if they are explained the contract properly. If they intend to take such a contract on, they should know the risks involved. If they are blind sided because the contract comes from a theist who is expect to be moral, then the fault lies from the early stages of how the religion was prosthelytized. Just because a face has a beard or a head a scarf and the mouth piece the ability to repeat phrases does not entail morality of consciousness regarding other beings. We write as such, as this has been developed through age and experience and we admit to it, to further assist those who are still embarking on that journey. The question should be asked is, why didn't their daughters get married?. The variable could be many, either any male was in fear of association to such a family, strictness to adhere to a particular status or simply put, no male was good enough for that particular family. We can assume that many narrations, were always aimed at a particular group , person during that period and it just is an assumption that it was meant for the whole of time. Regarding why some were allowed and some not, i doubt it has to do with being sinners before, it would more of a personality trait or vigor, libido or just pure intellect. JP as good as he is, is also promoting christian values. He understand that from a psychoanalytical point, society has degraded into an unethical course and has caused more harm then good. To reverse this travesty, he attempts to at least state the other side of the coin. If sex is used as just a thing of pleasure or for the self it has consequences. and i doubt he is pointing out to sex being harmful as it is part of nature. It is the disrespect and throw away usage of it which is harmful. Also this subject of Muta, marriage and relationships are not universal. They do not apply to all. In terms of statistics it may favour a large part of the human species, however there is a small group, that will always be left out of it. With the advent of how the 1% have constrained the living standards of the many, you will see many unwilling to embark on this journey of propagating or having meaningful relationships. This is why we have decadence, where these in and out relationships are solely meant to remove the long term of risk of relationships and look out for the self. Also there are many married male and females from third world countries, who work abroad. they probably see their families once a year. One would ask, what was their purpose in marriage if all they do is work to enable the others to survive.
  21. why do males and female chase each other?. First, there is exposure. I have to see something in order to either be moved to or away from. The more I am exposed to something the familiar it gets, in fact what could be detested, with time becomes agreeable. Why do females chase males with fame and fortune?. They are no different then the guy who sits opposite them at their school, work. but somehow one differs in grandeur then the other. Same goes for males. So when muta is agreed upon, both parties are or were heavily interested in each other, that lead to the exchange of hormones.
  22. when ever I read such topics, All I take away is confusion. Not confusion of how great the information is, rather how much jargon and nonsensical opinion is implied with the hue of weak literature. In a previous state, it gave the impression of intelligentsia, but with improved reading, even the debates of clowns on the YT, one is left with only one conclusion. the motives of both parties is never about the existence of a deity, it is more about their own positions. To prove a deity should be simple just as to disprove it would be simple too. Neither can do it simply, thus they retort to complex idea and language. And with time, its sinks further into the abyss of complexity just to prove how much more thinking has been involved. Just a fallacy. Both belief and non-belief are based on need. Fill that stomach and the need will be associated.
  23. use the history tab and find old posts related to this subject with responses to similar questions that have been proposed. There is nothing to understand as what you require is statistics. That would imply researching a large demographic of men who practice it. This forum does not have that data. What it has is opinions with a generality of introverts. When the idea of muta is suggested it is implied as an option. If the male in question has troubles with their self abuse, and non-marriage due to conditioned applied by the communities, then muta would be the logical conclusion to avoid mental damage. No one agreed the use of women as objective tools, it is just females who generally jump on the defensive, when it is mentioned. They give the pretense of it being a low class option and accept some males to follow an ascetic type of lifestyle because that is their feeling and opinion. Women want to change males to fit their ideal. Yet in the real world, many females agree upon such a deal?. It means that they accept it while knowing what it entails, because the male who proposes it, has to explain the conditions of it. Whether they want a relationship or do it as a temporary deal. It wont be logical to do it as a short term deal, as the female won't wont be able to sleep with a male again for 3 months or so. Thus we assume, it generally stems towards a relationship. I find the pretense of naivety quite comical. Do you actually think males approach women and ask lets do muta?. It probably works similar to the cases of male and female interaction, where there is an interest of making a relationship or in rare cases where they just want to engage in non-disclosure intercourse. This is not applicable for the regular male or female, it pertains more to a genetic disposition coupled with the male or female having the beiber complex. The more fame, wealth and looks a person has, the more likely their chance of being initiated with.
  24. monad

    Problem Adolescence

    Regarding what exactly? Being a presumed misogynist?
  25. monad

    Problem Adolescence

    Are you a female?. Why do you plaster makeup on your face?. Females always fight over me, why?. because they want to clean the boogers of my face? or they want this super hot old guy in a 10 piece suit with a beard all the teens want to imitate.
×