|
|
|
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله
Other languages [French / français, Spanish / español, Chinese / 汉语, Hindi / हिन्दी, etc.. ]
367 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 387 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 118 replies
- 32.8k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 1 reply
- 3.9k views
-
- 110 replies
- 28.7k views
-
- 6 replies
- 382 views
-
- 26 replies
- 7.8k views
-
- 4 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 8 replies
- 410 views
-
- 13 replies
- 774 views
-
- 0 replies
- 627 views
-
- 0 replies
- 587 views
-
- 0 replies
- 370 views
-
- 153 replies
- 26k views
-
- 1 reply
- 828 views
-
- 17 replies
- 9.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 322 views
-
- 0 replies
- 772 views
-
- 1 reply
- 841 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 564 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 5 replies
- 906 views
-
- 9 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 16 replies
- 5.4k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.2k views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Upcoming Events
No upcoming events found -
Posts
-
By Ibn-e-Muhammad · Posted
Proof of what exactly? Scientists are not dating rocks and fossils behind our backs; this is all public knowledge, and we have various researches available on homosapien fossils which push our species further back to 300,000 years, subhān'allāh. We already know the rate of decay for carbon-14, it is an internationally used reference standard. You're simply looking for the amount of radioactive material (carbon-14) in the fossil and comparing it to the original decay value and using that ratio to find the age of the fossil. Once that's done, you're not making any further hypothesis about it - you've already tested its age and now it's only a matter of classifying it morphologically. Your guess of 20,000 years is not aligning with the science, though. Jebel Irhoud is a site containing fossils of modern humans dating back to over 300,000 years. What would be your argument against something like? Other than baselessly doubting science, of course. -
By Ashvazdanghe · Posted
Salam a Farsi speaking in YT doesn't mean that it belongs to Iran which There is Shirazi grouplet & anti Iranian regime channels in Farsi language in YT & other social platforms are spreading many misinformation & propaganda which for example Shirazi crew spreads false & hateful videos from other countries likewise Afghanistan & Pakistan then claims it has happened in Iran which MKO terrorist cyber army promotes it in name of Iran by using too much fake accounts for increasing views & followers & comments of insulting to Sunni figures of any anti Iran channel whether shirazi grouplet or any anti Iranian regime channels . -
By Borntowitnesstruth · Posted
I am not denying radiocarbon dating. I am denying the illegal use of the term and hypothesis made upon such data. Sometimes, someone comes and says that such and such data belongs to such and such time while we haven't seen the proof, it is like throwing a statement at the face of audience without proof. About Prophet Adam (عليه السلام), I just made an honest guess by comparing time of prophets. Prophet Ibrahim (عليه السلام) came to earth 5000 years ago, prophet Nuh was his great great grand father if we suppose that he was 4000 before prophet Ibrahim then it makes 9000 years then again prophet Nuh was great great grandson of prophet Adam and if we suppose him to be 5000 years before Prophet Nuh then the whole time does not exceed 20,000 years. -
By 313_Waiter · Posted
One must realise that all power, and all help is ultimately coming from Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى), for He is as-Samad. That is what it means to be dependent. -
By Lion of Shia · Posted
According to the Qur'an, asking for someone's prayer or intercession is a form of shirk in lordship if the one who is entreated is regarded as acting independently and without God's permission.[42] what does this mean? What is independently?
-