Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
new-shia-naqvi

How Tall Is Imam Ali (as) And Prophet (saw)

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

i heard there was an event where the prophet (saw) held up imam Ali(as) on his (saw) shoulders to destroy idols ontop of the kaba

now i looked at the size of the kaba, it would take a good 15 people to reach the top of the kaba, so was this a mirracle or the actual height of the prophet (saw) and Ali (as)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam)

Rasoolallah (as) and Imam Ali (as) weren't really taller then normal human beings ( I believe)

But back in the day, the prophets used to be extremely tall (like giants) which is why some of their graves are sooooo long.

I dont believe the Kaaba was any smaller back when the prophet was alive, but I could be wrong.

Maybe someone else could shed more light on this topic, sorry I couldnt be of more help.

(salam)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zulfiqar (Imam Ali's Sword) was as tall as him (as). I think there are narrations about battles where his sword plus him would be around 12 - 14 feet in height (when raised) So you can estimate Imam Ali's height from this.

The Prophet (pbuh) must have been really strong to uphold the weight of Amirul Momineen on his shoulders when they were destroying the idols.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zulfiqar (Imam Ali's Sword) was as tall as him (as). I think there are narrations about battles where his sword plus him would be around 12 - 14 feet in height (when raised) So you can estimate Imam Ali's height from this.

The Prophet (pbuh) must have been really strong to uphold the weight of Amirul Momineen on his shoulders when they were destroying the idols.

Wowowowow What the hell did you say?!??! Zulfiqar long as a human? WOW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zulfiqar (Imam Ali's Sword) was as tall as him (as). I think there are narrations about battles where his sword plus him would be around 12 - 14 feet in height (when raised) So you can estimate Imam Ali's height from this.

The Prophet (pbuh) must have been really strong to uphold the weight of Amirul Momineen on his shoulders when they were destroying the idols.

Imam Ali asws was asked: who according to you is the bravest (warrior). He asws said: it is rasool Allah saww.

Ya Ali Madad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to genealogists our ancestors were all taller than us (averagely speaking). The interesting Question would be exactly how tall was the first Man on earth (Prophet Adam a.s). As time ensues, man produces himself in larger quantities but smaller in height. So in layman terms, the greater the population the smaller the height....

I have been to Israel, Syria and Egypt and after seeing some of the burial sites of past Prophets or relations, I was surprised that some of the lengths of these graves were almost 16-20 feet long. But who knows....maybe they are just made that way.

About Imam Alis (as) sword being as big as him....this is not actually true and if it is, I haven't come across any tradition to support this view. Some traditions do inform that Imam Ali (as) was not the tallest of his circles of companions but was broad and strong boned....and that the edge of his double edged sword was long enough to be seen hanging down to his feet. These traditions dictated the idea that during the desert expeditions one of the ways to identify the Imam amongst his companions was the visualization of the Sword and hence sometimes when people give lectures about his Mightiness at war this tradition comes to light and often is portrayed as if the Sword was as big as him.

Other traditions which are actually more metaphorically applied than literally is the often mentioning of the Imams sword breaking during clashes with the enemies. The traditions report that when the Sword broke the size of the remaining blade in one occasion was as small as the imams own hand and hence when the Dhul-Fiqar became available is poetically suggested that the sword not only did not break but in the battles was as tall as the imam....an expression which means "It stood out from the crowd"....I personally believe this is relation to the style of the Imam's fighting technique and the unique style of the double edged sword itself rather than the sword being as big as the Imam.

I could be wrong!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • Salam,  I just wanted to give my heartfelt and sincere apologies to the brothers and sisters for not being in contact with them over the past months regarding this project.  I think I took on too much with this. It was really affecting my work and also my marriage due to all the time it was taking, many messages that I had to respond to(I won't go into how exactly that part worked, but you all can probably take a good guess). When it started to affect my marriage, I decided that I really couldn't  carry on with it. I had to make an 'executive decision'. Although this project was important to me, my marriage and my family were more important.  I still think the project is a good idea, but I think there are some details that need to be thought thru a little more, like how the work will be distributed amoung the members of the team, and how and who will respond to messages. If anyone would like to continue the project, I could act as a 'consultant' but as far as 'day to day' operation, this would have to be done by someone else.  The personal issues I had because of this project actually lead me to believe that I shouldn't be advising anyone on topics of marriage (or anything else for that matter) since it seemed to me that I can't even handle my own marriage, which was in a downward spiral at that point (alhamduillah things are better now). 
    • The Group in question which I will not even associate the word Islamic was a rabid dog that bit the hand that was feeding it believing it was strong enough to be in a dominant position. The Saudis were originally funding these Wahhabi monsters to cause chaos in a country that was recently invaded by the US in which the US accidentally helped Iran gain a even greater powerful presence in the region. The Saudis did not like these neither did the US, so with oil money from the US the Saudis started to fund these radical groups. When the group in question got too powerful they announced a Caliphate directly challenging the power of  Saudi Arabia which sees itself as the leader of the Islamic world. This was a good opportunity for this new self proclaimed Caliphate because with the civil war in Syria and instability in Iraq they were able to spread extremely fast. Israel wants a divided Middle East and has been supporting these radical groups because Syria, Iraq and Iran challenge Israel’s war crimes against the Palestinians. Israel have even been accused of providing medical care and strategic bombing to help these terrorist groups which makes sense because the rabid dog has been rather kind to Israel, no attacks, no indiscriminate killing...makes you wonder. The US won’t intervene until Assad is toppled that is clear their bombing campaign does nothing compared the the Russians in Syria and the US are the middle man funding groups like FSA who support Al Nusra who support Guess who?! Exactly the rabid dog in question. This is much of the same tactic as Saudi Arabia just wait until there is good enough damage done in eliminating Iranian influence and place puppets in charge.  
    • If you want to know what the conclusion of an article is, as well as the arguments, then generally yes you have to read it. Otherwise, I will summarize here, then you'll reply with something I already considered in the article, and it will take a very long and frustrating thread to get the point across. If you have the time to post several comments on this thread, then you have the time to read it. It takes less than a fifth of the time to read than it does to write.

      As for science, part 3 deals with that.
    • In every church. The commands are 3.000 years old, from a time when Israelis still were polytheists and sacrificed animals to Gods on hilltops. In my understandng the idol ban was not a ban on photograps or sculptures, but a ban on worshipping Baal and other semitic Gods. Only the God Jahwe was to be worshipped by the Israelis.   
    • isn't there "Jesus/god" on the cross in about every  church?
×