Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. What do you mean by 'qasr' their 'roza'? If you mean break their fast then obviously not, because it's like asking if they can have a sandwich for lunch while fasting. If you mean travel to a remote location where they don't need to fast anymore then this is makrooh in the very least because even when you travel while fasting it is disliked to engage in acts that would invalidate the fast (this applies to the day of travel itself). Wallahu a'lam
  3. You know what? I'm quite happy that I am angered right now, just like everyone else. I'm very proud of the fact that seeing clowns and morons mock Abu Talib (عليه السلام) hurts me, just like it hurts everyone else here. On the day of judgement, I would never want to face the Prophet Muhammad ((صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)) while having mocked his uncle. I would never ever want to face Imam Ali (عليه السلام) while having mocked his father, he who took care of Prophet Muhammad ((صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)). The truth is very obvious, that us Shias are on the right path. The love Sunnis have for Prophet Muhammad ((صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)) and his pure progeny is just lip service. They love all the companions who oppressed Ahlul Bayt (عليه السلام), they love he who killed Lady Fatima (عليه السلام), they love she who fought against Imam Ali (عليه السلام). It's all fake.
  4. @Darth Vader https://www.Sistani.org/english/archive/25240/ Advice from His Eminence,Sayyid Ali al-Sistani (may the Almighty prolong his life) to the Believing Youth
  5. Today
  6. Maybe you don’t encompass the ability to read so let me repeat: I could care less about sects of Islam. The fact that you find me being critical of Shia interests does not automatically mean I am partial to Sunni interests. I am certain the Ummayads and Abbasids were tyrants. However, I have no shame and accepting that for Safavids as well. They are the door to innovation for the school of Ahlul Bayt. Next time save yourself time by trying to find Sunni references for me because I could care less about them. Both sects are full of flaws as is their Hadith literature. FYI, the Owais story has been debunked by Tashayyu scholars. Even if true, why did Imam Ali not pull out his teeth? Did he not love the Prophet more than Owais? So many problems in relying on that fabricated account. Anyways, that speaks volumes of your Yasser Habib inflicted manhaj.
  7. First of all, respect yourself. We know that these manners of yours were bequeathed (and inherited) from the people you follow, but here, you have to be respectful. I imagine, you’d be enraged (and convulsed), if I said that the Ottomans, or the Abbasid "rulers" were drunkards. Now, let me demolish everything you said. Here, hold my monocle and whiskers. In Sīrāt Iʿbn Ishaq, page 713, Sīrāt Iʿbn Hisham, volume 4, page 655, al-Bīdāyaḥ wal-Nīḥāyaḥ, volume 5, page 420: Aisha said: "The Messenger of Allah died on my bosom during my turn, I did not wrong anyone in regard to him. It was because of my ignorance and youthfulness that the Messenger of Allah died while he was on my lap. Then I laid his head on a pillow and got up beating my chest and slapping my face along with the women." More references: Musnād Ahmad Iʿbn Hanbāl, volume 43, page 369, tradition 26348. Musnād Aʿbi Yaʿlā al-Mawṣilī, volume 8, page 63, tradition 4586. Fatḥ al-Bārī, volume 6, page 225, tradition 2420. Irwa al-Ghalil, volume 7, page 86, (declared ‘Hassan’ by Al-Albaani). In Imtʿā al-Asmā, volume 2, page 137: “The mothers of believers began to hit their chests and put veil upon their heads, while the women of Ansār were hitting their faces and their voice got hoarse due to screaming.” In Tafsir Iʿbn Kathir, volume 7, page 421, Surah Adh-Dhariyat, verse 29, that Sarah, the wife of Abraham, and the mother of Jacob and Issac slapped/hit her face! In the book of al-Sīrāh al-Hālābīyā, volume 2, page 295: When the news reached Uwāīs al-Qārānī in Yemen, that two teeth of the Holy Prophet were broken in the Uhud, he extracted all his teeth. When the Holy Prophet got the news in Medina, that Uwāīs had struck down all his teeth, he exclaimed, “Indeed, Uwāīs is our devoted friend.” If you ask any normal human being, he’ll tell you that what Uwāīs did, is much more severe than tātbīr or lātm. The renowned Sunni Scholar, Shiekh Fārīd al-Dīn Attār, in Tāzkīrā tul-Awlīyā, pages 15-16 writes: Hādhrāt Uwāīs said: “If you are from among companions of the Prophet, tell me which tooth of the Holy Prophet was martyred? Also, why did you not break your teeth in adhering to the Prophet?” Upon saying this, he evidenced the fact that his teeth had been broken, and said: “When his tooth was martyred, I broke my tooth, then I thought perhaps it is another tooth, and my continuing to do so, I smashed all of my teeth, and upon doing so I felt comfortable.” Upon witnessing this, the companions proceeded to weep, and they realized that this constituted respect, whilst he had not seen him, he fulfilled the adhered to the obligation to follow the Prophet in its entirety, and taught this lesson when he left this world. In Tārīkh Baghdad, volume 4, page 422, and Ḥayāt al-Ḥayawān, page 101: ‘He (A'bu Bākr al-Mākkī) said: I heard al-Wārkānī saying: “The day on which Ahmad Iʿbn Hānbāl died, in it ‘Mātām’ and lamentation took place among four types of people: the Muslims, the Jews, the Christians and the Zoroastrians.” In the book of al-Rīyādḥ al-Nādḥīrā, page 187: “When Omar died, the jinn recited an elegy: Omar, female jinn are mourning you in a loud voice, and they are beating their faces!’
  8. Hold up, so are you confused on the Big Bang or evolution coming into existence?
  9. Yes, this is one of the reasons.The noha reciters have started acting like 'Zakirs' only with poetry.
  10. There are aspects of validity in the sense of critical consideration to what constitutes valid and authoritative but the thing that Qur'anists fail to understand is how fallacious they end up being through the new self-contradictory dogmas they employ. Some things they bring up are useful but also require a wider and deeper exploration of Hadith collections to really actually determine the validity of their position. Basically the Qur'anist generally determines the conclusion before reaching it, than going through a process to determine the conclusion. Also they seem to fall for a false-comparison when it comes to things like Karaite Judasim and Solar Scriptora (in Christianity). The nature of the Judeo-Christian Bible in relation to the Talmud and Catholic Church is categorically not an applicable comparison (which they usually work under the impression of) by the very nature of the text of the Bible itself in comparison to the Qur'an. One (Qur'an) is a received revelation (even if non-Muslims deny that it is) that in the first context is speaking to Muhammad himself, the other (Bible) is a compilation of linear narratives that claim to be a historical account and also include hymns and letters. There is also another fallacy I see them pulling, which is the assertion that the nature of Hadith itself is there to mislead or distort the Qur'an by nature and that reading the Qur'an alone as it is somehow equates to the only true (or an objective) understanding of the Qur'an and the theology, metaphysics, morals/ethics and philosophy/ontology it reveals. This view can manifest within some people as the dogma of "Those who accept Hadith are going to Jahannam", it's entirely illogical by the Qur'an's own standards which asserts a deeper understanding of the afterlife and what this life's purpose is. It's as if these people think that the Islamic position (whether Sunni or Shi'ite) is that all Hadith are infallible and non-debatable and that Hadith are more central to our Faith than the Qur'an, both of which are wrong and absurd views.
  11. I don’t understand why you found it uncomfortable to watch the first few minutes of the video. All those points mentioned by the scholars/speaker can be simply explained. don’t be shocked or put off when SDT or Shimrani potray it in such a 'shocking' way.
  12. Please set aside your feelings and see what Qur'an says: يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا إِن تَنصُرُوا اللَّهَ يَنصُرْكُمْ وَيُثَبِّتْ أَقْدَامَكُمْ 47:7 يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آَمَنُوا كُونوا أَنصَارَ اللَّهِ كَمَا قَالَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ لِلْحَوَارِيِّينَ مَنْ أَنصَارِي إِلَى اللَّهِ قَالَ الْحَوَارِيُّونَ نَحْنُ أَنصَارُ اللَّهِ 61:14 وَلِيَعْلَمَ اللَّهُ مَن يَنصُرُهُ وَرُسُلَهُ بِالْغَيْبِ إِنَّ اللَّهَ قَوِيٌّ عَزِيزٌ 57:25 Although Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) is Al-Qawi, Al-Aziz, He doesn't need anything from anyone. Our actions of helping Him are also His toufeqaat & blessings but since He Himself neither come to enforce His commands nor He force anyone to act righteously or in accordance to His commands therefore when we act or choose to act according to divine revelation or guidance, we automatically becomes "Ansar Allah" (helpers of God).
  13. The quranists are missing all tafasir and things around the verses, as well as any other rulings derived from ahadith. Also, they disobey Qur'an in and of itself. The Qur'an says obey the Prophet, so you must listen to the Prophet. This means taking ahadith.
  14. One person’s continuity is another person’s awkwardness and cultural confusion... Like @notme said, eventually a distinct natural English style will emerge, but until then, this is what we got.
  15. “Quranism” as practiced and believed is inherently self contradictory.
  16. Hold my falooda... Surely this isn't for real?
  17. @rkazmi33 I think there’s some confusion on what we’re discussing. I could respond point for point (there are some misconceptions you posted), but I don’t think we have baseline agreement on definitions. I honestly don’t think we’re even talking about the same thing. All I’ll say is that the psychology literature is very clear on this matter.
  18. Shari'ah is Shari'ah... It's hard to be a Muslim and not at least accept that Shari'ah is a valid system. But if Allah's law says to do x and y and a hadith says to do f and g, then there is no question about it, surely? This is what I mean, people see the word Qur'anist and think of these people who reject everything other than the Qur'an. Actually people who view Islam like this often are on a downward spiral and this is their last step before leaving the religion. Rather a Qur'anist worth giving time to is one who studies hadith, history and scripture and puts fact before falsehood, even when a majority follow such falsehood. Many Qur'anists are pro-Alid by the way and say that the Islam of man has been distorted certainly in the Ummayad caliphate but slightly later too.
  19. Salam Historicaly first Quranist was second caliph & after him first group were Khswarij in time of umnsyids & second group were Abbasids that became Qursnists & all of them rejected order of Prophet Muhammad (pbu) about imamate of Imam Ali & 11 Imams(عليه السلام) & know radical Quranists are trying to destroy any Islamic site like as Kaaba because they know it against their understand in from Qur'an
  20. Is it allowed for husband and wife to qasr their roza in Ramadan to have intercourse during day time
  21. Love nohas but am put off by the modern day theatrics. They are much better when live in an Imambargah or an actual Jaloos. Do not listen to the edited recordings where the reciter takes precedence over the noha if you know what I mean.
  22. Apart from the obvious verses about ahl el Beit (عليه السلام) I think they understand much better than many. Just by their study of semantics used throughout the Qur'an they can determine what really would mean such or such verb or noun, like 'strike' or 'pure', and reach another meaning that would be consistent over the whole book when 'traditionalists' as they call us would have interpretated them in different ways according to the surah. Not sure if I made myself clear. I would say they do not understand the shari`ah, or even do not believe in it as a juridical system.
  23. Well forcing someone to talk to you or stay with you in a relationship is also a sign of narcissism. I am saying that emotional and psychological abuse is more hurtful than silent treatment TO ME. But people want to insist that silent treatment is more hurtful. This is exactly why people resort to silent treatment. When you try to force your values, morals and lifestyles on other people. Yes, silent treatment people are weak, they may not be good at fighting, they may be too soft hearted, that's not neccesarily a bad thing. Just live and let live. Find friends who enjoy the regular fighting and taunting and are not sensitive, have a cruel sense of humor, but then you might be the one getting hurt. This is why people insist on forcing sensitive people to interact with them because then they always have upper hand. They don't have to worry about getting hurt. Bullies miss their victims, victims don't miss bullies.
  24. Sayed Sistani: Imam Khamenei: Sayed Fadlallah: Sheikh Naser Makarem: Sayed Sadiq Shirazi:
  1. Load more activity
  • Create New...