Jump to content
In the Name of God بسم الله
Zainuu

Entry posted by Zainuu in Belief

2,003 views

 Share

For his sake, there are angels following one another, before him and behind him, who guard him by Allah's commandment, surely Allah doesn't change the condition of the people until they change their own condition; and when Allah intends evil to a people, there is no averting it, and besides him they have no protector.
—[Ar-R'ad verse 11]
This verse in the holy Qur'an states that Allah is the protector of human beings and he has commanded angels to protect us. No one else is protecting human beings. Even if someone says that I will protect you, I will defend you then he can only do so by the consent of Allah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم). So, no one has any authority to protect a person and the command belongs only to Allah. 
But it doesn't mean that everything what you do, Allah will protect you. It doesn't mean that a human being cannot do anything about his destiny and in his defence. Here this topic becomes complex. 
If Allah is protecting us through angels and he is our lord, the greatest, the mighty; that doesn't mean Allah is handling all our affairs and we are free to sleep in a corner, and all will be in place automatically by the command of Allah. Allah has given us two hands, two legs, a brain, a face and (the most important) a self (soul) that he has perfected for us. 
"Wa Nafsinw Wamaa Sawwahaa"
"And the soul and him who made it perfect"  [Surah Ash Shams 91:7]
Now, we have to make use of all this. Isn't it enough to live a good life or to identify the Truth? Isn't it enough to forbid evil and practice good?
True that Allah is our protector and Allah is our guide and no one is guided except the one guided by Allah. True that, all are poor and paupers except the one who is provided by Allah. As it is said by Maula Ali (عليه السلام) in his Munajaat: 
"Mawlaya Ya Mawlaya, Antal ghaniyu wa Anal Faqeer wa hal yarhamul faqeera illal ghani"
"My Lord, O my Lord, you are the rich and I am a pauper and who is merciful to a pauper except the rich."
So,  does that mean we should stop planning, stop working and just ask Allah and move ahead. Does that mean we should accept what our vibes say and make decisions instead of making decisions through logic and reason and far-sightedness? No. Why would Allah grant us with the gift of different elements of the body if we have to close them off and just go with the flow. 
Imam Ali (عليه السلام) says in Nahj ul Balagha:

"All the illnesses and defects are in the soul itself and the cure to all our problems is also present in our 'self' only."
Also, "The one who identifies his self (soul) has identified his lord." — Imam Ali (عليه السلام) 
So, all this talk that 'All is written and we can't do anything and that which has to happen will happen etc' are not completely true. To say rightly, these are fake spiritual talks. As, Imam Ali (عليه السلام) clearly says that All is clearly within us. What are we searching for? What else do we need? 

Now, arises the question of fate. If all what I said is true then what about fate? I am not a denier of fate. I agree that it exists. Existence of fate cannot be denied but it is not the ultimate reality. Our fate is in our own hands. 
We can change it through our actions, supplications, good and bad deeds. When Allah sees what we are doing and how we are living and behaving, Allah changes it accordingly. My statement is an opinion but it can be easily verified through Qur'an, Hadith and also the views of Arifeen.
Don't sit idle and don't think you are divine and you will hear a voice from unseen. Act according to your state and stay patient for the rewards. If you fail try again instead of saying that, "It is my fate. what can I do?" How do you know it is your fate!
Imam Ali (عليه السلام) says, "A wise man is the one who thinks before he speaks whereas a fool is the one who speaks before he thinks." So, this is simply foolish to say that you failed or lost because Allah has destined that for you. You get what you sow. A person's actions, his quest for something is itself a tool to change his fate and destiny. And that is what the verse I stated above says. Definitely, Allah is our protector but:  '...Allah doesn't change the condition of the people until they change their own condition....'  [Part of the verse stated in the start]. This clearly means that Allah is protecting us but Allah has made us incharge of our own affairs and it's only we who can change our own condition. Accepting the destiny is wise if we know our destiny. But who knows his destiny except Allah, The Great, The All Knowing. 
Instead of getting into this querrel of fate, human being should try to focus upon action. As Ayatullah Taqi Behjat (May Allah be pleased with him) says: "May God give us the tawfeeq to perform our duties, that we don't be deprived of [performing] actions, not from within ourselves, neither from outside of us." Performing actions doesn't mean denying fate or denying the authority of Allah. Rather, it means accepting the blessings and opportunities provided by Allah, exploring them and exhausting them in the best way possible. We should understand that when we pray, Allah wants that we would ask him about something huge which a person is really deprived off and feels it as his necessity. Rather than asking that which Allah has already provided. Besides asking from Allah we should pray that "May Allah give us the tawfeeq to see what Allah has already blessed us with." We should explore within ourselves. 

"You presume that you are a small entity, but within you presides an entire Universe."
The verse I started with is an excuse to explain this relationship between fate and action. Aim is not to discuss the correct interpretation of the verse itself but just a part of it. My aim is also not to do a detailed discussion on fate and action but rather to only address the confusion between the two things. Normally, we notice in our society that this discussion is quite prevalent. Like many big conflicts in the world, the conflict of fate and action also ends up into two extreme parties. One (which I might call a pretend-saint) that says Fate is everything and nothing is in our hands. Whereas other which denies every role of fate and destiny completely and declares actions to be the only basis of different events occurring in life. While both have their reasons, both are wrong. This conflict is important to be addressed because it has a psychological effect. Obviously, a person who thinks that all is written and he is powerless will do nothing. He will sit and keep on denying on the blessings Allah has bestowed him with. He will act like a hopeless lazy person who is deemed to deviate from his path. This notion even if small in quantity is an evil notion and will cause problems in ones life. 
On the other side, the people who deny Fate and destiny. Such people are in true denial of god. This idea that only actions are the player behind what happens in life is also problematic because it cannot answer the many mysteries of life. Who can you blame for a natural disaster? The Japenese people, the Iranians; who are considered to be the most intelligent among the mankind live in those regions of the world where a lot of natural disasters occur. If we say that Japenese suffer because they are infidels then it would be the most lamest answer to the question. What about Iranians? So, actions matter but fate has it's own part. It is their to prove that Allah is the absolute and above everything. It doesn't mean that actions will not bear any fruit. Every action taken will have a reward or punishment but who knows when?
So, let us harmonize this. Let us end the blind beliefs occurring in our society due to the notion that 'Fate is everything and all depends on fate'. As is stated in Surah Al Asr: 
"By the passage of time! Surely humanity is in grave loss, except those who have faith, do good, and urge each other to the truth, and urge each other to perseverance." [103]
So,  it is certainly important to act without thinking about the fate. Removing all these blind beliefs about fate will lead us to passivity. Though, it seems small but in our traditionalist society, this idiocity is a huge problem. It has even entered the mentality of the educated and literate people because naturally it has nothing to do with education. It is because of overthinking and wrong mindsets and understandings about fate and destiny. It is because of ignorance and being illiterate is not a bad thing but being ignorant is equal to infidelity. To clarify, I am not calling anyone infidel but rather calling ignorance as infidelity. 
Let us also tell the arrogant human beings that whatever they might do, the destiny finally belongs to Allah. As is said in the above stated verse, in the last: '...and when Allah intends evil to a people, there is no averting it, and besides him they have no protector.'

Fate is something that already exists like some fundamental basis of events, while action is something that we build upon our fate. If they are weak, they won't change our fate. If they are strong with a true devotion, they will change our destiny according to their nature. If it is an evil action, our destiny will become worse then what it was. If our action is good, our destiny will become better than what it was. 
"So whoever does an atom’s weight of good will see it."
[Surah Zalzala 99:7]
"And whoever does an atom’s weight of evil will see it."
[Surah Zalzala 99:8]

 Share

0 Comments

Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×

  • Latest Blog Entries

    • Haji 2003
      Yield to companions
      By Haji 2003 in Stories for Sakina
         0 comments
      By the time the city finished installing ramps for paws beside every staircase, the ramps for people had quietly been removed.
      No one remembered the meeting where it was decided. Decisions arrived now as laminated notices tied to lampposts with biodegradable twine: PLEASE YIELD TO COMPANIONS; QUIET HOURS FOR CANINE SENSITIVITY. The notices bore smiling silhouettes of dogs wearing scarves. People learned to read them the way one reads weather—by feeling the chill before seeing the cloud.
      Mara noticed first when her neighbour collapsed on the pavement. He was thin, as if he had been erased a little at a time. The street was busy, yet no one stopped. A woman paused only to pull her terrier closer, murmuring reassurance. “Not you,” she said, as the man’s hand trembled toward her ankle. “Careful.”
      A drone hummed in and descended. Its camera irised, not toward the man, but toward the terrier. A soft voice chimed: IS YOUR COMPANION DISTRESSED? The woman nodded. A thermal blanket unfurled—around the dog. The man’s breath rattled like loose change in a pocket.
      At the clinic where Mara worked, the waiting room had been renovated. Plush beds lined the walls, bowls of filtered water glowed with LED halos. People stood. There were no chairs anymore; standing was healthier, the pamphlet said, and chairs took up space that could be used for enrichment. When the nurse called names, she called the dogs’. Owners answered for them, translating barks into grievances with practiced fluency.
      Mara’s brother arrived one afternoon with a bandage soaked through. He had been laid off, then laid out by a factory gate. “Just stitches,” he said. “I’ll wait.”
      But a golden retriever was wheeled past on a gurney, an IV pole jangling like a charm bracelet. Applause broke out. Someone filmed. “Such bravery,” a man whispered. The nurse smiled and closed the door.
      That night, Mara walked home through the park. It had once been a place of benches and chessboards. Now it was a sanctuary. Portraits hung from trees—dogs in graduation caps, dogs with medals. At the center stood a statue, bronze polished by touch: a dog gazing forward, jaw set in purpose. At its base, an inscription had been sanded smooth by time or by hands.
      She watched a man kneel to tie a shoelace. A collie stiffened, hackles raised. The man froze, palms open, the universal sign of surrender. A handler clipped a leash shorter. “You can’t loom like that,” she said gently. “They feel threatened.”
      Mara looked into the statue’s blank eyes and felt a strange vertigo. It was not that dogs were cruel; they were what they had always been—loyal, frightened, alive. It was that people had learned to look at one another through fur.
      On her kitchen table lay an old photograph, rescued from a drawer: her parents, laughing, no pets in frame. She tried to remember when laughter had required translation.
      Outside, the city hummed, orderly and kind, and she could not tell anymore—by posture, by priority—who was meant to serve whom.
    • shuaybi
      Beyond Taqlid: The Path Of Taslim
      By shuaybi in The Shuaybi Blog
         0 comments
      The episode is a rigorous examination of religious adherence within the Twelver Shia tradition, contrasting the modern practice of Taqlid with the foundational concept of Taslim, or total submission to the Ahl al-Bayt. The central inquiry is whether following a scholar’s speculative opinion is the path designed by the Infallibles, or a human construct relying on conjecture rather than Divine Knowledge.
      The author establishes the path of Taslim using primary narrations. This path requires three pillars: unconditional referral of all religious matters to the Imams, the precise preservation and transmission of their Hadith without addition or subtraction, and adherence to their specific speech as the definition of Shia identity. The Imams warned that refusing this direct referral risks spiritual deviation (Shirk).
      The core critique centers on the epistemological gap between the Infallibles’ demand for Certainty (Yaqin) and the admitted reliance of modern Usuli jurisprudence on Conjecture (Zann), or educated probability. The Imams consistently prohibited basing religious practice on Zann, insisting that Allah's proof is clear and accessible. Following a scholar is only acceptable if that individual functions as a transparent guide to the Imam’s preserved words, rather than acting as a filter who mixes the infallible truth with his own deductions.
      The author further argues that since seeking religious knowledge is obligatory for all Muslims, the means to access it must be universally available. Restricting laypeople from reading the clear, preserved body of Hadith—a Divine guarantee—and forcing them to rely on an intermediary creates a self-serving verification trap. True submission demands that the believer return to the clear light of the Akhbar, restoring the Imams as the direct and sufficient source of religious guidance, thereby moving the faith from a system of human opinion back to one of narrated truth.
    • Haji 2003
      Exodus vs. The Qur'an
      By Haji 2003 in Contemporania - AI enhanced
         0 comments
      Deepseek's analysis
      The prompt:
      Yes, that is a fair and insightful characterization. The difference in scope you've identified gets to the heart of how each text uses the Exodus story for its distinct theological purpose.
      Let's break down this distinction:
      The Quran: A Universal Monotheistic Message
      In the Quran, the conflict is fundamentally ideological, not ethnic or national. The message of Tawhid (absolute monotheism) is presented as universal truth, applicable to all parties.
      · For the Israelites: Moses is sent to liberate them and to call them back to the pure monotheism of their ancestor Abraham, from which they had strayed.
      · For the Egyptians, especially Pharaoh: The plagues are "signs" (آيَات) meant to invite Pharaoh and his people to recognize the one God. Their sin is not just oppression, but primarily polytheism and claiming divinity (shirk). Pharaoh's drowning-scene confession (10:90) underscores that the message was, in principle, for him too—though his acceptance came too late.
      · For the Reader: The story is a timeless lesson: the fate of those who reject God's messengers (like Pharaoh) versus those who believe, even if weak (like the Israelite believers and Pharaoh's own magicians who convert).
      Key Example: The Quranic Pharaoh is surrounded by some Egyptians who secretly believe (40:28-45), showing that the monotheistic message was intended for, and accepted by, some within Egyptian society.
      The Bible: A Particular Covenant with a Chosen People
      In the Biblical narrative, the focus is overwhelmingly on the election of Israel and the establishment of a unique covenant relationship.
      · For the Israelites: The Exodus is their foundational national liberation, leading directly to the covenant at Sinai. The laws and rituals (like Passover) are given specifically to them as a "kingdom of priests and a holy nation" (Exodus 19:6).
      · For the Egyptians: They serve as the instruments of God's judgment and the demonstration of His power. Pharaoh's heart is hardened so that God's glory and power might be shown (Exodus 9:16, Romans 9:17). While there is recognition of the "God of the Hebrews," there is no sustained call for the Egyptians as a people to convert to worshiping Yahweh. The focus is on their defeat, not their spiritual redemption.
      · Theological Goal: The story establishes Yahweh as the God who acts uniquely in history for His people, Israel. It's about identity, covenant, and law for a specific nation.
      Side-by-Side Comparison of the Audience

      Conclusion
      Your observation is precise. The Quran presents the Exodus as a paradigm of the universal prophetic struggle, where the message of One God is delivered to both the oppressed (Israelites) and the oppressor (Pharaoh and Egyptians), with eternal consequences for each based on belief.
      The Bible presents it as the formative, particularist history of Israel, where God acts decisively to create a covenant people, using the confrontation with Egypt to demonstrate His unique commitment to them.
      Thus, the Quranic account moralizes and universalizes the story, while the Biblical account historicizes and nationalizes it. This difference stems from the distinct contexts: the Quran establishing a universal faith for all nations, and the Torah establishing the identity of a specific nation.
    • shuaybi
      From Doubt To Certainty: Discovering Authentic Shi'ism
      By shuaybi in The Shuaybi Blog
         0 comments
      How "The Divine Guide in Early Shi'ism" Transformed My Faith
      Discover how Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi's groundbreaking book "The Divine Guide in Early Shi'ism" revolutionized my understanding of authentic Shia Islam and strengthened my connection to the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them).
      What This Video Covers:
      In this in-depth podcast episode, I share my transformative journey from confusion and doubt to clarity and conviction through studying early Shia hadith sources. Learn why this academic work has become essential for understanding authentic Imami Shi'ism.
      *10 Transformative Reasons Discussed:*
      * Restoring Complete Faith in Hadith Heritage* - Why our early collections (al-Kafi, Basa'ir al-Darajat) are authentic and trustworthy
      *Understanding the True Nature of Imamate* - The cosmic, supernatural role of the Imams beyond political leadership
      *Clarifying the Role of Reason (Aql)* - How rationalism differs from authentic Shia epistemology
      *Embracing Esoteric Dimensions* - The batin (hidden meanings) in Shia teachings
      *Exposing Rationalist Theology* - How Mu'tazilite influence corrupted original teachings
      *Identifying Religious Innovations (Bid'ah)* - Tools to distinguish authentic practice from later additions
      *Prioritizing Correct Belief (Aqeedah)* - Why foundational beliefs matter more than ritual correctness alone
      *Freedom from Blind Following* - Direct access to Imams' teachings without clerical mediation
      *Preparing for Imam al-Mahdi's Return* - Spiritual readiness through authentic knowledge
      *Truth in the Minority* - Understanding why authentic teachings are often preserved by the few
      Key Topics & Themes:
      • Early Shia Islam and Imamite doctrine
      • Hadith authentication methodology critique
      • Al-Kafi and classical Shia sources analysis
      • Ghuluw (exaggeration) accusations addressed
      • Supernatural abilities of the Imams
      • Pre-existence of the Ahl al-Bayt
      • Divine knowledge ('ilm) and esoteric wisdom
      • Rationalism vs. faith-based epistemology
      • Religious innovation in modern Shi'ism
      • Preparation for the return of the Twelfth Imam
      • Minority vs. majority religious perspectives
      About Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi:
      French-Iranian academic scholar and historian of Islam whose systematic study of early Imami sources reveals what the historical Imams actually taught, free from later theological filters and rationalist interpretations.
      Addressing Common Criticisms:
      This video thoroughly responds to allegations that Amir-Moezzi promotes ghuluw or relies on weak hadith, demonstrating instead how his methodology is grounded in the earliest and most authentic Shia sources.
      Who Should Watch This:
      • Shia Muslims seeking deeper understanding of their faith
      • Those experiencing doubt or confusion about Shia beliefs
      • Students of Islamic theology and hadith studies
      • Anyone interested in early Islamic history and Imamite doctrine
      • Believers preparing spiritually for Imam al-Mahdi's return
      • Those questioning modern rationalist approaches to religion
      Why This Matters Now:
      As we approach the end times and await the Imam's return, understanding authentic teachings becomes crucial. This book provides the foundation to distinguish between original Imamic teachings and later innovations, helping believers stand firm in truth.
    • Hameedeh
      Minimalism
      By Hameedeh in Think Positive
         20 comments
      Two years ago I became a minimalist. I'm not talking about music, sculpture or painting, but minimalism in my life. I read about creating a minimalist home, but I did not buy the book:
      http://zenhabits.net/a-guide-to-creating-a-minimalist-home/
      So, I am thrifty and I buy very little. Whenever I am shopping and see a dozen things I want to own, I question myself. Do I have storage space for this? Is this really necessary? Will I really love it or is it just something that I never had before and always wanted to have one? Just wanting to possess something is not a good reason to buy it. Could I take a photo of it and just look at it, without spending my money? This must be a good reason to join Pinterest, to have all the things you want to look at, but never need to buy, store or move them. 
      As you have seen, my ShiaChat blog is minimalist by nature. I usually say very little, because if there is one thing that I know, it is that I recognize great writing when I see it, but I am not a good writer. I hope to become a better writer some day, and in the meantime, I invite you to my tumblr. Please, if you can, start at the last page which shows my first post (a prayer for the safety of 12th Imam AJ) and then scroll your way up, and over to previous pages in chronological order, the way my brain was working. 
      http://hameedeh.tumblr.com/page/3
      ♥ May your days be sunny, your nights restful, and your heart satisfied with the blessings that Allah has given you. Think Positive. ♥
    • shuaybi
      Shia Hadith Vs Sunni Hadith - Critical Differences In Hadith Compilation
      By shuaybi in The Shuaybi Blog
         0 comments
      Shia Hadith Vs. Sunni Hadith - Critical Differences In Hadith Compilation
      This discussion examines a fundamental misunderstanding in modern Shia scholarly approaches to hadith verification. The central argument is that Shia scholars have inappropriately adopted Sunni methodologies for hadith authentication, despite the radically different nature of hadith compilation between the two traditions.
      The Shia tradition benefits from several unique advantages: First, unlike Sunnis who lost direct connection to Prophetic knowledge after Muhammad's death, Shias maintained connection through the Imams for nearly 300 years. Second, during political transitions between Umayyad and Abbasid rule, Imams Baqir and Sadiq established a systematic documentation approach, encouraging written preservation rather than oral transmission.
      Crucially, Shia hadith represents written transmission of documented works (usul), not oral chains. The ijaza system ensured authenticated book transmission with proper authorization, making Sunni-style isnad analysis largely irrelevant for Shia texts. Applying Sunni verification methods to Shia hadith creates a category error - using tools designed for oral transmission on written documentation.
      The major Shia compilations (Kutub al-Arba'a) represent methodically organized versions of original usul, collected through careful verification processes by scholars like Kulayni and Saduq. The Twelfth Imam himself directed followers not to doubt what trustworthy narrators convey.
      By adopting Sunni authentication methods, modern Usuli scholars have created a crisis of confidence in Shia heritage. The solution requires returning to the Imams' own verification principles and recognizing the unique strength and reliability of the Shia hadith tradition on its own terms.
    • shuaybi
      New video podcast series: The Divine Guide In Early Shia Islam
      By shuaybi in The Shuaybi Blog
         0 comments
      This video podcast series is an in-depth review of the book: "The Divine Guide in Early Shi'ism" by Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi.
      Video podcast series: The Divine Guide In Early Shia Islam
      A brief description of the book:
      The Divine Guide by Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi, is a groundbreaking academic work that explores the early development of Twelver Shia Islam, particularly focusing on the concept of the Imam in early Shia doctrine. Published originally in French, this work examines the esoteric teachings and spiritual dimensions of Imamology as understood by the earliest Shia scholars and traditionists.
      The book primarily analyzes the role of the Imam as a divine guide and repository of sacred knowledge, drawing from early Shia hadith collections like Al-Kafi and Basa'ir al-Darajat. Amir-Moezzi demonstrates how early Shia thought viewed the Imam not just as a political leader, but as a cosmic necessity and spiritual intermediary between God and humanity. The Imam is presented as possessing divine light, supernatural knowledge, and the ability to interpret both the apparent and hidden meanings of religious texts.
      A key argument of the book is that early Shiism had a deeply mystical and esoteric character that was later downplayed in favor of more rational theological approaches. The author shows how the original conception of the Imam included beliefs about their supernatural origins, divine appointment, and extraordinary powers - elements that were later rationalized or reinterpreted by later Shia scholars.
      This work is particularly significant because it challenges the common view that early Shiism was primarily a political movement. Instead, it reveals the rich spiritual and mystical dimensions of early Shia thought, showing how the doctrine of Imamate was fundamentally tied to concepts of divine guidance, sacred knowledge, and spiritual illumination.
      For students of Islamic history and theology, this book provides crucial insights into the development of Shia thought and the original understanding of the Imamate, making it an essential reference for understanding the spiritual foundations of Shiism.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Blog Statistics

    92
    Total Blogs
    520
    Total Entries
×
×
  • Create New...