Jump to content
  • entries
    6
  • comments
    59
  • views
    3,478

The Torah: Revealed or Inspired?

Mansur Bakhtiari

1,657 views

بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم

اللهم صل علی محمد وال وعجل فرجهم والعن عادائهم

السلام علیکم

Ok, so as you probably know, I started reading Maurice Bucaille's book, The Quran, The Bible and Science about 2 weeks ago. Alhamdulillah I've found it very interesting, I am finished the first 3 parts of the book, with the section on ahadith the only remaining part. However, one of my first observations while reading was that I remembered and someone agreed with the comment of brother @hasanhh on my first blog post on this topic, which criticised the book for being too simplistic. His study on the Torah was only a criticism of the book of Genesis for its scientific flaws in regards to the stages of the creation of the earth and how the authenticity could have been altered over time. Still, I will comment on that part.

Now, on page 2 I think he highlights a fundamental flaw in the thinking of most Christians. Many (though I think SC Christians might be a little more knowledgeable) Christians have no idea that multiple copies of the Torah existed. Around 300 BC (The book l'ancien Testament by Professor Edmund Jacob is quoted on this page) 3 copies eisted of the Hebrew text. Unfortunately it's hard to compare to figure out which text is the original as our oldest Hebrew texts date to around the 9th Century AD (page 3). 

Now here's the thing. The Torah, as a Holy text, has been collected (along with the Gospels) as an oral tradition at first. The Jewish people would sing these traditions which are recorded in the Bible. In Christian theology (and this is also a subject of discussion in Christian-Muslim debates conducted by polemicists such as Shabir Ally and Zakir Naik) that the Bible was not a revealed text. It's a text inspired by the Holy Spirit, to those Prophets who wrote them down. There are also collections of hymn's like the Book of Proverbs. I think it would be beneficial actually for a knowledgeable Christian like @LeftCoastMom to comment on this. Back to the subject of its authenticity, just like ahadith, since it's an oral tradition being passed on to compilers (Priests, in this case) if the compiler or the person passing on this tradition to the compiler is corrupt (like Abu Hurairah for example) then it's not hard for this collection to become a corrupt one.Let's refer to the Quran and see what it says in regards to the Bible, which I'm sure most are familiar with,

Sura 5:68 (Al-Maida)

"Say: 'People of the Book (Christians and Jews), you stand for nothing until you observe the Torah and the Gospel and that which is revealed to you from your Lord."

The word used in the Quran is inzila, from the root nzl. Different from the word for inspiration, which is from the root wahy. So the Quran recognizes that the Bible was revealed, just like the Quran, not inspired as Christian theology dictates.

I personally find this an interesting topic, whether or not the Torah is revealed or inspired. If we can get some Christians to engage in discussion with us in the comments that would be great and it would definitely be a good intellectual discussion for this website (happy @Jebreil???). 

So, let us have a discussion on this. Was the Torah revealed or inspired. Bring proofs via verses of the Torah and Gospels, and Inshallah it'll be a good debate in the comments! I will add some of my findings onto my next blog post Inshallah Ta'ala, and also that post will be revolving around the Gospels

note: I will be out of the country from the 18th to 27th of July, so there may not be any update on this for a while. Inshallah I will be able to do some writing though.



24 Comments


Recommended Comments

"Inspired", as you wrote in paragraph 3, line 4, is one of those really undefined words that suggest there is some truth in imaginings. Your emotional response to this is supposed to be floating and anticipatory. Floatacious.  Like the Quran reveals, most people use religion as entertainment.

The Old and New Testaments are a collection of stories, altered, revised and politically oriented for their time of transcription. Easy example is in Genesis. Yusuf -a.s. gets into his chariot, but chariots didn't exist for about another two millennium. Another same thing is the William Houston Hypothesis which says the Bible has a "missing thousand years" is one portion of its narrative because it little correlates with the archeological record.

You are also miss-reading Sura Maida. The Testaments both have adherence to the 1st and 2nd Commandments even though this is usually glossed over. You also have the problem of "cannot the same story be 'inspired' the same way twice?"

Referring to the Bible has another problem: as Qur'an reveals 5:41 people distorted Quran as well as their own Books. Proverbs 30:6 (also note what was added in verse 4 in the KJV) and Amos 2:4  are two examples.

Share this comment


Link to comment
19 minutes ago, hasanhh said:

You also have the problem of "cannot the same story be 'inspired' the same way twice?".

Yeah, seen that in a Shabir Ally debate. Thats a pretty good proof of Bibilical distortion.

21 minutes ago, hasanhh said:

"Inspired", as you wrote in paragraph 3, line 4, is one of those really undefined words that suggest there is some truth in imaginings. Your emotional response to this is supposed to be floating and anticipatory. Floatacious.  Like the Quran reveals, most people use religion as entertainment.

Inspired is a vague word, you're right, and if Allah swt only "inspired" a Holy book, that would mean that the Bible can not even really be considered a book of God. It also confuses me how clear jurisprudential laws could come from a "inspired" holy text.

However the point I wanted to make in that part of my entry is that the Quran makes it clear the Bible was not inspired, but revealed. If Mr. Bucaille had touched on this, that would have been great but unfortunately that didn't happen. Kind of like how Shia scholars prove Tashayyu through Sunni books, can our view on the inzila of the Torah be proven through the Torah itself?

27 minutes ago, hasanhh said:

Referring to the Bible has another problem: as Qur'an reveals 5:41 people distorted Quran as well as their own Books. Proverbs 30:6 (also note what was added in verse 4 in the KJV) and Amos 2:4  are two examples.

5:41

O Messenger, let them not grieve you who hasten into disbelief of those who say, "We believe" with their mouths, but their hearts believe not, and from among the Jews. [They are] avid listeners to falsehood, listening to another people who have not come to you. They distort words beyond their [proper] usages, saying "If you are given this, take it; but if you are not given it, then beware." But he for whom Allah intends fitnah - never will you possess [power to do] for him a thing against Allah . Those are the ones for whom Allah does not intend to purify their hearts. For them in this world is disgrace, and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment

I know its been pretty well established that there has been no Tahreef of Quran, as Allah promised to protect it. Though I do see the connection between this and what you said. "They distort words beyond their proper usages," could refer to those who cherrypick verses to promote terrorism and violence, people like that.

Proverbs 30 6

Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar

Somewhat that is actually happening today, with more openness in the Christian world and critical studies of Bibilical authenticity being conducted, no?

So in theory by exposing the distorters of the Bible this prophecy is technically coming true :)

Share this comment


Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Mansur Bakhtiari said:

 

However the point I wanted to make in that part of my entry is that the Quran makes it clear the Bible was not inspired, but revealed. ...

Kept for emphasis:

So in theory by exposing the distorters of the Bible this prophecy is technically coming true :)

The Quran uses more than one verb with Musa-a.s.  In 6:91 it is "revealed", but in other Ayats within the Qur'an the verb "given" is used. [See //corpus.quran.com/wordbyword... which is a good lexicographic source.]

l reiterate that the Bible is an edited collection of stories. Some like Yusuf-a.s. is nearly exact as revealed in Quran; the essential elements of the Exodus are the same; and some things that happened during Isa-a.s. time were too famous to be ignored in the next two centuries. ln summation there are some anecdotal accuracies in the Testaments

Share this comment


Link to comment

As far as I understand, in the 3rd century Common Era the "Bible" as we know it today was compiled on the Order of Constantine in a convening of Christian Clerics called "The council of Nicaea. However there are many theories as to what actually happened at this council'  "http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/nicaea.html

Whether the Quran states that the Bible is revealed or inspired is interesting. Thank you for bringing this subject forward for the rest of us simple ones to learn from.

Share this comment


Link to comment
16 hours ago, hasanhh said:

The Quran uses more than one verb with Musa-a.s.  In 6:91 it is "revealed", but in other Ayats within the Qur'an the verb "given" is used. [See //corpus.quran.com/wordbyword... which is a good lexicographic source.]

l reiterate that the Bible is an edited collection of stories. Some like Yusuf-a.s. is nearly exact as revealed in Quran; the essential elements of the Exodus are the same; and some things that happened during Isa-a.s. time were too famous to be ignored in the next two centuries. ln summation there are some anecdotal accuracies in the Testaments

Given, revealed.... it still supports the concept that its a book, if you want to say "written," by Allah. It's not that Allah simply gives the ideas and the stories to the Prophet to write, rather that Allah sends it down to the Prophet, and he memorizes/copies it down word for word. In Arabic there seems to be a clear distinction between inspiration (why) and revelation (nzl), which is enough to say that the Islamic view on the Bible is against what Christian Theologians say.

I think that's 100% true, the second paragraph. There are some inaccuracies and also you can't forget that people may have had political motivations for distortion.

@MariyahLalehgoing to look into that link Inshallah!

Edited by Mansur Bakhtiari

Share this comment


Link to comment
14 hours ago, MariyahLaleh said:

As far as I understand, in the 3rd century Common Era the "Bible" as we know it today was compiled on the Order of Constantine in a convening of Christian Clerics called "The council of Nicaea. However there are many theories as to what actually happened at this council'  "http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/nicaea.html

See: Eusebius, History of the Church, 4th Century. The edition l have has a lousy index so keep your own notes when you read it.

Share this comment


Link to comment
13 hours ago, yasahebalzaman.313 said:

If the quran says it was revealed then simply put it was not inspired.To me the quran is sufficient as evidence.

Yes but in terms of Christian theology. Can it be proven from Christian sources what the Quran says just as Shiism can be proven from Sunni books.

I love Ilm ul Kalaam :)

Share this comment


Link to comment
6 hours ago, Mansur Bakhtiari said:

Yes but in terms of Christian theology. Can it be proven from Christian sources what the Quran says just as Shiism can be proven from Sunni books.

I love Ilm ul Kalaam :)

Interesting. I have an English Torah That has been re-translated to the English by The Jewish society of America. I will need to read parts of this volume of the five books of Moses (Musa)  to assess what was written about the account of Moses and get back to you. Why would it be important if the Christian Theology States whether or not if the Books of the Torah were revealed or inspired as the Torah is referring to  Musa of the Levite  tribe of Israel and was not written originally by any Christians? Paul in the Greek Scriptures of the Bible (New Testament) stated : Every scripture is inspired by God and useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, (2Timothy 3:16)

I have a duo translation of the "new testament" in the new english  side by side with  modern Standard Arabic if anyone is interested in me posting pics of the writings in this arabic.

 

https://bible.org/seriespage/5-bible-inspired-revelation-god

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 16/07/2017 at 2:20 AM, MariyahLaleh said:

An easy internet source on the opinion of some Christians on how the Bible is a "inspired work revealed by God"

https://bible.org/seriespage/5-bible-inspired-revelation-god

hmmm the article seems kind of vague. For example:

In its theological usage inspiration is derived from the Latin Vulgate Bible where the verb inspire is used in 2 Timothy 3:16 and 2 Peter 1:21. The word inspiration is used in 2 Timothy 3:16 to translate qeopneustos, a word that occurs only here. Qeopneustos is derived from qeos, “God,” and pnew, “to breath.” Literally, it means “God-breathed” and expresses the concept of exhalation by God. More accurately, it emphasizes that Scripture is the product of the breath of God. The Scriptures are not something breathed into by God, rather, the Scriptures have been breathed out by God.

For me that sounds similar to the Qur'an which says Allah sent down or had given the Quran to mankind.

The following represent a few of the definitions of prominent evangelical theologians:

Those also seem pretty useless. Maurice Bucaille already mentioned in his book how so many Christian scholars already reject the full authenticity and trustworthiness of the Bible. The opinions of those scholars seem to have no Bibilical basis.

There are several important elements that belong in a proper definition of inspiration: (1) the divine element—God the Holy Spirit superintended the writers, ensuring the accuracy of the writing; (2) the human element—human authors wrote according to their individual styles and personalities; (3) the result of the divine-human authorship is the recording of God’s truth without error; (4) inspiration extends to the selection of words by the writers; (5) inspiration relates to the original manuscripts

Still very vague, but think about the last part. The original manuscripts are long lost to the bad motives of others. 

There appears to be some Bibilical proof for inspiration

2) The extent of Inspiration. This is stated in the words, “All Scripture is inspired.” The term “Scripture,” the Greek grafh, is used exclusively in the New Testament of the sacred writings, of some portion of the Bible—sometimes of the whole Old Testament (Matt. 22:29; Mark 14:49; Luke 24:45; John 10:35), and sometimes of a specific passage (Matt. 12:10; Luke 4:21; John 13:8).

Though ny the logic that only the original Bibilical manuscripts are inspired by God, then technically we don't know the authenticity of the majority of the Bible.

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 7/17/2017 at 8:47 AM, Mansur Bakhtiari said:

hmmm the article seems kind of vague. For example:

In its theological usage inspiration is derived from the Latin Vulgate Bible where the verb inspire is used in 2 Timothy 3:16 and 2 Peter 1:21. The word inspiration is used in 2 Timothy 3:16 to translate qeopneustos, a word that occurs only here. Qeopneustos is derived from qeos, “God,” and pnew, “to breath.” Literally, it means “God-breathed” and expresses the concept of exhalation by God. More accurately, it emphasizes that Scripture is the product of the breath of God. The Scriptures are not something breathed into by God, rather, the Scriptures have been breathed out by God.

For me that sounds similar to the Qur'an which says Allah sent down or had given the Quran to mankind.

The following represent a few of the definitions of prominent evangelical theologians:

Those also seem pretty useless. Maurice Bucaille already mentioned in his book how so many Christian scholars already reject the full authenticity and trustworthiness of the Bible. The opinions of those scholars seem to have no Bibilical basis.

There are several important elements that belong in a proper definition of inspiration: (1) the divine element—God the Holy Spirit superintended the writers, ensuring the accuracy of the writing; (2) the human element—human authors wrote according to their individual styles and personalities; (3) the result of the divine-human authorship is the recording of God’s truth without error; (4) inspiration extends to the selection of words by the writers; (5) inspiration relates to the original manuscripts

Still very vague, but think about the last part. The original manuscripts are long lost to the bad motives of others. 

There appears to be some Bibilical proof for inspiration

2) The extent of Inspiration. This is stated in the words, “All Scripture is inspired.” The term “Scripture,” the Greek grafh, is used exclusively in the New Testament of the sacred writings, of some portion of the Bible—sometimes of the whole Old Testament (Matt. 22:29; Mark 14:49; Luke 24:45; John 10:35), and sometimes of a specific passage (Matt. 12:10; Luke 4:21; John 13:8).

Though ny the logic that only the original Bibilical manuscripts are inspired by God, then technically we don't know the authenticity of the majority of the Bible.

I have to concur with your conclusion. Most of the sources available to us today are not verifiable. According to various (and often conflicting)  historical accounts of the activities of the Council of Nicaea, Certain manuscript were retained because they had values that corresponded with the beliefs of the sect in power; works provided by the gnostics (followers of Arius, who insisted the person of Jesus the Christ was not divine) were discarded, more than likely burned.  My uncle (dayi) has tried to access works locally in Instanbul and has recommended the following publication available online, i just have not signed up for this site yet.

http://www.worldlibrary.org/eBooks/WPLBN0001027053-Origin-and-History-of-the-Books-of-the-Bible-Both-the-Canonical-and-the-Apocryphal-Designed-to-by-Stowe-Calvin-Ellis.aspx?&Words=blble manuscripts

Edited by MariyahLaleh

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 7/21/2017 at 11:15 AM, MariyahLaleh said:

I have to concur with your conclusion. Most of the sources available to us today are not verifiable. According to various (and often conflicting)  historical accounts of the activities of the Council of Nicaea, Certain manuscript were retained because they had values that corresponded with the beliefs of the sect in power; works provided by the gnostics (followers of Arius, who insisted the person of Jesus the Christ was not divine) were discarded, more than likely burned.  My uncle (dayi) has tried to access works locally in Instanbul and has recommended the following publication available online, i just have not signed up for this site yet.

http://www.worldlibrary.org/eBooks/WPLBN0001027053-Origin-and-History-of-the-Books-of-the-Bible-Both-the-Canonical-and-the-Apocryphal-Designed-to-by-Stowe-Calvin-Ellis.aspx?&Words=blble manuscripts

Yeah, it seems that sectarianism caused much of the Bible to be lost unfortunately. Its also mentioned in Maurice Bucaille's book that certain religious practices of the Jews (like the Sabbath) could have been fabricated by the Jewish clergy for one reason or another (he didn't elaborate much on the Torah, which really dissapointed me. Though reading the comments on here reminded me....

On 7/17/2017 at 11:47 AM, Mansur Bakhtiari said:

2) The extent of Inspiration. This is stated in the words, “All Scripture is inspired.” The term “Scripture,” the Greek grafh, is used exclusively in the New Testament of the sacred writings, of some portion of the Bible—sometimes of the whole Old Testament (Matt. 22:29; Mark 14:49; Luke 24:45; John 10:35), and sometimes of a specific passage (Matt. 12:10; Luke 4:21; John 13:8).

I wonder if it's mentioned in the Torah, and how Jewish theologians view this......

Share this comment


Link to comment

To be clear, I do not speak or read Arabic. Unfortunately, I am at this point mono-lingual. I've read through an English translation Qur'an maybe three times over the years. I remember being surprised by reading a verse, I think it was in the fourth chapter/Sura, that mentioned the Torah and the Injeel being given as a guidance and a light. When people say that the Gospels were "corrupted" or changed, are they referring to copies of the Injeel before the writing of the Qur'an or after?

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Fascinating post.

I personally subscribe to the "maculate Torah" theory - namely the idea that a Revelation occurred at Mt. Sinai to Moses and the children of Israel, but that over time, that Revelation was corrupted.  To my mind, the most likely scenario for this is that whatever was from Moses was lost to us, either in the time of the wicked kings and queens or after the fall of the first Temple.  As the Israelites returned to the land under Persian rule and began rebuilding the Temple, a scribe (most likely Ezra) or group of scribes began to edit together the sources that they had on hand as an attempt to faithfully reconstruct the text.

I'm willing to take the leap that it's Ezra for a few reasons.  

A.) Ezra is the author attributed to Chronicles.  In Chronicles, there's a story of how the scroll of the Law was rediscovered in the Temple (seemingly out of nowhere with the entire Israelite population completely ignorant of its existence) and brought to King Josiah.  King Josiah has the whole people listen as the scroll of the Law is read to them, then they recommit to the covenant.  In spite of this, God still destroys Jerusalem and scatters Israel due to their years of ignorance of His covenant.

Ezra is in the position of providing unity and a spiritual vision to his people.  It's a little too convenient that he does exactly what Josiah did - namely listen to the book of the law, which has authority, not just because it's attributed to God, but because if the Israelites don't follow Ezra, God will destroy them, too.  

It's also just flat out odd that the Revelation given to Moses would simply be sitting in a scroll in the Temple with everyone unaware of its existence.  If people knew about Moses and the Exodus and the founding of their nation and their entire reason for having a Temple in the first place, then part of that story is that God spoke to Moses and gave the people a covenant.  Wouldn't someone ask,"Oh wait, where's that Covenant?"  Instead, this story seems to simply provide credibility to Ezra's redacted Torah or proto-Torah and course of action.

B.) There are definite hints of this in rabbinic tradition.

"Moses received the Torah at Sinai and conveyed it to Joshua, Joshua gave it to the Elders, the Elders to the Prophets, the Prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly".

The Great Assembly was the group that began building what we know as Judaism today after the fall of the First Temple.  The Great Assembly is the group which codifies the Tanakh - giving the Torah its form, deciding which Prophetic writings were genuinely inspired, determining which historical writings gave necessary context to tell the full story of the Jewish people and their covenant with God.

Oh yeah, and they were convened by Ezra, who acts as a nexus figure.  By tradition, Ezra isn't just a scribe, he's also Malachi (literally "My Messenger" - just as easily a title or pseudonym) - the last of the Jewish prophets. He's literally the hand off point in the chain of Torah transmission, the one who delivers Torah to Judaism on behalf of Moses. 

Rabbinic tradition says that had Moses not existed, Ezra would've been worthy to receive the Torah.

Anyway, it's just conjecture, but it's reasonable conjecture, and is in response to the simple fact that the Torah is riddled with contradiction and seems clearly to be cobbled together from different sources.  And I say that as a faithful, observant Jew.

And Allah knows best, right?

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 8/6/2017 at 4:48 PM, Joy-Elizabeth said:

To be clear, I do not speak or read Arabic. Unfortunately, I am at this point mono-lingual. I've read through an English translation Qur'an maybe three times over the years. I remember being surprised by reading a verse, I think it was in the fourth chapter/Sura, that mentioned the Torah and the Injeel being given as a guidance and a light. When people say that the Gospels were "corrupted" or changed, are they referring to copies of the Injeel before the writing of the Qur'an or after?

 

hmmm, I'm guessing it's referring to corruption before, because of course at the time the Quran was revealed the Torah and Injeel were considered corrupt books. I think even before the advent of Jesus Christ, there was corruption in the Bible. In the Bible, Quran and Science book I remember it mentioning how the sabbath and other religious rites could have been invented, though I don't remember much of it. But yeah, I think it refers to prior to the revelation of the quran.

2 hours ago, Ibn Maymun said:

Fascinating post.

I personally subscribe to the "maculate Torah" theory - namely the idea that a Revelation occurred at Mt. Sinai to Moses and the children of Israel, but that over time, that Revelation was corrupted.  To my mind, the most likely scenario for this is that whatever was from Moses was lost to us, either in the time of the wicked kings and queens or after the fall of the first Temple.  As the Israelites returned to the land under Persian rule and began rebuilding the Temple, a scribe (most likely Ezra) or group of scribes began to edit together the sources that they had on hand as an attempt to faithfully reconstruct the text.

I'm willing to take the leap that it's Ezra for a few reasons.  

A.) Ezra is the author attributed to Chronicles.  In Chronicles, there's a story of how the scroll of the Law was rediscovered in the Temple (seemingly out of nowhere with the entire Israelite population completely ignorant of its existence) and brought to King Josiah.  King Josiah has the whole people listen as the scroll of the Law is read to them, then they recommit to the covenant.  In spite of this, God still destroys Jerusalem and scatters Israel due to their years of ignorance of His covenant.

Ezra is in the position of providing unity and a spiritual vision to his people.  It's a little too convenient that he does exactly what Josiah did - namely listen to the book of the law, which has authority, not just because it's attributed to God, but because if the Israelites don't follow Ezra, God will destroy them, too.  

It's also just flat out odd that the Revelation given to Moses would simply be sitting in a scroll in the Temple with everyone unaware of its existence.  If people knew about Moses and the Exodus and the founding of their nation and their entire reason for having a Temple in the first place, then part of that story is that God spoke to Moses and gave the people a covenant.  Wouldn't someone ask,"Oh wait, where's that Covenant?"  Instead, this story seems to simply provide credibility to Ezra's redacted Torah or proto-Torah and course of action.

B.) There are definite hints of this in rabbinic tradition.

"Moses received the Torah at Sinai and conveyed it to Joshua, Joshua gave it to the Elders, the Elders to the Prophets, the Prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly".

The Great Assembly was the group that began building what we know as Judaism today after the fall of the First Temple.  The Great Assembly is the group which codifies the Tanakh - giving the Torah its form, deciding which Prophetic writings were genuinely inspired, determining which historical writings gave necessary context to tell the full story of the Jewish people and their covenant with God.

Oh yeah, and they were convened by Ezra, who acts as a nexus figure.  By tradition, Ezra isn't just a scribe, he's also Malachi (literally "My Messenger" - just as easily a title or pseudonym) - the last of the Jewish prophets. He's literally the hand off point in the chain of Torah transmission, the one who delivers Torah to Judaism on behalf of Moses. 

Rabbinic tradition says that had Moses not existed, Ezra would've been worthy to receive the Torah.

Anyway, it's just conjecture, but it's reasonable conjecture, and is in response to the simple fact that the Torah is riddled with contradiction and seems clearly to be cobbled together from different sources.  And I say that as a faithful, observant Jew.

And Allah knows best, right?

Wow, thats well detailed, thanks for that. Do you know of any Bibliical verses where it's mentioned that the Bible was revealed to Moses as opposed to being inspired?

2 hours ago, Ibn Maymun said:

Rabbinic tradition says that had Moses not existed, Ezra would've been worthy to receive the Torah

huh, sounds like

Imam Ahmad (17405), at-Tirmidhi (3686) and al-Haakim (4495) narrated via Mishrah ibn Haa ‘aan, from ‘Uqbah ibn ‘Aamir (may Allah be pleased with him) who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) say: “If there were to be a Prophet after me, it would be ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab.”

And yeah, Allah knows best :)

Share this comment


Link to comment

@Mansur Bakhtiari

The above person focused on the question of the Torah, whether it was corrupted before the Qur'an. You seem to make the case that the Injeel was changed. May I ask on what evidence have you researched that this is the case?

Joy-Elizabeth

Share this comment


Link to comment

Mansur,

20 hours ago, Mansur Bakhtiari said:

hmmm, I'm guessing it's referring to corruption before, because of course at the time the Quran was revealed the Torah and Injeel were considered corrupt books. I think even before the advent of Jesus Christ, there was corruption in the Bible. In the Bible, Quran and Science book I remember it mentioning how the sabbath and other religious rites could have been invented, though I don't remember much of it. But yeah, I think it refers to prior to the revelation of the quran.

Wow, thats well detailed, thanks for that. Do you know of any Bibliical verses where it's mentioned that the Bible was revealed to Moses as opposed to being inspired?

Sure.  I think the clearest example of this is Exodus 33:11 where the Torah claims that God spoke to Moses "face to face" (literally "faces to faces").  Exodus 31:18 makes the claim that the Ten Commandments were written "by the finger of God".

The Torah is riddled with the phrase "And the Lord said to Moses..." followed by a a commandment or a teaching.  Their relationship has a level of intimacy unmatched by all of our later prophets, part of that being a direct self-disclosure by God about Who He is and what He wants out of Israel.  That's pretty much what revelation is...

And if you want an example of contradiction cobbled together, start with Exodus 33:10 and read through to verse 20.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Actually reflecting on it further, I'm not sure that your original question is an either/or.  The Torah (that we have today) is a mixture of revelation and inspiration.  

Something definitely happened at Sinai - God initiated a relationship with the children of Israel, disclosing some deeper sense of His reality to Moses than could simply be grasped with the senses and providing guidance to Israel.  The notion that nothing of that is preserved in the Torah we have today seems farfetched.

That said, the Torah is not as it was given to Moses.  Ezra and the Great Assembly redacted and arranged the sources that they already had on hand.  God brought clarity to their minds to preserve the essential meaning, if not the exact text delivered to Moses "by the finger of God". 

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 8/11/2017 at 0:07 AM, Joy-Elizabeth said:

@Mansur Bakhtiari

The above person focused on the question of the Torah, whether it was corrupted before the Qur'an. You seem to make the case that the Injeel was changed. May I ask on what evidence have you researched that this is the case?

Joy-Elizabeth

I haven't researched this much, actually reading Maurice Bucaille's book has been the first look into the bible in comparison to Islam other that skimming some articles and debates by sketchy "dawah" guys on youtube, though Inshallah Ta'ala this won't be my last as I'm very interested in this.

In the book, it mentioned a lot of doubts over whether the writers of the Gospels were disciples of Jesus. It only mentions John as being an eyewitness, doesn't mention the status of Luke, but says Mark and Matthew are no longer considered disciples of Jesus by Christian scholars. I'm unsure if the Gospels have chains of narrations like Muslim ahadith, but I do know that there are a lot of pointers to the authenticity of shia hadith, especially in the fact that we had the twelve Imams to preserve the message of Islam. 

How do you verify the authenticity of the Gospels?

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 8/11/2017 at 5:10 AM, Ibn Maymun said:

Exodus 33:11 where the Torah CLAIMS that God spoke to Moses "face to face" (literally "faces to faces").  

 as yourself said, it’s a “claim”, that can not be verified ! re-written a millennium years after Moses by rabbis, and more than that: it’s false!

God does not talk with anyone directly !

Quran 42:51

And it is not for any human being that Allah should speak to him except by revelation or from behind a partition or that He sends a messenger to reveal, by His permission, what He wills. Indeed, He is Most High and Wise.

Share this comment


Link to comment

@Mansur Bakhtiari

@hasanhh

@yasahebalzaman.313

god is not rejecting that Torah was revealed all at once .

Quran 25:32

And those who disbelieve say, "Why was the Qur'an not revealed to him all at once?" Thus [it is] that We may strengthen thereby your heart. And We have spaced it distinctly.

The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) says: "The Torah, the Gospel, and the Zaboor, all were revealed in tablets and papers." [3]

Source:

۳. ↑ شیخ مفید، محمد بن نعمان، الاختصاص، ص۴۴، تحقیق علی‌اکبر غفاری، نشر جامعه مدرسین.    
Edited by Arminmo

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Blog Entries

    • By Haji 2003 in Contemporania
         3
      There is a populist theory that the pyramids must have had an alien inspiration. This is because of the range of innovations that they represent and knowledge across multiple disciplines and their orientation towards certain constellations.
      My problem with this theory is the bent pyramid at Dahshur. It's bent, because they got the maths wrong. Weird that aliens who managed to get to this planet but then got their measurements for a stone structure wrong. Seems pretty clear to me that the pyramids we see represent the refinement and development of Egyptian technology, rather than discrete alien intervention.
      In contrast, this planet is stuffed full of interesting resources in quantities just right for exploitation at the time that they'd be needed and human development would have reached a stage to take advantage. That's a far more likely candidate as evidence of extra-terrestrial involvement in the seeding of this planet with the correct quantities of resources at the time of its creation. Given the nature and extent of such material, it's likely to have been something more advanced than aliens doing the seeding.
      I was reminded of this by the current horseshoe crab shortage affecting north America. It seems as if they have been over-exploited because their blood contains a substance used to test medical products for the presence of bacteria.
    • By Haji 2003 in Contemporania
         1
      Summary
      The factors which allow countries to produce lots of brains may be the very factors that mean such brains will find better opportunities in countries that are better able to pay brains.
      Whether the countries producing the brains are able to benefit from their education-positive actions depends on whether the brains who leave for better opportunities consider their success to be a function of their childhood country or their own hard work.
      Countries that produce brains need to work hard in order to ensure that people recognise the source of their success.
      Brain drainees
      Brain drainees are countries that lose qualified people to other countries. Brain drainees typically need to create the brains in the first place and typically there are some conditions that need to be met in order to do this. In order to develop an educated population you need pupils who have enough to eat and drink, feel secure and who are not compelled to work as child labourers. Ideally, they should not have so much wealth that they have too much access to distractions that will keep them away from their studies. 
      You need parents who are willing to provide the time and attention needed for children to learn i.e. people who don't feel compelled to work excessive hours in their employment activities either because such work is badly paid or because it is so well paid but competitive that they have to work those hours to keep up with their peers. You need a social system that keeps parents with children rather than in bars.
      You need teachers who are qualified, i.e. those who know their subjects well enough that they want to impart knowledge rather than rote learning. And you need education leaders who see their leadership positions as ones that serve society rather than their own pockets.
      Countries can create brains for export without the above conditions, but the above represent an ideal, a sort of goldilocks zone. Societies that are neither too dysfunctional or too successful.
      Being in the goldilocks zone also means that parents, teachers and children see the value of utilitarian, functional subjects such as maths and engineering. In contrast in more developed societies there may be a tendency to study more values-expressive subjects such as the arts and social sciences.
      Brain drainers
      These are societies that systematically draw brains from other countries. Typically these societies are rich. People with brains do not move to poor countries unless they are on a World Bank or an NGO contract.
      The wealth of these societies means that the children within them have access to distractions, X-boxes do not play themselves, this means that they don't create as many brains as they could. There are other factors at play as well. Parents may find it more economically beneficial to spend time at work rather than with kids and they may also find it more productive to have less kids to begin with. Both factors reduce brains. 
      In such societies, there are good teachers, (obviously). But supply may be limited, this is because people who are well-qualified have a lot of other employment opportunities that are typically better paid than education. Teachers could be paid more, but typically these societies find it more effective to reduce tax rates in order to encourage commerce and enterprise and/or spend their budgets on the military which in turn create non-education job opportunities.
      The lack of parental support at home, the availability of distractions and other social forces that challenge traditional teacher/pupil relationships can also mean that teaching becomes more demanding and challenging.
      Because these societies are rich, however, it remains relatively easy to recruit qualified people in a range of different activities from other countries that are effective at producing them.
      Assessments of cause and effect
      It may well be that the very factors that allow countries to produce brains are the ones which reduce the opportunities for those brains to exploit the skills that they have developed in their home countries.
      Crucial to this issue is the perception of the brains themselves. If they attribute their success to their own labours and that of the brain drainee country that allowed them in, then there will be a net loss to the brain drainee country, it may be less likely to see any future returns to its investment.
      If however, the brains feel that they either owe a debt to the drainee country and/or that the drainee country offers opportunities in the long-term they may make a contribution to it.
    • By Qa'im in Imamology
         5
      The idea that the world is composed of four or five elements (fire, water, earth, wind, and aether) was almost universal in the ancient world. The science and mythology of many ancient civilizations, from Greece to Japan, operated on this understanding.

      While Islam is not really married to the idea of four elements (it is not supported in an explicit way in the Quran or hadiths), it is interesting to note that Islamic metaphysics and cosmology use this system.

      This is especially the case in the spiritual world. The jinn are made from a smokeless Fire, the humans are made from Earth (Teen), and the soul (ruH) comes from the word for Wind (reeH). The Throne of Allah was settled upon Water (11:7), until that water was separated into the heavens and earth. The angels are from light (Noor, a word related to Nar).

      Allah does not raise a prophet except that he speaks the language of his people. He may have used these literary devices to explain a realm that is ultimately beyond our understanding (ghayb). The Quran is a book that needs to be intelligible to people, especially when speaking on the unseen and unknown.

      While the universe is simply not made up of H2O, the image of Water as a fluid, clear, shapeless structure is befitting to understanding the world. In physics, the concept of fields (gravitational, spatial) operate largely on fluid mechanics. “Water” is a chaotic substance that was then categorized, compartmentalized and distinguished into the world we know today.

      Similarly, a simple sample of the water (saliva) in your body can create an entire profile of who you are: your DNA, and therefore, your family lineage, your appearance, your susceptibility to diseases, and even parts of your personality.

      There are some things that are beyond literal and metaphorical. The dichotomy of literal and metaphorical is sometimes not just inaccurate, but harmful to our readings of scripture.
    • By 3wliya_maryam in deep poetry
         6
      Why am I always agitated
      To the point where I'm just irritated
      At every small thing that comes my way
      I throw a tantrum not realising what I say
      Sometimes I reassure myself
      It's okay, your human, you can control yourself
      But everytime I try, its only temporary
      And I try to push away the guilt that I carry
      No matter how many times you fall
      Keep breaking through that strong immense wall
      Even if you still haven't been able to and you just wanna stop
      Be proud that you still didn't drop
      That you still haven't given up.
    • By Haji 2003 in Stories for Sakina
         0
      It's taken me nearly 15 years to get to 10,000 posts, so I thought I'd post something special.
      I remember the cold. I think it was the first time in my life that keeping warm was a struggle. Shafts of cold air channelled in through a train not designed to keep it out. Arriving at Amritsar station, there was some relief. I remember the shouts of ‘garam chai’ (hot tea) rising above the cacophony of engines, whistles, and general yells. This trip was the first time that I was allowed to drink tea. At home in London, tea was an adult’s drink, and there simply had been no occasion or need to drink it. Here at Amritsar station, in Indian Punjab, during the middle of the night, I was allowed to drink the strong, sugary hot tea and eat the hard-boiled eggs that the hawkers were selling. It was only many years later that I appreciated the business nous of selling hard-boiled eggs. Pre-packaged and ready to eat, what could be easier for a hawker to sell? 
      Some years later standing in the cold in the school playground would help me appreciate all the more as I read of Ivan Denisovich’s battles against hunger and cold in Solzhenitsyn’s account of life in a Soviet gulag. And many years later still this way of experiencing the novel would prompt me to encourage my daughter to read Denisovich’s account while she was fasting for Ramadan.
      Standing on the platform with my snacks, amongst the flow of passengers and porters, I took in the destination signs on the different trains, heading off to distant parts of a sub-continent. Perhaps my diminutive 10-year-old perspective added to the perceived size of the place; I would not be surprised. The porters wore a uniform, after a fashion. For each one of them, the acquisition of a customer provided a sense of purpose and superiority of status which would be underlined by rearranging their head-covering to better protect themselves from the luggage that would soon be loaded on top. On this trip, I was just a spectator to the rituals of engaging porters. When old enough to be a participant, I’d find it a difficult balance between exploiting and being exploited. 
      At last, it was time to get back in the train and cover myself as best I could with an assortment of clothes, waiting for the morning to bring some respite. Some mornings were awesome, the rising rays of sunshine spread across green fields, punctuated by trees and seemingly in rhythm with the regular beat of the wheels on the track. At some point, I’d have to go to the toilet, which was a balancing act of the toothbrush, toothpaste and some attempt at washing and keeping my distance from the ubiquitous hole in the floor.
      At first, I had distanced myself from the perceived filth of the train and had tried to keep myself to as small an area as possible. But as the hours passed my comfort zone expanded until I was even comfortable lying full stretch on the wooden slats of the third-class benches. As the miles passed the squalor, even that of the toilet, was no longer alien but something to which I had become habituated. Though I still haven’t managed to achieve the level of equanimity displayed by a fellow airline passenger who went into the toilet barefoot. As someone else commented on this practice, the liquid on the floor isn’t water.
      Safety was and still is a distant concept when it comes to Indian railways, best observed by the person at risk. In both my childhood travel and in recent times safety seems to lie, for example, in keeping your distance from the open door of the railway carriage. As a 30-year-old on a train from Chennai to Hyderabad and no parent to hold me back, I was able to lean out to take videos and photos to rekindle childhood memories of fleeting Indian railway stations. The observation stimulated the same sense of passing through and catching the moment in local lives. What I was not able to recapture in a photo was the rising dawn that I had observed in my childhood journey. 
      On that childhood trip, I had brought a couple of books with me, which I still remember. There was ‘Tarka the Otter’ and Joy Adamson’s ‘Home Free’. I can’t remember which one was more boring, but Tarka does stand out as being particularly good for being interrupted by the least remarkable scenery outside. The same can’t be said for the novel I discovered at our destination in Lucknow. Our host had a copy of ‘War of the Worlds’ the title itself was captivating and the story engrossing. I remember sitting in various locations of the house working my way through the invasion.
      A few years before this train trip, aged six, I had seen a book titled ‘War and Peace’ sitting on another relative’s bookshelf in London and that also seemed to suggest excitement within. I wasn’t there long enough to pick it up, but a few years after the Indian trip, when I was about 14 I made a point about buying the novel but the enthusiasm stimulated by the title was very, very quickly dimmed by the story within. I decided to grind down the story by reading a page a day. It took a couple of years, but I managed to finish it. 
      ‘War of the Worlds’ was the starting point, since then I’ve come to associate books with the places where I read them: Sterling Seagrave’s, ‘Dragon Lady’ accompanied me on a trip to Singapore and provided the incentive to visit China. 
      Aged 17, I was transiting between two Paris metro stations, on a trip to Aix-en-Provence when a kindly gentleman took pity on me and helped me with my overweight suitcase containing Lipsey’s tome ‘Positive Economics’. Amongst other books, this would be entirely superfluous to my needs at the French language summer course I was about to attend. Even in adulthood, I have never quite managed to balance taking on travels work-related things that I would use as opposed to those I might regret not having brought with me. Laptops and cloud storage have meant that that personal deficiency no longer has to be addressed.
      This had been a unique trip in some different ways. My mother was a widow, and we did not have a great deal of money. I hadn’t been abroad between the ages of 5 and 10. But travelling third class on Indian railways and staying with relatives wherever we went meant that this trip was fairly affordable. So, it was not unreasonable that my mother was not too impressed with what took place when we arrived at the border crossing between India and Pakistan sometime earlier. 
      When we got off the train for the immigration check, there was a French lady in front of us, and she and my mother started speaking. Quite proudly my mother presented me as someone who could speak French. The unexpectedness and ambition of the challenge meant that I was completely dumbstruck. For a good few hours to follow, I’d hear my mother’s lament about how much she had paid for a French Linguaphone course for me, which was well beyond our means. I had assured her that this would be a great aid to my linguistic efforts, the advertisement promised as much, and I had waited with great anticipation for its arrival. Finally, one day there was a brown rectangular package waiting for me outside our house. But for a 10-year-old to master the use of the different texts and develop some semblance of a study plan was quite an ambition and one for which my abilities and self-discipline fell seriously short. 
      There must have been a subconscious notion that the pursuit of academic endeavours would give access to budgets otherwise unavailable. A few years later I’d decide that photography O’level would offer a greater chance of scholastic success. Once more I was lured in by a mixture of an economy with the truth by the people promoting the offering and my imaginative willingness to fill in the blanks. First, there was a need to buy an SLR camera, and as time passed it became obvious that the necessary skills to process photos could not be acquired in the few minutes, I’d have to be in front of the enlarger at school every week. An investment in a darkroom became a necessity. This time self-discipline wasn’t needed to drive study. I had discovered a subject for which I had a passion. I’d end up spending many happy hours in the darkroom, well past midnight channelling Diane Arbus and Cartier Bresson. By the time a school trip to the Soviet Union took place, I was reasonably competent and still have some of the photos of that visit. 
      Looking back, both the camera and the Soviet trip itself seemed like a judicious investment in an unrepeatable experience, a few years later the USSR would cease to exist. This lesson in political upheaval was to prove particularly useful before a trip with my wife and kids to Syria. My brother had borrowed my video camera and forgotten to return it, and the realisation only came in the departure lounge at Heathrow. Buying a video camera specifically for one trip seemed like an extravagance, but soon afterward the civil war broke out. I have clips of my daughter walking amongst a temple to the Phoenician god Melquart, I wonder whether ISIS have left it standing?
      For the India trip, in contrast, there was no camera at all. As I had left London, I had been given a compact camera, which refused to show any sign of working for the duration of the trip and which it had not been possible to repair either. So, I have no tangible images of the entire trip. Whether that has forced me to try harder to remember over the years or whether I have become better at embellishing the details, I don’t know. I do know that on one review I have left on Tripadvisor, I have commented that the prohibition on taking cameras into a particular museum means that visitors are more likely to pay attention to the exhibits in their own right rather than as fodder for an Instagram feed. 
      From Lucknow, we went to my mother’s ancestral home in Fatehpur. We drove through the potholed roads of Uttar Pradesh, slowed even further by overladen agricultural traffic. We arrived in the evening, and all I could sense was that we entered a courtyard and then another. This was quite different to any home I had visited previously. Morning brought a much better sense of the place. The hallmark of the building was its twin towers, installed a couple of hundred years previously, with permission from the rulers of Awadh, since they were considered a mark of royalty and my maternal ancestor’s position as a tutor to the princely household earned him the favour to use them. These rose above the building and the surrounding town. Beneath them was the building’s mosque entered through several large wooden doors, several steps then led to a large courtyard at the other end of which was a narrow staircase leading to some apartments on the first floor. The men of the family had offices cum bedrooms on the ground floor of the courtyard, and their families slept in apartments on the first floor. Any tangible evidence of conjugal relations, such as a couples’ double bed was considered impolite. There were also apartments on the ground floor. To the right of the towers was the entrance to the building and beyond that the disused stables, a further courtyard and then the exit to the main street of the town.
      In Fatehpur, there were no books, or indeed television, but there was exploring the building, listening to stories, fishing and staring at a night sky whose lights I had never previously seen in such profusion. Frustratingly, the shot guns could only be seen and not touched, in fact, I wasn’t allowed to use the air gun. Even the fishing wasn’t with actual rods, but the sensation of the lightness of a short stick with a bait at the end being replaced with the sensation of something tugging at the end of a line remains vivid.
      Exploring the old building would be an experience for someone who had lived in a terraced house all his life. Playing cricket in its central square meant that we had room for both wickets and the ability to run between them, while back in London the garden lawn barely stretched a couple of metres and in our London suburb kids just didn’t play on the street. And then there was the dungeon. Like quite a bit of what we were to experience the name or prior description didn’t quite live up to schoolboy expectations. The Urdu word they all used was ‘mahal’ as in Taj Mahal, but you could hardly describe it as a palace. The dungeon itself was no more threatening than a basement room.  
      The family mahal stood in contrast to the Taj that we had visited on a side-trip while staying in Delhi with an uncle. The sense of serenity reflected off the colour and curves remains in my mind. The sound track no longer remains, perhaps the size of the place drowned out the chattering throngs. The image is now distilled from the range of different perspectives: the head-on view as captured by those photographers who pictured Princess Diana in the foreground, to my standing under the columns staring up and being up close to the marble.
      While the Taj was glorious enough to represent the nation and thus rose above its religious and ethnic antecedents, this was not the case with the family mahal. The condition of this modest building perfectly reflected the state of the community it housed: elegant decrepitude with only a memory of former glories. While the building’s statelier past was visible from the remnants of the structure, so the stories passed by each generation reminded subsequent ones of the lifestyle they had been denied because of opportunities missed and talents wasted. 
      Such was the problem they were facing that even acts of renovation seemed like destruction, where older styles of building work and decoration were replaced with more functional and cheaper modern ones. My youthful displeasure at the erasure of history would later be tempered by a more mature realisation of the practicalities of habitat when I had the chimney breasts and fireplaces of my Victorian house removed to create more space. 
      Occasionally the person who had hosted us in Lucknow would visit. He was a local politician and would arrive in a stately Ambassador car or even more excitingly a ‘jeep’. Not an eponymous one of course, but I still remember the fact that it had gun racks. Both that vehicle and the Ambassador were made in India. This was India before trade liberalisation. Not as familiar a place as the Pakistan we had travelled through to get here. Pakistan had the welcome familiarity of brands that I had grown up with; the ketchup was Heinz and the coke a recognisably friendly white swoosh on a red background. Billboard and television advertising was reassuring. Here unfamiliar names came across as peculiar. Why would a cola be called ‘Thums Up?’. 
      Such has been the irony of globalisation that a few weeks ago eating at Dishoom restaurant in London’s East End I saw the Thums Up logo once more. A symbol of rejecting western capitalism had itself become a brand, with a consumerist meaning, evoking a carbonated essence of India. 
      Like all children of Asian immigrants on visits to their parents’ country of origin, I was also overwhelmed with the extensivity and density of familial connections. There were first cousins, second cousins, and quite a lot more complicated combinations, for which there are no words in English. Added to this, a matriarchal aunt could also be a cousin. My wife came up with a novel way of explaining one such relationship to me. “If that aunt were Mary Queen of Scots, your mum would be Elizabeth I”. Indeed, an artefact of such complex and inter-related ties was the obvious existence of rivalries, jealousies, and squabbles spanning generations. In England, my younger brother and I had been protected from this aspect of extended family life. The protection came at a price: we didn’t know how to deal with it at all. At the age of 10 this did not matter, but on future visits, it would become more significant and certainly by the time my brother and I reached marriageable age. For the time being, it was just nice that as I wandered from apartment to apartment in the mahal, everyone I met was a relative and I was too young to understand any political dimension of that relationship. It would also be in subsequent visits to the mahal, when I was older, that I’d appreciate the tensions with the communities who lived outside the mahal.
      On my daily walks, I’d see hand powered sewing machines and food being prepared more laboriously than anything I had seen at home. The dirt floor did not afford the comfort of sitting cross legged and sitting on my haunches was not something my leg muscles were prepared for. Unlike the urban homes, I had come across in the sub-continent, the toilet here was a platform raised above the multi-coloured offerings beneath. So large was the place that any smells remained distant from any other rooms.
      The cold had not left us in Fatehpur. At night, they would light braziers which were wonderful for bringing around family members, sitting together on the Indian style wooden beds, sharing each other’s warmth, stories and gossip. 
       
       
       
       
    • By Haji 2003 in Contemporania
         0
      and there is no one around to hear it, does it make a sound?
      I think it most likely does, but I think the issue misses the point about the significance of that tree to our existence.
      There are lots of things happening in the universe that we cannot observe when they happen, but they are important for our understanding of natural history when we reach a point in our own development when we can observe their effects.
      So millions of years ago there were trees that were falling that we could not hear or observe, but we see their effects today when we dig and drill for hydrocarbons and we can reconstruct their ecosystem in such a manner that it provides us with a scientific understanding of why we are where we are today together with clues as to where we may be heading.
      At the level of the individual plant, then, we may never have been able to hear or see what happened to it. But the important aspect of its life, what it left behind has been useful for us.
      In the case of frozen mammoths, the evolution life and death of an entire species may have been of value to us in the form of the handful of specimens that have been observed. Had the millions of other mammoths not lived (whose sounds we'd obviously never hear) we would not have been able to acquire those specimens that serendipitously died in a manner that preserved them and learn more about them.
      The same point applies to the stars and the universe. Many of them have existed for billions of years, it seems, for the exclusive benefit of us being able to see them at this point in time, when their light could reach us.
       
    • By shadow_of_light in From Earth to Heaven
         0
      "Sardaar" by Ali Ashabi
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Blog Statistics

    72
    Total Blogs
    345
    Total Entries
×