Jump to content

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Son of Placid said:

I didn't say the verses would bother you, I said they should.

Your explanation is one line with no source, no proof against what the Qur'an actually says.

A Jew is not a Muslim, a Christian is not a Muslim, a Sabian is not a Muslim. The criteria is quite simple.

Believes in one God.  Believes in the last day.  Does righteous deeds.  That's less than the laws given to Gentiles.

Nothing about following Muhammad in either surah. Don't care what your grey narratives say, the Quran is black on white on this. 

What was revealed to Muhammad was the same as was revealed to Abraham and Jesus in their time. If you deny this, you deny the all Prophets their rightful place. 

Over the 10 years I have been on this site I have not called the Qur'an false, say what you like. I don't consider it to be false, so why would I say it is?  What you don't know is kicking you in the butt.

You still have to explain how Muhammad was to become the leader of the Levites, and why he was mentioned in the Bible as one cursed of God.

Im sorry. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, andres said:

Only God knows who will enter heaven, if you ask me. I am a protestant, but maybe there are some that believe otherwise. Does God know already today who will enter heaven? I believe, since God has given us a free will, he does not know, but protestants differ on this. Is there a hell where sinners will burn eternally in great pain?  Protestants normally believe so, personally I dont think such place make sense, but I dont know. I know however that the OT does not mention it. Could be a later "invention".

Im sorry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, IbnSina said:

 

 

Is it correct that the canon law is based on 7 books? These ones?
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM

 

So it is only a protestant thing? @andres I assume your a protestant, what would you say regarding that?

To my knowledge the concept of Jesus dying for your sins is universal for all branches of Christianity, is it not?

 

 

Could you clarify what you mean by rooted in Scripture?

Are the traditions the laws of God or not? Is there any proof linking these two?

 

The first question....that's a list of the parts of canon law (books )themselves. You can get it in one big tome like I have minus all the explanations. Canon law is based on Scripture and the Church Tradition and Disciplines derived thereof according to the interpretation of the Catholic Church.

 

Yes, the concept Jesus dying for our sins is pretty universal in Christianity, but what happens after conversion differs according to some different Christian groups. Not all believe in eternal salvation no matter what. Of course, Catholics think you can get purified in Purgatory if you mess up,but not too badly.

As far as traditions and God's law....one example...Catholics  are supposed to follow the Ten Commandments. ( I am assuming Muslims consider that the law of God? Would I be correct?) As far as a more every-day specific example of another kind goes: Canon Law does accept arranged marriages as well as " love-matches" initiated by the couple themselves. In either case, consent must be clearly given. Forced marriages are not allowed. I think it is the same in Islam.

 

Hope this helps. Sorry... Tired after a funeral.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, AfricanShia said:

Christianity is very limited with jurisprudence and doesnt really have any rooted jurisprudence at aside the 10 commandments. 

Well, if you think seven fat annotated law books ruling everything under the Catholic sun from the liturgy  to birth control is " limited", I admire you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, AfricanShia said:

Im sorry. 

I'm sorry too. I am too quick to jump on things. My Father is, by his very nature, Placid, me, not always. 

 

Back in the late 80's I had opportunity to work with a Muslim on evening shifts. We teamed up, did the job and had time to talk until 5:30 and he was gone for an hour. Lunch break was over before dusk, so I didn't see him for another hour. He was Arabic/broken French, I was English/broken French but somehow we managed to convey our message. He explained a little Ramadan to me and I was good with it. We often had time to talk, even while working.

One day he invited me to his "prayer room". We didn't talk religion, we talked about God, how we understood Him, how we worshiped Him, why we knew we should. The attributes we knew and the ones we came to realize through life.  The he said, "It is time to pray". I had no idea what he said, but we prayed back and forth, talked, prayed more, went back to work. I never had time to eat before the sun came up, but I managed to fast the last four days as respect for him and Islam as we discussed. On the last day he stopped reciting and we looked at each other. I said, "Do you feel that?". He said, "That is the Spirit from God, come to be with us." We praised, we wept, it changed us both. He never really knew me as "Christian", I never knew him more than whatever "Muslim" meant, but "religion" did not separate us. God does not separate real believers, religion does. 

I didn't know we were supposed to argue until I got on this site.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Son of Placid said:

I didn't know we were supposed to argue until I got on this site.

It is one thing to argue with each other in an angry tone and it is another to hold friendly discussions where we exchange information and compare. I like the second on, not the first one.

And that was a nice story you shared, thanks!

Edited by IbnSina

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, LeftCoastMom said:

Gotta be at an event in a minute.

Quick answers:

Can. 1083 §1. A man before he has completed his sixteenth year of age and a woman before she has completed her fourteenth year of age cannot enter into a valid marriage.

We believe a person's life should reflect  their confessed  faith. Not doing so puts one in danger of purgatory or worse.

The  rest I will have to leave until I return.

 

Sorry to hear about the funeral, my condolences.

Hmm, i see, but in most countries in the world, a 14 year old women is still considered a child, so she would still be a "child bride" so why would christians get freaked out by a child bride if their own religious laws allows it?

Does a women need her fathers permission to get married in your school of thought?

 

7 hours ago, LeftCoastMom said:

Catholics think you can get purified in Purgatory if you mess up,but not too badly.

Purified how? Thru punishment?

 

7 hours ago, LeftCoastMom said:

The first question....that's a list of the parts of canon law (books )themselves. You can get it in one big tome like I have minus all the explanations. Canon law is based on Scripture and the Church Tradition and Disciplines derived thereof according to the interpretation of the Catholi

Hmm, when you say that Cannon laws are based on scripture, does that mean that they are derived from the Bible?

The term church tradition is still confusing to me, what is it exactly based of? Like if you would ask the leader of the church, would they be able to provide concrete sources for these traditions?

I am not sure what islam says about the 10 commandments, ive never looked into it. And yes, forced marriages are not valid in Islam.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, andres said:

Only God knows who will enter heaven, if you ask me. I am a protestant, but maybe there are some that believe otherwise. Does God know already today who will enter heaven? I believe, since God has given us a free will, he does not know, but protestants differ on this. Is there a hell where sinners will burn eternally in great pain?  Protestants normally believe so, personally I dont think such place make sense, but I dont know. I know however that the OT does not mention it. Could be a later "invention".

For sure only God knows who will enter heaven.

According to the islamic faith there is such a thing as eternal hell, that is were satan will be sent to for example. Also, denying the existence of the Almighty, is not a small thing. It is the peak of ungratefulness, to have been created from fluid into a full walking and talking and thinking human being and then deny his creator, it is really shameful. Also some people even knowingly tries to work against God and people who do good, they believe satan should be worshiped.

Anyways, that put to side: What does the school of protestants in of itself say regarding that which I mentioned, is it possible to go to heaven regardless of the amounts of sins done if one loves Jesus? If one believes he died for ones sins, does that not excuse oneself from any sin committed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Son of Placid said:

I'm sorry too. I am too quick to jump on things. My Father is, by his very nature, Placid, me, not always. 

 

Back in the late 80's I had opportunity to work with a Muslim on evening shifts. We teamed up, did the job and had time to talk until 5:30 and he was gone for an hour. Lunch break was over before dusk, so I didn't see him for another hour. He was Arabic/broken French, I was English/broken French but somehow we managed to convey our message. He explained a little Ramadan to me and I was good with it. We often had time to talk, even while working.

One day he invited me to his "prayer room". We didn't talk religion, we talked about God, how we understood Him, how we worshiped Him, why we knew we should. The attributes we knew and the ones we came to realize through life.  The he said, "It is time to pray". I had no idea what he said, but we prayed back and forth, talked, prayed more, went back to work. I never had time to eat before the sun came up, but I managed to fast the last four days as respect for him and Islam as we discussed. On the last day he stopped reciting and we looked at each other. I said, "Do you feel that?". He said, "That is the Spirit from God, come to be with us." We praised, we wept, it changed us both. He never really knew me as "Christian", I never knew him more than whatever "Muslim" meant, but "religion" did not separate us. God does not separate real believers, religion does. 

I didn't know we were supposed to argue until I got on this site.

 

Its okay. Its not healthy to debate anyways. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IbnSina said:

For sure only God knows who will enter heaven.

According to the islamic faith there is such a thing as eternal hell, that is were satan will be sent to for example. Also, denying the existence of the Almighty, is not a small thing. It is the peak of ungratefulness, to have been created from fluid into a full walking and talking and thinking human being and then deny his creator, it is really shameful. Also some people even knowingly tries to work against God and people who do good, they believe satan should be worshiped.

Anyways, that put to side: What does the school of protestants in of itself say regarding that which I mentioned, is it possible to go to heaven regardless of the amounts of sins done if one loves Jesus? If one believes he died for ones sins, does that not excuse oneself from any sin committed?

Is there a possibility that Hitler will end up in Heaven? I find it hard to believe, but if he sincerely regretted all his sins...maybe. But he comitted suicide, which is also believed to be a great sin so he had only a second to regret his last sin. Maybe Stalin is a better example, he died from a heart attac. Personally I find it hard to believe that such gangsters love Jesus, but only God knows, and I am happy that I shall not judge.

Maybe there is a hell, but what is the point of torturing beings for eternity? Better not to wake them up. Protestants do not believe in purgatory. Now this fire is not eternal pain, however I am convinced God has a better solution. I do not think torture goes well together with Christianity

I also believe God has a solution for all those that never heard the Gospel. Scandinavian inhabitants did not until 1.000 years ago, after having been heathen since the end of the iceage 12.000 years ago. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, IbnSina said:

Sorry to hear about the funeral, my condolences.

Thank you. She was a wonderful person and I am going to miss her.   Most of the town showed up to the church to say goodbye. Old enemities were forgotten over her coffin and friendships renewed in tears. She would have liked that. She was a peacemaker.

6 hours ago, IbnSina said:

 

Hmm, i see, but in most countries in the world, a 14 year old women is still considered a child, so she would still be a "child bride" so why would christians get freaked out by a child bride if their own religious laws allows it?

Does a women need her fathers permission to get married in your school of thought?

 

 

That is a minimum age. The bishops of a region can bring the local churches into line with the customary laws of the land if they are over that age. You won't find priests or bishops agreeing to the marriage of 14 year old females in the US. 18 is the minimum age in most places in the US. And below that would require likely parental permission, as per state rules. An adult woman in modern times does not need her father's permission to marry. 

 

6 hours ago, IbnSina said:

 

Purified how? Thru punishment?

 

Some would define it as some sort of punishment. Some scholars prefer to define it more as  instruction.  Of course, we hope most of our relatives and friends go straight to heaven. There was zero talk of Purgatory at the funeral yesterday or almost any Catholic funeral I have attended.

6 hours ago, IbnSina said:

 

Hmm, when you say that Cannon laws are based on scripture, does that mean that they are derived from the Bible?

The term church tradition is still confusing to me, what is it exactly based of? Like if you would ask the leader of the church, would they be able to provide concrete sources for these traditions?

 

 

Yes...they are derived from the Bible as Catholics interpret it.

Yes, the Church scholars provide sources.

That's why our books are so heavy and fat...and what all those annotations are for. Lol. They could give you a bad back carrying them.

image.jpg

Edited by LeftCoastMom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, LeftCoastMom said:

That is a minimum age. The bishops of a region can bring the local churches into line with the customary laws of the land if they are over that age. You won't find priests or bishops agreeing to the marriage of 14 year old females in the US. 18 is the minimum age in most places in the US. And below that would require likely parental permission, as per state rules. An adult woman in modern times does not need her father's permission to marry. 

The age of 14 is the minimum age according to the Bible? Could you tell me where in the bible it says that the minimum age is 14? From what I could google, it seems that most quotes from christian scripture says that one can marry upon entering puberty. What is your opinion on Ezekiel 16:7-8?

What authority does the bishops have to change the minimum age if they agree that the age 14 is given in the Bible, thus the law of God?

A bishop would put the law of the government before the law of God? Then he puts the law of men above the law of God or he is a follower of his personal opinion but not a follower of the words of God, or at least what he considers to be the words of God.

If one were to take the laws of the Bible completely seriously and strictly, like it should, since its the words of the creator of the universe according to its followers, then technically a 14 year old women can marry whoever she wishes without her parents approval if I understood it correctly? 

 

49 minutes ago, LeftCoastMom said:

Some would define it as some sort of punishment. Some scholars prefer to define it more as  instruction.  Of course, we hope most of our relatives and friends go straight to heaven. There was zero talk of Purgatory at the funeral yesterday or almost any Catholic funeral I have attended.

Hmm, if a human being would be the worst human on earth and commit every sin possible and be a clear hypocrite, yet still love Jesus, but doesnt want to bother with following his teachings, will such a man still enter heaven after some "instruction" in purgatory?

What I am trying to ask is, exactly how bad of a christian do you have to be in order to go to hell? 

Or formulated in another way: Is the condition for entering heaven in Christianity that one should love Jesus?

 

53 minutes ago, LeftCoastMom said:

Yes...they are derived from the Bible as Catholics interpret it.

Yes, the Church scholars provide sources.

So ALL traditions are derived from the Bible if I have understood you correct.

Can you think of any traditions, or what one defines as tradition, that are no longer practiced within Christianity or any tradition, or what one defines as tradition, that was not done before but is done nowadays?

 

 

 

22 hours ago, Son of Placid said:

It was Paul's directive that a woman's hair should be covered in church. The reason was that a woman's hair was considered her glory, therefore a distraction in the church. Paul also mentioned that women should be silent because the chatter was distracting.

Are you all in agreeance that it was Paul that decided that women should cover her hair in the church? If so, what did he base it on and should one consider following his saying a tradition or an innovation or the word of God forwarded by Paul?

 

 

 

 

5 hours ago, andres said:

Is there a possibility that Hitler will end up in Heaven? I find it hard to believe, but if he sincerely regretted all his sins...maybe. But he comitted suicide, which is also believed to be a great sin so he had only a second to regret his last sin. Maybe Stalin is a better example, he died from a heart attac. Personally I find it hard to believe that such gangsters love Jesus, but only God knows, and I am happy that I shall not judge.

Maybe there is a hell, but what is the point of torturing beings for eternity? Better not to wake them up. Protestants do not believe in purgatory. Now this fire is not eternal pain, however I am convinced God has a better solution. I do not think torture goes well together with Christianity

I also believe God has a solution for all those that never heard the Gospel. Scandinavian inhabitants did not until 1.000 years ago, after having been heathen since the end of the iceage 12.000 years ago. 

Hmm, what does the Bible say of Pharaoh? In the Quran, it speaks of the moment when he know he was going to drown and that he confessed to the God of Moses but that his confession was too late and his punishment would not be decreased. As such, even when he had seconds of regret, it did not matter because at that point the judgement was already made and he was out of options.

If you ask me, i understand that imaginating someone suffering forever is hard but I do believe that it is because of our lack of understanding regarding the awesomeness of God. Once your true awareness of God and who He is increases, so would you understanding of how severe such a thing as denying him would be and then I do not think eternal suffering is far fetched idea anymore.

In Islam, we speak of many prophets that came before Prophet Muhammad(S), we believe that many religions before islam who might have later became a polytheistic religion was originally one of the religions of God who men then changed. Who knows, maybe even the religion of the old vikings were originally a monotheistic religion? One thing is certain though, that all people of older days had some kind of religion in their societies throughout the history of mankind.

I understand your personal opinion diverts from the traditional teaching of protestants but your personal opinion put to the side, what does the school of protestants say regarding my question:
Is it possible to go to heaven regardless of the amounts of sins done if one loves Jesus? If one believes he died for ones sins, does that not excuse oneself from any sin committed?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, IbnSina said:

Are you all in agreeance that it was Paul that decided that women should cover her hair in the church? If so, what did he base it on and should one consider following his saying a tradition or an innovation or the word of God forwarded by Paul?

We have to agree that Paul suggested it, the reasons were to help the church. There is also more on modesty. Paul had started churches. They were Gentiles and had little to no laws prior, so Pauls letters of instruction were to bring them to a righteous life. Pretty much all the pertinent laws were covered in his letters without dragging them through Jewish tradition.

Not sure I understand the emphasis on getting kids married off at 14. In most parts of the west, the legal age is 18. Jesus tells us to obey Gods laws and mans laws to the best of our ability. Mans laws say anyone touching a girl under legal age is guilty of statutory rape. Of course marriages are not arranged so the courts decided a girl should be mature enough to have part in the decision making. Asking permission for a daughters hand was a tradition of respect. Respect has been replaced with narcissism and entitlement, both taught by modern society.

In this secular society it's all gone to pot. It almost seems more like a girl cannot fornicate with anyone over 18 until she is 18. It was never the intent of the law, but is what it comes down to in modern society.

Jesus said to be in the world but not part of it. This includes keeping your morals and ambitions within the reigns of a law the world detests. It's becoming more of a challenge as time goes on. I am in the country, surrounded by Mennonites so life is good here, 

One of the toughest commandments is the one Jesus gave us. He said; "A new commandment I give unto you that you love one another as I have loved you, and love your neighbour as thyself." If properly understood and practiced, there's no room for sins. The best description of love is found in the thirteenth chapter of Paul's first letter to the Corinthians. 

There are Gods laws and there are man made god laws. God gave the "Jews" 10 commandments, Maimonides gave them 613 more at the turn of the 13th century. Religions have heaped believers with rules. Some because the people were going astray, others to show the clergy who was willing to jump the hoops. 

There is no, "give exactly this to the poor" kind of rule. The obligation is there, but it doesn't mean 10% to a church, (even though tithe envelopes are given to church members liberally.)

Giving time can be worth more than money.  I volunteered for years when I had no money. I became known as, "The most religious person I know" to kids and adults who called on me for advise and prayer for years after. I was also mocked by others for the same reason.

The one kid that haunts me is the one that came to me in need of help but I didn't see the depth of his angst. He committed suicide three weeks later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, IbnSina said:

Hmm, what does the Bible say of Pharaoh? In the Quran, it speaks of the moment when he know he was going to drown and that he confessed to the God of Moses but that his confession was too late and his punishment would not be decreased. As such, even when he had seconds of regret, it did not matter because at that point the judgement was already made and he was out of options.

If you ask me, i understand that imaginating someone suffering forever is hard but I do believe that it is because of our lack of understanding regarding the awesomeness of God. Once your true awareness of God and who He is increases, so would you understanding of how severe such a thing as denying him would be and then I do not think eternal suffering is far fetched idea anymore.

In Islam, we speak of many prophets that came before Prophet Muhammad(S), we believe that many religions before islam who might have later became a polytheistic religion was originally one of the religions of God who men then changed. Who knows, maybe even the religion of the old vikings were originally a monotheistic religion? One thing is certain though, that all people of older days had some kind of religion in their societies throughout the history of mankind.

I understand your personal opinion diverts from the traditional teaching of protestants but your personal opinion put to the side, what does the school of protestants say regarding my question:
Is it possible to go to heaven regardless of the amounts of sins done if one loves Jesus? If one believes he died for ones sins, does that not excuse oneself from any sin committed?

Traditional teaching is that if you honestly repent your sins, God will forgive. Also Hitler and Stalin. I may not agree with all official teaching if my church, but I agree with this. If you believe that Jesus died for your sins but do not repent your sins, you cannot recieve forgiveness.

The stoneage inhabitants in Scandinavia were not ancestors of the Vikings. We do not know much of their ethnicity or their eligion, but from the petrograps they made, they probably worshipped the Sun and Moon. Our Viking ancestors were indoeuropeans. As we still are. Originating from Kaukasus 4.000 years ago, they developed into Persians, Greek, Romans, Germans, Swedes and others. Our languages and religion have developed from a single culture, into different but related ones over time. Most indoeuropeans now have converted to Christianity and Islam. Scandinavians being about the latest, abanding the pagan Gods around the year 1.000AD. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, IbnSina said:

1. The age of 14 is the minimum age according to the Bible? Could you tell me where in the bible it says that the minimum age is 14? From what I could google, it seems that most quotes from christian scripture says that one can marry upon entering puberty. What is your opinion on Ezekiel 16:7-8?

2. What authority does the bishops have to change the minimum age if they agree that the age 14 is given in the Bible, thus the law of God?

3. A bishop would put the law of the government before the law of God? Then he puts the law of men above the law of God or he is a follower of his personal opinion but not a follower of the words of God, or at least what he considers to be the words of God.

4. If one were to take the laws of the Bible completely seriously and strictly, like it should, since its the words of the creator of the universe according to its followers, then technically a 14 year old women can marry whoever she wishes without her parents approval if I understood it correctly? 

 

5. if a human being would be the worst human on earth and commit every sin possible and be a clear hypocrite, yet still love Jesus, but doesnt want to bother with following his teachings, will such a man still enter heaven after some "instruction" in purgatory?

6. What I am trying to ask is, exactly how bad of a christian do you have to be in order to go to hell? 

Or formulated in another way: Is the condition for entering heaven in Christianity that one should love Jesus?

 

7. So ALL traditions are derived from the Bible if I have understood you correct.

Can you think of any traditions, or what one defines as tradition, that are no longer practiced within Christianity or any tradition, or what one defines as tradition, that was not done before but is done nowadays?

 The Holy See ( representing the collective wisdom of the Church) allows the bishops to follow the law of the land.  They do not do it by personal fiat. This has been done since ancient times. The Bible does not say " women and men must be married by such-and-such an age". So there is flexibility.  In ancient times it was Jewish custom for some, then Roman law in regards to marriage. Here and now  it is US law. Does Islam teach you to break the law of the land you are in? The Church isn't here to disrupt society unnecessarily. More maturity is considered better in Catholic marriages. A 14 year old is not considered an adult in most places in the US, so consent does not apply to her. She is legally incapable of giving it here. Depending upon the state, at an older age but still under 18,she would need parental permission. The Church rarely clashes with the state on this particular issue since,again, both entities feel maturity is better for marriage. I understand the Exekiel as being an allegory of God And his people. Marriage symbolism is heavily used by Jews and Christians.

 

If if a person was the " worst on earth", he or she clearly does not love or know Jesus. So he or she is likely going to hell. Only God knows. But Catholics do not believe in faith without action and evidence. It's an oxymoron.

 

I can't answer your last question because it is too broad. I'm not familiar with ALL Christian traditions.

 

 

Edited by LeftCoastMom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Can you think of any traditions, or what one defines as tradition, that are no longer practiced within Christianity or any tradition, or what one defines as tradition, that was not done before but is done nowadays?

I'm no expert on traditions either, may I ask, what are you looking for?

Moses laid a whole bunch of laws, (Thus saith the Lord), on Aaron. Considering we don't use earthen pots, we don't have to break all our pot after using them. Whatever the "sodden" process was, it allowed you to reuse them, but scrub and rinse something like 7 times...between meals. We don't build rock BBQs everywhere we go for sacrifices. I don't believe there are any more high priests that kill particular birds over earthen pots of fresh water anymore, although you never know.

I'm sure you mean traditions with more of an "astray" look to them, but demographics rule.

Picking up sticks on the Sabbath no longer causes God to strike you down. No fires, no cooking, no journey on the Sabbath. It has changed in the Jewish communities in the western world. Electricity is not fire. Temples are more than a journey away.

Should the explosion in an internal combustion engine be classed as a fire? 

There were many debates on how to advance with technology and keep the old traditions, (stemming from OT laws)

I lived in a Jewish dominant area for a couple years. Some even talked to me. Some of the things they told me...

Emergency surgery on the Sabbath is not allowed by one surgeon, it must be two. Reasons were not given, so not sure if it lightens the load to a "not really working" status, or confuses God as to who is actually working so neither are wrongly accused. I don't know all the answers. 

It's like the kosher laws that Islam has semi adapted. You don't wash and salt the entrails and burn them in the open, and you don't give the hind quarters of the animal to the Gentiles or poor inside your gates. 

Sacrifices were changed to Holy Communion for Christianity. Jesus started that tradition at the last supper they had together. As far as I know, all denominations have continued it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/26/2017 at 0:28 AM, LeftCoastMom said:

If if a person was the " worst on earth", he or she clearly does not love or know Jesus. So he or she is likely going to hell. Only God knows. But Catholics do not believe in faith without action and evidence. It's an oxymoron.

I agree. And so do the protestants I know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/25/2017 at 8:06 PM, IbnSina said:

A bishop would put the law of the government before the law of God? Then he puts the law of men above the law of God or he is a follower of his personal opinion but not a follower of the words of God, or at least what he considers to be the words of God.

If one were to take the laws of the Bible completely seriously and strictly, like it should, since its the words of the creator of the universe according to its followers, then technically a 14 year old women can marry whoever she wishes without her parents approval if I understood it correctly? 

Our world changes. Conditions are no longer the same as when the Bible was written. Especially the Jewish part of the Bible that partly is almost a milennium older than the Christian Gospels. Common sense say that it is not good for a 14 year old girl or boy to marry if they shall have a good life in a modern society. The Bible also teaches us to treat eachother well.

Edited by andres

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×