Jump to content


Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Personally, I don't think there is anything wrong with selfies. Like a couple of people said, it's usually in good fun. It's extremely presumptuous to assume that everyone who takes selfies is arrogant, vain, or has low self esteem. Most normal people take selfies on the spur of the moment and don't spend hours on end taking them.

I have a couple of friends who are quite fond of taking selfies and while I admit that seeing constant selfies in my Instagram feed does get a bit tiresome, it's unfair to make assumptions about people. Also, if you don't like seeing the constant selfies, you're not exactly obligated to look. You can always skip over them and move on to the next thing in your feed.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most people like to think they are the centre of the universe. Narcissism is a personality disorder. I think vain people would keep a mirror in front of them at all times if they did not get access to taking selfies. They would spend hours admiring their own reflections. To be honest, I do have a mirror in front of me on my desk and I do take at least five pictures everyday, but I never upload any on any social media site. People who do upload are definitely fishing for compliments and in my opinion it is an abnormal behaviour and females are more guilty of this too :S

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yay or Nay?


Tourist takes selfie in Brighton, arrested on terrorism offences
A tourist was arrested on suspicion of terrorism offences after taking a selfie video in Brighton.

Nasser Al-Ansari, 38, said he was filming a video of himself on his mobile phone outside a shopping centre in Brighton when the incident happened, according to the Argus.
Mr Al-Ansari, from Kuwait, said he was then taken to a car park by officers and held on suspicion of terrorism offences for three hours.
He explained: “I said, ‘I am 100 per cent co-operative. I will go wherever you wish, I just want to go home’.”
He says that police kept his mobile phone in order to examine it.
Detective Chief Inspector Paul Betts, from Brighton and Hove CID, confirmed to the Daily Mail that Mr Al-Ansari had been arrested under the Terrorism Act and released after "an assessment was made and there was no immediate threat."
"However, it was not possible at the time to examine his mobile phone, so an investigation continues in order to establish if it contains any evidence of a criminal offence. This will be completed as soon as possible and the phone will be returned to him if there is no reason to retain it further."
Following the attack in Tunisia last week, the UK’s official terror threat was increased to “severe”, meaning that a terrorist attack is regarded as “highly likely”. Police have increased their presence at a number of events in recent days, including Wimbledon and Armed Forces Day.
38 people were killed in the massacre on a Tunisian beach, including 30 Britons. The UK is also preparing to mark the 10th anniversary of the 7/7 bombings next week.
Across the UK, a minute’s silence was observed today at midday to mourn those who lost their lives in the attack in Tunisia.
The Independent has contacted Sussex Police for comment.

(I'm kidding this is outrageous)


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/4/2015 at 5:31 PM, Gaius I. Caesar said:

Don't people have any decency at funeral anymore? Somebody died and yet this guy just couldn't wait to take a selfie, plus why is he making that face? He should be mourning...

Maybe that's his 'sad face'

see here:

If you skip between the video and the picture, the similarities are uncanny.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rattlesnake selfie: Man 'may lose hand' after trying to photograph himself with venemous snake

A California man who tried to take a selfie with a rattlesnake faces losing his hand after the snake bit him.

Alex Gomez, 36, from Lake Elisinore, found the snake on his family's ranch while he was collecting rubbish.

He picked it up to pose for a selfie, but the snake bit him on the hand, causing his hand to swell and leaving him in considerable pain.

His neighbour, Byron Bonilla, called the emergency services and Mr Gomez was taken to hospital, according to reports.

Mr Gomez has received little sympathy from his family over the incident.

His mother, Deborah, has appeared on local news to share the "embarrassing" story of the potentially deadly incident.

"I told him the news people had been calling, and he said 'Mum, you better not', and I said 'I'm going to'," she said in an interview with KCAL 9, a CBS subsidiary.

"I’m going to teach him a real good lesson when he gets home. No mercy for him."

She said he might lose his hand as the skin around the bite was "rotting away".

Rattlesnakes are venomous and produce a hemotoxic venom that causes necrosis of cells and disrupts blood clotting.

California sees about 800 people a year bitten by rattlesnakes.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bismehe Ta3ala,

Assalam Alikum.

I can list so many problems these smart phones have caused to families and destruction of the youth.

While normal families used to gather in the same living room watching TV together all looking at the same screen, now you have everyone carrying a phone and texting. What has happened to talking, spending time with children, listening to one another? People used to sit down and talk on the dinner table and talk about there day. Now, parents read about it on a fb status. Within a decade we have seen social media devour precious family time into mindless inconsiderate zombies.

While people are driving, sitting, waiting, eating for goodness sake even in bathrooms and the first thing you see when you wake up and the last thing you see when you go to sleep, is that stupid phone.

M3 Salamah, FE AMIN Allah

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

karyakaram can wait. first let me take a selfie :D



Ram Ram..


I want to put this man next to his brother on the pier...

Edited by Marbles

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The International Business Times had a story called "SnapChat Selfie With Dead Body Leads To Murder Charges Against Pittsburgh Teen". A teenager sent a friend a snapChat selfie of himself with a dead body, and before the photo deleted itself the boy saved it and gave it to the police.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • Imam Ali ibn Abu Talib(as)   I have avoided the discussion of “The God” and aspects and working, so we do not get distracted and dwell in the realm( of Evil, Mercy, Love, help, present/absent, why does he not act, or why he/ she is silent, why allow all this, that is going on ) that is out of our domain for this discussion at this point in time. If there is a need, I(Layman opinion) will say, The one who  created me, doesn't own me anything, beyond guidance. If anything exists it's the lack of follow through or rejection of the guidance. I.e. If the humans allow conditions to develop, and there is oppression. Where is God is not the question. Question, is Humanity has been guided at two levels ( inner and outer), rejection of both is the issue not why God does not take away this evil person that we elected or tolerated until he/she turned on us(we were fine up untill it was happening to others). We human need to do our job, instead of having entitlement mentality, and deflect it to it's your fault God., where are you and why you do not help. We have been helped. Intellect/Guidance( brief understanding, as a layman). Maybe not the best example but it will suffice, We would not expect the Mars rover to dwell in the realm of our working, instead it should be concerned with its prime directive, and we are to provide it guidance to accomplish its work. There are may misunderstanding, in  definition, version, understanding due to linguistic, terminology(old/new), cultural (East/West) and lack of Conceptual discussion at the basic fundamental level instead of technicalities and mechanic(which is subconsciously embedded in the way we have been groomed in schools and universities). A charged and contentious environment does not help in getting to any resolution. It's usually tit for tat, and pride get in the way in different threads a that were responding to targeted and side issue out of context. No one to the best of my knowledge and understanding denies we are limited creations in all  aspects. Your creation and Your surrounding creation(s) , are proof of something that  can not be denied. So, there is a Cause, the unlimited, infinitely powerful, Unknown/Unseen Source of all this. What you(non Muslims) call that source is not relevant - you can call it a system,  I call it God. So, there are no Atheists or Agnostic here. What an Atheist/ Agnostic may be, saying is that they do not believe in the God of Islam as “presented “or as understood or as described. That is a very different issue. But this issue, gets mixed up with other issues dealing with the mechanics in other threads which are on specific topics. Getting back to the Topic. We turn now to Stephen Hawking. He proposes M-theory, a variant of string theory, to explain the origins of the universe. The conclusion of his last book, The Grand Design, states:
      Stephen Hawking is a SME ( Subject Matter Expert) in his field of Study. If he gave his scientific theory and left it at that. I would not care nor it should be my concern, as there are many SMEs and have their theories in the Scientific world about may things.  His connecting it to and concluding that there is no need for god( his understanding of what god is to him). Is the issue, I am highlighting it not only because of what he said, because he or people like him are followed and the laypeople use these ideas to formulate their ideology. This is something, prevalent, using  fiction which they call ‘Science” as a tool to attack Divine Religion. This is where this talk and connection / implication that this is the god and of you can’t pray to or ask for help form gravity, or physical laws are not empathetic, and are cold  and have no concern for the humans ….This connection makes no sense. Comparing apples and oranges and mixing stuff that is confusing. This mentally is delusional and it stems out of misunderstanding of the concepts of pray, or help, mercy, etc..or implications that ignorant people believe in miracles and angels. Or we can’t carbon date the text, or evidence of such and such event. In short ignorant conclusions by apparently learned people in their field of study Trickle down effect, and the lay Atheists/Agnostics take these talking point and formulate an opinion and argument with it. Objectivity is also an issue, here. Double standards. Scientific theories are not subject to the same rigorous, and shredding mentality.   Its 5000, 2000, 1400 old stuff, we are Technically advanced. We forget that this advancement is in Technology,(only). The basic alphabet  in terms of Social behavior, is as old as the cave people.  Moving beyond, Mechanics, working, Techinacilities and this attitude of the best generation to exist, every preceding generation had the same attitude. and we will be looked at and our theories considers as old and outdated by the new generations.  Its a Point is time assessment.  What are the benefits of the revealed information- i.e Revealed to us through our struggle and study through discovery of us and whats around us.? Do we follow the Laws, derived from this new knowledge?  If not what are we rally arguing about. If a person can't even at least in Theory acknowledge the laws of Nature for our(Humanity)  Benefit. If you were to do that, you may rethink you position, because you may realize that you have been arguing against something that Natural laws actually prove.  This is what concerns me, at this point. Why can't the objective, learned and "technically" advanced people  see that and make this connection?  
    • The nature of the Existence is to exist. Thats all.
    • If the father doesn't approve of it, and didn't leave the door open for further contact, then that's it. They are not being disrespectful. Saying "no" should not forcibly come with an explanation, thus you can't demand it nor force them to listen to you. It is called freedom, and that is more sacred than anything you can tell them.