Jump to content
Anonymous

Burning questions

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Anonymous said:

What is your question?

Okay.

I don't get why if we divide a number by zero the answer is infinity or undefined and not the standard zero?

Genuine question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Marbles said:

Okay.

I don't get why if we divide a number by zero the answer is infinity or undefined and not the standard zero?

Genuine question.

In term of pure math, zero is nothing. (Once, i ask to my Japanesse friend about what 1/0, his answer was 'impossible'. Perhaps until now i come to realize pure math acknowledge the 'absolute existence' cannot be divided by 'relative/contingent existence').

In term of applied math, zero is the lowest number that can not be imagined. Hence, only in applied math/engineering, 1/0 is infinity which is also unimaginable. (Once, my proffessor asking me what is logarithmic of 0, i stun and can not think, and he says about 0 is 1/infinity. Perhaps until now i come to realize that engineering is the branch of positivism/empiricism.).

My question :

If 2/3 whcih is 0,66666666... is considered as irrational number, then is 1/0 = infinity considered irrational number ? or is impossibility considered irrational too ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, myouvial said:

In term of pure math, zero is nothing. (Once, i ask to my Japanesse friend about what 1/0, his answer was 'impossible'. Perhaps until now i come to realize pure math acknowledge the 'absolute existence' cannot be divided by 'relative/contingent existence').

In term of applied math, zero is the lowest number that can not be imagined. Hence, only in applied math/engineering, 1/0 is infinity which is also unimaginable. (Once, my proffessor asking me what is logarithmic of 0, i stun and can not think, and he says about 0 is 1/infinity. Perhaps until now i come to realize that engineering is the branch of positivism/empiricism.).

My question :

If 2/3 whcih is 0,66666666... is considered as irrational number, then is 1/0 = infinity considered irrational number ? or is impossibility considered irrational too ?

I do not think, it is irrational number, because 0 is neither an even nor an odd number, if one would have said, it is even, it would have been rational and if one had believed it as irrational, one would have called it irrational. No one among mathematicians has every considered is even or odd and is rather called as origin in Cartesian coordinate system and and Real number.

I do not have any question right now. But I will ask, when I will have one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is the speed of light 186k mi/sec? Why not a bit faster or slower?

Also, does anyone believe the people who somehow manage to derive the speed of light from the Quran?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My question..

What should I ask here in this thread as my question? 

Plz answer me as quickly as possible 

And a request plz give a valid reason with the question to be asked byme ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Pangea said:

Why is the speed of light 186k mi/sec? Why not a bit faster or slower?

Also, does anyone believe the people who somehow manage to derive the speed of light from the Quran?

I also wonder how physicist took the number while i do not know the basis for measuring it.

My question:

Is this Islamic or old philosophist/ulama culture/way about discussion about anything ?

It seems fun and arising awareness and intelligent.

This method may be good for discussing sensitive topic, such as shia sunni.

Other method from my origin culture is replying poem to each other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Pearl3112 said:

My question..

What should I ask here in this thread as my question? 

Plz answer me as quickly as possible 

And a request plz give a valid reason with the question to be asked byme ;)

You did not reply any, so you cannot ask any question. haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Sindbad05 said:

I do not think, it is irrational number, because 0 is neither an even nor an odd number, if one would have said, it is even, it would have been rational and if one had believed it as irrational, one would have called it irrational. No one among mathematicians has every considered is even or odd and is rather called as origin in Cartesian coordinate system and and Real number.

I do not have any question right now. But I will ask, when I will have one. 

My question is about infinity not 0, is infinity an irrational number ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, myouvial said:

My question is about infinity not 0, is infinity an irrational number ?

Infinity is essentially undefined or unknown. I don't know whether it can be called an irrational number. I doubt it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another reason of 0/0 as undefined is that when you add it to odd, it results in odd and when you add it to even. It results even. So, if adding it with even number had resulted in odd, we could have taken it as odd number and if adding it with odd number it would have resulted in odd number we could have considered it as even. But since it is unknown as regards it's being even or odd. Therefore, we take it's division as undefined. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, myouvial said:

My question is about infinity not 0, is infinity an irrational number ?

Your answer depends upon nature of the elements.  If you can say that denominator is even or odd, you could say that it is rational or irrational.  That's what I tried to tell you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Marbles said:

Infinity is essentially undefined or unknown. I don't know whether it can be called an irrational number. I doubt it.

Yea, i also in the brim of knowledge. I think we need to know the exact definition of rational. One of the meaning of rational is can be divided (divisible). Other meaning of rational is logical. We need to explore more as english is my 2nd language.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sindbad05 said:

Your answer depends upon nature of the elements.  If you can say that denominator is even or odd, you could say that it is rational or irrational.  That's what I tried to tell you.

Ok, i got your point. Well, it is becoming complicated if i ask whether the inifiniy is even or odd number ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, myouvial said:

In term of pure math, zero is nothing. (Once, i ask to my Japanesse friend about what 1/0, his answer was 'impossible'. Perhaps until........

You mean his answer was:

impossibru-meme.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, myouvial said:

Ok, i got your point. Well, it is becoming complicated if i ask whether the inifiniy is even or odd number ?

Hmmmm, interesting question again. As it is known that if you add value of zero, it does not affect the result to which it is added, so it becomes impossible to answer what infinity it would result into because its character is unique and not determined as if it is even or odd. If it could be called as even, the infinity would be rational as 1/2=0.5. If it is considered as odd you, infinity would be rational. But since we cannot tell it, so we say it is impossible to tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Marbles @all the rest of you who apparently suck at maths.

Here is a simple explanation. 

Imagine you have a round cake. Imagine you divide it by 2. Each half would be ½ the size of the whole. Imagine you divide it by 10, each part would be 1/10th of the size of the whole.

What this means is, whatever number you divide something by, the “bits” will all be the size each slice will be cut into.

If you divide something by 2, you will fit 2 pieces together to make the whole. If you divide by 10, you will fit 10 pieces together to make the whole.

Now imagine you divided the cake, so each “slice” was exactly 0 in width. You would need to fit infinity slices together to make the whole.

This is why dividing by zero is always infinity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, starlight said:

Now imagine you divided the cake, so each “slice” was exactly 0 in width.  You would need to fit infinity slices together to make the whole.

God, it makes no sense to me.

Look, if each slice is 0 in width the total slices needed to put the cake together is also 0, because there are no slices to put together. So 0+0+0+0+0+0 ad inifnitum is zero not x ad infinitum.

This is why a more logical answer should be zero?

To my mind infinity makes sense when there's some bit to work with, any amount however tiny it may be. Eg 2.233333333 ad infinitum or 0.0034444444 ad infinitum. If we have zero to begin with then any attempt to divide would (should) result in another zero, ie. not in an unknown value, but a value that doesn't even exist.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, starlight said:

You would need to fit infinity slices together to make the whole.

The whole cake? or a whole nothing? or the 'absence' of the whole cake? :einstein:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Marbles 

The theory of infinity is that if you were to draw a graph with a Y and an X axis, and plot a line where the value of the Y coordinate equals 1/X, so for example if you go across to x coordinate 5, the value of the y coordinate would be 1/5, if you went across to where x = 14, y would equal 1/14 and so on. If you were to plot that graph, it would look similar to:

https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=y+%3D+1/x+graph

even if you plot an X value of a hundred million billion trillion grazillion jillion bulbillion, the value of the Y would never equal zero.

Let’s say this graph went all the way across from 0 to infinity. At the plot point where x = infinity, the y value would touch the x axis

So when x = infinity, y = 0.

What this means is, when you divide by zero, the answer is infinity.

Easier now? :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, saas said:

The whole cake? or a whole nothing? or the 'absence' of the whole cake? :einstein:

Look

12÷3=4

When we divide by 3 what we are essentially asking is that how many times 3 can go in a number? The answer here is 4.

Similarly,  how many times can 6 go in a number(12)

12 ÷6=2 The answer is 2. 

Now how many times can zero go in a number(12)? The answer is infinite times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • Salamun Alykum. I was today going through the videos of spokesperson of Islamic Caliphate such as Anjem Choudary and Abu Rumaysah. They were obsessed for implementing Shariah in UK and everywhere else. They were accusing America and Britain of its immoral policies. But aren't America and Britain the creators of ISIL and Daesh?? What is the scenario? Though ISIS has been finished but the ideology of Islamic Caliphate has not been wiped out and will not be wiped out until the Zuhoor of Imam (ajfs). Because Wahhabism = Islamic Calphate System and its not going to be eradicated. But can someone provide me a chain of events that how Terrorist Organization came into existence and from where they receive funding? And if they are created by Imperialist Powers then why they speak against them and threaten them?
      And Why Shia Militant Groups like Liberation force, Hezbollah and Hashd al Shaabi fighting these Daesh ?   
    • Are mosques in Pakistan mixed ? I mean do shia go without problem to sunni mosques and vice versa? Same here. I love mosques made of stones like this one:
    • Wa aleykumsalaam, Here is what our Aimmah has to say on this regard. 1 - محمد بن يحيى، عن أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى، عن ابن محبوب، عن جميل بن صالح، عن أبي عبيدة، عن أبي جعفر (عليه السلام) قال: إن ناسا أتوا رسول الله (صلى الله عليه وآله) بعد ما أسلموا فقالوا: يا رسول الله أيؤخذ الرجل منا بما كان عمل في الجاهلية بعد إسلامه؟ فقال لهم رسول الله (صلى الله عليه وآله): من حسن إسلامه وصح يقين إيمانه لم يأخذه الله تبارك وتعالى بما عمل في الجاهلية ومن سخف إسلامه ولم يصح يقين إيمانه أخذه الله تبارك وتعالى بالأول والآخر. Muhammad ibn Yahya has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn ‘Isa from ibn Mahbub from Jamil ibn Salih from abu ‘Ubaydah from abu Ja’far(as), who has said the following: “Certain people came to the Messenger of Allah after accepting Islam and said, ‘O Messenger of Allah, will any of us, after accepting Islam, be held responsible for what he had done in the time of ignorance?’ The Messenger of Allah said, ‘Whoever is good in his Islam and corrects the certainty of his belief is not held responsible for his acts in the time of ignorance in the judgment of Allah, the Most Blessed, the Most High. Whoever’s Islam is nonsense and has not corrected the certainty of his belief will be held responsible in the judgment of Allah, the Most Blessed, the Most High, for his past and later deeds.’” Source: al-Kafi by Shaykh Kulayni, Vol 2, Pg 461, H 1.  Al-Mahaasin by Shaykh al-Barqi, Vol 1, Pg 250, H 264. Grading: Allamah Majlisi said hadeeth is "Saheeh" (Authentic) in his Mirat ul Uqool, Vol 11, Pg 383. Shaykh Bahbudi also grades this hadeeth as "Saheeh" (Authentic) in his Saheeh al-Kafi, Vol 1, Pg 132.   2 - علي بن إبر هيم، عن أبيه، عن القاسم بن محمد الجوهري، عن المنقري، عن فضيل بن عياض قال: سألت أبا عبد الله (عليه السلام)، عن الرجل يحسن في الاسلام أيؤاخذ بما عمل في الجاهلية؟ فقال: قال النبي (صلى الله عليه وآله): من أحسن في الاسلام لم يؤاخذ بما عمل في الجاهلية ومن أساء في الاسلام اخذ بالأول والآخر. Ali ibn Ibrahim has narrated from his father from al-Qasim ibn Muhammad al- Jawhari from al-Minqari from Fudayl ibn al-‘Iyad who has said the following: “Once I asked abu ‘Abd Allah(as), ‘Will a man who is good in Islam be held responsible for his deeds in the time of ignorance?’ The Imam said, ‘The Holy Prophet has said, “Whoever is good in Islam will not be held responsible for his deeds in the times of ignorance and anyone who is not good in Islam will be held responsible for his acts of the past and those thereafter.’” Source: al-Kafi by Shaykh Kulayni, Vol 2, Pg 461, H 2.  Wa aleykumsalaam
    • should n't the sign be ">" instead of "=".
    • A bird in hand is better than two in a bush. 
×