Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Although your query is ambiguous somehow, there are points I'd like to draw your attention to:  

- Being the majority is not a sign of correctness in the viewpoint of the holy Quran.

More info:

 

- As for obligatory prayers, it is necessary to recite the obligatory acts (e. g. the Surah Al-Hamd) in Arabic.

Edited by John Algar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

                                                         :bismillah:

                                                         :salam: 

 

It dates back to the ignorance and the fear of people, why were the people of Kufa against imam Hussain (as)? Their hearts were with him (as) but their swords were against him (as). As brother John said, the number of people doesn't prove anything and less wrong or less right. Umayyadis and Abbasids always censored the imams (as) because they knew that the right would prevail if people would have known the truth, thus to this day due to their ancestors people follow what they've been born with without much research into other schools..

Why would you want to pray in farsi? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Arad1013 said:

Hi everybody I wonder why there are more sunnis than shias in the world. And can somebody teach me to pray on farsi. Peace be upon you all.

sunnis are more than shias because islam was spread all over the world by sunni. outside arabia islam was spread because of the jihad of umayyad, abbasid and ottoman rulers.

Edited by Follower of Truth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bismillah.

Salaam.

There are various reasons for that I try to mention some briefly:

1.    Financial factor: Sunnis have more financial resources and supported by rich Arab countries.

2.    Political factor: many western countries put forth many limitations for Shia communities and centers while Sunnis ones function freely.

3.    Propaganda against Shia Islam.

4.    Etc.

With Duas.

Narsis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Salam,

during the ottomans periods, there were sunni marja's (ahmad bin hanbal is one of them) studying on the hands of imam jaafar al sadiq, then he created his own school and it was taken in by the ottomans caliphate, and spread by them and ignored that there was an imam living ...and because the ottomans were ruling the arab islamic world at that time, they enforced that marja's school (ahmad bin hanbal) to be the main islamic school.

Edited by Tushi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Tushi said:

Salam,

during the ottomans periods, there were sunni marja's (ahmad bin hanbal is one of them) studying on the hands of imam jaafar al sadiq, then he created his own school and it was taken in by the ottomans caliphate, and spread by them and ignored that there was an imam living ...and because the ottomans were ruling the arab islamic world at that time, they enforced that marja's school (ahmad bin hanbal) to be the main islamic school.

oao! i am amazed at your marvelous story. ahmad ibn hanbal died long before ottomans emerged. and for your kind information he was not student of jafar sadiq. he even hadn't met him. there is no marja in sunni tradition. ottomans were follower of hanafi jurisprudence. you have to learn a lot about history, my dear brother.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, narsis said:

Bismillah.

Salaam.

 

There are various reasons for that I try to mention some briefly:

 

1.    Financial factor: Sunnis have more financial resources and supported by rich Arab countries.

 

2.    Political factor: many western countries put forth many limitations for Shia communities and centers while Sunnis ones function freely.

 

3.    Propaganda against Shia Islam.

 

4.    Etc.

 

With Duas.

 

Narsis.

what are you saying, man? your these three points are phenomena of twentieth century. but sunnis were large always from the very beginning of islamic history. islam was brought to the whole world by sunnis. the umaiyad, abbasid and ottoman rulers and their army brought islam to the whole world. islam was introduced to the roman empire(syria, jordan, lebanon, turkey, egypt, libia), the persian empire(iran, iraq, afghanistan), the indian empire(pakistan,india, bangladesh), northern and central africa, south-east asia(malaysia, indonesia, brunei etc), central asia (uzbekistan,kazakhstan, tajikistan, kyrgyztan), muslim region of china like xinxiang by sunni rulers and army. so of course sunnis are far more in number.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because the shias is the community that was and still till today the most tortured, butchered and oppressed throughout history. We are the minority but we are the strongest the most fearless people of all time, or else there wouldn't be an agenda to destroy us, it's not a coincidence.

Study some history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Arad1013 said:

Hi everybody I wonder why there are more sunnis than shias in the world. And can somebody teach me to pray on farsi. Peace be upon you all.

Because they've been slaughtering us throughout history.

Lots of Shia blood on the hands of the genocidal murderers.

On the flip side, since we've been getting slaughtered mercilessly for centuries, there's a lot more of us in Paradise. :grin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Akbar673 said:

Because they've been slaughtering us throughout history.

Lots of Shia blood on the hands of the genocidal murderers.

On the flip side, since we've been getting slaughtered mercilessly for centuries, there's a lot more of us in Paradise. :grin:

and you think shia didn't kill sunnis ! .. both of you guys been killing each other for centuries you giving normal muslims trouble , even now most troubles come from those two sects , every heard of sufi who bomb himself or insult prophat wives and create fitna , every heard of sufi khawarij , I guess not and probability never cuz sufi don't busy themelves with dunah and they are true muslims in my opinion . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, sakura1994 said:

and you think shia didn't kill sunnis ! .. both of you guys been killing each other for centuries you giving normal muslims trouble , even now most troubles come from those two sects , every heard of sufi who bomb himself or insult prophat wives and create fitna , every heard of sufi khawarij , I guess not and probability never cuz sufi don't busy themelves with dunah and they are true muslims in my opinion . 

Never said Shia didn't kill Sunni.

The OP asked why there are more Sunni than Shia in the world and that's why. Shia have been slaughtered much more than Sunni have plain and simple.

Go look up stats on how Shia have died throughout the centuries. Doesn't even compare to how Shia have killed Sunni.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Akbar673 said:

Never said Shia didn't kill Sunni.

The OP asked why there are more Sunni than Shia in the world and that's why. Shia have been slaughtered much more than Sunni have plain and simple.

Go look up stats on how Shia have died throughout the centuries. Doesn't even compare to how Shia have killed Sunni.

 

so now we gonna compare who killed more then the other -_- , the main problem is the killing , in islamic history more muslims died killing each others , then during muslims wars with crusades and mogals etc ... the problem is your hadiths who keep dividing muslims and telling that I am on right path with other is wrong , eventhought I don't follow any sects , I can feel the peace of sufis at least they never criticized me for only following quran , and they treated me normally , unlike when I am shia or sunnis frineds who try to demonize the path that I choose , I tell you I don't feel safe around neither sunni nor shias , sometimes I feel like if I tell sunni that I want to became shia they might kill me , and same for shia if I ever was shia then wanted to became sunni do you think it would be fine , I doubt it will . 

as long as sunni shia conflict exist with in islam and hate being feed to the young generations , groups like isis and their likes would keep on existing and destroying the whole ummah , even if you peaceful muslim who not engaged in those political wars and yeah those wars and hate are political not religious , your leaders made it religious . 

aisha and ali never claim to be sunni nor shia , both of them followed the quran and was taught by prophat mohammed s.a.w , so where did the differences come from , it only created to divide the muslims and keep them divided .

Edited by sakura1994

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LabaikYaHussein said:

Just remember there is more quantity and less quality in this world 

That's the best way to describe it.

True followers of righteous guidance have always been in lesser amounts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, sakura1994 said:

so now we gonna compare who killed more then the other -_- , the main problem is the killing , in islamic history more muslims died killing each others , then during muslims wars with crusades and mogals etc ... the problem is your hadiths who keep dividing muslims and telling that I am on right path with other is wrong , eventhought I don't follow any sects , I can feel the peace of sufis at least they never criticized me for only following quran , and they treated me normally , unlike when I am shia or sunnis frineds who try to demonize the path that I choose , I tell you I don't feel safe around neither sunni nor shias , sometimes I feel like if I tell sunni that I want to became shia they might kill me , and same for shia if I ever was shia then wanted to became sunni do you think it would be fine , I doubt it will . 

as long as sunni shia conflict exist with in islam and hate being feed to the young generations , groups like isis and their likes would keep on existing and destroying the whole ummah , even if you peaceful muslim who not engaged in those political wars and yeah those wars and hate are political not religious , your leaders made it religious . 

aisha and ali never claim to be sunni nor shia , both of them followed the quran and was taught by prophat mohammed s.a.w , so where did the differences come from , it only created to divide the muslims and keep them divided .

Sunni books are the only books that tell you to kill whoever disagrees with you. Read the book Of Attawhid for ibn taymya, or the "fight against the rafida". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Althaqalayn12 said:

Sunni books are the only books that tell you to kill whoever disagrees with you. Read the book Of Attawhid for ibn taymya, or the "fight against the rafida". 

will just in case I don't believe in neither sunni or shia , I believe in quran and inshallah I stay on the right path that I don't be case of any blood shade among muslims , and I pray all the sheikhs/imams who spread fitna to burn in hell .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, zainabamy said:

There's so much hatred and propaganda against the Shi'as, it means that Sunnis don't read Shi'a books and that most people when they revert to Islam are told to stay away from Shi'a Islam and not study it all. 

Their arguments are bombs, guns and knives. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Arad1013 said:

Hi everybody I wonder why there are more sunnis than shias in the world. And can somebody teach me to pray on farsi. Peace be upon you all.

Because it was the first state religion after the Prophet s.a.w. had passed away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • NO, IT IS HARAM. SENDING GIFT TO HER AND CONGRATULATING HER FOR HER FALLACIOUS MARRIAGE IS ALSO HARAM.
    • Imam Ali ibn Abu Talib(as)   I have avoided the discussion of “The God” and aspects and working, so we do not get distracted and dwell in the realm( of Evil, Mercy, Love, help, present/absent, why does he not act, or why he/ she is silent, why allow all this, that is going on ) that is out of our domain for this discussion at this point in time. If there is a need, I(Layman opinion) will say, The one who  created me, doesn't own me anything, beyond guidance. If anything exists it's the lack of follow through or rejection of the guidance. I.e. If the humans allow conditions to develop, and there is oppression. Where is God is not the question. Question, is Humanity has been guided at two levels ( inner and outer), rejection of both is the issue not why God does not take away this evil person that we elected or tolerated until he/she turned on us(we were fine up untill it was happening to others). We human need to do our job, instead of having entitlement mentality, and deflect it to it's your fault God., where are you and why you do not help. We have been helped. Intellect/Guidance( brief understanding, as a layman). Maybe not the best example but it will suffice, We would not expect the Mars rover to dwell in the realm of our working, instead it should be concerned with its prime directive, and we are to provide it guidance to accomplish its work. There are may misunderstanding, in  definition, version, understanding due to linguistic, terminology(old/new), cultural (East/West) and lack of Conceptual discussion at the basic fundamental level instead of technicalities and mechanic(which is subconsciously embedded in the way we have been groomed in schools and universities). A charged and contentious environment does not help in getting to any resolution. It's usually tit for tat, and pride get in the way in different threads a that were responding to targeted and side issue out of context. No one to the best of my knowledge and understanding denies we are limited creations in all  aspects. Your creation and Your surrounding creation(s) , are proof of something that  can not be denied. So, there is a Cause, the unlimited, infinitely powerful, Unknown/Unseen Source of all this. What you(non Muslims) call that source is not relevant - you can call it a system,  I call it God. So, there are no Atheists or Agnostic here. What an Atheist/ Agnostic may be, saying is that they do not believe in the God of Islam as “presented “or as understood or as described. That is a very different issue. But this issue, gets mixed up with other issues dealing with the mechanics in other threads which are on specific topics. Getting back to the Topic. We turn now to Stephen Hawking. He proposes M-theory, a variant of string theory, to explain the origins of the universe. The conclusion of his last book, The Grand Design, states:
      Stephen Hawking is a SME ( Subject Matter Expert) in his field of Study. If he gave his scientific theory and left it at that. I would not care nor it should be my concern, as there are many SMEs and have their theories in the Scientific world about may things.  His connecting it to and concluding that there is no need for god( his understanding of what god is to him). Is the issue, I am highlighting it not only because of what he said, because he or people like him are followed and the laypeople use these ideas to formulate their ideology. This is something, prevalent, using  fiction which they call ‘Science” as a tool to attack Divine Religion. This is where this talk and connection / implication that this is the god and of you can’t pray to or ask for help form gravity, or physical laws are not empathetic, and are cold  and have no concern for the humans ….This connection makes no sense. Comparing apples and oranges and mixing stuff that is confusing. This mentally is delusional and it stems out of misunderstanding of the concepts of pray, or help, mercy, etc..or implications that ignorant people believe in miracles and angels. Or we can’t carbon date the text, or evidence of such and such event. In short ignorant conclusions by apparently learned people in their field of study Trickle down effect, and the lay Atheists/Agnostics take these talking point and formulate an opinion and argument with it. Objectivity is also an issue, here. Double standards. Scientific theories are not subject to the same rigorous, and shredding mentality.   Its 5000, 2000, 1400 old stuff, we are Technically advanced. We forget that this advancement is in Technology,(only). The basic alphabet  in terms of Social behavior, is as old as the cave people.  Moving beyond, Mechanics, working, Techinacilities and this attitude of the best generation to exist, every preceding generation had the same attitude. and we will be looked at and our theories considers as old and outdated by the new generations.  Its a Point is time assessment.  What are the benefits of the revealed information- i.e Revealed to us through our struggle and study through discovery of us and whats around us.? Do we follow the Laws, derived from this new knowledge?  If not what are we rally arguing about. If a person can't even at least in Theory acknowledge the laws of Nature for our(Humanity)  Benefit. If you were to do that, you may rethink you position, because you may realize that you have been arguing against something that Natural laws actually prove.  This is what concerns me, at this point. Why can't the objective, learned and "technically" advanced people  see that and make this connection?  
    • The nature of the Existence is to exist. Thats all.
    • If the father doesn't approve of it, and didn't leave the door open for further contact, then that's it. They are not being disrespectful. Saying "no" should not forcibly come with an explanation, thus you can't demand it nor force them to listen to you. It is called freedom, and that is more sacred than anything you can tell them.
×