Jump to content

i dont like the words kafir and jahil

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

What is a Kafir? The Confusion in English Regarding the Quranic Use of the Word ‘Kafir’

One of the common confusions regarding the understanding of Islam in the English language, is namely the use of the Arabic word ‘Kafir’. The problem has arisen because some Muslims and (most) non-Muslims lack understanding of Quranic idiom and confuse and misunderstand how the Quran contains recurring Arabic words that have different meanings in different places despite being the same word.

Islamophobes like to capitalise on this by falsely accusing Muslims using the word ‘Kafir’ in its legal sense when referring to people who do not call themselves a Muslim, as ‘using derogatory words for non-Muslims’, and when Muslim theologians discuss the punishment for kuffaar (plural of Kafir) in the hereafter, Islamophobes ignorantly accuse them of ‘condemning all non-Muslims on earth to hell’.

Additionally, some people who are not Arabic speakers nor educated in the nuances of Quranic Arabic get confused when those self same theologians discuss the punishment for ‘kufaar’ in the afterlife, but also explain in the same breath that merely being currently a ‘non-Muslim’ or ‘non-believer’ doesn’t mean someone will end up in hell. So what’s going on? The confusion lies in lacking an understanding of the Quranic terminology and its use of identical Arabic words to mean different meanings in different sentences.

The Quranic Uses of the Word Kafir

The word ‘Kafir’ comes from the root ‘KFR’ (to cover, something covered), and has 525 cognates in the Quran. The word ‘kafir’, and its plural, occurs over 153 times in the Quran. The word literally means in Arabic ‘someone that covers’. Its literal meaning is therefore not ‘disbeliever’, but is used to convey a number of different meanings depending on the context of the Arabic sentence.

The word ‘Kafir’ is used at different times to mean different things in the Quran, here are some examples of its different usages below:

‘Kafir’ used in the literal sense in the Quran

The word Kafir refers to something that covers who physically covers something. This has been used in the Quran to refer to farmers, who cover seeds in the earth when they till (e.g. Quran 57:20).

‘Kafir’ used in the Theological [1] sense in the Quran

The word Kafir can be used in a Theological [1] sense to refer to those who will be judged in the hereafter as disbelievers, who were insincere in their life and deliberately rejected the truth which they covered despite knowing it was true. This also includes those who refused to question what they were taught (i.e. blind followers) and did not search for the truth when they became aware of their belief’s uncertainty. This meaning includes any person guilty of such insincerity whether they label themselves as Muslim or non-Muslim on earth;

‘Kafir’ used in the Political/Legal/Social/Community sense in the Quran

The word Kafir can be used to describe a community, people or background of a person, without being a theological indictment against them. Here are two examples:

1) Kafir as a generic word for non-believer / unbeliever

This description refers to using the word ‘Kafir’ to mean all ‘non-believers’ in Islamic revelation. This is not the same as the english term ‘disbeliever’, since someone who is not a believer in revelation may be sincere and be willing to challenge their society’s assumptions, and search for and accept truth if they find it. Since they are not convinced yet or aware of Islam they do not label themselves as Muslim. They may come from a situation or society where the actual truth is unclear, unknown and therefore covered from them. The category is used in Quran 60:5 and tells Muslims of the prayer of Abraham (pbuh) that he did not want to be a trial or torment for thosewho are non-believers in his message. The verse then goes on to talk about showing kindness and being just to non-believers [Quran 60:8], except those who actively fight and unjustly expel believers from their homes due to their beliefs.

2) Kafir as a word for pagans/polytheists exclusively (and not ‘people of the Book’ i.e. those following Judaism and Christianity)

While the Quran can use ‘Kafir’ in a general sense to mean all non-believers of Islam (including people of other Abrahamic faiths), it sometimes uses the word ‘Kafir’ to describe (7th century Arabian) pagans exclusively. This usage does not include the people of the book, who are  are believers in the previous revelations from God, whereas the pagans and polytheists (in this example in Arabia) are believers in no revelation. So in this usage of the word ‘Kafir’, this case only refers to those pagans, and not Jews and Christians. One example of this specific usage and meaning is when the Quran prohibits Muslims from marrying ‘Kufaar’ (pagans [Quran 60:10]) whereas Muslims are not prohibited from marrying ‘people of the Book’ [Quran 5:5].

A Note on English Translation

Therefore in the English language, a distinction must be made when translating the word Kafir depending on the context of the Arabic sentence being translated. A theological usage [1] of the word should use the english word ‘disbeliever’, since until the day of judgement only God knows who has truly rejected the truth and disbelieved in it. This is different from the generic term for non-believers or unbelievers and should be used in english translations of the word Kafir if the context is purely a legal discussion about relations between people who are Muslim and those who are not.

The difference between disbeliever and unbeliever/non-believer in English, is the former involves actively rejecting of truth (or rejecting the search for truth i.e. being a blind follower), while the latter is a broader description meaning merely the absence of belief. The is same as the difference between the words disarmed and unarmed, or disabled and unable. To disarm is the remove a weapon from someone, but to be unarmed is merely to have no weapon.

The prefix dis- in English, comes from the Latin meaning “apart,” “asunder,” or having a negative, or reversing force. Whereas the prefix un- in English comes from Old English (and Germanic) which means “not”, and the prefix non- in English comes from Latin meaning “not” as well.

Therefore the English word ‘disbeliever’ is more accurate a translation for Kafir in the theological sense [1], where the individual rejects truth or the search for it, and ‘unbeliever’, or ‘non-believer’ is more accurate a translation for Kafir in the Legal/Social sense, to mean someone who simply is not a believer of Islam.

Currently, most translations tend to already use the english word ‘pagan’ to translate usages of the word ‘Kafir’ in the Quran that refer to the 7th century religion of Arabia and therefore require no refinements in that case.

‘Hanif’ [Rightly Inclined] Non-Muslims will be saved in the hereafter

Like the Christian concept, no one except God can determine whether someone is ultimately saved or not, or a theological [1] ‘Kafir’, since sincerity can only truly be known by God, and only He judges the hereafter of anyone.

There will be people on the day of judgement that never labelled themselves a ‘Muslim’ and will not suffer perdition (i.e. a Hanif – rightly inclined). One famous example of this during the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) is Zayd bin ‘Amr who never labelled himself a Muslim before he died. Likewise on the day of judgement the Quran explains that there will be Christians, Jews and others who will be saved. They are the ones who were sincere, rejected falsehood, accepted whatever of the truth they could find in their time:

‘Indeed, those who believed and those who were Jews or Christians or Sabeans who believed in God and the Last Day and did righteousness – will have their reward with their Lord, and no fear will there be concerning them, nor will they grieve’ [Quran 2:62]

Each soul will be judged in the hereafter according to their circumstances, choices, sincerity, access to revelation, awareness of truth and whether they questioned or followed blindly, by God’s superior wisdom and mercy.

Aside from the verse of Quran mentioned above [Quran 2:62] about non-believers who are saved, the classical Islamic scholar, Ibn Taymiyyah said that non-believers in Islam are saved if they are sincere to the truth. He discusses how calling such people Kafir does not mean they are disbelievers who will be punished in the hereafter:

“Takfir [the calling of a people as ‘Kafir’ in the Quran] is part of God’s warning (but not a promise [of punishment in the hereafter]), for even if a person denies something said by the Messenger [Muhammed] he might be a man who is new to the teachings of Islam, or perhaps he lived in a country far away or something else like that; this person does not become an disbeliever because of what he rejected until the proof is established upon him. Perhaps he has not heard the scriptural text, or he has heard of them but he has not firmly understood them, or they have been presented to him in a contradictory manner requiring an explanation, even though he is mistaken. I always mention the tradition in the two authentic books in which the man said: When I die, then burn me, cremate me and scatter my ashes into the sea, for indeed if God is able to punish me with a punishment unlike that received by anyone else among the worlds, He would surely do so. God asked him why he did that and he said: I feared You. So God forgave him. This man doubted the ability of God to resurrect him when he was turned to dust; rather, he believed God could not resurrect him and this is unbelief by the consensus of the Muslims but he was ignorant. He did not know that and he was a believer who feared that Allah would punish Him and so Allah forgave him for that.”

[in Majmu’ Al-Fatawa, Chapter: Al-Aqeedah]

‘Evil Inclined’ Muslims (Munafiqeen) Will Suffer Perdition in the Hereafter

Someone who labelled them self on earth as a Muslim can still suffer perdition in the hereafter and be revealed to be actually a theological [1] ‘Kafir’ (disbeliever).

About those who call themselves Muslim but are not saved in the hereafter, the Quran says:

‘When the hypocrites come to you, [O Muhammad], they say, “We testify that you are the Messenger of God” And God knows that you are His Messenger, and God testifies that the hypocrites are liars. They have taken their oaths as a cover, so they averted [people] from the way of Allah. Indeed, it was evil that they were doing’. [Quran 63:1-2)

In the hereafter, someone may have never been labelled a Muslim (i.e. a non-Muslim), but is not a disbeliever under the eyes of God, while someone maybe outwardly a Muslim, but is a disbeliever under the eyes of God. The label ‘non-Muslim’ is not coterminous with disbeliever (nor with ‘a tilling farmer’!), despite the Quranic word describing all three meanings being the same. This is just like the Arabic word ‘Dhann’ can be used in the Quran to mean certainty or its exact opposite, doubtfulnessdepending on context.

Therefore, it might sound confusing to a non-Muslim english speaker who is unfamiliar with semitic languages and the Quran, but one could say without any contradiction that all kufaar (pl. of kafir) will be punished by God for their insincerity, whether they called themselves Muslim or non-Muslim, while all hanif (rightly inclined) non-Muslims and Muslims will be saved by their sincerity.

God alone knows truly who the actual disbelievers are amongst those who call themselves Muslims and non-Muslims, and he alone knows who are the sincere seekers of truth amongst those who call themselves Muslims and non-Muslims.


In the West, many Islamophobes like to obscure nuances behind Islamic discourse and incite hatred against Muslims and Muslim theologians by falsely claiming to unknowing non-Muslim audiences that Muslims using the word ‘kafir’ are ‘condemning all non-Muslims to hellfire’, when this is not the case in reality.

In Judaism, the word used for non-Jews is ‘goyim’, literally ‘The nations’, which means people of the nations outside the tribes of Israel. A Goy can be righteous before God and be saved, it is not a derogatory term. In both cases of Kafir and Goyim are not related to the theological destination [1] of a person, but merely categories and identifications in Jewish (Halakha) and Islamic law. A word is derogatory only by the tone it is used, some can call someone ‘white’ or ‘black’ in either a descriptive tone or a derogatory tone. It is therefore the context which determines whether something is to be viewed derogatorily or not.

No Muslim or any other human can judge the destination of any other human being in the hereafter – as such judgement is only for God, nor can anyone know for certain if someone truly is a disbeliever in truth. It would be pointless for a Muslim to invite people to Islam if he/she considered them to be disbelievers, since disbelievers are by definition people who are insincere and will never accept the truth.

‘Verily, those who disbelieve, it is the same to them whether you warn them or do not warn them, they will not believe’ [Quran 2:06]

Therefore, it is better to say (in English), that a non-believer may accept truth, but a disbeliever would never do so. Muslims clearly understand that using the word ‘Kafir’ in theological [1] discussions as disbeliever, is quite different from discussing the word ‘Kafir’ in the everyday sense of simply a non-believer in Islam. The latter is used only to denote the meaning of ‘not being a Muslim’ for practical reasons under Islamic legal categories and identification, and is therefore not derogatory and should not be understood as such.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, realizm said:


Maybe you have been watching too many salafi stuff.

Because I hate when it is pronounced with a long beard, no mustache and an english accent.

Ok i seriously want you gaius el king and ronburgundy to stop.all right just stop!!!!i am going thru a religous crisis and i need people to speak to not just criticise me completely. Do u understand me.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sidnaq said:

Ok i seriously want you gaius el king and ronburgundy to stop.all right just stop!!!!i am going thru a religous crisis and i need people to speak to not just criticise me completely. Do u understand me.

No, I don't understand what you want to discuss. I assume nobody else does either, since the replies seem appropriate and as expected to me. Can you explain more what it is that you want to talk about?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you expect people to FEEL like the way you do?.

 You are not going through a religious crisis. Ron pasted an article explaining it and your response.....

That is like me offering food to a hungry person and they complain, I am starving please do not feed me?.

Do you enjoy the attention from all the controversial posts you make?.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its like  swearing "walahi !" "By God" or "Khud ki kasam" . 
For some people its like they incorporate these in their routine conversations for others "By  GOD" is used in extreme conditions only. 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, notme said:

@Ron_Burgundy nice informative article. Did you write it? Or if not, can you provide link/reference? Thanks.

Sister, I never write stuff. I usually don't get enough time, but i do read things and bookmark them. 


Here is the link


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, sidnaq said:

Ok i seriously want you gaius el king and ronburgundy to stop.all right just stop!!!!i am going thru a religous crisis and i need people to speak to not just criticise me completely. Do u understand me.

Wow. Please accept my apologies if I hurted you, I really did not mean to. I was just pointing at the takfiri speech which we all hear all day on Youtube and other platforms... And advising you not to pay attention to it because obviously hearing this is affecting you.

No need to get angry.

2 hours ago, ShiaChat Mod said:

ShiaChat rules do not allow calling someone else (guest or member) a kafir or jahil. I think @sidnaq is not referring to something at ShiaChat but on other sites or in videos she watched.  

Precisely what the brother said.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjKjJuLttTXAhXNI1AKHbmwCnkQFghbMAk&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Fhuseinmhanna%2Fthe-structure-of-the-universe&usg=AOvVaw1u9CB07-W2u5JxwR-e2HWP http://qfatima.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/tawheed.pdf
    • Feminists typically use terms like "male-dominated culture" so I just wanted to ask if you are a feminist. Also patriarchy is not inherently bad. No matter how you look at it Islam promotes a form of a patriarchal society. So just so you know. However I am not defending the patriarchy of Desi culture. Which is what we are talking about. I am advocating the patriarchy of an Ideal Shia Islamic social society (Yes these have existed historically to various extents).    Also I have seen housewives who can cook a mean paratta and clean well and still they are degraded by not only other women but by men, who tend to gravitate towards free-loving women. They are not appreciated by men as well. I am talking of the West, so I will let others respond on how accurate your statements are about the east. Something tells me you are still projecting and exaggerating.    Again, when you use the word "men" you are referring to a specific type of men. So don't generalize like the OP did. Also modesty is also a concern as well. I have seen this and I can give anecdotes as well to prove this. But let us not play the anecdote game. You would be surprised what western Muslim women, especially in college, get up to. So let us not pretend Muslim women are angels. Remember, for every Muslims man who fornicates there is often times another Muslim woman willing to do it with them. So don't think it is a "guy" issue, it is also a gal issue as well. Also there may be more reasons than the ones you and I listed too as to why an eastern man wants to marry a western woman, but it has everything to do with the guy trying to "make-up" for his guilty conscious and it may manifest in ways such as he thinking he can make it up by having his wife cook and clean (in a weird and twisted way, after all humans are psychologically complex creatures). But your cynical explanation makes it sound is as if Muslimah are dainty little flowers who earn money through a job and when they get married their hubby goes all Hollywood mustache twirling villain on them, or goes Ape on them out of nowhere. This is an incredibly naive and biased analysis and only ends up creating more questions rather than answering them.     Also you just answered your question. Replace men with "cultural Desi men". But you saying "men" is generalizing and I can also name "hundreds of examples" that run counter to yours. As can anyone here. No one here is defending Desi (primarily hindu influenced culture). But you seem to think we are.   On a tangential note Muslims nowadays are willing to blame Islam rather than Hindus for the defiencies that are present in Desi culture. Despite the fact that most of the deleterious behaviors of Desi culture had its origins in ancient Hindu culture that ancient Muslims picked up on. "Purdah" is a famous example of something that quite likely originated amongst  and was widely propagated  by Hindu culture and that Muslims adopted as well but tend to confuse with Islam in incorrect ways (the state of the prophets wives was not the same of a random Muslim woman back then and now,  most scholars agree on this).    Also you went on a tangent about working and being modest. Read my first post on the topic to know that Muslim women ALWAYS worked for 1400+ years in some job or another but had time for their family and household responsibilities. Even Umar Ibn al Khattab of all people hired a woman as "head of market operations ".  And above all else these Muslim women only thought of their job as a job and never let their job or income define them. I don't care if you earn money or not. You are not special or free or liberated or any other adjective you can name. And historically Muslim women used to be doctors way back even in the 1000s but never used to let their career define them. Except that they heal people. But modern day feminism does define a womans worth by her income and somehow she is "not tame" because she earns money. That is laughable. Sister "notme" did a good job of explaining the problem with people like you and your motivations to work. 
    • Sermon 1: Praise is due to Allah whose worth cannot be described…. In this sermon he recalls the creation of Earth and Sky and the creation of Adam and in it he mentions the Hajj Praise is due to Allah whose worth cannot be described by speakers, whose bounties cannot be counted by calculators and whose claim (to obedience) cannot be satisfied by those who attempt to do so, whom the height of intellectual courage cannot appreciate, and the divings of understanding cannot reach; He for whose description no limit has been laid down, no eulogy exists, no time is ordained and no duration is fixed. He brought forth creation through His Omnipotence, dispersed winds through His Compassion, and made firm the shaking earth with rocks. https://www.al-islam.org/nahjul-balagha-part-1-sermons/sermon-1-praise-due-Allah-whose-worth-cannot-be-described#creation-universe
    • https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx?ContentTypeID=90&ContentID=P02630 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primitive_reflexes http://islamic-laws.com/eatinghabbit.htm According to the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.), inviting relatives, friends and neighbours for a dinner (Valeema) is sunnat on five occasions - Marriage, Aqiqa (first shaving of the child's head), Khatna (circumcision), when one has bought a new house or made a new house and lastly, when a visitor returns from travel. For Vegeterians Unless they choose a proper balance of foods, strict vegetarians are at risk for several deficiencies, especially vitamin B12. The other nutrients at risk are riboflavin, calcium, iron, and the essential amino acids lysine and methionine. Vegetarian children not exposed to sunlight are at risk for vitamin D deficiency. Zinc deficiency can occur in vegans because the phytic acid in whole grains binds zinc, and there is little zinc in fruits and vegetables. Since B12 is present only in animal foods and a limited number of specially fortified foods, vegans should probably take B12 supplements prescribed by a physician. Further, the symptoms of vegetarianism may include protein deficiency, amino acid and mineral depletion coupled with chronic low levels of energy. Another tradition describes green kasni leaves as a very good vegetable. Not a single leaf of kasni is devoid of a drop of water of heaven and therefore when one eats one should not shake it. It is also stated that kasni leaves (endive) are superior to all vegetables in the same manner as Ahlul Bait (a.s.) are superior to all mankind. Kasni leaves when eaten cause birth of male children who are also beautiful. When a person was ill with fever and headache, the Imam (a.s.) asked kasni leaves to be beaten in pulp, spread on paper, and sprinkled with oil of banafsha and then applied on the forehead of that person as it will completely cure both the fever and the headache.   The effects of eating Behi (quince), as stated by Hazrat Ali (a.s.), are the following: a)      Strengthens weak heart b)      Causes increase in weight c)      Cleans the stomach d)      Increases reason e)      Makes a man courageous   According to Imam Ja'far-e-Sadiq (a.s.), eating Behi (quince) improves complexion and causes beautiful children. When a person complained to Imam Reza (a.s.) of having few children, he (a.s.) asked him to eat egg with onion.
    • http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/22/israeli-bloggers-photograph-inside-one-islams-holiest-sites/ An Israeli blogger’s photograph from inside one of Islam’s holiest sites set off a firestorm in the Middle East also Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain added two organizations to their terror lists: the World Islamic Council and the International Union of Muslim Scholars. Eleven people were also added to the list, including two Muslim Brotherhood operatives. http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/11/23/organisation-of-which-hadi-awang-is-vp-declared-terrorist-body/