Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
akidulhassanali

Shia Sources For The Praise Of The Sahaba (RA)

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

1) Al Majlisee he himself narrated a tradition from at-Toose stating that Ali (May Allah be pleased with him) told his companions:

''I advise you not to tease the companions of the prophet (peace be upon him), because they are the companinos of your prophet (peace be upon him). They are the companions of those who neither introduced any innovation into the faith nor did they honour any innovators. Yes, this is the advice of the prophet (peace be upon him)''.

Reference: Al-Majlisee, Hayyat ul-Quloob (Volume 2, Page 621)

2) Jaa'far the son of Baaqir, sometimes known as 'as-Saadiq,' (truthful):

''The companions of the prophet (peace be upon him) numbered twelve thousand. Eight thousand from Madeenah, two thousand from Makkah and two thousand from Talakas. None of them was a Qadree (a denier of Allah's Qadr), a Marharbee, a Harooree or a Mut'azilee (a deviant sect in islam known for using too much ration and leaving Quran ayats for rational explanations). None of them held an opinion that clashed with the established tenents of the Qur'aan and the Sunnah....they spent their nights weeping and praying, ''Oh Allah take away our lives before we eat bread''.

Reference: Al-Qummee, Kitab ul-Quloob (Volume 2, Page 621)

3) Ali (may Allah bless his soul) also stated:

''Allah has chosen many people from among the Muslims to approve extend the divine mission. Allah and His Messenger have conferred the highest status on the fisrt two Caliphs, Abu Bakr (may Allah bless his soul) and Umar (May Allah be pleased with him). I swear by my own life that they occupy the greatest position in the fold of Islam. May Allah have mercy upon them, for they suffered intensely for the sake of Islam. May Allah compensate them for their sacrifices.

Reference: Ibn ul-Muthim, Sharh Nahj ul Balaghaa (Iraan) Page 488

4) Furhermore, the book Nahj ul Balaghaa which is attributed to Ali (May Allah have mercy on him) contains many sermons in praise of the companions such as Abu Bakr (May Allah be pleased with him) and Umar(May Allah be pleased with him). A further tradition states that when Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) died, Ali (May Allah be pleased with him) asked Allah to bless him and have peace on him saying:

''There is no other person on earth with whose deeds I desire to merge with my deeds, except the man in this coffin (refering to Umar, May Allah be pleased with him )''

Reference: This has been recorded by many Shia scholars:

Sayyid Murtadha in Kitab ush Shaafee, (Page 171)

Aboo Jafar at-Toosee in Talkhees ash Shafee (Iran: Volume 2, Page 428)

Ibn Babwee, Ibn Abee'l-Hadeed and Sudooq in Ma'ani ul Akhbaar (Iran: Page 117)

5) Moreover it is found in another Shia book that Ali (May Allah be pleased with him) said:

''The best men in the community after the Prophet (peace be upon him) is Abu Bakr (May Allah be pleased with him) and Umar (May Allah be pleased with him).''

Reference: Sayyid Murtadha, Kitaab ush Shafee (Volume 2, Page 428).

Edited by akidulhassanali

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is there to answer?

Most of the ahadith up there are about companions in general.

It is your friends who make up lies about Shias hating the companions. (Note: companion is not only resticted to Abu Bakr and Umar as some Sunni like to think).

Edited by Youth Of Ali

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shias hate the sahaba!  Read what Baqir Majlisi said in his book about Abu Bakr and Umar!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

What did he say?

  1) Al Majlisee he himself narrated a tradition from at-Toose stating that Ali (May Allah be pleased with him) told his companions:

''I advise you not to tease the companions of the prophet (peace be upon him), because they are the companinos of your prophet (peace be upon him). They are the companions of those who neither introduced any innovation into the faith nor did they honour any innovators. Yes, this is the advice of the prophet (peace be upon him)''.

Reference: Al-Majlisee, Hayyat ul-Quloob (Volume 2, Page 621)

Nothing contrary to this? :D

I think you're forged copy paste from KCY has been exposed.

Try being a bit more subtle next time. :P

Edited by Youth Of Ali

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Baker, Umer, Othman, Muawiya, Hafsa, Ayesha, et al.. the only "Sahaba" you Bakris know and care about?

Yes we disassociate ourselves from the above ^Enemies of Islam^

Shias love the true Sahaba more than any of you Bakris could ever.

Edited by -ZeinaB-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As for u Qizil-BASHED, ur words mean nothing cause u have too many conflicting reports on the issue of the sahaba.

Your words have the weight of a turd, as for the Fasiqs who you worship as Sahaba, they can go hell. :squeez:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Youth of Ali, is that the only quote u could answer me on?

What about the other texts?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Now that you are trapped you avoid the issue. Either Baqir Majlisi was against Abu Bakr and Umar or for them. He couldn't be both. So which is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam)

This is the Shiite stance on Companions, mr. Abdel Hasan, and it will always be such;

Some people asked Imam al Redha (a) once about the meaning of the traditions "My companions are like the stars, If you follow any of them, you shall recieve guidance", and another one saying "Leave my companions to me" Both of these traditions are considered by Sunnites as the foundation of their generalization of judgement regarding all companions of the Prophet (s) barring None. thus justifying even their acts wich contradicted Islamic justice, calling what they could not justify as "An error in ijtehad". But the Imam (a) provides us with the actual explenation of these and other such Ahadith outlining in an easy manner their exact meaning. In his answer regarding the first tradition, he says "Yes; He did say this hadith" meaning thereby the companions who did not take any alteration after him or any change (to the islamic creed) He was asked; "How can you tell that they altered and changed?" He said "This is due to what is reported about him (The prophet (s)) that he said; "Certain individuals among my companions will be pushed away by force from my pool (Of kawtar) on the day of judgement just as strange camels are pushed away from the watering place, and i shall cry "O Lord! My companions! My companions!" and it shall be said to me [Prophet Mohammad](s); "You do not know what innovations they invented after you" so they will be pushed away towards the left side (Where hell is), and i [Prophet Mohammad] (s) shall say "Away with them; ruined they shall be."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even if these narrations were found in the books that akidulhassanali mentioned , he forgot that the Shia Books aren't 100% authentic like the Sahih Bukhari :!!!:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

In other words anything which shows the reality of the Sahaba (ra) in ur books, then u will reject it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your foundational beleifs are flawed, as it was these very same people who compiled the Quran which u and I read today. So to say these very same people were not upright will cast doubt directly on the Quran, Nauzubillah. Becasue how can we beleive the Quran is authentic, if it came into the hands of 'unjust' people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^...precisely....that is where the concept of tahreef comes in shi'a theology the fact that it was Uthman (ra) that compiled the quran and according to the shi'as he is destined for hell (astaghfirullah) .......

and a considerable number of shi'as (not all) do infact believe that some alteration may have occured b/c it is known that Uthman did burn all the other Quran's after he compiled the official version of it, that we use to this day and age.......

and they also believe that Ali(ra) had compiled his version of the Quran that was not made the official version....and i am not sure if all shi'as except this .. but one of my friends believes that the original compilation of Ali (the true one) is w/ the Mehdi....and so one can infer that Islam truly will only come into being after the Mehdi....so...basically we are misguided in this day and age.

Edited by alibaba1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

heres a shia source for you. and our ulema view these are more authentic than your random quotes:

"While I was worthiest of them all . . ." Ali (as)

He said: Abul Hasan Ali b. Muhammad al-Katib reported to me from al-Hasan b. Ali al-Zafarani, who reported from Abu Ishaq Ibrahim b. Muhammad al-Thaqafi, who reported from al-Masoodi, who reported from al-Hasan b. Hammad, from his father, who reported from Razin Bayya' al-Anmat, who said:

I heard Zaid b. Ali b. Husain, peace be upon him, narrating from his father who reported from his father who said: I heard Amirul Mo'mineen, peace be upon him, addressing the people thus: "By Allah, people gave allegiance to Abu Bakr while I was worthiest of them all, together with the attire of mine. But I swallowed my anger, and waited for my Sustainer's will, keeping my chest low to the ground (i.e. adopting a low profile). Then Abu Bakr died, appointing Umar as his successor, though he knew that I was the worthiest of them all, together with this attire of mine. But I swallowed my anger and waited for my Sustainer's will. Then Umar died and made it an agenda for the consultative committee (al-Shura). He appointed me the sixth among the six members, like the share of the grandmother! And he said: 'Kill the dissenting minority;' and by this he meant no one but me. But I swallowed my fury, waited for my Sustainer's will and kept my chest low on the ground.

Then, the dissenting people did what they did after having sworn allegiance to me; and I had no alternative but either to fight against them or disobey Allah."

Al Amali - 19th Assembly

Shaikh Mufid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In other words anything which shows the reality of the Sahaba (ra) in ur books, then u will reject it!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

(salam)

The bitter reality of the first three has been potrayed in the "sahih" books for all to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shias hate the sahaba!  Read what Baqir Majlisi said in his book about Abu Bakr and Umar!

And we are the opposite, we say Sahaba were thousands and thousands, read nukhbatul fikar by Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani on the definition of a sahaba from a sunni point of view.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

(salam)

Unlike you, we do not support the hypocrite amongst the companions, and yes, there were many. The special status given to abu bakr and co. has no sound basis at all.

Those idiotic morons at kfc are the only ones who seem to think that the shia do not respect the companions!

Edited by SHIA-OF-ALI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • If one turns to Jesus for a favor, I don't see how or why God should resent it. You see, SoP, asking someone for a favor does not mean that you worship him. Asking someone for something just means that you consider him capable of fulfilling your wish. That is all. It does not mean you necessarily equate him to God. So personally I would have no problem if a Christian (or even a Muslim) asks Jesus for something. Asking Jesus for something is no different to asking your boss to give you a salary raise or a promotion. Why do you ask your boss? Why don't you just ask God for a promotion and leave it at that? You ask your boss because you know that your boss will be able to fulfill your wish. Similarly, if you believe that Jesus, because of his close relationship to God, will be able to fulfill your wish, I find no problem your asking Jesus for a favor. Asking for something is not the same as worshiping. I hope you understand what I am trying to say. A lot of people make a lot of fuss on this topic. But to me it is perfectly OK. 
    • The Saudis have no shame in declaring that they are pro-Israel and anti-Shia: https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5047348,00.html   https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5047289,00.html
    • Brother, all Muslim women who don't observe Hijab know that it's Wajib. They all know that it's in Quran. Your approach should be changed. When I said be nice to her, I mean be super nice. For example, see what she likes to drink in the morning. Wake up early, GI to kitchen, make a perfect coffee or whatever and go to her room and give it to her. You should try hard. It's a Jihad. You can also peel fruit and give it to her during the day. She should feel that her brother is supportive and trustful first. I know you are good to her now, but for a big change like Hijab observation, you should try harder. When I was back in Iran, I used to do similar things for my mother, and it affects on the person. I made breakfast and gave it to my mum on her bed when she woke up. I didn't do that to ask my mum to do sth, I did that because I love my mum. I realized that women like it. After several months of supporting and being nice, you can gradually start talking about Hijab. That time you can be HOPEFUL to see some small changes in her dress style (maybe wearing long shorts or leggings instead of short ones). Regardless of whatever result you'll get, you did your effort and Jihad. If it's a small change, you should be proud of yourself. 
    • 1. The narrations from Ahl albaayt AS indicate the permission of wearing black clothes in  month of Muharram  for the  mourning for Imam Hussein over the calamities  faced by him 2.  The views of ulema indicate that the black clothes are not permissible while praying. The simple question arises here does it mean that the praying during the month of Muharram with black clothes is Makrooh . haram? Similarly, if the Kaaba is clothed black in all does it mean that all the persons praying there have makrooh  prayers because of black Kaaba? would you please like to clarify? wasalam
    • See this http://holywatcher.narod.ru/iblis.pdf Very dangerous path.  They keep saying that Iblis did not prostrate because he did not want to worship other than Allah. However the Quran, and Iblis' response in the Quran is not so! Iblis says in the Quran that he did not prostrate because Adam a.s. was made of 'mud' ... in essence saying he is higher... or in other terminology known as 'Racism' and Arrogance.  So why and where on earth are these people forcing the image that Iblis acted out of love for God?? Completely absurd.  @Haydar Husayn
×