Conciseness? ONCE AGAIN SILLY ARGUMENT... HOLY GOD.... BABA YOU CLAIM IT'S NOT CONCISE, SO IT NOT BEING "CONCISE" MEANS YOU GO TO WAR?.............
AJEEEEEB WALLA AJEEEB. IN'TU SHUNU? IN'TU MU MUSLIMEEN? ESH'U MIN EL MAW'DU ALA AKRAD, IN'TU HI'CHI IT'SEER'UN....
Read this on article 140:
Notice the basis of it being "imprecise" is simply related to where it should be held.
And taking over kirkuk by force didn't result in bloodshed? I'll show you the dead civilians if you want.
Plus HOW THE HELL IS THAT AN ARGUMENT? You are basically admitting don't follow the constitution, if so, why are you coming to kurds claiming "you are stealing land"...MATE YOU WON'T EVEN IMPLEMENT ARTICLE 140.
BABA wallah i'm done with you shia. I'm better off calling myself yehudi, maybe you will respect me more.