|
|
|
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله
Forums
-
Religion Forums
-
- 874
- posts
-
- 666.8k
- posts
-
- 326.5k
- posts
-
- 127.4k
- posts
-
- 50.4k
- posts
-
- 12.1k
- posts
-
- 121.8k
- posts
-
- Awrah
- By Guest Gamila,
-
-
Other Forums
-
- 480.3k
- posts
-
- 376.1k
- posts
-
- 105k
- posts
-
- 9.7k
- posts
-
- 60.6k
- posts
-
- Shia Community In Ecuador?
- By Guest Ali Sagar,
-
- 416.5k
- posts
-
- 3k
- posts
-
-
Language Specific
-
- 10.3k
- posts
-
- 4.8k
- posts
-
- Write Up Needed - Urgent
- By Guest Junoon,
-
- 61.2k
- posts
-
- Qasam wapis Lesakty ?
- By Guest BiLaL,
-
- 5.6k
- posts
-
-
Site Support
-
- 43.8k
- posts
-
- 44
- posts
-
-
Gender Specific Forums
-
Who's Online 9 Members, 0 Anonymous, 158 Guests (See full list)
-
Popular Contributors
-
Member Statistics
66,972
Total Members2,016
Most Online
-
Forum Statistics
209,105
Total Topics2,959,455
Total Posts
-
Popular Now
-
Recent Post Feed
-
By Syed Ali Mehdi Shah Naqvi · Posted
Quran 3:7 It is He who has sent down to you, [O Muhammad], the Book; in it are verses [that are] precise - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific. As for those in whose hearts is deviation [from truth], they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation [suitable to them]. And no one knows its [true] interpretation except Allah . But those firm in knowledge say, "We believe in it. All [of it] is from our Lord." And no one will be reminded except those of understanding. It doesn't contradict Quran. We just get when occasion of revelation of this verse from Hadith that's all. 1. Words of Abu Saed Al Khudri (رضي الله عنه) (That verse was revealed exclusively) 2. Words of Ummul Momineen Ayesha (That no verse except for one declaring her innocence was revealed for her) 3. Words of 'Umar bin Abi Salamah (عليه السلام) (The verse was revealed exclusively) 4. Words of Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) (That these 5 are AhlulBayt in context of this verse and Rasool (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) said to Umme Salmah (عليه السلام) that you are at Your place when she (عليه السلام) asked Am i with them) -
By Syed Ali Mehdi Shah Naqvi · Posted
Narrated 'Umar bin Abi Salamah - the step-son of the Prophet (ﷺ): "When these Ayat were revealed to the Prophet (ﷺ): 'Allah only wishes to remove the Rijs from you, O members of the family, and to purify you with a thorough purification...' (33:33) in the home of Umm Salamah, he called for Fatimah, Hasan, Husain, and wrapped him in the cloak, then he said: 'O Allah! These are the people of my house, so remove the Rijs from them, and purify them with a thorough purification.' So Umm Salamah said: 'And am I with them O Messenger of Allah?' He said: 'You are in your place, and you are more virtuous to me.'" Jami Al-Tirmidhi: Vol 1, Book 46, Hadith 3787 I believe you already know this. he (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) called for Fatimah, Hasan, Husain, and wrapped him in the cloak, then he said: 'O Allah! These are the people of my house! Its clear though. -
There is no denial that Ahl al-Kisa are included in the revelation of Ayat al-Tathir, that is not the dispute. The question is how does inclusion of a party necessitate exclusion of another? The Ayah itself is plain in its meaning that Wives of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم are the primary addressees. Even if, hypothetically, there was a narration that said the Ayah refers exclusively to Ahl al-Kisa and not Ummahat al-Mu’minin, such a narration would have to be rejected, as Quran stands in judgment over riwayat. Didn't your own Imams say "if our narration opposes the Quran then throw it against the wall"? There is no need to consult the scholars you mentioned because we cannot take their interpretation over and above the plain meaning of the Verse itself, plus the overwhelming position of Ahlus Sunnati wal-Jama’ah is that the Ummahat al-Mu’minin are included in Ayat al-Tathir. -
By Syed Ali Mehdi Shah Naqvi · Posted
Brother in your own hadith of Kissa, word "revealed" has been mentioned. And it refers specifically to five as per hadith of Abu Saed Al Khudri (رضي الله عنه). Plus According to Wajahat Hussein Al-Hanafi and Syed Husnain Bukhari, many scholors of tafseer of Ahle-Sunnah believed that this verse is specific for the five people. You can go and check out those long lectures of Syed Husnain Bukhari. -
By Syed Ali Mehdi Shah Naqvi · Posted
I was waiting for this anyways. If that's the case, then the ONE verse, she talked about in hadith wasn't revealed for Abdur Rehman Bin Abi Bakr either. It was specifically for Umm Ul Momineen Hazrat Ayesha as wife of Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم). Therefore it was the best time to quote such an important virtue when Marwan tried to degrade them by fabricating. -
The ruling party which is anti Muslims has somehow bought a few influential names like Khalbe Jawad, Yasoob Abbas and Shia Wakf Board to be their boot lickers. They consistently give out statement in support of the govt despite their crimes against Muslims in India. The Shia Wakf board even offered to give some statue or other thing and donated a huge money for Ram Mandir ( Constructed after demolition of Babri Kashif) , the site is controversial and has lead to riots and deaths of Muslim. This basically triggered a lot of online hatred against Shi'as in India. Basically it's divide and rule policy adopted against Muslim by the govt. Where they bought a few Shia personalities and give them huge media attention. -
Couple of points: when sayyidatuna A’ishah رضى الله عنها says “us” in the first person plural, she is only referring to the children of sayyidina Abi Bakr as-Siddiq رضى الله عنه and not to the category of Prophet’s wives, as the context of the Hadith makes clear when Marwan made a specific allegation that an Ayah in the Quran was revealed against Abd ur-Rahman b. Abi Bakr. Ayat al-Tathir is general in referring to the Prophet’s wives, and is not specifically regarding sayyidatuna A’ishah but all the Ummahat al-Mu’minin رضى الله عنهنّ The Hadith al-Kisa only proves that the Ahl al-Kisa عليهم السلام are included in the Ahl al-Bayt as mentioned in Ayat al-Tathir, it does not prove exclusion of the Ummahat al-Mu’minin. Exclusion can never be proven since the Ayah itself begins by addressing and mentioning them.
-
By Syed Ali Mehdi Shah Naqvi · Posted
Ayah e Tatheer isn't general either. She said there is no verse revealed for her, except for once declaring her innocence. Umm Ul Momineen Hazrat Ayesha has denied that Ayah e Tatheer or any other was revealed for her. Aisha said from behind a screen, "Allah did not reveal anything from the Qur'an about us except what was connected with the declaration of my innocence (of the slander)/ Umm ul Momineen Hazrat Ayesha said: Allah did not reveal anything from the Quran about us except for one............................................. And then hadith of Hazrat Abu Saed Al-Khudri (رضي الله عنه) ( by Atiyah Al-Aufi) that this verse was revealed for five people is clear cut. -
Umm al-Mu’minin رضى الله عنها meant there was no Ayat that was revealed about her specifically apart from the Ayat regarding her innocence. Obviously, she is included in the other Ayat that mention the Prophet’s wives in general, especially Ayat al-Tathir.
-
Islam particularly school of Ahlebayt as is logical and appealing to mind. That any sound person have any reason to oppose. Regarding Tatbeer or walking on fire makes no sense rather it demages the School of Ahlebayt as. I know how Shia muslim mock on sofi practices and call it illogical . So every reasonable person has will criticise our actions of Tatbeer and walking on fire. That too when non of Imams have done. May be understanding why Imam Hussain sacrificed his life will be more appropriate to attain Imams and Allah's happiness.
-
-
Blog Entries
-
-
.thumb.jpeg.1314fb697bc633b9dadc62891b9b1eef.jpeg)
