Jump to content

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Salaam,

 

This may seem like a weird request. But I remember a while ago reading a historian discuss exactly what lead up to Abu Bakr to decide to conquer Persia. Essentially, the historian discussed that it seems strange for Abu Bakr to periodically decide to launch an invasion of Persia without some sort of events that occurred. From what I can remember vaguely, a muslim army assisted an Arab village that was under Persian rule or Lakhmid rule in fighting against three persian princes who were in the village and exacting oppressive laws in that village. Thus, during the battle the persian princes were killed and when news went to the Ruler of Persia he became furious and sent a battalion of Persian soldiers attacked an encampment of muslim soldiers. After that my memory is hazy of what the source said. So could someone find for me that source? I remember grabbing it from Wikipedia about a year ago. Thanks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Guest Account Ali said:

Salaam,

 

This may seem like a weird request. But I remember a while ago reading a historian discuss exactly what lead up to Abu Bakr to decide to conquer Persia. Essentially, the historian discussed that it seems strange for Abu Bakr to periodically decide to launch an invasion of Persia without some sort of events that occurred. From what I can remember vaguely, a muslim army assisted an Arab village that was under Persian rule or Lakhmid rule in fighting against three persian princes who were in the village and exacting oppressive laws in that village. Thus, during the battle the persian princes were killed and when news went to the Ruler of Persia he became furious and sent a battalion of Persian soldiers attacked an encampment of muslim soldiers. After that my memory is hazy of what the source said. So could someone find for me that source? I remember grabbing it from Wikipedia about a year ago. Thanks. 

Also, one more addition. The historian in question was non-muslim, I believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • It is not just information (khabar), it is knowledge. How this knowledge relates to deeds can be understood with the help of these verses: Surah Ar-Room, Verse 7:
      يَعْلَمُونَ ظَاهِرًا مِّنَ الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا وَهُمْ عَنِ الْآخِرَةِ هُمْ غَافِلُونَ They know the outward of this world's life, but of the hereafter they are absolutely heedless.
      (English - Shakir) Surah Ar-Room, Verse 8:
      أَوَلَمْ يَتَفَكَّرُوا فِي أَنفُسِهِم مَّا خَلَقَ اللَّهُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا إِلَّا بِالْحَقِّ وَأَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّى وَإِنَّ كَثِيرًا مِّنَ النَّاسِ بِلِقَاءِ رَبِّهِمْ لَكَافِرُونَ Do they not reflect within themselves: Allah did not create the heavens and the earth and what is between them two but with truth, and (for) an appointed term? And most surely most of the people are deniers of the meeting of their Lord.
      (English - Shakir)  
    • I hope I can visit Cairo soon. 
    • I also love those stone mosques,  Cairo is full of them.
    • Well the Orthodox Church which I identify with does images and all that but I think it's ok but I'm quite critical when they start offering stuff to the images and statues of Jesus but if it's just acknowledged as a representation nothing more then it's ok to have them in the Church.
    • Masjid al Imamain al Hassanain Beirut southern suburb.    
×