Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Huseyin_Cetin_Turkish_Shia

Muawiya killed aisha

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

"Mauweyah invited Ayesha for dinner, and he got a ditch dug in the ground, filling it up with sharp knives and swords, with their blades facing upwards. According to Alama Ibn Khaldoon, Mauweyah masked that ditch with lanky pieces of wood, and spread a carpet on top of it all to camouflage it. He placed a wooden chair over it for Ayesha to sit. No sooner Ayesha sat on the chair, the whole set up retrieved and she fell in the pit, injuring herself from head to toe, and breaking a lot of bones. To hide his felony, Mauweyah got the ditched filled up with lime. That is how he murdered Ayesha; she was sixty four years old when Mauweyah murdered her towards the end of 57 Hijri. This proves, with out a doubt, that Mauweyah was an enemy of Prophet Mohammed (p), and he proved his enmity towards the Prophet (p) by murdering his (p) wife. The only reason that Mauweyah performed this heinous act was that Ayesha stopped him from making fun of Islam from the pulpit of Masjid-e-Nabvi.. This is why no one knows the exact location of Ayesha’s grave in Medina."

He killed the Mother of the Believers Ayesha in cold blood after ordering the killing of her brother Muhammad bin Abu Bakar. He was also responsible for the killings of many other companions of the Prophet (p) including Hajar bin Adi and Ammar Yasir.

Following the death of Muhammad bin 'Abu Bakr the people of Egypt gave bayya to Muaweyah. It was following this (event) that Ummul Mu'mineen Ayesha would curse Muaweyah and Amr bin Aas after every Salaat.

Tadhkira ul Khawass page 62

Sunni References:

Musharriful Mahbubin by Hazrat Khuwaja Mehboob Qasim Chishti Mushrrafi Qadri (ra) Pages 216-218

Kokab wa Rifi Fazal-e-Ali Karam Allah Wajhu, Page 484, By Syed Mohammed Subh-e-Kashaf AlTirmidhi, Urdu translation by Syed Sharif Hussein Sherwani Sabzawari, Published by Aloom AlMuhammed, number B12 Shadbagh, Lahore, 1st January 1963.

Habib Alseer Rabiyah AlAbrar, Volume 1, Alama JarulAllah Zamik (530 Hijri),

Hadoiqa Sanai, by Hakim Sanai (Died 525 Hijri, at Ghazni), Page 65-67,

Namoos Islam, by Agha Hashim Sialkoti, Published Lahore, 1939 - Pages 66-67

Tazkarah Tul-Aikram Tarikh-e-Khulafa Arab-Wa-Islam by Syed Shah Mohamed Kabir Abu Alalaiyi Dana Puri, Published Le Kishwar Press, Lakhnow, April 1924/ 1346 H

Sipah e Sahaba and other Wahabi scum have introduced Muaweyah as a companion of the Prophet (pbuh) using narrations fabricated by Muaweyah and his filthy descendants.

One very clever move by the Wahabis was to declare Muaweyah a scribe (katib e Wahi) who wrote down the revelations of Allah's Messenger.

All praise be to Allah swt, the leading Sunni scholars realising this conspiracy of the Wahabis, have declared all hadith praising Muaweyah as fabricated.

Not a single hadith in praise of Muaweyah is Sahih (authentic)

Many classical Sunni scholars whilst listing those individuals honored as writer of the revelation did not count Mu'awiya. For evidence see the following texts:

Fathul Bari page 450 Volume 2

Irshad Saneed Volume 9 page 22

Umdhathul Qari Volume 9 page 307

Nasa al Kafiya page 170

Iqd al Fareed Volume 2 page 197

al Isaba Volume 3 page 413

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one notable sahabi this munafiq killed was Amr ibn Hamiq al-khuzai(ra) he was also mentioned in a letter that Hussain(as) wrote to muawiyah

one must also remember that many veterans of Badr and companions who gave the pledge under the tree were also martyred fn siffin fighting against these syrian infidels.

Edited by Panzerwaffe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not one Sunni will admit that Ayesha was murdered by Muawiya (LA). Doing so will negate everything they have been brainwashed into believing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just Imagine, there are sunnis who say that Yazid did not kill Imam Hussain (as)..but we shiahs did...why...???...for their love of Yazid..although we can give them many sunni references...

Then if you claim the above....they will charge the shiahs of another killing, of Ummul Mo'meneen.

If you really want to defeat these stubborn ignorant fools...then....then...then...then..there are many other things besides the above ateast!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ask sunnis where is the grave of ayesha??

good point, also ask sunnis what the wahabies ( the closest sect to sunnis)

are doing to the prothet (pbuh) s house, what they have done 2 the beloved wife khadijas house,

the houses of the sahabas, the mazari serifs, qabirs of the reletives of the prothets.

ask them what u can, they will deny and deny and allways deny,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is interesting. They know where Muawiah's grave is, yet they don't know where Aisha is buried. It is clear that the truth has been hidden.

Truths are allways hidden in there eyes.

truths also hurts thats why its truth. and its hard to them 2 accept the truth,

And i was wondering, Do they really know where muawiyas (LA) grave is, coz i heard that a companion of the prothet (pbuh) called, Amman bin abdurahmaan has returned to mecca after a long period, and he has heard the disgusting things which muawiya and yazeed (LA) has done to the ahlulbayt (as) and their followers. there for he destroy the grave of muawiyah (LA).

well thats what i heard. and again all i can say is sunnies need 2 wake up from the dream they are seing and turn towards to the truth as the time is running out day by day.

may Allah's curse be with Yazeed and muawiyah (LA) for ever.

and may allahs blessings be upon the true believers and the followers of the ahlulbayt (as)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Truths are allways hidden in there eyes.

truths also hurts thats why its truth. and its hard to them 2 accept the truth,

And i was wondering, Do they really know where muawiyas (LA) grave is, coz i heard that a companion of the prothet (pbuh) called, Amman bin abdurahmaan has returned to mecca after a long period, and he has heard the disgusting things which muawiya and yazeed (LA) has done to the ahlulbayt (as) and their followers. there for he destroy the grave of muawiyah (LA).

well thats what i heard. and again all i can say is sunnies need 2 wake up from the dream they are seing and turn towards to the truth as the time is running out day by day.

may Allah's curse be with Yazeed and muawiyah (LA) for ever.

and may allahs blessings be upon the true believers and the followers of the ahlulbayt (as)

In damascus, there is a grave that supposively is where he is buried. But it could be fake? However, if it is fake, I would alteast expect that they had a fake grave for Aisha, too. That would be even a greater irony, that there is a fake grave, or misnamed one, for Muawiah, yet none for Aisha.

-Wa'salaam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is interesting. They know where Muawiah's grave is, yet they don't know where Aisha is buried. It is clear that the truth has been hidden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you know last time i went syria for chelum, i urinated all over the grave of muawiyyah, and the guards spotted me and chased me all over baab sagheer, an old iranian woman took off her chador thing and covered me in it so i sneaked out and waited on the coach for about 3 hours lol. honestly they were making out as though id done something really bad, the weirdos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Subhan Allah.

Do you believe that Muawiya (la) killed Aisha, or he didn't?

If there is any ambiguity about my position regarding Yazid and Muawiyah, then I'll clear this up right now:

May Allah curse Yazid and throw him in the fire for his role in Karbala and the oppression of Imam Husayn (as) and the crimes he committed against the people of Medina!

May Allah curse Muawiyah for his aggression against Imam Ali (as), his betrayal of Imam Hasan (as) and his role in the appointment of Yazid as caliph! Never had the position of caliph become so meaningless.

May Allah curse the enemies of Ahlul Bayt (as)!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I am dying here laughing out loud.

No! Stay alive! I will call the paramedics!

good point, also ask sunnis what the wahabies ( the closest sect to sunnis)]

I'm curious, where does the term, Wahhabism come from? I never heard Sunnis call themselves that....what does it mean to you?

Edited by HappyFriday

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then why call them Wahabbis if you know it insults them?

Because they are worshipers of Abdul Wahhab and are doing takiyyah by denying that are not the worshipers of Abdul Wahhab. Abdul Wahhab was a brutal murderer of both Sunnis and Shias, by claiming that these people are not doing tauhid. Therefore, he justified his deviant behavior that he has a right to kill them as they were doing bidah. His whole motive was to amass wealth and power. Here is a thread about worshiping Abdul Wahhab,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can this thread be used for a serious discussion on whether or not a supposed sahabi murdered one of the Prophet's (pbuh) wives?

Wouldn't the sunnis just say these are weak?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i sneaked out and waited on the coach for about 3 hours loll.

Some people read Sun Tzu, sounds as if you have been reading accounts of the Battle of Hunain. :P

Shouldn't you have been jumping up and down on the grave shouting, "come and get us if you think you're hard enough?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

salam.gif

In the Tarikh of Ibne Khaldun, in the book Khilafate Muawiya o Ale Marwan

"Bibi Ayesha was martyred by Marwan and his Family.She was invited for dinner and a pit was dug. It was filled with swords,knifes etc and the pit was then covered. When she came she was made to sit there.As soon as she sat down, the floor collapsed. She was old and could not recover.She was the favourite wife of Prophet pbuh.gif and he would call her humaira."

OgAAAOmbE6ClXX7bmxo4AojCs091Fv-wwj4oFXQOKpBHCGHL03FpfVIVxJ7oC1KPEmIicuAnSMfoFnTi4wjHMCLcxLYAm1T1UDOGcrNoCQDsBRNLyWe5JxmiAqiz.jpgOgAAAABetTalg8ZNMomamdPLnxHHyzZtRBAGM0QAwEASXyQA2Cwtn3I4vN81nVzNFk2LhQvyIfGWT2Nf-DlTE_P7dUMAm1T1UEZI8F7TWdno2rwDPBtZa3rC7y4o.jpg

Although many believed she died of old age.

wasalam.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • NO, IT IS HARAM. SENDING GIFT TO HER AND CONGRATULATING HER FOR HER FALLACIOUS MARRIAGE IS ALSO HARAM.
    • Imam Ali ibn Abu Talib(as)   I have avoided the discussion of “The God” and aspects and working, so we do not get distracted and dwell in the realm( of Evil, Mercy, Love, help, present/absent, why does he not act, or why he/ she is silent, why allow all this, that is going on ) that is out of our domain for this discussion at this point in time. If there is a need, I(Layman opinion) will say, The one who  created me, doesn't owe me anything, beyond guidance. If anything exists it's the lack of follow through or rejection of the guidance. I.e. If the humans allow conditions to develop, and there is oppression. Where is God is not the question. Question, is Humanity has been guided at two levels ( inner and outer), rejection of both is the issue not why God does not take away this evil person that we elected or tolerated until he/she turned on us(we were fine up untill it was happening to others). We human need to do our job, instead of having entitlement mentality, and deflect it to it's your fault God., where are you and why you do not help. We have been helped. Intellect/Guidance( brief understanding, as a layman). Maybe not the best example but it will suffice, We would not expect the Mars rover to dwell in the realm of our working, instead it should be concerned with its prime directive, and we are to provide it guidance to accomplish its work. There are may misunderstanding, in  definition, version, understanding due to linguistic, terminology(old/new), cultural (East/West) and lack of Conceptual discussion at the basic fundamental level instead of technicalities and mechanic(which is subconsciously embedded in the way we have been groomed in schools and universities). A charged and contentious environment does not help in getting to any resolution. It's usually tit for tat, and pride get in the way in different threads a that were responding to targeted and side issue out of context. No one to the best of my knowledge and understanding denies we are limited creations in all  aspects. Your creation and Your surrounding creation(s) , are proof of something that  can not be denied. So, there is a Cause, the unlimited, infinitely powerful, Unknown/Unseen Source of all this. What you(non Muslims) call that source is not relevant - you can call it a system,  I call it God. So, there are no Atheists or Agnostic here. What an Atheist/ Agnostic may be, saying is that they do not believe in the God of Islam as “presented “or as understood or as described. That is a very different issue. But this issue, gets mixed up with other issues dealing with the mechanics in other threads which are on specific topics. Getting back to the Topic. We turn now to Stephen Hawking. He proposes M-theory, a variant of string theory, to explain the origins of the universe. The conclusion of his last book, The Grand Design, states:
      Stephen Hawking is a SME ( Subject Matter Expert) in his field of Study. If he gave his scientific theory and left it at that. I would not care nor it should be my concern, as there are many SMEs and have their theories in the Scientific world about may things.  His connecting it to and concluding that there is no need for god( his understanding of what god is to him). Is the issue, I am highlighting it not only because of what he said, because he or people like him are followed and the laypeople use these ideas to formulate their ideology. This is something, prevalent, using  fiction which they call ‘Science” as a tool to attack Divine Religion. This is where this talk and connection / implication that this is the god and of you can’t pray to or ask for help form gravity, or physical laws are not empathetic, and are cold  and have no concern for the humans ….This connection makes no sense. Comparing apples and oranges and mixing stuff that is confusing. This mentally is delusional and it stems out of misunderstanding of the concepts of pray, or help, mercy, etc..or implications that ignorant people believe in miracles and angels. Or we can’t carbon date the text, or evidence of such and such event. In short ignorant conclusions by apparently learned people in their field of study Trickle down effect, and the lay Atheists/Agnostics take these talking point and formulate an opinion and argument with it. Objectivity is also an issue, here. Double standards. Scientific theories are not subject to the same rigorous, and shredding mentality.   Its 5000, 2000, 1400 old stuff, we are Technically advanced. We forget that this advancement is in Technology,(only). The basic alphabet  in terms of Social behavior, is as old as the cave people.  Moving beyond, Mechanics, working, Techinacilities and this attitude of the best generation to exist, every preceding generation had the same attitude. and we will be looked at and our theories considers as old and outdated by the new generations.  Its a Point is time assessment.  What are the benefits of the revealed information- i.e Revealed to us through our struggle and study through discovery of us and whats around us.? Do we follow the Laws, derived from this new knowledge?  If not what are we rally arguing about. If a person can't even at least in Theory acknowledge the laws of Nature for our(Humanity)  Benefit. If you were to do that, you may rethink you position, because you may realize that you have been arguing against something that Natural laws actually prove.  This is what concerns me, at this point. Why can't the objective, learned and "technically" advanced people  see that and make this connection? Technical stuff/mechanic, of Biological change, next stage, or toasters, cars, bridges, space race, new medicine and quest of the common animal are of what consequence except for knocking a book or theory of descent or maybe some new medicine may develop form the finding. If the theory of micro evolution as marketed to support the a particular version of evolution ,  is inserted here, its argues that we will always be a step behind and they(Virus) will mutate, or accomplishing something making life better and having some toys and pride issues over other nations that we went to pluto..so what ?  How does this help us , solving the social problems of Humanity? (That is what Divine Religion is about).. Is there a comprehensive Social theory under development due to above technical advancements. ?  Is there a comprehensive Social theory out there? (maybe not to the liking of the people due to Nurture, but is there) To, me it looks like a willful denial of the Nature, a clash of Nature vs Nurture. People are finding any thing to latch on to stay free of any obligation/accountability.  Correct me if I am wrong, I am a layman, average person. I read , what is written by people , i assess and drive at a conclusion. So, I post to be criticized, constructive criticism. So, I can better under and remove misunderstanding(s) to gain better knowledge.   
    • The nature of the Existence is to exist. Thats all.
    • If the father doesn't approve of it, and didn't leave the door open for further contact, then that's it. They are not being disrespectful. Saying "no" should not forcibly come with an explanation, thus you can't demand it nor force them to listen to you. It is called freedom, and that is more sacred than anything you can tell them.
×