Everything I did is something anyone can do Sayed or not.
But a lot of people see that Sada are the example. They see them and assume they are people who can help guide them on the right path because there bloodline flows back to the prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم). By Allah there are good people who are sada. But also Bad people who are sada too. The Sayed is not always the good guy.
And yes Brother I will never leave Islam. I'm proud to be called Muslim!
From what I know, we don't accept that hadith that said that Mutah was banned during the Battle of Khaybar. But lets say we did accept it (just theoretically). That wouldn't change any of the major facts of the argument, that
1. Even if theoretically it was banned in Khaybar, we have many, many hadith from our Imams((عليه السلام)) that say it is allowed. These hadith were after Khaybar. So for us Shia, it is allowed.
2. The ban of Umar was a general ban, not a specific ban. He said, 'It is banned (prohibited'). He didn't add a condition to that (It is banned until x, y, z). He was the first to do that. So even if we accept , again theoretically, that is was banned by Rasoulallah(p.b.u.h) on the day of Khaybar, this ban ended, meaning after that is was allowed, whereas the prohibition of Umar didn't end, meaning it is still, today in 2020, not allowed. That is the difference and that is why we could theoretically, if it was shown to be credible, accept the banning on the day of Khaybar hadith, but we could not accept the ban of Umar, because it goes against many, many hadith that we know are authentic as well as Holy Quran.
One more hadith from sahih Muslim to add to the above narrations:
Sahih muslim 1405e
Abu Nadra reported:
While I was in the company of Jabir b. Abdullah, a person came to him and said that Ibn 'Abbas and Ibn Zubair differed on the two types of Mut'as (Tamattu' of Hajj 1846 and Tamattu' with women), whereupon Jabir said: We used to do these two during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ). Umar then forbade us to do them, and so we did not revert to them.
حَدَّثَنَا حَامِدُ بْنُ عُمَرَ الْبَكْرَاوِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْوَاحِدِ، - يَعْنِي ابْنَ زِيَادٍ - عَنْ عَاصِمٍ، عَنْ أَبِي نَضْرَةَ، قَالَ كُنْتُ عِنْدَ جَابِرِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ فَأَتَاهُ آتٍ فَقَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ وَابْنُ الزُّبَيْرِ اخْتَلَفَا فِي الْمُتْعَتَيْنِ فَقَالَ جَابِرٌ فَعَلْنَاهُمَا مَعَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ثُمَّ نَهَانَا عَنْهُمَا عُمَرُ فَلَمْ نَعُدْ لَهُمَا