monad

what stage are you at?. The masonic, Illuminati stage?. Flat earth vs round Earth? Colonies on mars? List goes on - If you are wanting to make some points, make some, but making one lined childish remarks to infer your newly found secret knowledge that makes you think you are above the rest of the theists means jack. You are still a slave like the rest, who has to follow the laws of those you detest. so shut up or speak up properly. child.

Buddy, we are dealing with zombies here. The topic keeps changing course constantly, which implies that the majority cannot comprehend the true objective. some of the females here are not interested in facts, they keep inferring their childish emotions and claiming that there is as some form of righteous indignation. The fact was, a female defense lawyer somehow got the alleged victims underwear as evidence?. if not : the male is claiming that this is what she wore, he would have not known it, if it was rape in a muddied alleyway. Alleyways are generally have low lighting Well, geegolly, let me think. Hyper aggressive male who is in a heightened sexual mode. observers two women of the same height, body language, one is dressed with light clothing the other with jeans and a coat. Who do you think his target will be?. The one where he can rip the cloths of far easily or not?. Do you actually use that head of yours to think?. There is a substantial body of indirect evidence suggesting that sexual attractions occur with increased frequency during states of strong emotion. For example, heterosexual love has been observed to be associated both with hate (James, 1910; Suttie, 193S) and with pain (Ellis, 1936). A connection between "aggression" and sexual attraction is supported by Tinbergen's (1954) observations of intermixed courting and aggression behaviors in various animal species, and a series of experiments conducted by Barclay have indicated the existence of a similar phenomenon in human behavior. Plenty of research out there, but as usual no one is interested in fact, they are driven by emotions. she is not a victim. The court acquitted the male. If you are claiming she is victim because a female lawyer used underwear as potential evidence and feelings got hurt, then we must examine all forms of evidence ever being used as evidence. Case close.

perhaps if you learn read properly, I do not have to waste my time re-writing the same nonsense. All you had to write is that you acknowledge I was right from the first post. That take courage. But being a female you can't do that. Because females have to right even when they are wrong and admitting that you are wrong would demean the whole post.

why don't you go and do a stake out at the town or city centre, where most of the clubs are. I am sure observational experience might be educational. The context is in regards to behavior.

This is comical. I tried to find Khadim the video, and I ended up many sites with the same discussions. It all follows the same trend. The females simply cannot not understand the rational points being made. the females seems to change the whole point made into something that is not even related to the subject matter. How is that even possible. You have taken my responses to infer that I am claiming she was being punished for wearing poor choice of clothing? understand the context. I suggest some books on anthropology. Desmond Morris - People Watching is a good start. I will write this in baby language. She went out dressed provocatively. Why?. Because she has the freedom too?. So are we stating while she was dressing up, she said OHHH, I feel the liberties of this great nation, where I can dress in a short skirt, so that the sun will glim off my newly shaved legs?. I will add a tad bit of cleavage, with extra perfume, to smell like a lovely garden in paris, and red lipstick, just like the lushes red tulips of Holland. Duuhhh, all of this is done to for the purpose of attraction. Males do the same. And then they all get together in a setting where they will be in a loud and dark room, drinking alcohol, dancing, all eyeing out the next potential love and having to get very close to each other just to speak. After having their laughs, and in a state of heightened sexual arousal and intoxication, what do you think hyper will occur?. Someone will be taken advantage off. That is a fact. So, there is nothing about provocation, especially when seduction is involved. As I have pointed out, the female do not want to comprehend the whole picture, they are whining about under garments being used as a possible coercive evidence, while none of them, even like me know the language of the law. Why do you always try to be different for the sake of having an alternative point of view? Let's all shame these rapists and be firm against them. Islam tells us that we should show compassion to a woman. It literally goes against the Quran for a man to even consider using force during sexual Intercourse. Bro, seriously. read the above. It went from rape, to not being rape, too omg, under wear was used as evidence, cant do that in a LAW OF COURT WHERE THE OBJECTIVE IS TO FIND EVIDENCE, think of the victim, this is inferring the male is already a rapist - to now what? monad is stating she deserved it?.

dude, It was a video next to the article, probably on the Irish post. Remove it if you want. I am not going to google it just for this. Thanks. to edit : if the pants were being used as evidence or being used as coercive evidence, then there must be validity for it being used. It does not matter what age anyone is in there, the objective is justice. Find the truth. Ohh please don't wave that knife I used to kill or used for killing, I find it offensive?. We can clearly see, the females are barraging on feelings as there is nothing else to actually grasp. It is a court, what do they expect to happen in there?. You have lawyers whose main objective is to defend and attack.

I appreciate the imitative adult response, however it is nothing but manipulative. Leaving aside the particulars of this case, in Ireland women are allowed to wear what they like and men are not allowed rape anyone under any circumstances. It is clear and there is no confusion about it. This case is controversial because, at least as it has been presented, it challenged this simple common sense assumption. Men are responsible for their own behavior. It seems using rational isn't a strong point here. This is not about dress code but the new papers have made it as that. A particular point as been used as the main discourse of claiming the not guilty point. Clearly the evidence in court was in favor of the man, and knowing if the public had such evidence they too would probably side with the male. I suggest you take your nonsensical associative bias regarding the freedom of western idealism regarding the liberties of females to do what they will and what want somewhere it has tangible value. A social club setting might entail, I hear at the local Irish bar must be a great insight for wild life anthropologists. If men must be responsible then so must women. I do not see anyone stating the obvious as written early. What made her think it was okay to date a guy 10 years older then her. The age of consent in Ireland is 17. For all we know she felt guilty for what she did and the only way to save face was to accuse someone for rape. Again none of us have evidence.

yes, different articles seem to present it with alterations. However I still blame the 17year old. She went out on a date with an older guy and decided to dress in a particular way to be more appealing. She clearly was not wear those items by it self, so something led him to believe she was seducing him, and that were his signals to follow through. Of course in her mind, she was still playing the innocent little girl, playing dress up, imitating the magazine and movie covers. He was most likely a hyper aggressive male, thus the ability to seduce her on a date. He won her from the countless of males that thought or decided to ask her out, but he did it. That is a sign of his aggressive nature and not showing his confidence. The nonsense regarding controlling desires, also falls back on the females. It works two way to initiate something, females want it both ways. I suggest stop using humans rights to justify emotional opinion. He was acquitted, as the evidence was on his side. The articles are nothing but sensationalism, to get the females in a uproar. I wrote bohoo, knowing that the discussions would be nothing but conjecture, as we have no evidence.

O W N A G E time x2 A: The defense lawyer was female. Elizabeth O’Connell <--- female! Elizabeth O’Connell asked jurors at Cork Central Criminal Court last week to consider the teen had worn “A, B , C.” “Does the evidence out-rule the possibility that she was attracted to the defendant and was open to meeting someone and being with someone?” O’Connell asked jurors during closing arguments. “You have to look at the way she was dressed,” she added. The assault happened while she was a sleep, ( from the video ) and then it goes to some misogynistic diatribe. A jury of eight men and four women acquitted the man unanimously after deliberating for 90 minutes, that is 1h30min. Questions : What was she doing sleeping in a bed with a male, not wanting to consummate but in her underwear?. Getting a tan from the ceiling lights? Did she not expect, that there is a possibility intercourse will happen?. This isn't a movie. Do women think they can do what they will, even with seduction and expect males to be subjugated?. We are dealing with biology and body language. Ohh please, let us share a bed naked, but you better behave like a good saint and not touch me. There were four women in the jury who could have abstained or given a different verdict. The evidence was against the female. The feminists have taken this out of context and are using the underwear to ignore whatever other reasons where that lead to this intercourse without permission. Carry on discussing nonsense. As usual the females need something to be hysterical about. EVIDENCE is king in the courtroom, yes, not queen but king.

boohoo,. A: no article as been presented. B : An article is not what was presented inside a court, this implies we are not told the true nature of the evidence. Articles are sensationalism so that you can go and the owner can twiddle their thumbs because you made them rich..

Netflix has better stories. Vice and RT has more realistic ones. Writing/speaking the truth generally makes one hard to deal with, as they do not conform to pretense. Humans are good at using each other, and they do it best with sweet words and kindness. Obviously to let the guard down before they strike you to further their own preservation.

I think the OP is actually implying that they too have no interest in religion and advising someone is problematic as they then have to study what they wish to stay away from. I doubt it is difficult to give advice. to guide someone. Hey bro, I am finding this situation difficult, however as you have realised a mistake and wish to part take a new path, I suggest a visit to this site. www.al-islam.org and spend the next few years learning. If you have any questions you can join Shiachat and discuss issue that you may have. However side note - you will both burn in hell.

What does this have to do with the problem the op has?, unless you intended to tell her, perhaps she should read self help books, get some Tony poppins, Brian lazy, Les orange, dale Turniple drugs into her system. But you did not, you self aggrandized your self. I suggest you readdress your Dyer quote on this. It must be a delusion to think you are envied for being socially able, perhaps they were competitive females as your self wanting status. I get on well in all circles, even in my silence. I enjoy observing the fools with their pretense of existing. You should just come off clean and state that you are the upper class, and those others, i,e me- the peasant class are the ill educated, lazy, indolent and are not interested in growth. In fact you could go far as to claim, your superiority even to the closeness to God. After all, your sighs and neighs have been answered. Your circles are clown jesters fighting for prestige and status. Knowing the nature of existence, they were fortunate to have accumulated X, be it in fame or fortune. Your lifestyle is based on who can claim the highest position to whatever methods are employed and if achieved it is then associated via God, his saints or virtue. So, no, there is no self betterment for virtue, it is based on social hierarchy. I am sure you all manipulate each other extensively for that dopamine fix. I got promoted, nice, me too, me three, not me, I bought a new car, me too, I am going too as well, er, nice dress its new, its designer, weeee mine isnt, I bought it from a chairty shop, I have money but I like to give back, weeeee, I just came from holiday, weeee, I am going to one as well, weeeee, I already have three this year, weeee, I am pregnant, me too, but you are a guy?, so, guys can get pregnant too, hur hur, have some food, weeeee, so lets discuss x, y ,z, weeeee, omg you are so smart, i know, weee. Later that evening in each families private conversation What follow is : did you see what he/she said to be, think they are better then us, see what they were dressed like, you see what they spoke like, talked off, they are not wealthy, just ordinary folk from this family and so and so so . This is your competitive circles. Like I wrote I have been in them, from friends, families to individuals I do not know. Judging is part of human nature, it is what allows us to make decisions. Do not take these self help gurus to be the truth, they are sales men/women. whatever they write or speak off, has been written much more profoundly from those whom they copy it from. They are like drug dealers, selling snippets of emotional rhetoric to get the crowd hyped. O W N E D!

Learn to google first. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuch Trangender or mix gender through birth is no different then someone born with a disability. somewhere the genes went wrong. They are not evil, in fact they must suffer immensely not knowing their true gender or like a disabled person not feeling or having the ability to be able bodied to be good slaves or despots. To claim it is due to their parents evil, is nonsense, just ill educated contrived oppression and justification for class war fair and responsibilities.

waste time on shiachat?. What does it mean God can and cannot do?. Cannot do or won't do, and what evidence does one have to imply God has done, will do, can do apart from the words spoken or written from ones own mind.