Jump to content
Anonymous

Burning questions

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Chewing Gum said:

Why human is the only creature who refuses to be what he is ?

So basically, if you were truly satisfied with something, its unlikely that you would be motivated to do more?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, myouvial said:

You did not reply any, so you cannot ask any question. haha

 Hehhhhehe:]

Operson? His does silence communicatesplz somebody ask some silly bit simple question so that I could answer it plzzz 

And no maths or physics plz I have these 2 subjects badly:¢

1 hour ago, Chewing Gum said:

Why human is the only creature who refuses to be what he is ?

This one seems a bit simple and interesting

Because human has brain 

Ur question reminds me of a dialogue of a Bollywood movie assumingvthat u understand Hindi

 Hum WO ni hotey Jo hum dikhatey- Hai Lekin hum WO hotey hai Jo hum chupatey hai 

See I believe that a man has emotions and attraction is one of the strongest emotions

A human brain gets attracted towards some thing which amazes him and he likes what amazes him and Tries to get in himself what he gets attracted to

   Another reason if we see its our desires Which tend to make us become what we are not 

Like actors they fake not only to world but themselves too 

 Until a man finds self satisfaction

Until and unless he is satisfuecwith himself he will try to gt happiness from outside by getting into things which he feels would satisfy him or make him happy

Its all game of mind I guess

   Well I guess I answered the question quite well 

Now finally my turn yeahhhh 

What dies silence tells a person? His does silence communicates with us? What's the language of silence ? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Pearl3112 said:

 

Ur question reminds me of a dialogue of a Bollywood movie assumingvthat u understand Hindi

 Hum WO ni hotey Jo hum dikhatey- Hai Lekin hum WO hotey hai Jo hum chupatey hai 

insaan ka chehra bhi bari ajeeb cheez hai . Ye bilkul piyaz ki manind hota hai . Ess ko cheelay chalay jao . Jab tamam paratain (layers) cheel chukain gay tab ja kar asli chehra dikhnay ko milay ga

Edited by Chewing Gum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Chewing Gum said:

insaan ka chehra bhi bari ajeeb cheez hai . Ye bilkul piyaz ki manind hota hai . Ess ko cheelay chalay jao . Jab tamam paratain (layers) cheel chukain gay tab ja kar asli chehra dikhnay ko milay ga

you should go with scallions so you don't have to take of layers too see what's inside. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Ron_Burgundy said:

you should go with scallions so you don't have to take of layers too see what's inside. 

That is very astute of you august brother but as per the prevailing hamartia ; humans have been wearing a mask for so long that they have forgotten who they were beneath it . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Chewing Gum said:

That is very astute of you august brother but as per the prevailing hamartia ; humans have been wearing a mask for so long that they have forgotten who they were beneath it . 

this is so dramatic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@starlight 

I don't have a problem with understanding the theory of infinity, but the full extent of its relationship with the zero as it's taught in modern mathematics.

I trust the experts and accept their answer, so any number divided by zero is infinity or undefined. I'm not being a contrarian, but I think it's not an absolute answer. A different conception or theoretical basis could well bring up a different result. It seems the theory has been adopted to help experts formulate other, related theories better. 

Eg a simple search brings up this:

In order to work with infinity, you must first define it. You may think you know what infinity is, but really you don't have a concrete definition. In fact, there are many different definitions of infinity that you could use, each of which result in different behaviors. For example, the real projective line has a concept of infinity such that 1/∞=0, while when talking about infinite sets one uses cardinal numbers (another type of infinity) to represent the sizes of these sets. You must make it clear what infinity you are talking about in order to work with it.

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/28940/why-is-infinity-multiplied-by-zero-not-an-easy-zero-answer

Thank you for taking the time to break it down for us. If one high school example doesn't quite explain it, the other does!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, repenter said:

You mean his answer was:

impossibru-meme.png

 

He is a doctor thou. I learn a lot from him.

About reversibility, he says "that liquefying coal into a liquid fuel and solid carbon is a irreversible process.'

My question : In term of irreversibility, human can not go back to the world again once he is judged in the hereafter/akhira. What is other occurance which prove of reversibility ? Is it when old age would become like a child again ?

Hahaha, he is handsome than above picture, with beards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, starlight said:

@Marbles @all the rest of you who apparently suck at maths.

Here is a simple explanation. 

Imagine you have a round cake. Imagine you divide it by 2. Each half would be ½ the size of the whole. Imagine you divide it by 10, each part would be 1/10th of the size of the whole.

What this means is, whatever number you divide something by, the “bits” will all be the size each slice will be cut into.

If you divide something by 2, you will fit 2 pieces together to make the whole. If you divide by 10, you will fit 10 pieces together to make the whole.

Now imagine you divided the cake, so each “slice” was exactly 0 in width. You would need to fit infinity slices together to make the whole.

This is why dividing by zero is always infinity

Or dividing by zero is impossible, since there is no such cake with 0 in width.

My next question:

Can you divide the cake entirely similar each of them, wide, weight, volume, without any error of deviation ?

What is the measure to prove the cake division is  similar/just ?

Can human (or even Nabi Muhammad SAW or Imam a.s. themselves) do justice/adil 100% guaranteed ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, myouvial said:

Can you divide the cake entirely similar each of them, wide, weight, volume, without any error of deviation ?

No, my slice would always be bigger.:rolleyes:

19 minutes ago, myouvial said:

What is the measure to prove the cake division is  similar/just ?

 

Equality/similarity is not always the same as justice.

20 minutes ago, myouvial said:

Can human (or even Nabi Muhammad SAW or Imam a.s. themselves) do justice/adil 100% guaranteed ?

Not doing justice is zulm actually and Prophet (saw) and Imams are  Masoom,so yes.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, starlight said:

No, my slice would always be bigger.:rolleyes:

Equality/similarity is not always the same as justice.

Not doing justice is zulm actually and Prophet (saw) and Imams are  Masoom,so yes.

 

Are you a martial artist or other artist ? or politician who do not answer direct to the point

or are you a cook who collect, mix, cook the ingredient,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Marbles said:

Infinity is essentially undefined or unknown. I don't know whether it can be called an irrational number. I doubt it.

Infinity is where a wife's mind is. Undefined, lrrational, and you never get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, starlight said:

@Marbles @all the rest of you who apparently suck at maths.

Here is a simple explanation. 

Imagine you have a round cake.

To solve your arithmetic problem, first you have to define "round".

:D

Now "cake" is easy to understand:  :eat:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 01/02/2017 at 6:45 PM, starlight said:

Look

12÷3=4

When we divide by 3 what we are essentially asking is that how many times 3 can go in a number? The answer here is 4.

Similarly,  how many times can 6 go in a number(12)

12 ÷6=2 The answer is 2. 

Now how many times can zero go in a number(12)? The answer is infinite times.

A. 12 / (0+0+0.....+0..) = 0

B. 12 / (0+0+0.....+0..) = ∞

For me that's where the problem is. Two of the same strings giving 2 different answers, one completely nothing and the other incompletely the entire cake where it's entirety is unknown.

Is it fair to say A) adopts the non-fictional approach by actually working on arithmetic values for real numeric possibilities (where 0 is emblematically the absence of a number) and B) employing a more philosophically inclined form of mathematical science based on practicable concepts and not actual numerical values?

For example (B), the idea of infinity itself is not absolute, nor a number and in it's boundless value it is not only unknown but immeasurably unwholesome. Therefore, is it fair to conclude B) employing a multitude of 0's is a wishfully representative concept contrary to a real definitive outcome? For instance, in 12 hotel rooms how many non-persons can you accommodate? Principally, the answer is none (0) because you don't have any to begin with (true arithmetic value). But, theoretically (absent of calculated experience) we could defy logic with a conceivable notion where nothing (absent of value) is considered a unit of something. Due to it's boundless nothingness, can we then really add a boundary to assign arithmetic operations by reapplying nothing with nothing?

Much like quantum mechanics which confirms for nothing to create something, we would have to first employ laws where nothing can be seen to produce something (adding boundaries or restrictions). How modern day science fuelled mathematicians adopt these new laws is something beyond me. But one thing is clear if you add limitations (law) to nothing, it no longer resembles the valueless 0 and it's reinstatement with something wilfully defined (in practicable formulas) remain exclusive and not universal.

Some mathematicians agree, some disagree, the ones sitting on the fence are just pulling their hair wondering if 0 is infinite in itself.

for me:

0 + 0 = what?
0 - 0 = when?
0 / 0 = why?
0 x 0 = how?

Not long ago I queried the same thoughts with my calculator. The result:

Funny_Pictures_8916.jpg

Edited by saas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, myouvial said:

Can human (or even Nabi Muhammad SAW or Imam a.s. themselves) do justice/adil 100% guaranteed ?

Prophet Musa [as] accidently killed a man, Yunus [as] wrongly left his people when he ought to have stayed , it was not a sin, but the better option was to stay. Musa [as] ought to have remained silent and obeyed Khidr and not question him [it can be argued but i'm unsure].

Can a Prophet of God, or an Imam [asws] choose a less virtuous option [not a sin] when they have the ability to have chosen a more virtuous option?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, uponthesunnah said:

Prophet Musa [as] accidently killed a man, Yunus [as] wrongly left his people when he ought to have stayed , it was not a sin, but the better option was to stay. Musa [as] ought to have remained silent and obeyed Khidr and not question him [it can be argued but i'm unsure].

Can a Prophet of God, or an Imam [asws] choose a less virtuous option [not a sin] when they have the ability to have chosen a more virtuous option?

A Prophet (pbuh) who does not err, sin or wander. Does not speak out of his own desire and is equal to revelation as a revelation revealed. Whether it appears to us as less virtuous or more, I believe it's all in the grand design of the Divine. What may appear as less virtuous does not override the greater virtuosity of intent. In the example of Musa (as) and Khidr, there is the issue of appointment of knowledge. Besides the Word (Book), revelation is not entirely a medium accredited to Jibrael alone as Allah ÓÈÍÇäå æÊÚÇáì is unrestrained in employing various means in which knowledge/wisdom is delivered. Khidr being one of those vessels. For us these are exemplary traditions which serve as reminders that even the chosen sincere servants are not equal to the knowledge of God and are at all times dependent on their Lord. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, uponthesunnah said:

Prophet Musa [as] accidently killed a man, Yunus [as] wrongly left his people when he ought to have stayed , it was not a sin, but the better option was to stay. Musa [as] ought to have remained silent and obeyed Khidr and not question him [it can be argued but i'm unsure].

Can a Prophet of God, or an Imam [asws] choose a less virtuous option [not a sin] when they have the ability to have chosen a more virtuous option?

Yes, they (a Prophet of God or an Imam [asws]) can choose a less virtuous option, but i believe they never did choosing a less virtuous option.

My question:

While a Muslim always refers to the example (e.g. Sunnah) of the Prophet of God and an Imam [asws] about the standard reference of virtuosity, how do Muslim judge a Prophet of God, or an Imam [asws]'s action as more or less virtuous option ? 

(I need some more elaboration lesson).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/2/2017 at 1:48 AM, Ron_Burgundy said:

My question;

 

How old would you be if you didn't know how old you are?

Answer: When our consciouness do not know what is the meaning of 'old' (or age?).

My question :

How old would you be when you realize that old (or age) is nothing when you never acquire lessons in your life ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/2/2017 at 2:29 AM, Pearl3112 said:

 Hehhhhehe:]

Operson? His does silence communicatesplz somebody ask some silly bit simple question so that I could answer it plzzz 

And no maths or physics plz I have these 2 subjects badly:¢

This one seems a bit simple and interesting

Because human has brain 

Ur question reminds me of a dialogue of a Bollywood movie assumingvthat u understand Hindi

 Hum WO ni hotey Jo hum dikhatey- Hai Lekin hum WO hotey hai Jo hum chupatey hai 

See I believe that a man has emotions and attraction is one of the strongest emotions

A human brain gets attracted towards some thing which amazes him and he likes what amazes him and Tries to get in himself what he gets attracted to

   Another reason if we see its our desires Which tend to make us become what we are not 

Like actors they fake not only to world but themselves too 

 Until a man finds self satisfaction

Until and unless he is satisfuecwith himself he will try to gt happiness from outside by getting into things which he feels would satisfy him or make him happy

Its all game of mind I guess

   Well I guess I answered the question quite well 

Now finally my turn yeahhhh 

What dies silence tells a person? His does silence communicates with us? What's the language of silence ? 

 

 

My answer :

There is no information come to our mind, soul, heart.

My question :

When do human practice/do real/haqiqat silence ? (Is it when ones death, sleep, rest or ...?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Just wondered. I have a relative who has a friend who travels to Europe and he always buys salmiakki for my relative. It's kind of a joke between them. 

1 hour ago, repenter said:

Porque?

Why? :D This reminds me of something funny with my husband. I asked him if he would like a cookie and he said no. Then when he saw the cookies he changed his mind. I said,  You didn't want one and now you do? He said I thought you meant pork. خوک  :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • Iran condemns Egypt terrorist attack Tehran (ISNA) - Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Bahram Qassemi has strongly denounced a deadly terrorist attack in the Egyptian city of Arish, which killed and wounded hundreds of people on Friday morning.   In a statement, Qassemi blasted the brutal attack and expressed sympathy with the Egyptian nation and the bereaved families of the victims. "Undoubtedly, the Takfiri terrorism that is suffering the heaviest defeats these days in the region does not refrain from making any desperate effort and ruthless move to assert its existence once again," he noted. "This sharply increases the responsibility of regional governments to gain a real and accurate understanding of terrorism and to seriously and collectively counter it," Qassemi went on to say. He also called on all nations and governments to be as vigilant as possible at this particular juncture in the face of new plots by the bloodthirsty losers. End Item https://en.isna.ir/news/96090401571/Iran-condemns-Egypt-terrorist-attack
    • They have mutual responsibilities. Quran orders women to have hijab and men to lower their gaze. Men dont have to cover their hair because a man whose hair is uncovered doesnt seem attractive to women. Women are much different from men. Due to their different creation, men and women have different responsibilities. For example, men have to work to support their families but women dont have to do it. Or another example is jihad (to fight in the fields) which is not wajib for women. If you dont like the way you look when you cover your hair then just change your scarf. There are many different styles; you may like some of them.  
    • hi the allowing for human cloning is permitted for curing & wellness not for beauty Site code fa599 Archive code 549 Genetic modification profile and Soul problem Thematic classification of rights and judgments Genetic modification Genetic modification share                   Summarize the question What is the genetic and neonatal birth order of this method? question What is the genetic modification of Islam? How does a person come up with this method and how do you solve the problem of the soul? Concise answer The genetic modification in NIC has a type that is normal in nature, which is different from the rule, but in general, if the correction is based on the embryo or sperm and oocyte of the couple, to prevent the occurrence of hereditary and genetic diseases And the birth of the baby is paralyzed and ill and also causes the physical or mental perfection of the infant and does not require any other haram action, according to the Shari'a do not have such an obstacle. And the child born in this way, because of the husband's sperm and ovum, has no problem.   But in relation to the problem of the soul, it should be said that if this correction is before the breath of the soul, there is no problem, and if, after blowing the soul into the body (four months), it is still not difficult, because the soul and soul that after During the stages of growth, the body is given to the body, it is related to that body, and with it's life, and the person's identity depends on the personality of the same soul, and the Takvina spirit and the body of that body and body are intrinsic to that soul.   Detailed Answer The advancement of science and technology in recent decades has provided significant services to human health, health and improvement of human life. Among these advances in the field of medicine, scientists have been able to invent some methods to prevent inherited and genetic diseases so that they can modify the embryo or sperm and ovum in the early stages of growth. And prevent the birth of sick and paralyzed and defective babies.   Obviously, as the wisdom and consequently sharia judge, the patient should go to the doctor for treatment, and if he is diagnosed by a doctor, he should do this. By saying this, if there is such a possibility that in the early stages of the dismemberment of the sprout and before the birth of the infant or the patient can be prevented, there should be no problem.   Genetic modification in the medical sciences has different types, which is natural in terms of its kind, which is different from the jurisprudential point of view. But what is said in answer to the question is that in general, if the modification is carried out on the fetus or sperm and the egg of the husband and wife, and without combining it with sperm of a man or an ovum of another woman, and that leads to health and physical perfection Or spiritual, and does not require another forbidden act, this correction is permissible. But if it is possible that the corrective action would not be useful and that the defect may be caused by the fetus, the permit is the place of the problem.   Since the birth of a newborn born in this way has not been violated, this infant belongs to the husband and wife of the Shari'a.   But if genetic modification is carried out by combining sperm with a man or an ovum of another woman, who is joining the believer of this work and the child who is born of this process? There are different views among the jurists.   Below, we will draw your attention to the following issues:   1. What is the pregnancy sentence for a woman with a sperm of her husband? Is the child born in this way the decree of a true child?   All the great authorities: The principle of this task is unimportant; provided that it is avoided of the forbidden pretext (such as the look and the touch of a non-lawyer) and the child is born, all the rules of the child of that husband and wife are. [1]   2-   What is the decree of introducing sperm to a woman's womb if her husband is not supportive?Who is the child who is born?   All the great authorities (except the Grand Ayatullah Khamenei): This is forbidden, and if a son is born, it belongs to the owner of the spit and to the woman who owns the womb. [2]   Grand Ayatollah Khamenei: The principle of this task is unimportant; provided that it is avoided of the forbidden pretext (such as the look and the touch of the nonhuman), and if a son is born, it belongs to the owner of the spit and to the woman who owns the womb. ]   Concerning the soul issue, here it should be said that if this action was carried out in the very early days, it does not have an embryo at all. And if it is after that, the spirit that is not removed from the body and no other spirit has come to its place. In any case, the soul and soul, which is given after a process of growth to the body, is related to that body and with its lifetime, and the diagnosis of that body depends on the personality of the same soul, also It is the spirit of Tekvivna and the temporarily possessed by that body, and that body is the mumble of that spirit.   The result is that if it is a genetic modification without committing unlawful acts and thus preventing the birth of defective babies, it is not only permissible, but also desirable, because of the birth of sick and sick babies who are nursing and nursing and raising children It has many problems for parents and family, prevention and safe delivery of children to the community.   The response of the Office of the Grand Ayatullah, Fazel Lankarani (Al-Ajali), to the question:   Genetic modification, if it is limited to treating drugs and the like, does not involve the inoculation of the male vagina, and there are no conflicts with the spirit issue.   The Office of the Grand Ayatullah Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi (Azhali):   Correction is by no means a problem, but simulation is not allowed. And there is no problem in the spirit of genetic modification.     [1] Khamenei, Ayubawat al-Sathatat, S 1271 and 1277; Imam, Tahrir al-Waslah, C 2, Allaqih, M 1; Tabrizi; Sūrat al-Najajah, vol. 5, p. 1013; Fazil, Jameem al-Masaleh, vol. 1, 2103, 2104; Vahid, The explanation of al-Masaleel, 2900; Sistani, the explanation of Al-Masaleh, the artificial insemination, M 69; Safi, Jamea Alahakam, J 2, S 1392; Opri, J 2, S 1392; Optical, Esfahat, C 2, S 903 and C 1, 985 ; PICKTHAL: Sufatiat, 2nd Dec., 1757, and Office: Behjat. [2] Imam, Tahrir al-Waslah, C 2, Al-Jalah, M 2 and 3; Tabrizi, Esfahat, S 2094: Fadhil, Juma al-Masaleel, J 1, S 2105, and Wahid, explaining al-Masaleel, M 2898; Sistani, explaining al-mussel, artificial insemination 65; Safi, Jamaalahakam, J 2, S 1391; Optical, Sufatiat, C 2, S 908; Mt. Sufatiat, vol. 1, p. 1527; and Behjat, Medical Essay, p. 35. [3] See: Abuba elastatat, p. 304, 1275, 1277 and 1271; Student's dissertation, Hosseini, Sayed Mojtaba, Pages 292-293, S 475,476 and 477. persian source translate by google translate:http://www.islamquest.net/fa/archive/question/fa599
    • hi the Imams do miracle for everybody the Iranian have the honor that Imam Reza(as) & his Sister Lady Fatima Masoumeh (as) buried in Iran but other countries like Iraq & Syria have this honor but unfortunately the Wahabist of Saudi arabia insulting the holy Imams (as) & Lday Khadija(as) & Abbas(as) the uncle of prophet(pbu) & Abdulmotalib(as) by destroying the Baqi Shrine. 
    • To prove Ayatollah Khamenei's vision is wrong we should know how Natives treated settlers upon their arrival.  Is it not documented that there were fair exchanges in the beginning? Then how did that turn into human hunt afterwards ? And even if reciprocal animosity did take place, how do you ignore the feeling of the person holding a gun against one who does not. It is almost impossible that mass killing took place without some form of self contentment. And I am not just trying to justify Sayid's word. Go see any civil war when two former neighbors fight, it is often with this feeling of destructive pleasure.
×