Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sheikhspear

Praytime.info

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

I'm in Birmingham right now and I wanted to check my prayer times. I went to http://praytime.info/ first and then to the website of the local Khoja jamaat: http://www.ksmnet.org/ which displays daily prayer times. I found significant differences, particularly in beginning of Fajr and Maghrib. How can it be? Do we have different methods of calculating prayer times in Shia fiqh that result in such differences? Or does one of these sites simply have it wrong?

Below is a comparison of the times on both websites for today:

praytime.info Fajr: 01:08 Khoja Jamaat Fajr: 2:40

praytime.info Sunrise 4:45 Khoja Jamaat Sunrise: 4:44

praytime.info Dhuhr: 13:08 Khoja Jamaat Dhuhr: 13:13

praytime.info Sunset: 21:31 Khoja jamaat doesnt give Sunset time

praytime.info Maghrib: 22:00 Khoja Jamaat Maghrib: 21:41

Khoja Jamaat doesnt give Asr and Isha times to compare with praytime.info

I just checked the Sunni site islamicfinder.org and the Sunni times for Birmingham today are as follows:

Fajr: 2:31

Sunrise: 4:44

Dhuhr: 1:08

Asr: 5:33

Maghrib: 9:31

Isha: 11:32

So Sunni Fajr time is close to Fajr on the Khoja website, Sunni Dhuhr is identical to praytime.info, Sunni Asr is identical to praytime.info, Sunni Maghrib is understandably identical to Sunset on praytime.info and Sunni Isha is over and hour and a half before Isha on praytime.info

I don't get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm going to follow the Khoja one during my stay here but my practical problem aside, I'm just really interested in what can be the reason for those differences, do we have different calculation methods that are all acceptable within Shia fiqh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange, it's pretty opposite for me in the States. I live in the east coast and I praytime.info gives me more accurate timings than our local website yahusain.com which seems wayy off. Maybe it's just a glitch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • New poll is up on the homepage! Or use this link: Poll #11
    • Ok, let me ask you this: Is this the kind of Quran alone where we forsake hadith entirely or are you telling us that we should accept hadiths that only supported by the Quran? Because we can all agree that the Quran is the ultimate hadith, alhamdullilah. If it is the latter, I have no problem with it, I try to uphold that principle myself but it is the former that I take issue with. Because you are only stripping away the history but also the context of the Quran and it's message.
    • Is it ok to work on a political campaign for a politician whose views you mostly agree with, except of course the LGBT factor and of course abortion? Engaging politically is one of the best ways to make an impact, the problem is the people us muslims identify with more in the West tend to be on the left-side of the spectrum, and there have been movements to reform the democratic party so that you can weed out the corporatist stooges and the people that bow to special interests and get people who represent the people more. These tend to be mostly progressives, a lot of whom are atheists but believe in humanistic principles. Would it be ok to campaign for them in some way or another even if there are issues you don't necessarily agree with them on for religious reasons? 
    • I need strong coffee in the morning.  To get my heart started.
    • Fake News Alert l just watched Geo. W. Bush's complete speech on C-Span. Quo Vide. The parts shown on Nutwork news are at the beginning at the closing comment. The beginning welcomed the Clinton group, Madeline Albright, Condi Rice and people from repressive regimes. The part at the beginning about the uncivilized nature of current American politics can be applied to a lot of people, not just to Democrats and Republicans. There was nothing l heard about "blood and soil" and other fascist elements, anything that could be applied to Trump except from the Diatribes of Radical Democrats assumptions and assertions. l recommend watching it if for no other reason that this was one of Bush 43's better talks. OPINE: Lying Nutworks and Misleading Media.     "Stop the Lies"
×