Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What represents the best economic system? Socialism seems like an ideal that never quite works. Some element of privatisation and foreign investment is crucial for the functioning of any economy, giving all control to the state just inflicts more govt. imposed tyranny and takes power away from the corporations and private investors and hands it to the state. Capitalism on the other hand gives full power to the private investors and to a bunch of greedy people at the top. However, the argument is often made that the rich create jobs for the poor in a capitalistic environment, whereas in socialism, where the rich are taxed very heavily, they just won't employ as many people and you'll just have many unemployed people. So what represents the best system? Also, a lot of people seem to blame capitalism for a lot of wars we face, but I don't know if private corporate interests can be blamed for that entirely, because Ron Paul is a hard-core advocate of free market economy and smaller governments, but he is also very isolationist and libertarian on foreign policy, so I'm not sure you can blame capitalism for that. 

Edited by Mohamed1993

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Islamic system:

1. Allows private business owner to do business. 

2. Government maintains parity in market through public response and installs it's own businesses to increase competition and lower inflation.

3. Everyone is levied taxes according to their wealth.

4. Every individual is allowed in job as long as he or she has capability to perform.

5. Basic needs of impoverish class such as widows, orphans and jobless are met. No one may sleep hungry or without a shelter and without medicine. 

And so on so forth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an imperfect world; there will never be an ideal system.

However, socialism within democracy will distribute the power better than other systems. Power corrupts, but peer and voter pressure to not be corrupt will help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Hannah 43 said:

 Being human they create hell.

There is no system that works perfectly. We just do the best we can. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sindbad05 said:

Islamic system:

1. Allows private business owner to do business. 

2. Government maintains parity in market through public response and installs it's own businesses to increase competition and lower inflation.

3. Everyone is levied taxes according to their wealth.

4. Every individual is allowed in job as long as he or she has capability to perform.

5. Basic needs of impoverish class such as widows, orphans and jobless are met. No one may sleep hungry or without a shelter and without medicine. 

6. The Islamic system also discourages people from becoming rich, thereby thwarting a gradually increasing gap between the rich and the poor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Reza said:

Public ownership for what's essential, private ownership for everything else. 

I really like this idea, but how do you decide what is essential? In 1900 neither electricity nor indoor plumbing were considered essential. In 2000 cell phones were a luxury item, but now they are essential enough that people on welfare are sometimes able to get a free basic phone and limited service. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with laissez faire is that it is really crazay faire. A disorderly free-for-all in which the crooked and criminal win.

The problem with socialism is gov't is glacial, parochial and abhors innovation before corruption and extortion are even factored in.

No matter what system is designed, a stable banking and credit system has to be maintained.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, baqar said:

6. The Islamic system also discourages people from becoming rich, thereby thwarting a gradually increasing gap between the rich and the poor.

That's a new one. Nowhere is it mentioned that it is haram or even makrooh to be rich, as long as you do your obligations such as zakat and khums then there is no harm in owning a successful business and being rich.

Some of our hadiths also encourage lavish spending on certain items, such as perfumes.

It's like you want people to impoverish (is that the word?) themselves, and in fact that might be haram.

Edited by E.L King

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, E.L King said:

That's a new one. Nowhere is it mentioned that it is haram or even makrooh to be rich, as long as you do your obligations such as zakat and khums. 

Some of our hadiths also encourage lavish spending on certain items, such as perfumes.

Charity is very encouraged, and lavish spending decreases/redistributes wealth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, notme said:

Charity is very encouraged, and lavish spending decreases/redistributes wealth.

So because charity is encouraged, then being rich is dicouraged? That's not how it works. There's no contradiction, I can be very rich and also very much giving to the poor. You might imagine that is difficult, but I know family friends who are extremely stacked up yet are impeccable believers who also happen to pay a lot of charity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Islam gives you a set of principles and rules/guidelines, and it is up to the state to set up a system that upholds these principles and rules.

For example, there is no Verse or hadith which explicitly says "medicare for all" - but we know for example that allowing a person to die or suffer when we could have helped him/her is haram and sinful. 

So then the state would have to come up with the best possible healthcare system to ensure that people do not die when they could be helped.

Edited by E.L King

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Reza said:

private ownership for everything else

Not including water, electricity, energy, trash and other natural and renewable sources. All of that should be made public to the people and for every investor that invests in these public companies; Their money should fund social security. Everything else should be private.

Edited by Gaius I. Caesar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gaius I. Caesar said:

Not including water, electricity, energy, trash and other natural and renewable sources. All of that should be made public and every investor's money should fund social security. Everything else should be private.

I'd like to see everyone provided basic housing, food, education, and necessary medical care, in addition to utilities and infrastructure. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, notme said:

I'd like to see everyone provided basic housing, food, education, and necessary medical care, in addition to utilities and infrastructure. 

Me too, I would add one more thing, Strict poverty control laws. Should be illegal to be under the poverty line. It's absolutely unnecessary for people to live under such circumstances and conditions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gaius I. Caesar said:

Me too, I would add one more thing, Strict poverty control laws. Should be illegal to be under the poverty line. It's absolutely unnecessary for people to live under such circumstances and conditions.

Same as I asked Reza above, who determines what is poverty?

I think as long as everyone is adequately fed, housed, protected from illness and crime, and has access to education, and is in a stable financial situation, nobody is poor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, notme said:

There is no system that works perfectly. We just do the best we can. 

With all its injustice the best system to raise workers living standards. It is not hard to pick the free enterprise system. No one is trying to go move to North Korea are Cuba. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that someone who is into drugs does not wish to work. Should steal the money from someone who does not use drugs and works very hard for his family. The Koran teaches one to be righteous. Not to take drugs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, E.L King said:

That's a new one.

Not really!

Staying by the sunnat of our Holy Prophet (pbuh) and Imams (as) is true Islam, in which case, wealth is not a very good idea.

Jesus put it very succinctly "It will be easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the gates of heaven."  

Just think of that!

Edited by baqar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Hannah 43 said:

Are you saying that someone who is into drugs does not wish to work. Should steal the money from someone who does not use drugs and works very hard for his family. The Koran teaches one to be righteous. Not to take drugs

What? Who do you think said that? Who are you talking to? I don't understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine the the ideal economic system is one that's embedded with other systems, on a global scale that isn't extreme towards capitalism (in the US for example, the extreme case), nor entirely Socialist (China the other extreme case), but the best of both worlds, or elements in both. And doesn't leave a part of the world out, or steal from one place and horde it. 

It must address health, taxes, education, population, subjective ethical/normative practices/beliefs, food/resources and other systemic issues, while maintaining some balance.  Maybe it's not the ideal, but perhaps more efficient than the current prevailing system.  Perhaps this one I'm envisioning coincidentally aligns with Islamic guidelines, but I wish I was more learned on the subject of Islamic finance/economics.

This system may require that the world realizes quality of life for all, is more important than quality of life for just a select few, creating a gap that perpetuates what seems to be periodic/continuous war.  So once again, I'm not answering the question because I'm hoping in my scenario humankind experiences a moral/ethical evolution over a technological one.

Probably doesn't really answer your question since I think of Ideal as also practical.

Edited by wmehar2
more detail/grammar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hannah 43 said:


socialists try to create paradise on earth. Being human they create hell.
Only Allah can create  paradise  not humans
 

Democratic socialism is like saying democratic rate we get the vote to take other people's property. You can always get people to vote to take other people's things

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Hannah 43 said:

Are you saying that someone who is into drugs does not wish to work. Should steal the money from someone who does not use drugs and works very hard for his family. The Koran teaches one to be righteous. Not to take drugs

Mashallah. What is happening I come to this site for my love of Allah the holy Koran.
And I find myself talking silly politics.Astaghfiru lillah. Maybe I'm just getting too old. Forgive me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • actually, one such effort done is: (1) Whosoever is an adherent to one of the four Sunni schools (Mathahib) of Islamic jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i and Hanbali), the two Shi’i schools of Islamic jurisprudence (Ja`fari and Zaydi), the Ibadi school of Islamic jurisprudence and the Thahiri school of Islamic jurisprudence, is a Muslim. http://ammanmessage.com/the-three-points-of-the-amman-message-v-1/ but extreme wahhabis reject this. let's not be extremists like them. i remember, during 2003 invasion of iraq, thousands of gi joes died. today, the modern jihadists are their foot soldiers. how to prevent this (being foot soldiers for US or some other entities) from repeating itself in future? 1. spread the fact that shiism is not majoosi/jewish creation. 2. while not belittling others, shiism has strong evidence to be the islam  propagated by the Prophet, preserved through His Ahu Bayt as. 3. let's race towards good deeds - you don't have time to throw stones during a 100m dash, do you?
    • Looking at anyone who is not your partner in marriage - with lust - is haram.
    • Al-Salamu Alaykum This is what you should do if you found a lost item: Question: Suppose that Muslim, residing in a non-Muslim country finds a suitcase (full of clothes) with or without the owner’s nametag on it. What should he do with it? Answer: A suitcase of personal belongings normally has the nametag through which the owner can be contacted. If he knows that it belongs to a Muslim or a non-Muslim whose property is sacrosanct (or even if there is a likelihood —a considerable likelihood— [that it belongs to a non-Muslim whose property is sacrosanct]), it is necessary for him to announce it for one whole year that he has found that item [so that the owner can come forward and claim it]. If he cannot find the owner [even after the lapse of one year], he should, based on obligatory precaution, give it in charity. However, if he knows that it belongs to a non-Muslim, it is permissible for him to keep it provided that he is not legally bound to announce what he finds in that country or to hand it over to the authorities, etc. (1) In the latter case, he is not allowed to take possession of it; rather it is compulsory on him to act in accordance with the legal undertaking. Question: If I find an item in a European country without any distinctive sign on it [identifying the owner], is it permissible for me to keep it? Answer: If it has no distinctive sign by which one can contact the owner, it is permissible for you to keep it except in the case [of the legal undertaking] mentioned earlier. Source:  http://www.sistani.org/english/book/46/2057/
    • Provided they're bought up correctly with love and teachings of ahlulbayt! If you have a great support system then its definitely possible. 
    • Guest Mother of 3
      Is it permissible to have an abortion at 3weeks old if the mother has 3 children aged 11years, 10years  & 18 months, she struggles with them aged 42 and has no family support? The older children are from a previous marriage but the ex husband does not support in any way or financially. Her husband works long hours and comes home 10pm most days of the week. She works 16 hours a week and does the tuition, swimming, and school runs. She feels tired and drained most days and feels she cannot cope if she has another child. She feels quite alone and depressed as she would never consider abortion but due to her circumstances feels this will put more pressure on her marriage. Her husband said he would support her if she aborts the pregnancy. She feels she is going through depression and this pregnancy will make it harder for her and in turn she will not be able to cope.
×