Jump to content
Sindbad05

Is Ammar Nakhswani against Wilayat e Faqih

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Recently, I saw a video of Ammar Nakhswani. He just say that Wilayat-e-Faqih is not among Usul-e-Deen. However, I believe that in Usul-i-Deen, there is Imamate and Imams ask us to follow those who are good in religion if we do not have direct access to Imam. So, are we playing in the hands of Western society ? This is a shame for us, I was really sad to have listen this from Ammar Nakhswani.

I will try not to listen him again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's right it isn't, its a theory Imam Khomeini had, you're not forced to accept it if you're Shia. There are maraja who disagree with it in Qom as well. He's neutral on the issue btw, not actually against it, he respects Imam Khomeini and Sayed Ali Khamenei, but he doesn't think they should be elevated to the extent of an infallible, which perhaps some Shias tend to view them as.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:salam:

Of course, Wilayat al faqih is not from usul eddeen. 

Problem is people who speak about it in even with the slightest criticizm often do it in opposition to Iran's political stance.

By the way, democracy is not from usul eddeen either. I have yet to see a shia speaker speak against it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Mohamed1993 said:

He's right it isn't, its a theory Imam Khomeini had, you're not forced to accept it if you're Shia. There are maraja who disagree with it in Qom as well. He's neutral on the issue btw, not actually against it, he respects Imam Khomeini and Sayed Ali Khamenei, but he doesn't think they should be elevated to the extent of an infallible, which perhaps some Shias tend to view them as.

dont propagate this please... no shia thinks they are infallible... And I know alot of WFers....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, kirtc said:

dont propagate this please... no shia thinks they are infallible... And I know alot of WFers....

Let me word this differently, he said there are those who think if you don't follow WF, you don't follow twelfth imam, in other words likening the two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mohamed1993 said:

there are those who think

Since when did we base our understanding of things on "there are those who think"?

And two words likening each other does not equate each other.

Your first mistake was ignoring the leader of WF stance on his infallibility, your second mistake is to take "those who think"'s misunderstandings/self delusions as a basis of judgement of the principle of WF and your third mistake was to equate words that does not equate each other and then pass statements.

I will tell you one thing brother, for sure, those who wish to cause friction between followers of WF and those who do not follow it have their basis in animosity towards islam as a religion. And these friction causing ideas and whispered words are nothing but the wests agenda.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Sindbad05 said:

Recently, I saw a video of Ammar Nakhswani. He just say that Wilayat-e-Faqih is not among Usul-e-Deen.

You have a link to the video?

Edited by Hameedeh
Fixed the quote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sindbad05 said:

Recently, I saw a video of Ammar Nakhswani. He just say that Wilayat-e-Faqih is not among Usul-e-Deen.

Well, both Ayatullah Khamenei and Ayatulah Khamenei are people of great learning and taqwa. .

But a learned or a muttaqi person does not necessarily have all that it takes to run a country.

It is undeniable that both could do with some courses inn diplomacy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, IbnSina said:

those who wish to cause friction between followers of WF and those who do not follow it have their basis in animosity towards islam as a religion

Not everyone that disagrees with WF wants to cause friction though or destroy it, some have legitimate disagreements and I believe we can have an open discussion about these issues. There are a lot of issues maraja disagree on and I don't really see why we cant' do so respectfully. 

54 minutes ago, IbnSina said:

your third mistake was to equate words that does not equate each other and then pass statements.

By saying if you don't follow WF you don't follow twelfth Imam, what else are you implying though? Some reject WF because they only believe in absolute authority under the umbrella of an infallible, so by saying you're rejecting twelfth Imam if you reject WF, aren't you implying you think the leader of WF is infallible, seeing as though there is definitely no consensus over this issue in Shia theology?

Edited by Mohamed1993

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Mohamed1993 said:

By saying if you don't follow WF you don't follow twelfth Imam, what else are you implying though? Some reject WF because they only believe in absolute authority under the umbrella of an infallible, so by saying you're rejecting twelfth Imam if you reject WF, aren't you implying you think the leader of WF is infallible, seeing as though there is definitely no consensus over this issue in Shia theology?

Regular people are way below the level of wisdom and faith from either, so practically speaking, what's the point of discussing these discernments anyway? It's like a poor homeless beggar comparing different sizes of mansions and palaces. Most people would be fortunate to be to the level of the deputy's deputy's deputy's deputy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Reza said:

what's the point of discussing these discernments anyway?

Well if we're going to make choices on who we do and don't listen to based on their stance on this issue then we may as well clear the doubts right? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sindbad05 said:

Recently, I saw a video of Ammar Nakhswani. He just say that Wilayat-e-Faqih is not among Usul-e-Deen. However, I believe that in Usul-i-Deen, there is Imamate and Imams ask us to follow those who are good in religion if we do not have direct access to Imam. So, are we playing in the hands of Western society ? This is a shame for us, I was really sad to have listen this from Ammar Nakhswani.

 

Waliyat-e-Faqih is different and doing taqleed of marja is different, I hope you are not mixing both of them. Waliyat-e-Faqih is a governance system of a shia state before the re-appearance of Imam (A.S). Even some marja also have difference regarding how much authority one can have as a Waliya-e-Faqih. So there is no problem if Ammar has different opinion. For me he is really helping young shia generation to have grip and knowledge of their deen. We should appreciate his effort rather than just point of out some content we don't agree with him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mohamed1993 said:

Well if we're going to make choices on who we do and don't listen to based on their stance on this issue then we may as well clear the doubts right? 

That's a choice people have to make. Speakers have opinions, they don't exist to cater and validate every belief and opinion we have. If that's the criteria we have before we listen to a speaker, there won't be many that fit the bill. 

52 minutes ago, Jebreil said:

To Whom you submit is the quintessential Islamic question and must never be delegated to another without evidence. And where there is a lack of adequate evidence, the claim to authority should be rejected and refused. It is the essence of tawalla and tabarra.

I didn't say it wasn't an important question in its own right. I'm just saying the discussion often is at a level that has little productive and practical significance for most people on the ground. 

52 minutes ago, Jebreil said:

Your argument is bad. There are Sunni thinkers of greater wisdom and faith than the regular guy, but regular guys must judge between their claim and the Shi'i claim on the loci of authority. This they do on the basis of evidence and argument.

Since there are discussions where evidence and argument is presented, one should consult them in order to know whether they must submit or refuse submission.

Again, I say practically speaking. While we can have discussions on the exact details of authority, people have real lives, and have to take positive guidance and support wherever they can find it, from near to far. And it's hard to separate things that are so far away from us. You just know it's good. God gives guidance for that realization. But we still like to talk like we know it all, even though our eyes are blurry. 

Trusting in others above us on the righteous spiritual path, no matter who they are, or where on the spectrum, will always be in the proper scope and context. The sincere and balanced ones, with guidance from the Lord, understand this instinctively and will be successful. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Jebreil said:

People have real lives and so cannot determine for themselves which authority God wants them to legitimise? Strange attitude.

I didn't say this. All I said is that hairsplitting within a plane far above the grasp of most people isn't a valuable exercise. It doesn't help one spiritually, nor really give much insight on the essence of authority. 

Also, I don't understand your insistence on pigeonholing a solitary worldly authority, when in reality, we have a spectrum, and continuous sting of authorities, whose position relative to one another is not in dispute -- but in one's life, they must go through the chain. And it's best to do in order.

Legitimacy of an authority rests on whether they lead you to the next legitimate authority on the Godly chain, which ultimately ends in God himself. It's as simple as that.

Youre thinking too hard about this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jebreil said:

I can't change your wish not to exercise that right, but when you suggested that regular Shi'as would be wasting their time investigating this issue, I found it was backed by a poor argument.

Again, you're missing my point entirely here. We're looking at things from different vantage points. 

There's not much more I can do to clarify myself. If I wasn't clear enough, I apologize.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Mohamed1993 said:

He's right it isn't, its a theory Imam Khomeini had, you're not forced to accept it if you're Shia. There are maraja who disagree with it in Qom as well. He's neutral on the issue btw, not actually against it, he respects Imam Khomeini and Sayed Ali Khamenei, but he doesn't think they should be elevated to the extent of an infallible, which perhaps some Shias tend to view them as.

I have never seen any Shia who consider Khamanei and Khomeini as infallible bro.

If there are any in your sight, please refer me some names.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mohamed1993 said:

Let me word this differently, he said there are those who think if you don't follow WF, you don't follow twelfth imam, in other words likening the two.

Wilayah-e-Faqih is not only Khamanei and Khomeini, they include all marajas who narrate to Hadith and if you really are against following all the Faqih in religion, then may I ask why you listen to physicians ? why not treat yourself with medicine ? There is Wilayah everywhere, in religion it is through the most learned in religion. In universities, they are teachers and in hospitals they are doctors. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Jebreil said:

The controversy surrounds this quote from Sayyed Khomeyni:

The wilaya of the faqih is something that God has made; it is the very same wilaya of God's Emissary.

The correct interpretation is that the faqih has the same legal jurisdiction as the Prophet - the wilaya here is one of legal authority, authority over legal affairs, which to a lesser degree is had by fathers and guardians. It is not wilaya over the physical or spiritual cosmos.

Sorry brother, first of all please mention the source of this which Khomeini said it. I want to see it.

Secondly, the faqih do not have same legal jurisdiction as the Prophet, Prophet is lawgiver appointed by God where as Faqih is the expounder of the laws of Allah through lawgiver. There are many things which are not explicit in Quran but Prophet PBUHHP made it clear to us such as who are entitle to Sadqa and who are entitled to Khums and Prophet PBUHHP told us this. No any Faqih can have power to tell it except with the help of Hadith of Masoomeen. 

Henece, Faiqh has not same legal jurisdiction as of Prophet and Imam. However, if you give me reference of what khomeini has said, I will tell you what does it mean. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Sindbad05 said:

Wilayah-e-Faqih is not only Khamanei and Khomeini, they include all marajas who narrate to Hadith and if you really are against following all the Faqih in religion, then may I ask why you listen to physicians ? why not treat yourself with medicine ? There is Wilayah everywhere, in religion it is through the most learned in religion. In universities, they are teachers and in hospitals they are doctors. 

Bro, not all maraja agree with the absolute authority of the maraja including control over the political affairs of the nation as it exists in Iran, that is what Sayed Ammar is debating here. Many maraja say the role of the jurist should be limited to non-litigious matters in the absence of an infallible Imam. 

Edited by Mohamed1993

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Mohamed1993 said:

Bro, not all maraja agree with the absolute authority of the maraja including control over the political affairs of the nation as it exists in Iran, that is what Sayed Ammar is debating here. Many maraja say the role of the jurist should be limited to non-litigious matters in the absence of an infallible Imam. 

1. I have a question that has Quran or Hadith prohibited that any Alim or Maraja should be president or Prime Minister of the State ? I believe there is no such thing in Quran or Hadith.

2. I have different opinion for WF. That is the main field of religious scholar is religion. Therefore, he can hold a public office to oversee the affairs of the state if they are running according to Islamic laws or not. However, the other affairs of the state belong to people having knowledge in respective fields such as economists should govern finance, auditor should be responsible for audit and People having journalism degree to regulate Media. 

3, Having said that religious scholar should oversee ethics and morals in the state departments does not mean that if he has extra knowledge about politics, he should not be president or Prime Minister or Head of the state. So, this is where I think Ammar Nakswani have said, instead of giving impression that there is no Wilayah for Faqih at all. Lolz 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Mohamed1993 said:

He's right it isn't, its a theory Imam Khomeini had, you're not forced to accept it if you're Shia. There are maraja who disagree with it in Qom as well. He's neutral on the issue btw, not actually against it, he respects Imam Khomeini and Sayed Ali Khamenei, but he doesn't think they should be elevated to the extent of an infallible, which perhaps some Shias tend to view them as.

Obviously they are not infallibles. But he is our Spiritual Leader in the period of Ghaybah of Imam e Zamana (ajfs).

And one should note that number of Religious Maraje supporting Wilayat e Faqih are far more in number than those who are neutral and those who oppose it. But The System of Wilayat e Faqih is so essential and deeply rooted in Islam that you can't deny that. Every Ummah needs a Leader and the characteristics of this Leader can't be listed down so easily. The Leader of our Age (The Last Age) is Imam e Zamana (ajfs) but because he(a.s) is not among us to direct us we need a representative. And that representative has various characteristics for Eg - Just, Brave, Pious, Intellectual, Politically Active etc etc.

But if we put the notion of a leader aside then we will surely loose unity. Just see through it. Before the Islamic Republic came into existence, How much unity was then practiced anonymously? How much oppression was there across the globe on Shias and the Shrines of Ahlulbayt(a.s). 

If there is no Wilayat e Faqih then there will be no one to lead the Ummah to protect the Ummah, to guide the Ummah, to serve the Ummah, to unveil the face of Hypocricy on Earth, to take away power from the hands of oppressors, to do everything that God wants. People of Iran and other parts of the World are in Deep Love with Imam Khamenei (h.a) and Maraje Ekram Ayatullah Seestani (h.a) who are both playing very very vital role in guiding the Ummah. And Ayatullah Seestani (h.a) himself says people to follow Imam Khamenei very very religiously!

 

Warriors of Iraq say that they will give their lives for these 2 leaders. One needs to have a very rational thinking ability and pure heart to understand the rank that these 2 leaders hold in the Eyes of Imam (a.s) and ultimately Allahسُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى.

And if you are Neutral over following Wilayat E Faqih then sorry brother you are indirectly neutral on the blood of Holy Martyrs who are defending Holy Shrines all day and night, Who are there to rescue oppressed ones from Iraq, Syria and other parts of Middle East.

Neutral is not an option. Allah said, Enjoining Good and Forbid Evil. There is no notion of neutralism. You are either supporting good or bad.

 

Edited by Waseem162

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • Gen. Soleimani congratulates Ayatollah Khamenei, Muslim world for end of ISIS https://en.isna.ir/news/96083017322/ Tehran (ISNA) - In a letter to the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei Khamenei, the Commander of IRGC Quds Force Major General Qassem Soleimani announced the end of ISIS's domination over Islamic lands.   Following the historic victory of Iraq and Syria's resistance movement over the sedition of Takfiri terrorism and the end of ISIS's domination, which manifested by lowering the flag of this American-Zionist group at Abu Kumal--the last key area in the hands of ISIS--General Soleimani issued an important message to Ayatollah Khamenei. The following is the full text of Major-General Soleimani's message to Ayatollah Khamenei: In the Name of God, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful "Indeed, we have opened for you (Prophet Muhammad) a clear opening." Quran: 1, 48) To the dear and brave Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Khamenei: Salamun Alaikum, Six years ago, a dangerous plot like the ones at the time of Amir al-Mu'minin (as), which prevented the Muslims from truly understanding the Pure Islam of Muhammad (pbuh), this time, mixed with the poison of Zionism and arrogance, covered the Islamic world like a devastating storm. This devastating and poisonous sedition was created by the enemies of Islam with an aim of initiating widespread war within the Islamic world and a fight among Muslims. The evil movement, under the name of the "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant," managed, in the early months, to deceive tens of thousands of Muslim youth from both countries, causing a very dangerous crisis for the influential and crucial countries of the Islamic world: "Iraq" and "Syria." They occupied hundreds of thousands of square kilometers of land from these countries along with thousands of villages, towns, and provincial centers; they destroyed thousands of factories, manufactures, and major infrastructure of these countries--including roads, bridges, refineries, wells, gas and oil lines, and power plants; they destroyed or burned important cities with valuable historical monuments and national civilizations by bombing them. Although it is not possible to calculate all the damage caused yet, the preliminary investigation estimates damages to be around $500 billion. In this event, there were extremely horrendous crimes that could not be shown, which included the following: decapitation of children, skinning men alive before their families, taking young girls and women hostage and raping them, burning people alive and group massacres of hundreds of young people. People of these countries, astounded by this poisonous storm, became part of them or victims of the takfiri criminals, and millions of other Muslims left their homes and were displaced throughout other cities and countries. In this dark sedition, thousands of mosques and sacred centers of Muslims were destroyed or ruined, and sometimes a mosque along with the Imam and all the people in it were blown up. More than 6,000 young people, deceived in the name of defending Islam, blew themselves up by way of suicide bombings, using explosive vehicles at city squares, mosques, schools, even hospitals and public places of Muslims; as a result of these criminal acts, tens of thousands of innocent men, women, and children were martyred. To be continued https://en.isna.ir/news/96083017322/Gen-Soleimani-congratulates-Ayatollah-Khamenei-Muslim-world
    • Yes, that's what Khoei says. 
    • There are many good people in this world, i have suffered same what you have. Its not a big deal i think most of the people have gone through this. you need to try to ignore this stuff and continue doing gud.  There is a saying of imam ali a.s "The best revenge is to improve yourself", there are many other sayings by imam ali a.s you can google them, this will inspire you to do gud to others. Our ahlulbaith a.s has always done gud to everyone and never cared about others. YA Ali madad.
    • If sense perception is combined with either reasoning or intellectual intuition (which you can think of as the fitrah for now) then yes it can lead to such realizations. But sense perception alone - devoid of these higher faculties, is the definition of dunyawi. It is the level at which the mushrikeen see reality, so obviously it is not sufficient to bring belief. Belief requires sense perception along with thought and/or the awakening of the higher intellect.
    • I Know, and I agree mostly with your sentiments. I also agree that a muslimah should not think like that with regards to a proper husband. Also I am single and not married yet. So I cannot give advice in that department. But I like to think I am fairly observant of social phenomena. And Also I think that a way that a muslimah can help prevent getting married to a guy like that is by not having shallow standards of a marital partner. I remember in this one podcast a muslim psychologist said that the minimum time a guy and girl should court each other is 6 months. And that during those six months it is important to find out as much as you can about the guy or girl. And to above all else not rush into a marriage. And that part of finding out all details of the potential partner is by asking the right questions. And these questions should be defined by either muslim marital counselors, or by couples who truly have a good relationship.   And my own input is that if we are going to be honest most of our parents had terrible marital relationships, and thus as our generation grows up we (both genders) develop shallow and unrealistic spousal expectations. And when we carry these into our marriages, the marriage becomes like a bag of popcorn. It is really good for a while to a brief time, but once the "pop" happens is when the marital bubble bursts and now the main issue becomes cohabitation instead of trying to enact some Fabio novella with your spouse.    I think what any muslim woman here can admit is that for every women who had a bad first marital partner there were "signs" of him being not so great even before the marriage. But naivety can sometimes blind muslim women in not being attentive of these things. And even if these signs were not present before the marriage, a thorough vetting process and prolonging courtship can help to sort these things out before the marriage, if even a marriage should occur.   Anyone would be surprised that a thorough vetting process and asking the right questions during a prolonged courtship can filter out partners who could potentially do haram things like physical abuse, etc. Since for most men and women, they don't randomly start abusing or that men just go ape on their wives for no reason, but that trained behavioral health specialists or generally mentally acute people can tell of "signs" that certain men and women are more prone to do abuse if given the right situations depending on certain personal factors of an individual. Muslims need to start utilizing these resources better so as to filter out guys and even girls who do these things. 
×