Jump to content
In the Name of God بسم الله
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Prophet Nuh (عليه السلام) an early social entrepreneur V2

Haji 2003


Same methodology as before, but more specific prompts on my part - and better answers



An important motivation for exploring this topic was my previous blog post about Prophet Yusuf's ((عليه السلام).) policy options. The overall theme of that post was the role of the State (Egyptian) that would intervene in the national grain market on the advice of Prophet Yusuf ((عليه السلام).). That was an example of how (in my opinion) Islam presented a non-market based solution to an external shock. This might not be well received in circles that favour 'private enterprise'.

My proposition is that Prophet Nuh's ((عليه السلام).) story, on the other hand, deals with a type of individual that free marketers and capitalists etc. hold as a hero of the economic system - the entrepreneur. However he's a specific type of entrepreneur since he was not driven by the profit motive, but he's an entrepreneur nevertheless. In this post I substantiate that proposition. This post refines some of the issues initially explored in V1. This is still work in progress and the references to the Qur'an that gpt4 makes need to be researched.

The stories of the two Prophets I think are interesting insofar as they show solutions to external shocks (famine and flood) being provided by Prophets and those solutions have similarities with economic philosophies that are today considered to be ideological opposites. That opposition perhaps reflects a weakness on the part of modern thinking.

My prompts in bold and gpt4's answers in plain text.

Imagine you are a scholar of Islam with an interest in management. How could the story of Noah in the Qur'an be seen through the lens of social entrepreneurship?

Social entrepreneurship is about recognizing societal problems and using entrepreneurial principles to create, organize, and manage ventures to bring about social change. In the context of the story of Noah (Nuh in Arabic) as it is told in the Qur'an, we can extract various lessons related to social entrepreneurship.

  1. Vision and Determination: Noah had a clear vision and was determined to build an ark despite the ridicule of his people. This reflects the characteristics of a social entrepreneur who has a clear vision for a social change and is persistent despite challenges and criticism.
  2. Resourcefulness and Innovation: Noah was not a shipbuilder, yet he was tasked with building an ark to withstand a great flood. He had to be resourceful and innovative in his approach, just like a social entrepreneur who often has to work with limited resources and come up with innovative solutions to societal problems.
  3. Leadership and Teamwork: Noah had to lead and manage his family and the animals on the ark. He needed to ensure everyone's survival during the flood. This highlights the need for strong leadership and team management skills in social entrepreneurship.
  4. Resilience and Patience: Noah faced a lot of opposition from his people. Despite this, he remained patient and resilient, demonstrating the ability to withstand a lot of negative pressure. This mirrors the challenges faced by social entrepreneurs who often need to maintain their resilience and patience in the face of obstacles and opposition.
  5. Social Impact: Ultimately, Noah's mission was about saving mankind and animals from a catastrophic event. This aligns with the ultimate goal of social entrepreneurship, which is to create a positive social impact.

It's important to note that religious texts like the Qur'an are interpreted differently by different people, and the above is one possible interpretation. These lessons extracted from the story of Noah can be used as a source of inspiration and guidance for social entrepreneurs.

Thank you. Noah was not selling anything for money. How could his enterprise be viewed in terms of exchange theory?

Exchange theory, which has roots in economics, sociology, and psychology, is a social psychological and sociological perspective that explains social change and stability as a process of negotiated exchanges between parties. It posits that human behavior is driven by the exchange of rewards, both tangible and intangible.

In the context of Noah's story from the Qur'an, the 'enterprise' he was undertaking was not a typical business venture aimed at monetary gain. Instead, it was a mission with a spiritual and moral goal, to save humanity and the animal kingdom from divine retribution. The exchange happening here was not of goods, services, or currencies, but rather of faith, obedience, and survival.

Noah, as a Prophet, was tasked to communicate God's message to his people. He 'offered' salvation and divine mercy in exchange for faith and righteous behavior. Those who accepted his message and acted accordingly were 'rewarded' with survival in the face of the cataclysmic flood.

This kind of exchange—where the 'goods' are intangible and the 'currency' is faith, trust, and obedience—is not typical in the world of business, but it is common in religious and spiritual contexts. It also exists in social entrepreneurship to some extent, where the 'reward' for supporting a cause may be an intangible sense of satisfaction, community belonging, or moral fulfillment.

In this interpretation, the 'profit' Noah was seeking was not material wealth, but the salvation of his followers. Similarly, the 'profit' for a social entrepreneur may not always be monetary but can be the social impact and positive change that they are able to bring about.

Again, it's important to remember that this is just one interpretation of the story. Different people may have different perspectives based on their personal beliefs, values, and experiences.

Please elaborate on Noah's entrepreneurial role as a risk-taker.

An entrepreneur, by nature, is a risk-taker, and social entrepreneurs are no exception. They are willing to take on significant risks to bring about positive social change, often venturing into uncharted territories and challenging the status quo.

In the story of Noah from the Qur'an, Noah can be seen as a significant risk-taker in the following ways:

  1. Challenging the Status Quo: Noah challenged the prevailing norms and beliefs of his society by preaching monotheism in a largely idolatrous community. This was a significant risk as it made him a target of ridicule, rejection, and even threats to his safety.
  2. Long-Term Commitment Despite Uncertain Outcomes: Noah was tasked with building an ark—a monumental task—despite the lack of any immediate signs of a flood. This uncertainty could be likened to the risks that entrepreneurs take, as they often invest considerable resources in projects without a guaranteed outcome.
  3. Stakeholder Resistance: Noah faced significant opposition from his own community, including from some of his own family members. This resistance is similar to the pushback social entrepreneurs often face from various stakeholders who are resistant to change.
  4. Resource Allocation: Building an ark required significant resources, both in terms of time and materials. Allocating these resources for a purpose that many deemed pointless was a significant risk. Similarly, social entrepreneurs often have to make tough decisions about resource allocation with no guarantee of success.
  5. Personal Risks: In addition to the societal risks, Noah also undertook personal risks. His unwavering commitment to his mission resulted in personal loss, including the loss of some family members who didn't believe in his message. This is akin to the personal sacrifices and risks many entrepreneurs take on—financial, emotional, and physical—in pursuit of their vision.

In all these ways, Noah embodies the risk-taking nature of an entrepreneur, demonstrating the courage, resilience, and determination that are key characteristics of successful entrepreneurship.

As a social entrepreneur, Noah was both taking risks in his enterprise and expecting others to take risks as well. For what reasons would his potential stakeholders be willing to take those risks?

In the context of the story of Noah from the Qur'an, potential stakeholders—those who listened to Noah's message and chose to support his mission—were expected to take significant risks. Here are some potential reasons they might be willing to take those risks:

  1. Belief in the Vision: The stakeholders who joined Noah likely believed in his vision of monotheism and the impending divine punishment. Much like stakeholders in a social enterprise, they were likely moved by his message and felt that the cause was worth the risk.
  2. Trust in the Leader: The stakeholders likely trusted Noah as a leader, believing that he was divinely guided and would lead them to safety. This level of trust is also crucial in social entrepreneurship, where stakeholders need to trust that the entrepreneur will use their resources wisely and effectively to achieve the desired social impact.
  3. Desire for Salvation: The primary 'reward' that Noah's followers sought was divine mercy and salvation. This was a powerful motivator for them to take the risk and join him on the ark.
  4. Sense of Moral Duty: Some of Noah's stakeholders might have felt a moral obligation to support his cause and stand against the prevailing societal norms of idol worship.
  5. Community and Belonging: By joining Noah, the stakeholders became part of a community of believers. This sense of belonging and community can be a strong motivator, especially in times of adversity.

In social entrepreneurship, stakeholders often take risks for similar reasons. They believe in the entrepreneur's vision, trust in their leadership, desire to contribute to a positive social change, and find value in being part of a community that shares their values and goals.

Is there any evidence in the Qur'an that Noah was a trustworthy man?

Yes, the Qur'an does present Noah as a trustworthy and righteous man. The Qur'an refers to Noah as a Prophet, which in Islamic belief denotes someone chosen by God to deliver His message to the people. Prophets in Islam are seen as models of moral and ethical conduct.

In the Qur'an, Noah is described as a grateful servant of God (Surah Al-Isra, 17:3) and a messenger who was inspired by God (Surah Al-Shu'ara, 26:105). His dedication to the task given to him by God, despite immense ridicule and opposition from his people, further underscores his trustworthiness and commitment.

Moreover, the Qur'an describes Noah as patient and steadfast in the face of adversity. In Surah Hud (11:36), God tells Noah that no one else will believe in his message beyond those who already have, suggesting that Noah had done his utmost to convince his people. Noah's response to this divine decree, and his continued dedication to his mission, further underscores his trustworthiness.

It's important to note that the depiction of Noah as a trustworthy figure is based on the Islamic belief system, which sees the Qur'an as the word of God and Noah as a prophet. Different people may interpret these texts in different ways, depending on their cultural, historical, and personal contexts.

Your last response has made some useful references to specific Qur'anic ayats. Can you please substantiate the previous points you have made in his conversation with reference to specific ayats?

Absolutely, I'd be happy to provide references from the Qur'an that can support the points we've discussed in this conversation about Noah's role as a social entrepreneur. Here are a few examples:

  1. Vision and Determination: Noah's vision and determination can be seen in Surah Hud (11:36-37), where God instructs Noah to build the Ark under His guidance and in His vision. Despite the ridicule of his people, Noah remains determined and committed to his task.
  2. Resourcefulness and Innovation: Surah Hud (11:37) also speaks to Noah's resourcefulness and innovation. Despite not being a shipbuilder, he is able to construct an ark capable of surviving the flood. This required significant innovation and resourcefulness.
  3. Leadership and Teamwork: Noah's leadership is apparent in his efforts to gather his followers and the animals onto the Ark, as described in Surah Hud (11:40).
  4. Resilience and Patience: Noah's patience and resilience can be seen in Surah Nuh (71:5-6), where he mentions calling out to his people day and night without them increasing but in flight. Despite his people's rejection, Noah continues his mission with patience.
  5. Social Impact: The ultimate goal of Noah's mission was to save his followers from the impending divine punishment. This is clear in Surah Al-A'raf (7:64), which mentions that Noah was able to save a group of believers.
  6. Risk-Taking: Noah's risk-taking is evident in Surah Hud (11:38), where it is mentioned that he began constructing the ark and whenever the chieftains of his people passed by him, they ridiculed him. Despite the ridicule and societal pressure, Noah took the risk and continued with his mission.

The above references are translations and interpretations from the Qur'an and reflect the points discussed in the context of social entrepreneurship. The interpretations of these verses can vary among different scholars and readers.


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Latest Blog Entries

    • By beardedbaker in The Sun Will Rise From The West
    • By Haji 2003 in Contemporania
      After October 7th 2023, there has been horror as to what happened on that day, with the rebuttal that the history of the conflict provides explanatory context. This article examines historical analysis which suggests that the violence that occurred in the region 90 years ago was entirely predictable due to uncontrolled immigration.
      The Source
      This is a letter published by The Times newspaper on October 14 1936. The writer was a well-known academic/ historian who had visited Palestine at the time of some tension.
      The context of violence between Arabs and Zionists
      He draws comparisons between the Zionist/Arab conflict and that which had taken place between other peoples within the British Empire.
      He particularly draws attention to the scale of European immigration into Palestine as the cause of the violence. And he further draws attention to the cultural differences between Arabs and the Europeans who were settling in Palestine as another cause for the conflict.
      He concludes that the cause (immigration) and effect (violence) had played out as expected.

    • By Haji 2003 in Contemporania
      I came across an interesting newspaper article published on February 27, 1920, in the Manchester Guardian newspaper (the forerunner of the modern Guardian newspaper), it's titled, "Some essential features of the Zionist Programme".
      The author is listed as "from our Special Correspondent" and the location of the writing is given as Jerusalem.
      The 'voice' of the piece appears to be an entirely Zionist one, as you may guess from the quotations that follow.
      The article starts as follows:
      That's interesting. As I've remarked previously on Shiachat, the Zionist ambitions seem to have changed over time.
      Well Britain is no longer the power it once was, and these promises are nowadays being made to the Americans.
      Hmm. This might have been labelled as being anti-semitic if the source had been non-Jewish.
      I am not entirely sure what is being proposed here to the British rulers of Palestine, perhaps it may be a two level pay structure, higher pay for Jews vs. Arabs?
      Interestingly the Zionist promoters of these ideas seem quite happy to use the term Palestine and nowhere is Israel mentioned.
    • By shadow_of_light in From Earth to Heaven
      لحظه‌های یادگاری 
      به یاد کردگارِ زندگی‌بخش
      که هر جز جهان دارد از او نقش
      به یاد روحِ در تربت دمیده
      که تار و پود انسان را تنیده
      به یاد عهد و میثاق اَلَستی
      به بیعت با رَهِ یکتاپرستی
      به یاد سجده‌ی کل ملائک
      به یاد لحظه‌ی آغاز هستی
      به یاد توبه‌های ناب آدم
      به هابیل اولین مظلوم عالم
      به کشتی نشسته بر دلِ کوه
      به یاد نوح و کشتیبانیِ نوح
      به یاد هاجرِ جوینده‌ی آب
      زِ مروه تا صفا نالان و بی‌تاب
      به آن لحظه که اسماعیل خندید
      چو زمزم درکنارش میخروشید
      به ابراهیم و آتش چون شَوَد سرد
      به آن لحظه که بت را سرنگون کرد
      سجده‌ی خورشید و ستاره و ماه
      به یاد یوسفِ افتاده درچاه
      به یاد دیدِگان خفته از غم
      به یعقوبی که در سوگ است و ماتم
      شدند آن خفتگان آن روز بیدار
      که شد زنده دلش از شوقِ دیدار
      به موسی و به یاد دستِ پر نور
      به نعلِینی که جا ماندند در طور
      به نجواهایی که از اعماقِ دریا
      رَوَد بالا به سوی عرشِ اعلا
      به یاد بهترین شاهان دنیا
      به اسحاق و به ادریس و به یحیی
      به یاد مریم و طفلی که در مهد
      سخن گفت از کراماتِ خداوند
      به آن لحظه که در تاریکیِ غار
      پیام آوَرد سروشِ غیب از یار
      به یاد آن که بت‌ها را شکسته 
      رسولی که زِ دنیا دل گسسته
      به یاد جمله من کنتُ مولاه
      به اسرار نهفته در دل چاه
      به یاد دختر از جور خسته
      به اشک لاله‌ی پهلو شکسته
      به یاد چشمه‌های خشک و تشنه
      به خونِ حنجرِ زخمی زِ دشنه
      به مشکِ پاره و اشکِ دو دیده
      تن بیجان و سرهای بریده
      به میراثِ نهان از چشم خاکی
      به یادِ آرمان‌شهرِِ آتی
      شَهَنشاها! نمیدانم کجایی!
      نمیدانم چرا از ما جدایی!
      مسیحای زمان و جانِ عالم!
      نمیدانم که آخر کی می‌آیی!
      به یاد صوت عرش و حق‌الیقین
      به شور و شوقِ پیروانِ یمین
      به یادِ لحظه‌های یادگاری
      به یاد خاطرات ماندگاری
    • By Meedy in Never thought I would see days like these
      Everyday   ,   Every second,         Every situations,         Every difficulties,           Every achievements 
      Take all these a test and trials where your patient is tested, your faith is tested, your ability to control your desires and emotions are tested, family relations is tested etc.....
      Focus on passing these tests with patient, faith in God, doing religious obligations, praying to God, always seeking help from God, seeking forgiveness and thanking him in every situations we are in.  
      Remember God has something better waiting for you in the after world so try and somehow put a smile on your face every now and then...
    • By Haji 2003 in Contemporania
      The theory that the pyramids were built or had their construction guided by extraterrestrials is challenged by the existence of mistakes in the construction of some of them.
      But I think the Egyptians were privy to Divine Guidance, which in itself is interesting because the evidence of a Pharoah moving from polytheism to monotheism supports Qur'anic teaching as I understand it.
      The bent pyramid at Dahshur
      There is a populist theory that the pyramids must have had an alien inspiration. This is because of the range of innovations that they represent and knowledge across multiple disciplines and their orientation towards certain constellations.
      My problem with this theory is the bent pyramid at Dahshur. It's bent, because they got the maths wrong (see the picture I took a few years ago below). It's weird that aliens who managed to get to this planet but then got their measurements for a stone structure wrong. Seems pretty clear to me that the pyramids we see represent the refinement and development of Egyptian technology, rather than discrete alien intervention. Also supporting my contention is a landscape literally littered with smaller pyramids, these people were learning, developing and increasing the scale of their creations as they grew more confident.

      If not aliens then who?
      My understanding of the Qur'anic references to Pharaoh is that they provide an example of a powerful leader, with immense resources, who was nevertheless brought down by divine intervention. The Pharaohs were representatives of a culture with a level of scientific, organisational, military and communications capability unknown at that time and for a long time yet to come.
      Indeed the very existence of mistakes in their work and subsequent improvements demonstrates that they had the capability to learn. Nevertheless the fact that the Pharoah of the time of Moses was brought down by believers in Allah who were weaker in numbers and military strength, is a sign to subsequent rulers around the world about how weak their position can be.

      And importantly the Qur'an tells us that the evidence of such civilisations is there for us to observe in order for us to better understand the message that is being conveyed to us:

      A final thought
      Were the ancient Egyptians privy to Divine guidance? I think there is evidence in the Qur'an that they may have been. Here are some references to Allah communicating with other cultures.



      And indeed there is material in the historical record that at least one Pharoah (Akhenaten) tried to promulgate a faith that had similarities to monotheism. The initiative did not last very long and in the reign of the next Pharoah (Tutankhamun) the Egyptians reverted to polytheism. I use the phrase similarities to monotheism because although he removed references to the pantheon of deities that the Egyptians previously worshipped, his new religion nevertheless involved worship of the sun.
      The following extract is from a book published within the last few years that addresses head on the issue of monotheism and Akhenaten's rule.
      Hoffmeier, J.K., 2015. Akhenaten and the Origins of Monotheism. Oxford University Press.
      Perhaps Akhenaten was amongst the many Prophets that we believe have been sent by God at different times and places to different cultures? I am speculating here, but perhaps the message was corrupted? Still, I would like to believe that the archaeological evidence of Akhenaten's rule supports the idea that Allah's message was not restricted to just the children of Abraham.
      See Also
    • By Haji 2003 in Contemporania
      Since the inception of Islam, there had been various sects competing for prominence; many had died out, and the two major ones were Twelver Shia and the Sunni fiqh.
      Then suddenly, from the start of the 19th century to the end of that century, we have the emergence of Ahmadiyya, the renewal of Ismailism and the creation of a new faith entirely, Baha ism. Go back a hundred years, and we can add Wahhabism to this list. I identify a common thread amongst all these new religions in this post.
      Four religions in a couple of hundred years ... and three Knights
      That's an unusually fertile period of spiritual spontaneity by any measure. Or is the explanation for such flowering of faith more mundane and perhaps guided by vested foreign interests or even stimulated by them? Because what marked that period, from the ones that preceded it was the growing recognition by countries from outside the middle eastern region that it was an important geographical location in itself and also for its proximity to the wealth of India. That latter point is important because there is little disagreement that British foreign policy towards the middle east paid due cognisance to the views and interests of the Government of India - of course, that is a pre-independence Government, so wholly controlled by Britain.
      Abdul Wahhab developed what is commonly referred to as an austere interpretation of Islam, one that denounces the rituals and beliefs that he felt had accreted over the centuries. There is a rich vein of (conspiracy) theories, easily found on the internet, that in his travel to Iraq in the early 18th century, he could have come across British agents (specifically a 'Mr Hempher'). Certainly, the British East India Company had been well established at that time, and a British consulate had been established in Iraq in 1802. Less widely commented on is the fact that the famous Danish/German explorer Carsten Niebuhr travelled to Arabia in 1761.
      But leaving conspiracy theories aside, it's possible to develop an argument about foreign involvement based on far less controversial ideas. Britain may not have been a midwife to Wahhabism, but I think people of all geo-political persuasions would agree that Britain was a helpful nanny.
      The person with whom the British did have extensive dealings was Ibn Saud, who had entered into a pact with Abdul Wahhab in 1744. British sources said he persistently approached Britain for support and was generally rebuffed. Saud was a political leader who continued to promote the Wahhabi philosophy after the death of its founder. Saud was no cleric. But he was shrewd enough to mould the ideology as the basis for providing a motivation for conquest and a glue that would hold his fighters together. British records show that he took responsibility for hiring and firing clerics based on his political agenda.
      My source for this and some other information about Wahhabism that is presented here is a PhD dissertation submitted to King's College London in 2002 by Hassan Syed Abedin, titled "Abdul Aziz Al-Saud and the great game in Arabia, 1896-1946".
      Ibn Saud (who would in due course be given the British title 'Knight Commander of the Most Eminent Order of the Indian Empire') was ultimately successful in his goal of receiving support from Britain in 1914 when Britain needed to have someone distracting the Ottomans so that they could devote fewer resources to World War I taking place in Europe.
      Prior to that, it's argued that Ibn Saud had spent considerable efforts in achieving a status similar to the one held by Mubarak Al Sabah, the emir of Kuwait. This ideal status would have meant that Sauds and their territories would have been subjects of the Ottoman empire, but who would be given the protection of the British.
      This version of events does not look very good for Ibn Saud, presenting him as someone who is willing to do business with non-Muslims in order to undermine a Muslim ruler, and he'd serve a useful role in helping Britain with the following objective:
      Crewe private telegram to Hardinge, Viceroy of India, November 12,1914, cited in Busch Britain, India and the Arabs: 1914-1921, p. 62.
      Further, east we find the rise of the modern-day Nizari Ismailis, whose Aga Khan in the mid-19th century created a new role for himself in providing services to the British Empire (Aga Khan I would receive an annual British pension of £20,000 per year). Mihir Bose (a noted writer on the subject) says that the Aga Khan had to plead his case for some time before the British took him seriously since they wanted to be sure that they were backing a local ally who'd present them with better value than the alternatives. His grandson Aga Khan III would be bestowed the title of 'Knight Grand Commander of the Order of the Star of India'. Their esoteric faith was totally at odds with the one promulgated by Wahhab, but regardless of that difference served a useful purpose.
      Regardless of the support he gave, the British were aware of the hypocrisy of his religious position:
      Sir Charles Napier to Governor-General of India, Earl of Ellenborough, 1843
      The period around the 1840s is interesting for the following reason, as the following letter makes clear:
      Purohit, T. (2012) The Aga Khan Case (religion and identity in colonial India). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
      The writer of the letter is Major Henry Rawlinson, the military officer who worked for the commission in Persia from 1834 to 1838 and subsequently served as a political agent in Qandahar. So the British were interested in there being dislocation in Iran at around this time because of a perceived threat to their interests in Afghanistan.
      This makes the genesis and development of the third religion covered here all the more interesting.
      In roughly the same period, the mid-nineteenth century, we also see the rise of the Bahai faith in Iran. Mirza Ali Mohammad was born in 1820 and was executed in 1850. A focus of his attention was economic inequality in Iran. There were clear political implications, as  noted by the middle eastern commentator Juan Cole:
      The socio-economic aspect of Bab's teachings are also explained here:
      Mansoor Moaddel (1986) The Shi'i Ulama and the State in Iran. Theory and Society, Vol. 15, No. 4 (Jul., 1986), pp. 519-556. This extract: p526.
      This socio-religio-poliitcal impact of a new faith did not go unnoticed by the colonial powers of the time and gained ground as a result of their support as a means of destabilising the Qajar dynasty. Like Ibn Saud, Abdul Baha, eldest son of the Baha'u'llah, would also be awarded the title of Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire, ostensibly for his work in alleviating famine.
      Shahvar, S. (2018) ‘Oppression of Religious Minority Groups in Times of Great Upheaval in Late Qajar Iran: The 1892 Persecution of Jews and Baha’is of Jewish Origin in Hamadan Based on Two Newly Discovered Letters’, The Jewish quarterly review. University of Pennsylvania Press, 108(2), pp. 225–251.
      Going further east, we find the third innovation in the Muslim religion towards the end of the 19th century and one that would lead to charges of being the creation of a new religion entirely. The Ahmadis would destabilise Muslims in the Indian sub-continent. Their support for the British in India is expressed in their texts:
      There is a reason for this approach; unlike the established religions of the Indian sub-continent, the leader of this new religion needed legitimacy. By acquiescing to the needs of the invaders, he sought to achieve that. For the established religions doing the same would have been challenging because they would have lost the legitimacy of their many existing followers; the new religion with far fewer followers had much less to lose in this respect but potentially a great deal more to gain. 
      I am not saying that the British went into the middle east with the prior notion of introducing new faiths. However, it is reasonable to say that in an environment where there were new powers in the region, for someone starting a new faith, the potential for a symbiotic relationship with these new arrivals was obvious. 
      For the invaders, these new religions provided a ready-made supportive constituency with which to challenge the established order, whether it be the Ottomans, the Qajars or the established religious order in India.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Blog Statistics

    Total Blogs
    Total Entries
  • Create New...