Leaderboard

See: and w/s

Drawing babies faces, distributing rizq, controlling universe etc. is all mentioned in Khutba al-Bayan but this khutba is the fabrication of ghulats (LA) and obviously not from Imam Ali (as). w/s

(salam) Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala says in his Qu'ran: From Allah, verily nothing is hidden on earth or in the heavens. He it is Who shapes you in the wombs as He pleases. there is no god but He, the Exalted in Might, the Wise. ( سورة آل عمران , Aal-e-Imran, Chapter #3, Verse #5/6) (wasalam)

^Astaghfirullah. Imam (as) never said this. w/s

ÓÀÑÇ .............. Ðãÿ ÏÇÑیÇŸ Ïی ÇیÀÀ ªŠšی ÓÀÑÇ Çی ÈÑÎæÑÏÇÑÇ ÌیæیŸ ÌیæیŸ ȪÌÏÇ ÌÇÓی ˜ãÈá ÀõäÏÇ ÌÇäÇ Çی ȪÇÑÇ ÇÌ ÊõæŸ ˜äÇŸ ÓæÀäÇ áäÇÆیŸ ˜äÇŸ áäÇÆیŸ یÇÑÇ æیáÇ¡ ÊیÑ¡ ÌæÇäی ÌÇ ˜ÿ ãšÏÿ äÆیŸ ÏæÈÇÑÇ ÓÀÑÿ æÇáیÇ ªæš ÓæÇÑÇ æʪی õªŠ Ïÿ ÑÇÀیÇ æϪæیŸ ÑÇÊ Ïÿ äÇŸ ãÇÀیÇ æÇÇŸ ˜ª ÓÇÀیÇ ÈÀÊÑ Óی ˜õ̪ ÀæÑ ÏیÀÇšÿ јªÏæŸ ÓÇäȪ ÌæÇäی ÈÀÊÑ Óی ˜õ̪ ÀæÑ ÏیÀÇšÿ äÀ ˜Ñ ÏæŸ äÇÏÇäی ÚÈیÑ ÇÈæÐÑی

same irrelevant arguments. There is a joke about Pashtuns in Afghanistan that relates to such arguments as free speech or freedom of press etc. The story goes- The Judge asks the defendant (Pashtun) why he stole the gardener's fruits" to which the defendant replies 'It was so because his daughter had pink sandals'..... totally unrelated. I dont believe in any freedom but the expediency of the apparatus of the state. Where they have TOTAL control they throw the masses bones under the name of freedom of this or thte right of that.... but the moment its monopoly of control is challenged it takes those freedoms far too quicker than they give them. You know that people could be deported without even getting to see the evidence tying them to whatever they are accused of? Not untill so long ago the West (contrasting itself with the godless commies) prided itself with freedom of religion. They were so convinced by their propagated arguments that they even started believing in it as some noble truth. How is the case today? Religion is the number one institution that is under attack. In the name of religion resource wars are waged and masses discriminated. Today French children of muslim faith cannot wear their headscarves or the ridiculous and retarded move of the oh so liberal swiss to have banned the minarets etc. All it took to derail West of its bs freedom wagon was apparently some 19 terrorists and three planes. No amount of freedom of press or the operation of the system could justify the amount of pain that mahr's family and friends went through. My Point- freedom etc are meaningless and non existent. Its a concept that justifies oppression of the strong over the weak. It was through such arguments that the wealthy secured the Iraqi resources through the suffering of the masses- be it that american family that lost their dear ones or the countless and nameless innocent Iraqi victims.

LOL. You know why that became a big story and something happened in response? Because in Canada we have freedom of speech and press. The press, including, and especially the state sponsored station, CBC, were active in publicizing this story and criticizing the politicians about it. Opposition politicians spoke out about the case without fear of being jailed or added to some blacklist of politicians who are blocked from running for future office. In a word, it became a story because of our system working.

(bismillah) This is in no way an exaustive study or scholarly effort, it is merely a few observations I have made, being a truth seeker who was a Christian and also studied about Judaism before embracing Islam a few years ago. The first likeness I would like to note is that of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and Prophet Moses (as). Both were known to have spent time alone, getting away from the hustle and bustle of society to take time to reflect. Moses (as) tending to his sheep in the wilderness, and Muhammad (pbuh) spending time meditating in the cave. It was in these times alone that both recieved their first Revelation from Allah. Both recieved a Law from Allah to guide their people, Moses (as) with the Torah and Muhammad (pbuh) with the Quran, and both lead their people to freedom from oppressors, Moses (as) from the Egyptians to the Promised Land, and Muhammad (pbuh) from the Makkans to Medina. "I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him." Deuteronomy 18:18 I find the likeness of Imam Ali (as) to be that of Prophet David (as). Both became mighty wariors at a young age. Both were selected as ruler by Prophets, David (as) by Samuel (as), and Ali (as) by Muhammad (pbuh). They both obtained their rightful rulership for which they were annointed after what can be considered a related likeness, the Kingdom of Saul and the Caliphate. Both delivered volumes of beautiful sermons that the word "poetry" is too lowly a word to describe them, David (as) the Psalms and Ali (as) the sermons of Nahjul Balagha. Mu'awiya is similar to Constantine, both having taken advantage of a Religion on the rise, changing it to suit the desires of the empire and using it to manipulate people and conquer land.

Mashallah :D Haha stronger evidence points toward Uthman being better than Ali (as). Astaghfurallah. May Allah swt guide us all... And here is a video response to it: (Yes, i am bored :D)

118 Days, 12 Hours, 54 Minutes On June 21, reporter Maziar Bahari was rousted out of bed and taken to Tehran's notorious Evin prison—accused of being a spy for the CIA, MI6, Mossad…and NEWSWEEK. This is the story of his captivity—and of an Iran whose rampant paranoia underpins an ever more fractured regime. ...Continued at: http://www.newsweek.com/id/223862/

äÀیŸ ÀÇ äÊÇ Îæ Ï ˜æ ÇȪی æÀ Ìæ áÀÌÿ ãیŸ ÎÏÇ ˜ÿ Èæ áÊÇ Àÿ

^Imami scholars (such as Shaykh Mufeed and majority of his time) believed that Prophets (as) [except Muhammad (saw)] were not protected from minor sins (which do not degrade them) before the time of their prophetic mission. إن جميع أنبياء الله - صلوات الله عليهم - معصومون من الكبائر قبل النبوة وبعدها وما يستخف فاعله من الصغائر كلها، وأما ما كان من صغير لا يستخف فاعله فجائز وقوعه منهم قبل النبوة وعلى غير تعمد وممتنع منهم بعدها على كل حال، وهذا مذهب جمهور الإمامية، والمعتزلة بأسرها تخالف فيه. Imams of Ahlul Bayt (as) were also not protected from minor sins (which do not degrade them) before the time of their Imamah. إن الأئمة القائمين مقام الأنبياء (ص) في تنفيذ الأحكام وإقامة الحدود وحفظ الشرائع وتأديب الأنام (1) معصومون كعصمة الأنبياء، وإنهم لا يجوز منهم صغيرة إلا ما قدمت ذكر جوازه على الأنبياء w/s

To Skinee, I think you might be right about this poster, check out this link: http://ashraf786.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=24631&page=1#194933 He/she has tried it on another Muslim site. Should know not to trust someone with that name!! Wasalaam.

just to cleay this up quickly.. its a guy friend of mine who referred me to this website a whle back.. i asked him how seriouse it was and he told me some funny things written in the mens section. this is the only reason i know whats there.... i really have no intention or even care to go check anything in there. im sure its even worse then he told me. .. just to clear that up.

thanks to those who helped.. And I asked a few friends, they agree'd that it shouldnt be considered istihaza. .. and umm, no its a yeast infection not fungal. search it online, its a certain thing inside a woman that is always present, and the amount of it can be elevated due to , pregnancy, mesntrual , changed sexual partners , soaps that cause irritation and a few other ones. Mine is caused because of my mesntrual cycles, my body elevates the amount of the specific hormone, wich then creates a small infection. Im very clean, I do wudhu all day and shower atleaste twice a day. I dont wear tight clothing and I wear cotton under garmets to keep cleaner. you guys shouldnt think its such a bad topic... this is in the sisters forum, and if youve ever looked in the guys section.. theres stupider more random disgusting questions. Mine is a medical question that couldnt be answered by just anyone out there.. hey atleaste im not asking, "GUYS PLEASE HELP, I WATCH PORN 3 TIMES A DAY AND LOVE IT AND CANT STOP"... like common, how many of those are in the guys sections only!!!! ... have some respect , a girl comes here asking for some help.. and unfortunatly has to tell the personal thing.. if it was so WRONG im sure a moderator would have removed it immediatly. how should I add this to the masturbation topic if this is A MEDICAL ISSUE. this question is perfectly legit. and Im sure will help many other sisters out there, cause trust me.. ALOT of women get this especially when pregnant, or having theyre mesntrual cycle. Its a natural thing in the body.. and sometimes the amount of that hormone gets elevated and causes an infection that is not able to be stopped until the symptoms occure, and then you have to medicate to reduce the level of the hormone. so get over it.. if its a medical matter, why would I put it in a section called masturbation???...seriosly. like i see I have now a bad rep on my profile. whats with that. I thought people out here would be helpfull.. great way to show support for a fellow sister huh. but anyways. thanks to the few who commented politly and tryed to help. :) I appreciate your comments. Oh and by the way.. the medication made it go away, so no... its not a funagl infection I found that somewhat insulting .. to be honest. claiming me to be unclean and having fungus!!!.

(salam) It's sometimes not possible to find unanimity amongst Sunni scholars of Hadith regarding Tawtheeq. In any case, all of these narrators are reliable according to Ibn Hajar il-'Asqalaani in al-Taqreeb. Ibn Hajar in Taqreeb ul-Tahdheeb says about Rabee'a ibn Naajid: ÑÈíÚÉ Èä äÇÌÏ ÇáÃÒÏí ÇáßæÝí íÞÇá åæ ÃÎæ ÃÈí ÕÇÏÞ ÇáÑÇæí Úäå ËÞÉ ãä ÇáËÇäíÉ ÊÞÑíÈ ÇáÊåÐíÈ Ì 1 Õ 298 - Mansab

(salam) I don't see how anyone can deny this fact... Here is an authentic narration from al-Khasaa'is ul-`Alawiyya of al-Nasaa'i: 66 - ÃÎÈÑäÇ ÇáÝÖá Èä Óåá ÞÇá ÍÏËäÇ ÚÝÇä Èä ãÓáã ÞÇá ÍÏËäÇ ÃÈæ ÚæÇäÉ Úä ÚËãÇä Èä ÇáãÛíÑÉ Úä ÃÈí ÕÇÏÞ Úä ÑÈíÚÉ Èä äÇÌÏ Ãä ÑÌáÇ ÞÇá áÚáí íÇ ÃãíÑ ÇáãÄãäíä áã æÑËÊ ÇÈä Úãß Ïæä Úãß ÞÇá ÌãÚ ÑÓæá Çááå Ãæ ÞÇá ÏÚÇ ÑÓæá Çááå Èäí ÚÈÏ ÇáãØáÈ ÝÕäÚ áåã ãÏÇ ãä ØÚÇã ÞÇá ÝÃßáæÇ ÍÊì ÔÈÚæÇ æÈÞí ÇáØÚÇã ßãÇ åæ ßÃäå áã íãÓ Ëã ÏÚÇ ÈÛãÑ ÝÔÑÈæÇ ÍÊì ÑææÇ æÈÞí ÇáÔÑÇÈ ßÃäå áã íãÓ Ãæ áã íÔÑÈ ÝÞÇá íÇ Èäí ÚÈÏ ÇáãØáÈ Åäí ÈÚËÊ Åáíßã ÈÎÇÕÉ æÇáì ÇáäÇÓ ÈÚÇãÉ æÞÏ ÑÃíÊã ãä åÐå ÇáÂíÉ ãÇ ÞÏ ÑÃíÊã ÝÃíßã íÈÇíÚäí Úáì Ãä íßæä ÃÎí æÕÇÍÈí ææÇÑËí ææÒíÑí Ýáã íÞã Åáíå ÃÍÏ ÝÞãÊ Åáíå æßäÊ ÃÕÛÑ ÇáÞæã ÓäÇ ÝÞÇá ÇÌáÓ Ëã ÞÇá ËáÇË ãÑÇÊ ßá Ðáß ÃÞæã Åáíå ÝíÞæá ÇÌáÓ ÍÊì ßÇä Ýí ÇáËÇáËÉ ÖÑÈ ÈíÏå Úáì íÏí Ëã ÞÇá ÃäÊ ÃÎí æÕÇÍÈí ææÑíËí ææÒíÑí ÝÈÐáß æÑËÊ ÇÈä Úãí Ïæä Úãí Rasoolullah (as) said: "You (`Ali (as)) are my brother, my companion, my heir/inheritor, and my minister/vizier..." (salam) - Mansab

Yes, I believe she should tell her husband (though different situation might warrant different decisions). I don't mean because of virginity or whatever but because it would help her husband (in sha Allah) to know what's hurting the woman he loves. It's a terrible feeling to see someone you care about in pain, not having a clue as to what the reason is and feeling powerless to help it. And of course for her, keeping it bottled up from the person she loves could be agonizing. Left unsaid and such pain kept within can really hurt a marriage. It would also help him to be more careful when it comes to intimate relations. I don't mean abstaining, but just realizing he needs to go easy with her and be very considerate of the trauma she's had associated with what should be otherwise be an enjoyable experience, one that is very important to their marriage.

FALSE (i love my name: after reading the book "SAYEDAT NESSA' AL ALAMEEN) has anyone ever influenced you to do something you dont believe in?

ws and (salam) brother sharib, i'm unable to find it uptill now.talashe bisyar magar jari hae agar aap ko hi dikhae pare to khud is ki islah frmaeye ga aur agar meri nazar mendoobara ye sher aaya aur koi kasar hui to zaroor doobara naqal kr denge. Àã äÿ ˜ÀÇ ˜ãÇ á Àæ Ìæ Êã Àã ˜æ Ȫæ á Ó˜æ ÝÑÇÒ Àã äÿ Êæ ÝÞØ ÈÇÊ ˜ی ÇÓ äÿ ˜ãÇá ˜Ñ ÏیÇ یæ Ÿ äÀ ˜ªیä Çäی ØÑÝ ã̪ÿ Èÿ ÈÓ ˜Ñ ˜ÿÝÑÇÒ ˜ÀیŸ ÇیÓÇ äÀ Àæ Îæ Ï Óÿ Ȫی Ȫš ÌÇ æٔŸ ÇæÑ Êã Ȫی äÀ ãáæ

It's a misleading article in several ways 1) The basic premise of the article is that Hezb's main goal is to hold on to power and get as many people under their 'control' as possible. "Hezbollah's recent encouragement of this phenomenon highlights the compromises it had been required to make in order to remain the preeminent force among its domestic Shiite constituency" Hezbollah apparently decided to expand its support for this practice after the 2006 war, to maintain its support base and keep the Shiites in Lebanon under its control. Note the phrase 'under it's control' To 'control' the Lebanese Shiite's has never been the goal of Hezb, whether stated or otherwise. That is the problem with non-muslims writing articles about Islam or Shiism with a very superficial understanding of the basic issues. Hezb rose up for 'Amr Maroof wa Nahiya Al Munkhar' (Enjoining Good and Forbiding Evil) and the main part of this was their focus on the defense of the Lebanese against the Zionist enemy when the Lebanese Govt. and army failed to do this in the early 1980s. Their objectives and focus has not changed. Nothing in their speeches or practices indicates this, IMO. 2) The practice of Mutah only began to be practiced and encouraged by Shia ulema and Hezb in Lebanon after the 2006 war. This is pure nonsense. The practice and encouragement of mutah as a halal options for some people in some situations has been the norm in Lebanon for a while now, at least since the Shia revival in the early 80's. Even before that, it was done in some areas. Even with all the 'encouragement' by Hezb and others, the practice is still very limited and the overwhelming majority of Shia inside and outside Lebanon practice permenant marriage and have probably never engaged in mutah. This didn't change after the 2006 war. 3) The 'halal hookup' thing is new and unique to Hezbollah. This is complete nonsense. The 'halal hookup' in the sense of trying to find spouses for eligible br and sis is not a new thing and is done by many Islamic organization in almost every country in the world. I have personally been involved in this with a group here in the US, and I have posted about this many times. There are many Sunni and even Christian groups that do this. Mutah is marriage and so facilitation of mutah is no different, amoung the followers of Ahl Al Bayt, from facilitation of permenant marriage, given that the girl, if she has never been married, has the permission of her father. This is needed for permenant marriage as well. It might be easier for Hezb to find women who are willing to participate in mutah since they have a more extensive network than most other organizations and the ratio of unmarried women to men is greater in Lebanon than say the US or Canada amoung the Shia. .

What a load of BS. If the majority of Muslims are as deep in denial of the roots of Western successes and the roots of their own failures, the winter will last for a good deal longer yet.

Renounce yourself foremostly, and insh'Allah you'll find some clarity. We avidly distance ourselves from those we think would be a danger to us, but we too often miss out on acknowledging the truest enemy, the one within. I personally believe that the manner in which 'bad company' affects you depends far more on you than it does on 'them'. You can be a beacon, reaching out to those immensely different from you and bringing light to them through your company; you can be in the presence of the worst of sinners and transform a part of them with your own shining akhlaq. Or you can become a shadow, darkly mirroring acts that will distance you from God as you see them done around you. All this can happen amidst the same group of people; the deciding factor is the surety of your own faith. When you start dividing yourself and closing yourself off to people you presume aren't good- particularly tragic if that presumption is not based in absolute, incorrigible fact tested 70 times over- you might possibly be doing yourself a service, perhaps preventing yourself from becoming a shadow. But you're also potentially limiting your capacity to be a beacon, don't forget that. How could we ever expect to do amr bil maroof and nahy ana'l munkar if we were if intended to surround ourselves only with 'good' people, and why would God make these practices an essential part of the furu al din if we were meant to perpetually run away from wrongdoers? Maybe it's just me, but I have a difficult time respecting someone who has a clean slate purely because they've shut off every possible avenue of sin. I'm more inclined to respect people who can befriend their fellow human beings- regardless of creed or lifestyle- with an open mind and heart, and consciously, actively choose goodness without even momentarily feeling superior to anybody else. And before you feel inclined to determine that someone is 'good' or 'bad', remember the words of Plato: "everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle." If we could see how much effort it takes someone to achieve the same sort of goodness that comes easily to us, or see how wonderful a person was before untold waves of anguish turned them bitter and 'bad', would we still be so quick to dismiss? The guy you see in the prayer hall lecturing children on how to be good Muslims might be the same guy you see in the library smooching with his kafir girlfriend, just as the fellow you see smoking a blunt in the park might be the same guy who regularly volunteers at his local homeless shelter. Appearances can be deceiving, and life is short. Why waste time condemning when we could be healing? :wub:

another factual mistake I noticed when they say temporary marriage opposed to permanent marriage doesn't require the involvement of high religious figures. this is a false comparison because in shia fiqh both the permanent and temporary don't require witnesses or involvement of figures so its nothing exclusive to mut3a.

this is a media disinformation article part of the global war on Hizbullah and Iran to tarnish their image in any way possible. (wasalam)

This is a complete sidetracking of the issue that you people engage in--as usual. Shias who criticize the 'Islamic' Republic do not do so on the basis of Western guidance or ideologies; they do it because of their own adherence to the Imami teachings and their understandings of that. Yes, the West is brutal and wrong in many aspects and yes they do so much wrong; but, so does Iran and it has been thoroughly proven. It makes no difference if the 'innocent' Supreme Dictator "didn't authorize it"; his clowns certainly commit all manners of the worst and most brutal acts of oppression, resembling Yazid and Saddam. The Shah's men also did many things he probably did not know about, but it is all irrevelant to the victims, don't you think? If Khamenei is in opposition to what his dogs do, then let him stop it or make the truth known. Why the rest of this hysterical nonsense?

For spending time in public with a goofy commedian? No. You might want to seek out better sources on the Western world than www.dieporkfilledwesterndogkaffirs.com

ham ahh bhi kartay hain to hojatay hain badnaam wo katl bhi kartay hain to charcha nahi hota

Well, you certainly wouldn't end up spending 4 months in a prison getting beaten and interrogated by security officials for it, I can tell you that much.

(salam) I actually saw this specific Daily Show segment (spanning few episodes) with Jason Jones in Iran. It was not bad as what you normally see on the Western media. They were focusing more on Iranians on the street. All the issues being discussed were light weight and fluffy. I don't think people should be offended, because the Daily Show is a comedy show about fake news. However last Sunday, they had Maziar bahari on CBS 60 minutes. I believe there is a complete transcript of the interview. I actually have a question. How does Iranians view these tortures which are being carried out in prisons? Is it acceptable over there? :unsure: I know the USA carried out water boarding and other "torture" like techniques over here, but a majority of folks over here are against this. At one time, the administration did tried to put a positive spin on "torture".

If you can shed doubt on the validity of Saanei's opinion because of his acceptance of kosher meat.. others can disagree with Gulpayghani's opinion because he thinks its an abomination that women are given leadership positions in Iran. You can't simply pick and choose who to take seriously because of your own personal beliefs. Well, you can.. but don't expect anyone to take it seriously. Perhaps they are supposed to be applicable to all time. Perhaps they are not. Do you speak to your wife in confidentiality or ask her advice? According to these haddiths, your wife is incompetent by virtue of the fact that she is a female and doing either of these things is simply not acceptable. So perhaps they are supposed to be adhered to.. or perhaps not... Perhaps grading, context, and thoughtfulness should be practiced in reviewing these haddiths.. perhaps not. Maybe I am limited to my experiences because growing up my father had the utmost respect for my mothers advice. Islam tells us that our wives are the protectors of our honor and our secrets, and one of these haddiths says that a man should not come to a woman in confidentiality. You will have to excuse me if I don't take these haddiths as absolutes since they contradict a lot of what Islam says about women and even undermine the family unit itself. I agree that the emphasis that is put on how much is earned is unhealthy and at times detrimental to the family.. but I don't think that arguing that women are not the blithering idiots that these haddiths portray them as = downfall of the family, and I think trying to set them up as such is dishonest. I think that those judges, doctors, and hardworking Muslim women in leadership positions are an amazing tribute to our religion and do nothing short of spreading the Islamic message of equality and respect for the female gender.

What kind of response is this?! Seriously. What the hell? Maybe not in the technical sense? What is wrong with you? He works for Newsweek.

Journalist Maziar Bahari's account of captivity in Evin Prison, Iran. For your consideration and entertainment. http://www.newsweek.com/id/223862 Some select nuggets: Bizarro world. Bizarro world.

^^ Lol thanks for the comments anyways. I do not mind.

^ No Hizbullah has nothing to do with Sayed Fadlallah. They are supporters of the Islamic Republic and get funded by them. Their spiritual and political leader is Sayed Ali Khamenei, before him it was Imam al Khomeini. There is nothing hidden or secret or unknown about this. It is fact.

salam, yahan tu badhay talented loag mojood hain. bilkul badha nahi hai, balkay bohat hi mazey dar hai. ye lejiyie aik koshish aur kijie.. اب وہ جو چل دیاہے تو ہے تُو کیوں مضطرب کمبخت، نارسا دل ِ حیراں سنبھل سنبھل

ye shair abhi abhi kaha hai.........................ghazal pori kerni paday gee. :) ãÑÿ ÀÑ ÔÚÑ ˜æ Çäÿ áیÿ äÀ ÌÇä ˜À Êæ ÎæÔ ÝÀãیæŸ ãیŸ ã ÀæÇ äÇÏÇŸ ÓäȪá ÓäȪá

Babes, you see you can't answer this question with a mere 'yes' or 'no'. There is more to it than aye or nay. You have to go back to the reasons for what causing her to exercise this 'right'. That is not absolute. I mean it's not like your wife would tell you at the time of nikah that she wouldn't do any housework if or if not he didn't help. This is not how it works man. All 'ifs' and 'buts' have been pointed out to you clearly. Are you sure? We had 3 SC marriages in the past. People met here and took it to the 'real' life. So don't assume :P

^ many thanks for that incredibly insightful contribution into this critical matter.

YourFutureHusband banned. Previously banned member Yiligiz, Gamal Ali, Storm Large, and many, MANY other accounts.

Salam Ashaar from Iftikhar Arif which I like: Khazana-e zaro gauhar pe khaak daal ke rakh, Hum ahle mehro muhabbat hain dil nikaaal ke rakh. hamein to apne samandar kee reit kaafi hai , tu apne chashma-e be- faiz ko sanbhaal ke rakh. Charagh kaun se bujhne hain, kinko rahna hai , yeh faisle abhee auron ke akhtiyaar mein hain. wassalam

ungliyaan toot gaen pathar trashte trashte faraz aur jab bani soorate yar to khareedar a gae

(salam) I am eagerly waiting to read the "cultural rebel" thread that you're going to start soon!

ye to puranay zamanay ki baat hogaie, be to ye kaheay " har aik sheh say neralay tumharay sms "

<br /><br /><br />behan sahiba , to may kab kehraha hoon k ye aap k personal halaat hain , it doesnt matter that u r a kid or kidney , choti behan g , har cheez ko etna seriously nahi laytay , k b bacho par pabandi na lagadain es room may ?

<br /><br /><br />i think kitchen say aaraha hay dhua, jab roti paknay rakh kar shaeyri karaingi to yahi hoga <br /><br /><br />aik to bilawajha may shak karnay walay loog mujhay bilkul pasand nahi hain

Definately my daughter :wub: berat doa mikonam alba kk

salam imam zaman (3ajjala Allah ta3ala farajahou sharif) ws